Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 342
Filtrar
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 149: 26-35, 2024 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38705476

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The environmental surveillance of air grilles in clinical areas has not been systematically analysed. METHODS: Samples were collected from frequently touched items (N = 529), air supply (N = 295) and exhaust (N = 184) grilles in six medical and 11 surgical wards for the cultures of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs): meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), and isolates were selected for whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The contamination rates were correlated with the colonization pressures of the respective MDROs. RESULTS: From 3rd October to 21st November 2023, 9.8% (99/1008) of the samples tested positive, with MRSA (24.2%, 24/99), CRAB (59.6%, 59/99) and CPE (2.0%, 2/99), being the only detected MDROs. The contamination rate in air exhaust grilles (26.6%, 49/184) was significantly higher than in air supply grilles (5.8%, 17/295; P<0.001). The contamination rate of air exhaust grilles with any MDRO in acute medical wards (73.7%, 14/19) was significantly higher than in surgical wards (12.5%, 4/32; P<0.001). However, there was no difference in the contamination rate of air exhaust grilles between those located inside and outside the cohort cubicles for MDROs (27.1%, 13/48 vs 28.8%, 30/104; P=0.823). Nevertheless, the weekly CRAB colonization pressure showed a significant correlation with the overall environmental contamination rate (r = 0.878; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.136-0.986; P=0.004), as well as with the contamination rate in air supply grilles (r = 0.960; 95% CI: 0.375-0.999; P<0.001) and air exhaust grilles (r = 0.850; 95% CI: 0.401-0.980; P=0.008). WGS demonstrated clonal relatedness of isolates collected from patients and air exhaust grilles. CONCLUSIONS: Air grilles may serve as MDRO reservoirs. Cohort nursing in open cubicles may not completely prevent MDRO transmission through air dispersal, prompting the consideration of future hospital design.

4.
J Hosp Infect ; 123: 52-60, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35196559

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are rampant in hospitals and residential care homes for the elderly (RCHEs). AIM: To analyse the prevalence of MRSA colonization among residents and staff, and degree of environmental contamination and air dispersal of MRSA in RCHEs. METHODS: Epidemiological and genetic analysis by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in 12 RCHEs in Hong Kong. FINDINGS: During the COVID-19 pandemic (from September to October 2021), 48.7% (380/781) of RCHE residents were found to harbour MRSA at any body site, and 8.5% (8/213) of staff were nasal MRSA carriers. Among 239 environmental samples, MRSA was found in 39.0% (16/41) of randomly selected resident rooms and 31.3% (62/198) of common areas. The common areas accessible by residents had significantly higher MRSA contamination rates than those that were not accessible by residents (37.2%, 46/121 vs. 22.1%, 17/177, P=0.028). Of 124 air samples, nine (7.3%) were MRSA-positive from four RCHEs. Air dispersal of MRSA was significantly associated with operating indoor fans in RCHEs (100%, 4/4 vs. 0%, 0/8, P=0.002). WGS of MRSA isolates collected from residents, staff and environmental and air samples showed that ST 1047 (CC1) lineage 1 constituted 43.1% (66/153) of all MRSA isolates. A distinctive predominant genetic lineage of MRSA in each RCHE was observed, suggestive of intra-RCHE transmission rather than clonal acquisition from the catchment hospital. CONCLUSION: MRSA control in RCHEs is no less important than in hospitals. Air dispersal of MRSA may be an important mechanism of dissemination in RCHEs with operating indoor fans.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Humanos , Meticilina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Pandemias , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología
5.
Aust Vet J ; 100(3): 107-113, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34859426

