In vivo cardiac diffusion tensor imaging on an MR system featuring ultrahigh performance gradients with 200 mT/m maximum gradient strength.

PURPOSE: Our aim is to assess the potential of an MR system with ultrahigh performance gradients (200 mT/m maximum gradient strength) to address two interrelated challenges in cardiac DTI: low SNR and sensitivity to bulk motion. METHODS: Imaging was performed in 20 healthy volunteers, two patients, and one swine post-myocardial infarction. The impact of maximum gradient strength was assessed with spin echo cardiac DTI featuring second-order motion compensation and varying maximum system gradient strengths (40, 80, 200 mT/m). Motion compensation requirements at 200 mT/m were assessed with sequences featuring zeroth-, first-, and second-order motion compensation. SNR, mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy, helix angle transmurality, and secondary eigenvector angle in the left ventricle were compared. RESULTS: Increasing maximum system gradient strength from 40 and 80 mT/m to 200 mT/m increased SNR of b = 500 s/mm2 images by 150% and 40% due to reductions in TE. Observed improvements in DTI metrics included reduction in variance in mean diffusivity and helix angle transmurality across healthy volunteers, improved visualization of myocardial borders and delineation of suspected scar. Whereas second-order motion compensation acquisitions were robust to motion-induced signal dropout, zeroth- and first-order motion compensation acquisitions suffered from severe signal loss and localized signal voids, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ultrahigh performance gradients (200 mT/m) enable high SNR DWIs of the heart and resultant improvements in diffusion tensor metrics. Despite reduced diffusion-encoding duration, second-order motion compensation is required to overcome sensitivity to cardiac motion.

Efficacy of Balloon Expandable Extreme-Low Temperature Ventricular Epicardial Cryoablation: A Preclinical Proof of Concept Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Current epicardial ablation technologies are limited by the inability to create adequate depth lesions and risk of collateral injury to extracardiac structures. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of ventricular epicardial ablation with a novel balloon-expandable extreme-low temperature (XLT) cryoablation catheter with an embedded insulation pontoon for protection of extracardiac structures which has been specifically designed for epicardial ablation. METHODS: 10 healthy swine underwent surgical (6) and subxiphoid percutaneous (4) epicardial access respectively. A total of 3-6 sites were targeted in the right and left ventricular wall for different exposure durations. Ablation was performed with a large footprint (surgical) and smaller footprint (percutaneous) version of the HeartPad® (Corfigo Inc., Montclair, NJ) XLT system. The system consists of the balloon-expandable cryoablation catheter and a console. The console vaporizes liquid helium (-269˚C) and controls continuous delivery of extremely cold helium gas at high flow rates through a high-efficiency ablation element mounted on an expandable insulation pontoon to protect extracardiac structures. Ablation lesions were assessed by gross pathology and histological examination. RESULTS: A total of 42 epicardial lesions were created. The mean lesion depth increased progressively with the ablation time (surgical catheter: 11±2 mm at ≤30 seconds, 13±4 mm at 60 seconds, 15±3 mm at ≥120 seconds, P =0.001; percutaneous catheter: 10±2 mm at 30 seconds, 14±2 mm at 60 seconds, 16±2 mm at 120 seconds], P =0.001). Lesion geometry appeared unaffected by presence and thickness of epicardial fat. One episode of ventricular fibrillation occurred following ablation over the atrioventricular groove and 2 adjacent obtuse marginal arteries. CONCLUSION: Surgical or percutaneous epicardial ablation using the HeartPad® XLT cryoablation system is feasible and can efficiently produce deep ventricular lesions in different epicardial locations.

Vascular Access Complications Following Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: Impact of Vascular Closure Devices.

