Trends in Adverse Event Reporting Before and After the Introduction of the Med Safety App in Nigeria.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous reporting of adverse events (AEs) is a mainstay of pharmacovigilance, and an ongoing challenge is how to ensure that more high-quality reports are collected for comprehensive information provision. The Med Safety App, a smartphone-based application, was launched in Nigeria in November 2020 to provide an electronic platform for users to seamlessly report AEs. There has been a paucity of evidence on the use of this application or other mobile applications for reporting adverse drug reactions/AEs following immunization in the Nigerian environment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends in adverse event reporting before and after the introduction of the Med Safety App in Nigeria. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study using data from the VigiFlow database to compare adverse event reporting in Nigeria before and after the deployment of the Med Safety App. The baseline period was 1st April 2019 to 30th October 2020 and the comparison period was 1st November 2020 to 31st May 2022. We used Vigilance Hub, the back-end system for the Med Safety App, to extract data on App downloads and de-identified user statistics. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics, frequencies and proportions. Quality was assessed by assigning a completeness score to each individual case safety report. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test for differences in medians between groups. RESULTS: Following deployment of the App, the Nigerian National Pharmacovigilance Centre recorded an increase in the total number of adverse event reports received in VigiFlow, from 2051 in the baseline period to 18,995 following deployment of the App, with 81.7% of those reported via the Med Safety App. There was a reduction in the proportion of paper-based reporting from 98.4 to 15.7% post-deployment, and direct reporting by consumers increased from 2.7 to 17.6%. Of the 15,526 reports submitted via the App, 15,111 (97.3%) had a completeness score above 70% and 6993 (45%) had a completeness score of 100%. The median completeness score of adverse event reports on the Med Safety App was 6 out of 7. On bivariate analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis test, there was an association between means of reporting and completeness score, and this association was significant, with a p value of 0.0001, which may reflect the validation rules that are applied within the App. CONCLUSION: Deployment of the Med Safety App increased both the number and quality of adverse event reports; however, more awareness and capacity building are needed to strengthen and sustain reporting on the tool by all categories of healthcare professionals and consumers/patients.

A Retrospective Review of Serious Adverse Drug Reaction Reports in the Nigerian VigiFlow Database from September 2004 to December 2016.

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a source of concern in healthcare as they negatively affect patients. Serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs) have an even greater impact on patients and the system in terms of morbidity and financial burden. The establishment of National Pharmacovigilance Centers (NPCs) has enhanced ADR reporting in Africa. The Nigerian Pharmacovigilance Centre has been collecting ADR reports using VigiFlow since 2004. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify and analyze SADR reports in the Nigerian VigiFlow database in order to profile the patients with SADRs, the medicines most implicated, system organ classes (SOCs) affected, outcome of such reactions, including fatalities, and ADR reporting trends over the years. We also looked at the data elements provided in the reports as a proxy measure of report quality. METHOD: We retrospectively assessed all individual case safety reports (ICSRs) received by the NPC in Nigeria and entered into VigiFlow as SADR reports between September 2004 and December 2016. We defined SADR as any untoward reaction to any medicine dose that resulted in death, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was life-threatening. The suspected SADRs were analyzed at the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities SOC and Preferred Term levels. RESULTS: A total of 11,222 ICSRs were entered into VigiFlow during the study period, of which 298 (3%) were classified as SADR reports. Adults were the most affected (244/282; 87%). The median number of medicines per report was 3 (interquartile range = 2-4.75). Nevirapine (36/336; 11%), as a single entity, was the most reported medicine. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection affected 128/232 (55%) of those with SADRs. There was no statistically significant association between the number of reactions per report and sex of the patients (p = 0.280), their age groups (p = 0.670), or the number of medicines per report (p = 0.640). Hospitalization was the most frequently cited reason for classifying a report as serious (151/276; 53%) and death was reported in 48 cases (48/283; 17%). Based on the SOC, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (139/550; 25%) was the most affected, while anemia (55/550; 10%) was the most reported specific reaction. A substantial number of patients (107/256; 42%) either recovered fully or were recovering from the SADRs. The number of SADR reports received varied by year with no consistent trend. CONCLUSION: There is under-reporting of ADRs in the Nigerian VigiFlow® database, particularly SADRs and those involving pediatric and geriatric age groups. Given that over half of the SADR reports involved antiretroviral drugs, it is imperative to increase the surveillance of ADRs related to this class of drugs through regular clinical assessment of reports and provision of feedback on the findings to healthcare providers. Direct consumer reporting should also be encouraged as a means of increasing ADR reporting.