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic oroantral fistulae (OAF) with secondary sinusitis can occur following repulsion of cheek teeth in horses. CASE REPORT: An 8-year-old Andalusian cross gelding presented with an iatrogenic clinical crown fracture of tooth 209, which underwent repulsion of its apical portion (day 0). The horse was treated with intramuscular penicillin and intravenous gentamicin (5 days), followed by oral trimethoprim-sulphonamide (10 days) and then oral doxycycline (14 days). The acute iatrogenic OAF created during the initial repulsion persisted; a chronic OAF was identified on day 24. On day 48, septic sinusitis with multidrug-resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli was confirmed. Although susceptible to enrofloxacin in vitro, 30 days of therapy was unsuccessful. Subsequent serial cultures grew multiple MDR and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) gram-negative microorganisms. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revealed multiple sequence types of E. coli, with a range of resistance and virulence genes. The orientation of the OAF, regional osteomyelitis and septic sinusitis were confirmed with computed tomography on day 70. On day 74, enteral nutrition was provided through a cervical oesophagostomy tube for 3 months for prevention of oral feed contamination. The OAF was treated with various alternative therapeutics, including apple cider vinegar, propolis and amikacin impregnated products, until resolution on day 116. CONCLUSION: These non-conventional therapeutics, antimicrobials and long-term oesophagostomy contributed to the successful treatment of a complicated OAF. In the future, WGS may be useful to inform antimicrobial selection when MDR or XDR organisms are identified.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Caballos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Animales , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Nutrición Enteral/veterinaria , Escherichia coli , Enfermedades de los Caballos/tratamiento farmacológico , Caballos , Masculino , Fístula Oroantral/complicaciones , Fístula Oroantral/terapia , Fístula Oroantral/veterinaria
6.
J Hosp Infect ; 121: 65-74, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34953945

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become endemic in many healthcare settings. AIM: To analyse the incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and genomic relatedness of patients with newly diagnosed gastrointestinal colonization of MRSA. METHODS: Epidemiology and genetic analysis by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in a hospital network in Hong Kong. FINDINGS: Between October 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2018, a total of 919 (2.7%) of 34,667 patients had newly diagnosed gastrointestinal MRSA colonization by admission screening. The incidence was 0.67 ± 0.32 per 1000 patient-days per quarter. Including patients with gastrointestinal MRSA colonization, the overall burden of MRSA increased by 59.2%, with an addition of 4727 MRSA patient-days during the study period. Patients referred from residential care home for the elderly, with history of hospitalization in the past six months, and consumption of fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, and proton-pump inhibitors in the preceding six months were found to be independent risk factors by multivariate analysis in the case-control analysis. The median survival of cases was significantly shorter than that of controls (860 vs 1507 days, P < 0.001). Of 919 patients, 127 (13.8%) developed symptomatic MRSA infection in a median of 112 days. Of 19 patients with paired MRSA faecal and blood culture isolates subjected to WGS, clonality was found in 16 (84.2%) pairs of MRSA isolates. MRSA ST45 constituted 44.7% (17/38) of MRSA isolates. CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal MRSA colonization may contribute to adverse clinical outcomes and pose an unrecognized burden upon hospital infection control.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Anciano , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Humanos , Meticilina , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología
7.
Hong Kong Med J ; 27(5): 384, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34706992

Asunto(s)
Homicidio , Mala Praxis , Humanos
9.
J Hosp Infect ; 116: 78-86, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34403765

RESUMEN

AIM: To describe the nosocomial transmission of Air, multidrug-resistant, Acinetobacter baumannii, nosocomial, COVID-19 Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB) in an open-cubicle neurology ward with low ceiling height, where MRAB isolates collected from air, commonly shared items, non-reachable high-level surfaces and patients were analysed epidemiologically and genetically by whole-genome sequencing. This is the first study to understand the genetic relatedness of air, environmental and clinical isolates of MRAB in the outbreak setting. FINDINGS: Of 11 highly care-dependent patients with 363 MRAB colonization days during COVID-19 pandemic, 10 (90.9%) and nine (81.8%) had cutaneous and gastrointestinal colonization, respectively. Of 160 environmental and air samples, 31 (19.4%) were MRAB-positive. The proportion of MRAB-contaminated commonly shared items was significantly lower in cohort than in non-cohort patient care (0/10, 0% vs 12/18, 66.7%; P<0.001). Air dispersal of MRAB was consistently detected during but not before diaper change in the cohort cubicle by 25-min air sampling (4/4,100% vs 0/4, 0%; P=0.029). The settle plate method revealed MRAB in two samples during diaper change. The proportion of MRAB-contaminated exhaust air grills was significantly higher when the cohort cubicle was occupied by six MRAB patients than when fewer than six patients were cared for in the cubicle (5/9, 55.6% vs 0/18, 0%; P=0.002). The proportion of MRAB-contaminated non-reachable high-level surfaces was also significantly higher when there were three or more MRAB patients in the cohort cubicle (8/31, 25.8% vs 0/24, 0%; P=0.016). Whole-genome sequencing revealed clonality of air, environment, and patients' isolates, suggestive of air dispersal of MRAB. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the view that patient cohorting in enclosed cubicles with partitions and a closed door is preferred if single rooms are not available.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , COVID-19 , Infección Hospitalaria , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/epidemiología , Acinetobacter baumannii/genética , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 58(12): 2001-2008, 2020 10 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33027043