BACKGROUND: Vascular access-site complications are the most frequent complications of percutaneous catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Whether arterial/venous vascular closure devices (VCDs) prevent vascular complications is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the benefit of VCDs in patients undergoing CA of VAs. METHODS: Consecutive CA of VAs were included (2018-2022). Vascular accesses were obtained with ultrasound guidance. At the discretion of the operator, arterial and/or venous VCDs were used. Cases were divided into 3 groups: no use of VCDs for any of the arterial/venous accesses (manual compression - MC), use of VCDs for some but not the all of the accesses (Partial-VCDs), use of VCDs for all of the accesses (Complete-VCDs). Vascular complications were defined minor if they didn't require intervention or major if they required intervention. RESULTS: A total of 1,016 procedures were performed in 872 patients (62±13 years, BMI 30±6 kg/m2, 27% female) during the study period. Femoral arterial access was obtained in 887 procedures (875 single access - 7.4±1.5 Fr size, 12 two accesses - 7.3±3 Fr and 6.9±1.8 Fr). Femoral venous access was obtained in 1,014 procedures (unilateral in 17%, bilateral in 83%, mean N. 2.6±0.7, 8.4±1.3 Fr). Hemostasis was achieved with MC in 192 (19%) procedures, Partial-VCD in 275 (27%), and Complete-VCD in 549 (54%). A vascular complication occurred in 52 (5.1%) procedures, including a minor hematoma in 3.9% and/or a major complication in 1.7%. The rate of vascular complications was 6.8% (5.2% minor and 1.6% major) in the MC group, 7.6% (5.1% minor and 3.3% major) in the Partial-VCD group, and 3.3% (2.9% minor and 0.9% major, P=0.014 for comparison) in the Complete-VCD group. At multivariable analysis, Complete-VCD remained independently associated with lower risk of vascular complications (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.96, P=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing CA of VAs, Complete-VCD is associated with lower rates of vascular-related complications compared to MC or Partial-VCD.

Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Heart Failure Subtypes.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) improves clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to evaluate the impact of CA on clinical and quality-of-life outcomes across HF subtypes. METHODS: All patients undergoing AF ablation at a tertiary center were enrolled in a prospective registry and included in this study (2013-2021). The primary end point was AF recurrence. Secondary end points included AF-related hospitalizations and quality-of-life outcomes. Patients were categorized according to their HF status: no HF, HFrEF, HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). RESULTS: A total of 7020 patients were included (80% no HF, 8% HFrEF, 7% HFmrEF, and 5% HFpEF). Over 3 years, the cumulative incidence of AF recurrence after ablation was as follows: HFpEF (53%), HFmrEF (41%), HFrEF (41%), and no HF (34%); P<0.01. Multivariable Cox analyses confirmed these findings using no HF group as reference (HFpEF: hazard ratio, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.21-1.78]; HFmrEF: hazard ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.04-1.45]; and HFrEF: hazard ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.01-1.37]; P<0.05 for all). In all groups, CA resulted in a significant reduction of AF-related hospitalization (mean rate per 1 patient-years [before and after CA]; HFpEF [1.8 versus 0.3], HFmrEF [1.1 versus 0.2], HFrEF [1.1 versus 0.2], and no HF [1 versus 0.1]; P<0.01 for each comparison) and significant improvement in quality of life as measured by both the AF symptom severity score and the AF burden score (P<0.01 for the comparison between baseline and follow-up for each score when tested separately). CONCLUSIONS: AF recurrence rates after CA were higher in patients with HF compared with those without HF, with patients with HFpEF being at the highest risk of recurrence. Nonetheless, CA was associated with a significant reduction in AF symptoms, AF-related hospitalization, and HF symptoms in most patients irrespective of HF subtypes.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation of Idiopathic LV Arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Comparative efficacy and safety data on radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus pulsed field ablation (PFA) for common idiopathic left ventricular arrhythmia (LV-VAs) locations are lacking. OBJECTIVES: This study sough to compare RFA with PFA of common idiopathic LV-VAs locations. METHODS: Ten swine were randomized to PFA or RFA of LV interventricular septum, papillary muscle, LV summit via distal coronary sinus, and LV epicardium via subxiphoid approach. Ablations were delivered using an investigational dual-energy (RFA/PFA) contact force (CF) and local impedance-sensing catheter. After 1-week survival, animals were euthanized for lesion assessment. RESULTS: A total of 55 PFA (4 applications/site of 2.0 KV, target CF ≥10 g) and 36 RFA (CF ≥10 g, 25-50 W targeting ≥50 Ω local impedance drop, 60-second duration) were performed. LV interventricular septum: average PFA depth 7.8 mm vs RFA 7.9 mm (P = 0.78) and no adverse events. Papillary muscle: average PFA depth 8.1 mm vs RFA 4.5 mm (P < 0.01). Left ventricular summit: average PFA depth 5.6 mm vs RFA 2.7 mm (P < 0.01). Steam-pop and/or ventricular fibrillation in 4 of 12 RFA vs 0 of 12 PFA (P < 0.01), no ST-segment changes observed. Epicardium: average PFA depth 6.4 mm vs RFA 3.3 mm (P < 0.01). Transient ST-segment elevations/depressions occurred in 4 of 5 swine in the PFA arm vs 0 of 5 in the RFA arm (P < 0.01). Angiography acutely and at 7 days showed normal coronaries in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this swine study, compared with RFA, PFA of common idiopathic LV-VAs locations produced deeper lesions with fewer steam pops. However, PFA was associated with higher rates of transient ST-segment elevations and depressions with direct epicardium ablation.

