RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To explore the diagnostic performance of the Node-RADS scoring system on preoperative assessment of mesorectal lymph node metastasis (LNM) status in rectal cancer, in comparison with the ESGAR category and size of lymph node (LN). METHODS: Preoperative clinical and MRI data of 154 rectal adenocarcinoma patients treated with radical resection surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The differences in the clinical, pathological and imaging characteristics between the pN- and pN + groups were surveyed. The correlations of Node-RADS score and ESGAR category to pN stage, LNM number and lymph node ratio (LNR) were investigated. The performances on assessing pathological LNM were compared among individual approaches. A nomogram combined the imaging and clinical features was also established and evaluated. RESULTS: Significant differences in CEA, tumor maximum diameter, tumor location, LN short-axis diameter, Node-RADS score and ESGAR category were found between the pN- and pN + groups. Node-RADS correlated significantly with pN stage, LNM number, and LNR (r = 0.665, 0.685, and 0.675, p < 0.001). Node-RADS had the highest AUC (0.862) for predicting pN + status, surpassing ESGAR (AUC = 0.797, p = 0.040) and LN size (AUC = 0.762, p = 0.015). The nomogram had the best diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.901), significantly outperforming Node-RADS alone (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: The Node-RADS scoring system is comparable to the ESGAR category and surpasses short-axis diameter in preoperatively predicting LNM in rectal cancer. Integrating imaging and clinical features will lead to an enhancement in diagnostic performance. Moreover, a clear relationship was demonstrated between the Node-RADS score and the quantity-dependent pathological characteristics of LNM.