Orthognathic surgery improves quality of life and depression, but not anxiety, and patients with higher preoperative depression scores improve less.

This study assessed quality of life (QoL), depression, and anxiety before and after orthognathic surgery and identified risk factors for poorer postoperative outcome. This multicentre prospective study included 140 patients from five French medical centres. We assessed patients before surgery (T1), 3 months after surgery (T2), and 12 months after surgery (T3). We assessed the severity of the orofacial deformity, physical, psychological, social, and environmental QoL (WHOQOL-BREF), and depression and anxiety (GHQ-28). Risk factors for poorer outcome were identified using linear mixed models. Between baseline and 12 months, there was significant improvement in psychological and social QoL and in depression (although below the norms reported in the general population), but not in anxiety. Physical QoL was poorer in patients who were younger, who had a mild orofacial deformity, and who were depressed. Psychological QoL was poorer in younger patients and in depressed patients. Social QoL was poorer in patients who were single, who had a mild orofacial deformity, and who were depressed. Although orthognathic surgery provides a moderate improvement in psychological and social QoL, the systematic screening and treatment of depression could further improve QoL after surgery because it is a major predictor of poor QoL in this population.

[Psychological effects of orthognatic surgery and postoperative dissatisfaction: presentation of a research protocol]. / Effets psychologiques de la chirurgie orthognatique et insatisfaction postopératoire : présentation d'un protocole de recherche.

INTRODUCTION: The causes of postoperative dissatisfaction in orthognathic surgery are difficult to grasp. The aims of our study are to analyze the effects of orthognathic surgery on self-esteem, body image, psychological morbidity, and quality of life. We also want to assess the combined effects of these factors on postoperative dissatisfaction, and to study the interest of personality assessment (especially neuroticism) as a predictive factor of dissatisfaction. METHOD: Three hundred patients candidates for maxillo-mandibular osteotomy will be included in the study. They will answer a questionnaire assessing self-esteem, body image, psychological morbidity, quality of life, and personality. The evaluation will be conducted preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months and at 1 year. The degree of satisfaction will be measured postoperatively. EXPECTED RESULTS: The results should help evaluate the psychological effects of orthognathic surgery and identify predictors of postoperative dissatisfaction, and especially the role of neuroticism.

[The development of craniomandibular disorders after bilateral sagittal osteotomy]. / Evolution des désordres cranio-mandibulaires après une ostéotomie bilatérale sagittale.

The aim of this study is to know the repercussions of modified sagittal ramus split osteotomy of the mandible on the anamnesic symptoms of cranio-mandibular disorders in 89 patients. The sample was divided into different groups according to the surgery type: mandibular advancement or mandibular retrusion with or without maxillary surgery. The anamnesic approach allows to evaluate the felt symptoms. All had a surgery by the same surgeon and with the same technique: mandibular sagittal bilateral surgery according to the modificated Obwegeser osteotomy. The statistical analysis shows some differences between groups.