Impact of Contact Force on Pulsed Field Ablation Outcomes Using Focal Point Catheter.

BACKGROUND: Conventional focal radiofrequency catheters may be modified to enable multiple energy modalities (radiofrequency or pulsed field [PF]) with the benefit of contact force (CF) feedback, providing greater flexibility in the treatment of arrhythmias. Information on the impact of CF on lesion formation in PF ablations remains limited. METHODS: An in vivo study was performed with 8 swine using an investigational dual-energy CF focal catheter with local impedance. Experiment I: To evaluate atrial lesion formation, contiguity, and width, a point-by-point approach was used to create an intercaval line. The distance between the points was prespecified at 4±1 mm. Half of the line was created with radiofrequency energy, whereas the other half utilized PF (single 2.0 kV application with a proprietary waveform). Experiment II: To evaluate single application lesion dimensions with a proprietary waveform, discrete ventricular lesions were performed with PFA (single 2.0 kV application) with targeted levels of CF: low, 5 to 15 g; medium, 20 to 30 g; and high, 35 to 45 g. Following 1 week of survival, animals underwent endocardial/epicardial remapping, and euthanasia to enable histopathologic examination. RESULTS: Experiment I: Both energy modalities resulted in a complete intercaval line of transmural ablation. PF resulted in significantly wider lines than radiofrequency: minimum width, 14.9±2.3 versus 5.0±1.6 mm; maximum width, 21.8±3.4 versus 7.3±2.1 mm, respectively; P<0.01 for each. Histology confirmed transmural lesions with both modalities. Experiment II: With PF, lesion depth, width, and volume were larger with higher degrees of CF (depth: r=0.82, P<0.001; width: r=0.26, P=0.052; and volume: r=0.55, P<0.001), with depth increasing at a faster rate than width. The mean depths were as follows: low (n=17), 4.3±1.0 mm; medium (n=26), 6.4±1.2 mm; and high (n=14), 9.1±1.4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Using the same focal point CF-sensing catheter, a novel PF ablation waveform with a single application resulted in transmural atrial lesions that were significantly wider than radiofrequency. Lesion depth showed a significant positive correlation with CF with depths of 6.4 mm at moderate CF.

Multipolar Electrograms: A New Configuration That Increases the Measurement Accuracy of Intracardiac Signals.

