Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 97(8): 578-83, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26492903

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges as it produces subtle radiological changes. It has been suggested that it is not suitable for breast conserving surgery (BCS). The aim of this study was to ascertain the diagnostic adequacy of modern mammography and ultrasonography in the context of a fast track symptomatic diagnostic clinic in the UK. It also sought to compare the mastectomy, re-excision and BCS rates for ILC with those for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was carried out on all new symptomatic cancers presenting to the one-stop diagnostic clinic of a single breast unit between 1998 and 2007. RESULTS: Compared with IDC, ILC was significantly larger at presentation (46mm vs 25mm), needed re-excision after BCS more often (38.8% vs 22.3%) and required mastectomy more frequently (58.8% vs 40.8%). Although mammography performs poorly in diagnosing ILC compared with IDC, when combined with ultrasonography, sensitivity of the combined imaging was not significantly different between these two histological types. CONCLUSIONS: Provided ultrasonography is performed, standard radiological imaging is adequate for initial diagnosis of symptomatically presenting ILC but some additional preoperative workup should clearly be employed to reduce the higher number of reoperations for this histological type.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Lobular/diagnóstico , Mamografía/métodos , Mastectomía Segmentaria/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma Lobular/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Pronóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía Mamaria/métodos
2.
Breast ; 24(4): 318-20, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25800381

RESUMEN

The advent of sentinel lymph node biopsy has revolutionised surgical management of axillary nodal disease in patients with breast cancer. Patients undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for large breast primary tumours may experience complete pathological response on a previously positive sentinel node whilst not eliminating the tumour from the other lymph nodes. Results from 2 large prospective cohort studies investigating sentinel lymph node biopsy after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrate a combined false negative rate of 12.6-14.2% and identification rate of 80-89% with the minimal acceptable false negative rate and identification rate being set at 10% and 90%, respectively. A false negative rate of 14% would have been classified as unacceptable when compared to the figures obtained by the pioneers of sentinel lymph node biopsy which was 5% or less.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/estadística & datos numéricos , Axila , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estudios Prospectivos , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...