Appropriateness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device implants in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate use criteria (AUCs) are a diverse group of indications aimed to better evaluate the benefits of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the proportion of ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) implants as appropriate, may be appropriate (MA), or rarely appropriate (RA) on the basis of the AUC guidelines. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients within the National Cardiovascular Data Registry undergoing ICD implantation between April 2018 and March 2019 at >1500 US hospitals. The appropriateness of ICD implants was adjudicated using the AUC. RESULTS: Of 309,318 ICDs, 241,438 were primary prevention implants (78.1%) and 67,880 secondary prevention implants (21.9%); 243,532 (79%) were mappable to the AUC. For primary prevention, 185,431 ICDs (96.4%) were appropriate, 5660 (2.9%) MA, and 1205 (0.6%) RA. For secondary prevention, 47,498 ICDs (92.7%) were appropriate, 2581 (5%) MA, and 1157 (2.3%) RA. A significant number of RA devices were implanted in patients with New York Heart Association class IV heart failure who were ineligible for advanced therapies (53.9%) and those with myocardial infarction within 40 days (18.1%). The appropriateness of the pacing lead was more variable, with 48,470 dual-chamber ICD implants (62%) being classified as appropriate, 29,209 (37.4%) MA, and 448 (0.6%) RA. Among CRT-D implants, 63,848 (82.2%) were appropriate, 9900 (12.7%) MA, and 3940 (5.1%) RA for left ventricular pacing. A total of 99,754 implants were deemed appropriate but excluded from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services National Coverage Determination. More than 92% of hospitals had an RA implant rate of <4%. CONCLUSION: In this large national registry, 95% of mappable ICD and CRT-D implants were considered appropriate, with <2% of RA implants. Nearly 100,000 appropriate implants are excluded by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services National Coverage Determination.

Prospective evaluation of the effect of smartphone electrocardiogram usage on anticoagulant medication compliance.

PURPOSE: Compliance with anticoagulation treatment for atrial fibrillation is highly variable. Smartphone electrocardiograms that allow patients to have greater insight into their arrhythmia burden may improve anticoagulant compliance. METHODS: Patients were enrolled if they had atrial fibrillation with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or more, were eligible for anticoagulation and had a smartphone. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a smartphone electrocardiogram (AliveCor Kardia) to record their electrocardiograms 5 times/week or to the control group. All patients received 6 months of anticoagulant (apixaban) dispensed as 1-month pre-loaded pill boxes. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were enrolled from July 2017 to August 2019, but 5 patients in the monitor arm and 1 in the control arm withdrew prematurely. The monitor and control groups did not differ in age, gender, CHA2DS2-VASc score, or comorbidities. Median medication compliance was 99.7%, with nonsignificantly greater compliance in the monitor group (100%) than in the control group (99.7%) (p-value = 0.247). There was also no significant difference between missing any dose and use/nonuse of the smartphone monitor (48.9% vs. 55.1%; p-value = 0.692). Mean monitor compliance was 86.8% ± 14.0% with an average of 4.34 recorded electrocardiograms per week. Monitor group patients with perfect medication compliance had significantly higher monitor compliance than those patients who missed doses (median 95.3% vs 86.7%; p-value = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In a study population with higher-than-expected medication compliance, the use of smartphone electrocardiogram did not demonstrate an improvement in medication compliance as compared to usual care. Greater monitor compliance was associated with greater medication compliance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: BOAT-OAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03515083.

Comparative outcomes of vascular access closure methods following atrial fibrillation/flutter catheter ablation: insights from VAscular Closure for Cardiac Ablation Registry.

PURPOSE: This registry compared the safety and efficacy of vascular closure device Perclose (PC) with figure-of-eight stitch (Fo8) and manual compression (MC) following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation/flutter. METHODS: VAscular Closure for Cardiac Ablation Registry (VACCAR) is a prospective, observational registry that assessed the time to hemostasis (TTH), time to ambulation (TTA), length of stay (LOS), complications, patient-reported outcomes, and pain medication use. RESULTS: A total of 434 patients (mean age 64.0±11.0 years; 38% female; 94.9% white) were enrolled between October 2017 and May 2019: 156 in MC, 203 in Fo8, and 75 in the PC group. Median TTH was significantly reduced in the PC and Fo8 group at 7 and 9 min respectively vs. the MC group at 20 min (p<0.001). Median TTA was significantly reduced in both the PC and Fo8 group at 2.2 h vs. the MC group at 6.5 h (p<0.001 for both). Median LOS for the PC group was significantly reduced at 27.5 h compared to the MC and Fo8 group at 29 h (p<0.01). A higher proportion of same-day discharges were noted in the PC and Fo8 groups at 14 (18.7%) and 25 (12.3%), respectively, compared to 5 (3.2%) in the MC group (p<0.01 for all). There was no significant difference in complications between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both PC and Fo8 are safe with improved TTH, TTA, LOS, and a higher number of same-day discharges compared to MC.