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurements of intracardiac electrograms (EGMs) remain a clinical challenge because of the suboptimal attenuation of far-field potentials. Multielectrode mapping catheters provide an opportunity to construct multipolar instead of bipolar EGMs for rejecting common far-field potentials recorded from a multivectorial space. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop a multipolar EGM and compare its characteristics to those of bipolar EGMs METHODS: Using a 36-electrode array catheter (Optrell-36, Biosense Webster), a far-field component was mathematically constructed from clusters of electrodes surrounding each inspected electrode. This component was subtracted from the unipolar waveform to produce a local unipolar, referred to as a "multipolar EGM." The performance of multipolar EGMs was evaluated in 7 swine with healed anteroseptal infarction. RESULTS: Multipolar EGMs proved superior in attenuating far-field potentials in infarct border zones, increasing the near-field to far-field ratio from 0.92 ± 0.2 to 2.25 ± 0.3 (P < 0.001). Removal of far-field components reduced the voltage amplitude (P < 0.001) and enlarged the infarct surface area (P = 0.02), aligning more closely with histological findings. Of 379 EGMs with ≥20 ms activation time difference between bipolar and multipolar EGMs, 95.3% (361 of 379) were accurately annotated using multipolar EGMs, while annotation based on bipolar EGM was predominantly made on far-field components. CONCLUSIONS: Multielectrode array catheters provide a unique platform for constructing multipolar EGMs. This new EGM may be beneficial for "purifying" local potentials within a complex electrical field, resulting in more accurate voltage and activation maps.

Catheter Ablation as First-Line Therapy in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Patient Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF), antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are considered a first-line rhythm-control strategy, whereas catheter ablation is a reasonable alternative. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the prevalence, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients with PerAF who underwent catheter ablation as a first or second-line strategy. METHODS: This multicenter observational study included consecutive patients with PerAF who underwent first-time ablation between January 2020 and September 2021 in 9 medical centers in the United States. Patients were divided into those who underwent ablation as first-line therapy and those who had ablation as second-line therapy. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 2,083 patients underwent first-time ablation for PerAF. Of these, 1,086 (52%) underwent ablation as a first-line rhythm-control treatment. Compared with patients treated with AADs as first-line therapy, these patients were predominantly male (72.6% vs 68.1%; P = 0.03), with a lower frequency of hypertension (64.0% vs 73.4%; P < 0.001) and heart failure (19.1% vs 30.5%; P < 0.001). During a mean follow-up of 325.9 ± 81.6 days, arrhythmia-free survival was similar between the groups (HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.92-1.41); however, patients in the second-line ablation strategy were more likely to continue receiving AAD therapy (41.5% vs 15.9%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A first-line ablation strategy for PerAF is prevalent in the United States, particularly in men with fewer comorbidities. More data are needed to identify patients with PerAF who derive benefit from an early intervention strategy.