RESUMEN

Serological testing for the detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is emerging as an important component of the clinical management of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as well as the epidemiological assessment of SARS-CoV-2 exposure worldwide. In addition to molecular testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection, clinical laboratories have also needed to increase testing capacity to include serological evaluation of patients with suspected or known COVID-19. While regulatory approved serological immunoassays are now widely available from diagnostic manufacturers globally, there is significant debate regarding the clinical utility of these tests, as well as their clinical and analytical performance requirements prior to application. This document by the International Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Taskforce on COVID-19 provides interim guidance on: (A) clinical indications and target populations, (B) assay selection, (C) assay evaluation, and (D) test interpretation and limitations for serological testing of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 infection. These evidence-based recommendations will provide practical guidance to clinical laboratories in the selection, verification, and implementation of serological assays and are of the utmost importance as we expand our pandemic response from initial case tracing and containment to mitigation strategies to minimize resurgence and further morbidity and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Betacoronavirus/inmunología , Agencias Internacionales , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pruebas Serológicas/métodos , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
12.
J Hosp Infect ; 106(2): 226-231, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32652214

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In late 2019, a novel human coronavirus - severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) - emerged in Wuhan, China. This virus has caused a global pandemic involving more than 200 countries. SARS-CoV-2 is highly adapted to humans and readily transmits from person-to-person. AIM: To investigate the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 under various environmental and pH conditions. The efficacies of various laboratory virus inactivation methods and home disinfectants against SARS-CoV-2 were investigated. METHODS: The residual virus in dried form or in solution was titrated on to Vero E6 cells on days 0, 1, 3, 5 and 7 after incubation at different temperatures. Viral viability was determined after treatment with various disinfectants and pH solutions at room temperature (20-25oC). FINDINGS: SARS-CoV-2 was able to retain viability for 3-5 days in dried form or 7 days in solution at room temperature. SARS-CoV-2 could be detected under a wide range of pH conditions from pH 4 to pH 11 for several days, and for 1-2 days in stool at room temperature but lost 5 logs of infectivity. A variety of commonly used disinfectants and laboratory inactivation procedures were found to reduce viral viability effectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the stability of SARS-CoV-2 on environmental surfaces, and raises the possibility of faecal-oral transmission. Commonly used fixatives, nucleic acid extraction methods and heat inactivation were found to reduce viral infectivity significantly, which could ensure hospital and laboratory safety during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/crecimiento & desarrollo , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Viabilidad Microbiana , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/patología , Virulencia , Inactivación de Virus , COVID-19 , China/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Humanos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/epidemiología
20.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 25(12): 1539-1545, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31004768

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the viral epidemiology and clinical characteristics of patients with and without clinically apparent respiratory tract infection. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted during the 2018 winter influenza season. Adult patients with fever/respiratory symptoms (fever/RS group) were age- and sex-matched with patients without fever/RS (non-fever/RS group) in a 1:1 ratio. Respiratory viruses were tested using NxTAG™ Respiratory Pathogen Panel IVD, a commercially-available multiplex PCR panel. RESULTS: A total of 214 acutely hospitalized patients were included in the final analysis, consisting of 107 with fever/RS (fever/RS group), and 107 age- and sex-matched patients without fever/RS (non-fever/RS group). Respiratory viruses were detected in 34.1% (73/214) of patients, and co-infection occurred in 7.9% (17/214) of patients. The incidence of respiratory virus was higher in the fever/RS group than in the non-fever/RS group (44.9% (48/107) versus 23.4% (25/107), p 0.001). Influenza B virus, enterovirus/rhinovirus and coronaviruses were detected more frequently in the fever/RS group, whereas parainfluenza virus 4B and adenovirus were detected more frequently in the non-fever/RS group. Among the non-fever/RS group, chest discomfort was more common among patients tested positive for respiratory viruses than those without respiratory virus detected (44% (11/25) versus 22% (18/82), p 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory viruses can be frequently detected among hospitalized patients without typical features of respiratory tract infection. These patients may be a source of nosocomial outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Virosis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Coinfección/epidemiología , Coinfección/virología , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/patología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Saliva/virología , Virosis/patología , Virosis/virología , Virus/genética , Virus/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...