Outcomes using a single tapered dilator for Micra leadless pacemaker implant.

OBJECTIVES: Comparison of outcomes, device deployment time (DT), and total time (TT) using a single tapered Coons dilator versus sequential serial dilation for implantation of the Micra leadless pacemaker. BACKGROUND: Micra leadless pacemaker placement requires a 23 French Micra introducer sheath (MIS) for percutaneous delivery. We sought to evaluate outcomes with use of a single tapered Coons dilator (CD) versus sequential serial dilatation (SD) method to facilitate insertion of the Micra introducer sheath. METHODS: 35 patients were included in the SD arm and 49 in the CD arm. DT and TT were recorded in minutes and cost in dollars. Analysis was performed using independent t-test between two groups and one-way ANOVA to evaluate inter-operator variability in the CD arm. RESULTS: Both DT and TT were significantly lower for the CD arm (15.1 ± 5.1 vs 23.5 ± 9.3, p < 0.0005 and 29.9 ± 14 vs 39.3 ± 13.5 min, p = 0.000374; respectively). The cost was also significantly lower using a CD versus SD. There was no inter-operator variability in the CD arm between 6 operators (p = 0.177 for DT and p = 0.304 for TT). No complications occurred in the SD arm. There were 3 vascular access site complications in the CD arm, all of which occurred early in the operator's experience. CONCLUSION: Coons dilator is an efficient and cost-effective method for vascular dilatation to facilitate Micra leadless pacemaker insertion. Rate of complications is low and expected to improve with greater experience.

Trends and Outcomes of Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in a Community Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the trend in growth of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) performed in the United States with analysis of rates and predictors of major adverse events. BACKGROUND: Sustained VT is a significant cause of sudden death, heart failure (HF), and recurrent shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients. Catheter ablation for VT reduces arrhythmia recurrence. Limited data are available regarding the use, safety, and long-term outcomes after VT ablation. METHODS: Using the U.S. Medicare database linked to the Social Security Death Index, we examined the annual use of VT ablation in 21,073 patients over 12 years, with 30-day risk of mortality, nonfatal major adverse events (MAEs), 1-year risk of mortality, re-hospitalization, repeat ablation, and factors associated with adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Among 21,073 patients (age 70 ± 9 years; 77% men; 90% white), there were 1,581 (7.5%) non-fatal MAEs within 30 days. There were 963 (4.6%) vascular complications, 485 (2.3%) pericardial complications, and 201 (1%) strokes and/or transient ischemic attacks. Mechanical circulatory support use was infrequent (2.3%). The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 4.2% and 15.0%, respectively. The 1-year incidence of repeat ablation was 10.2 per 100 person-years and re-hospitalization for HF or VT was 15.4 per 100 person-years and 18 per 100 person-years, respectively. Patients with an ICD had increased 30-day (4.9% vs. 0.86%) and 1-year mortality (17.5% vs. 2.54% [22.9 per 100 person-years vs. 3.1 per 100 person-years]; hazard ratio [HR]: 2.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.21 to 3.88). Rates of hospitalization for HF (18 per 100 person-years vs. 1.8 per 100 person-years; HR: 4.00; 95% CI: 2.78 to 5.78) or VT recurrence (22.7 per 100 person-years vs. 2.1 per 100 person-years; HR: 5.70; 95% CI: 4.09 to 7.96) were also higher at 1 year. Between 2000 and 2012, annual VT ablation volumes increased >4-fold. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation for VT is frequently performed. Short-term MAEs and 1-year mortality is significant and is highest in patients with an ICD. These findings may provide greater insight of outcomes in an unselected real-world population undergoing VT ablation.