Association of device detected atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmia with adverse events in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) are known to have worse outcomes. However, there are limited data on the temporal relationship between development of these arrhythmias and the risk of subsequent congestive heart failure (CHF) exacerbation and death. METHODS: The study cohort comprised 5511 patients implanted with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in landmark clinical trials (MADIT-II, MADIT-RISK, MADIT-CRT, MADIT-RIT, and RAID) who were in sinus rhythm at enrollment. Multivariate cox analysis was performed to evaluate the time-dependent association between development of in-trial device detected AF and VT/VF with subsequent CHF exacerbation and death. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that AF occurrence and VT/VF occurrence were both associated with a similar magnitude of risk for subsequent CHF exacerbation (HR = 1.73 and 1.87 respectively, p < .001 for both). In contrast, only in-trial VT/VF was associated with a significant > two-fold increase in the risk of subsequent mortality (HR = 2.13, p < .001) whereas AF occurrence was not associated with a significant mortality increase after adjustment for in-trial VT/VF (HR = 1.36, p = .096). CONCLUSION: Our findings from a large cohort of ICD recipients enrolled in landmark clinical trials show that device detected AF and VT/VF can be used to identify patients with increased risk for CHF exacerbation and mortality. These findings suggest a need for early intervention in CHF patients who develop device-detected atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation versus radiofrequency ablation of the pulmonary veins and left atrial posterior wall: Patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Data are lacking on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) following cryoballoon ablation (CBA) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA). We sought to evaluate QoL and clinical outcomes of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation only (CRYO-PVI-ONLY) versus RFA with PVI and posterior wall isolation (RF-PVI+PWI) in a large prospective PRO registry. METHODS: Patients who underwent AF ablation (2013-2016) at our institution were enrolled in an automated, prospectively maintained PRO registry. CRYO-PVI-ONLY patients were matched (1:1) with RF-PVI+PWI patients based on age, gender, and type of AF (paroxysmal vs. persistent). QoL and clinical outcomes were assessed using PRO surveys at baseline and at 1-year. The atrial fibrillation symptom severity scale (AFSSS) was the measure for QoL. Additionally, we assessed patient-reported clinical improvement, arrhythmia recurrence, and AF burden (as indicated by AF frequency and duration scores). RESULTS: A total of 296 patients were included (148 in each group, 72% paroxysmal). By PRO, a significant improvement in QoL was observed in the overall study population and was comparable between CRYO-PVI-ONLY and RF-PVI+PWI (baseline median AFSSS of 11.5 and 11; reduced to 2 and 4 at 1 year, respectively; p = 0.44). Similarly, the proportion of patients who reported improvement in their overall QoL and AF related symptoms was high and similar between the study groups [92% (CRYO-PVI-ONLY) vs. 92.8% (RF-PVI+PWI); p = 0.88]. Arrhythmia recurrence was significantly more common in the CRYO-PVI-ONLY group (39.7%) compared to RF-PVI+PWI (27.7 %); p = 0.03. Comparable results were observed in paroxysmal and persistent AF. CONCLUSION: CRYO-PVI-ONLY and RF-PVI+PWI resulted in comparable improvements in patient reported outcomes including QoL and AF burden; with RF-PVI+PWI being more effective at reducing recurrences.

Prior history of atrial fibrillation and arrhythmic outcomes: Data from the WEARIT-II prospective registry.

INTRODUCTION: Wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is utilized in patients with assumed but not yet confirmed risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD). Many of these patients also present with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the rate of WCD-detected ventricular or atrial arrhythmia events in this specific high-risk cohort is not well understood. METHODS: In WEARIT-II, the cumulative probability of any sustained or nonsustained VT/VF (WCD-treated and nontreated), and atrial/supraventricular arrhythmias during WCD use was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method by prior AF, with comparisons by the log-rank test. The incidence of ventricular and atrial arrhythmia events were expressed as events per 100 patient-years, and were analyzed by prior AF using negative binomial regression. RESULTS: WEARIT-II enrolled 2000 patients, 557 (28%) of whom had AF before enrollment. Cumulative probability of any sustained or nonsustained WCD-detected VT/VF during WCD use was significantly higher among patients with a history of AF than without AF (6% vs. 3%, p = .001). Similarly, the recurrent rate of any sustained or nonsustained VT/VF was significantly higher in patients with prior AF versus no prior AF (131.5 events per 100 patient-years vs. 22.7 events per 100 patient-years, p = .001). Patients with prior AF also had a significantly higher burden of any WCD-detected atrial arrhythmias/SVT/inappropriate arrhythmias therapy (183.2 events per 100 patient-years vs. 74.8 events per 100 patient-years, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that patients with a history of AF wearing the WCD for risk assessment have a higher incidence of ventricular arrhythmias that may facilitate the decision making for ICD implantation.

Risk Prediction in Male Adolescents With Congenital Long QT Syndrome: Implications for Sex-Specific Risk Stratification in Potassium Channel-Mediated Long QT Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Sex-specific risk management may improve outcomes in congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). We recently developed a prediction score for cardiac events (CEs) and life-threatening events (LTEs) in postadolescent women with LQTS. In the present study, we aimed to develop personalized risk estimates for the burden of CEs and LTEs in male adolescents with potassium channel-mediated LQTS. METHODS AND RESULTS: The prognostic model was derived from the LQTS Registry headquartered in Rochester, NY, comprising 611 LQT1 or LQT2 male adolescents from age 10 through 20 years, using the following variables: genotype/mutation location, QTc-specific thresholds, history of syncope, and ß-blocker therapy. Anderson-Gill modeling was performed for the end point of CE burden (total number of syncope, aborted cardiac arrest, and appropriate defibrillator shocks). The applicability of the CE prediction model was tested for the end point of the first LTE (excluding syncope and adding sudden cardiac death) using Cox modeling. A total of 270 CEs occurred during follow-up. The genotype-phenotype risk prediction model identified low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, comprising 74%, 14%, and 12% of the study population, respectively. Compared with the low-risk group, high-risk male subjects experienced a pronounced 5.2-fold increased risk of recurrent CEs (P<0.001), whereas intermediate-risk patients had a 2.1-fold (P=0.004) increased risk . At age 20 years, the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk adolescent male patients had on average 0.3, 0.6, and 1.4 CEs per person, respectively. Corresponding 10-year adjusted probabilities for a first LTE were 2%, 6%, and 8%. CONCLUSIONS: Personalized genotype-phenotype risk estimates can be used to guide sex-specific management in male adolescents with potassium channel-mediated LQTS.

Efficacy of Pulsed Field vs Radiofrequency for the Reablation of Chronic Radiofrequency Ablation Substrate: Redo Pulsed Field Ablation.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of pulsed field ablation (PFA) for redo procedures is unknown. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PFA when performing PFA over chronic RFA (redo environment). METHODS: This was a 3-step in vivo study. In step 1 (creation of redo environment), 6 swine underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with a local impedance measuring catheter and a contact force-enabled catheter in 3 different sites: the right atrium (RA) (intercaval line with intentional gaps), the left atrium (LA) (pulmonary vein isolation [PVI] with intentional gaps and superficial posterior wall ablations), and the left ventricle (LV) (short RFA applications [chronic RFA]). In step 2 (re-ablation), following a survival period of ≈5 weeks, animals were retreated as follows: in the RA, a focal PFA catheter over the prior intercaval line; in the LA, PVI using a pentaspline PFA catheter; and in the LV, animals were randomized to focal PFA or RFA. In each arm, 2 types of lesions were performed: acute or acute over chronic. In step 3 (remapping and euthanization), following an additional 3 to 5 days, all animals were remapped and sacrificed. RESULTS: In the RA, re-ablation with PFA resulted in a complete intercaval block in all animals, expanding and homogenizing the disparate chronic RFA lesions from a width of 4 to 7 mm (chronic RFA) to a width of 16 to 28 mm (PFA over chronic RFA). In the LA, re-ablation with PFA resulted in complete PVI and transmural ablation of the PW. In the LV, the mean depth for acute RFA (post 2-5 days survival) was 7.6 ± 1.3 mm vs 3.9 ± 1.6 mm in the acute over chronic RFA lesions (P < 0.01). In contrast, the mean depth for acute PFA was 7.0 ± 1.6 mm, similar to when ablating with PFA over RFA (7.1 ± 1.3 mm; P = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: PFA is highly efficient for ablation following prior RFA, which may be beneficial in patients presenting for redo procedures. In the ventricle, PFA resulted in lesions that are deeper than RFA when ablating over chronic superficial RFA lesions.

QRS Morphology and the Risk of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data on the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) on the risk of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia in heart failure patients. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to assess whether QRS morphology is associated with risk of ventricular arrhythmias in CRT recipients. METHODS: The study population comprised 2,862 patients implanted with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)/CRT-D for primary prevention who were enrolled in 5 landmark primary prevention ICD trials (MADIT-II [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial], MADIT-CRT [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy], MADIT-RIT [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduction in Inappropriate Therapy], MADIT-RISK [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial-RISK], and RAID [Ranolazine in High-Risk Patients With Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators]). Patients with QRS duration ≥130 ms were divided into 2 groups: those implanted with an ICD only vs CRT-D. The primary endpoint was fast ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) (defined as VT ≥200 beats/min or VF), accounting for the competing risk of death. Secondary endpoints included appropriate shocks, any sustained VT or VF, and the burden of fast VT/VF, assessed in a recurrent event analysis. RESULTS: Among patients with left bundle branch block (n = 1,792), those with CRT-D (n = 1,112) experienced a significant 44% (P < 0.001) reduction in the risk of fast VT/VF compared with ICD-only patients (n = 680), a significantly lower burden of fast VT/VF (HR: 0.55; P = 0.001), with a reduced burden of appropriate shocks (HR: 0.44; P < 0.001). In contrast, among patients with non-left bundle branch block (NLBBB) (N = 1,070), CRT-D was not associated with reduction in fast VT/VF (HR: 1.33; P = 0.195). Furthermore, NLBBB patients with CRT-D experienced a statistically significant increase in the burden of fast VT/VF events compared with ICD-only patients (HR: 1.90; P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest a potential proarrhythmic effect of CRT among patients with NLBBB. These data should be considered in patient selection for treatment with CRT.

Extraction outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads vary by manufacturer and model family.

AIMS: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads is considered challenging. The structure of each ICD leads is variable between manufacturer and model families. The net impact of lead family on the safety and effectiveness of TLE is poorly characterized. We assessed the safety and efficacy of ICD TLE and the impact of manufacturer ICD model family on the outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study cohort included all consecutive patients with ICD who underwent TLE between 2013 and 2022 and are enrolled in the Cleveland Clinic Prospective TLE Registry. A total of 885 ICD leads (median implant duration 8 years) in 810 patients were included. Complete ICD TLE success was achieved in 97.2% of the leads (n = 860) and in 98.0% of the patients (n = 794). Major complications occurred in 22 patients (2.7%). Complete procedural success rate varied by manufacturer and lead family; Medtronic 98.9%, Abbott 95.9%, Boston Scientific 95.0%, Biotronik 91.2%, P = 0.03, and Linox family leads had the lowest, 89.7% P = 0.02. Multivariable predictors of incomplete ICD lead removal included ICD lead age > 10 years and Linox family lead. Multivariable predictors of major complications included ICD lead age > 15 years and longer lead extraction time, and predictors of all-cause mortality within 30 days included lead extraction for infection, end-stage renal disease, and higher New York Heart Association functional class. CONCLUSION: Complete and safe ICD lead removal rate by TLE is extremely high but varied by manufacturer and lead family. Linox family lead and >10 years lead age were independent predictors of incomplete lead removal.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in elderly and very elderly patients: safety, outcomes, and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) risk increases with age. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in the older population. METHODS: All patients undergoing AF ablation (2013-2021) at our institution were enrolled in a prospectively maintained registry. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence. Patients were divided into 3 groups: non-elderly (< 65 years), elderly (65-75 years), and very elderly (> 75 years). Patient surveys at baseline and during follow-up were used to calculate quality of life (QoL) metrics: the AF severity score as well as the AF burden. RESULTS: A total of 7020 patients were included (42% non-elderly, 42% elderly, and 16% very elderly). Periprocedural major complications were low (< 1.5%) and similar in all groups besides pericardial effusion which was more frequent with older age and similar between the elderly and very elderly. At 3 years, AF recurrence for persistent AF (PersAF) was highest in the very elderly group (48%), followed by the elderly group (42%), and was the lowest in the non-elderly group (36%). In paroxysmal AF (PAF), there was no difference in AF recurrence between the elderly and non-elderly, while the very elderly remained associated with a significantly increased risk. Multivariable Cox analysis confirmed these findings (PersAF; elderly: HR = 1.23, P = 0.003; very elderly: HR = 1.44, P < 0.001) (PAF; elderly: HR = 1.04, P = 0.62; very elderly: HR = 1.30, P = 0.01). Catheter ablation resulted in a significant improvement in quality of life, irrespective of age group. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation in elderly and very elderly patients is safe, efficacious, and associated with QoL benefits. Overall, major complications were minimal and did not differ significantly between age groups, with the exception of pericardial effusions which were higher in the elderly and very elderly compared to non-elderly adults. Very elderly patients had a higher rate of AF recurrence when compared with elderly or non-elderly patients. Nevertheless, ablation resulted in a remarkable improvement in QoL and a reduction of AF burden and AF symptoms with a similar magnitude, irrespective of age.

Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias Among Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Both selective and nonselective beta-blockers are used to treat patients with heart failure (HF). However, the data on the association of beta-blocker type with risk of atrial arrhythmia and ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in HF patients with a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are limited. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the effect of metoprolol vs carvedilol on the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) and VA in HF patients with an ICD. METHODS: This study pooled primary prevention ICD recipients from 5 landmark ICD trials (MADIT-II, MADIT-CRT, MADIT-RIT, MADIT-RISK, and RAID). Fine and Gray multivariate regression models, stratified by study, were used to evaluate the risk of ATA, inappropriate ICD shocks, and fast VA (defined as ventricular tachycardia ≥200 beats/min or ventricular fibrillation) by beta-blocker type. RESULTS: Among 4,194 patients, 2,920 (70%) were prescribed carvedilol and 1,274 (30%) metoprolol. The cumulative incidence of ATA at 3.5 years was 11% in patients treated with carvedilol vs 15% in patients taking metoprolol (P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that carvedilol treatment was associated with a 35% reduction in the risk of ATA (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.53-0.81; P < 0.001) when compared to metoprolol, and with a corresponding 35% reduction in the risk of inappropriate ICD shocks (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47-0.89; P = 0.008). Carvedilol vs metoprolol was also associated with a 16% reduction in the risk of fast VA. However, these findings did not reach statistical significance (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.70-1.02; P = 0.085). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggests that HF patients with ICDs on carvedilol treatment experience a significantly lower risk of ATA and inappropriate ICD shocks when compared to treatment with metoprolol.

Primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

Introduction: The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is effective for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The benefit of the ICD in patients with advanced CKD, remains elusive. Moreover, the benefit of the ICD in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and HFrEF who are cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients may be attenuated. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that patients with CKD who are CRT recipients may derive less benefit from the ICD due to the competing risk of dying prior to experiencing an arrhythmia. Methods: The study population included 1,015 patients receiving CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D) device for primary prevention of SCD who were enrolled in either (Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial) MADIT-CRT trial or the Ranolazine in High-Risk Patients with Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator (RAID) trial. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the stage of CKD: those with Stage 1 to 3a KD, labeled as (S1-S3a)KD. The second group included patients with Stage 3b to stage 5 kidney disease, labeled as (S3b-S5)KD. The primary endpoint was any ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) (Any VT/VF). Results: The cumulative incidence of Any VT/VF was 23.5% in patients with (S1-S3a)KD and 12.6% in those with (S3b-S5)KD (p < 0.001) The incidence of Death without Any VT/VF was 6.6% in patients with (S1-S3a)KD and 21.6% in patients with (S3b-S5)KD (p < 0.001). A Fine and Gray multivariate competing risk regression model showed that Patients with (S3b-S5)KD had a 43% less risk of experiencing Any VT/VF when compared to those with (S1-S3a)KD (HR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.33-0.94] p = 0.03. After two years of follow up, there was almost a 5-fold increased risk of Death without Any VT/VF among patients with (S3b-S5)KD when compared to those with (S1-S3a)KD [HR = 4.63, 95% CI (2.46-8.72), p for interaction with time = 0.012]. Conclusion: Due to their lower incidence of arrhythmias and higher risk of dying prior to experiencing an arrhythmia, the benefit of the ICD may be attenuated in CRT recipients with advanced CKD. Future prospective trials should evaluate whether CRT without a defibrillator may be more appropriate for these patients.