Outcomes of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program to limit perioperative opioid use in outpatient minimally invasive GI and hernia surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative pain management is important for patient satisfaction while returning to homeostasis in the safest way possible. Studies show that patients don't require as much opioids as once thought. The benefits of ERAS pathways extend beyond enhancement of patients' perioperative experience, and include reducing opioid prescriptions in the face of the ongoing nationwide opioid crisis and evidence of prescription opioids as a contributor. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing same day minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures for GI and hernia disease using a minimal-opioid ERAS protocol at two community hospitals between January 2020 and May 2022. We included elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for acute appendicitis without perforation, and minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) inguinal and ventral hernia repair or abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Primary outcome was postoperative opioid use. RESULTS: A total of 509 patients were included, undergoing procedures of MIS hernia repair (52.5%), LC (43.6%), and LA (7.9%). Only 9.4% of patients received opioid prescriptions at discharge, with no difference between groups. Among the patients receiving a prescription at discharge, there was a significant difference in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prescribed (25.0 ± 0.0 in the LA group, 65.0 ± 41.4 in the LC group, 100.6 ± 46.2 in the MIS hernia/AWR group; P = 0.015). Nine percent of patients called with pain management concerns postoperatively. ASA score ≥ 3 was associated with increased odds for postoperative opioid prescription (OR 2.084; P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that an opioid-sparing ERAS program effectively manages pain for patients undergoing multiple outpatient MIS GI/hernia procedures, and suggests generalizability across a diverse range of operations. Therefore, the use of ERAS may safely and effectively expand beyond inpatient MIS and open surgeries that target reduced length of stay to also minimize opioids for outpatient procedures.

The impact of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery on quality of life: do patients with atypical symptoms benefit?

INTRODUCTION: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may manifest atypically as cough, hoarseness or difficulty breathing. However, it is difficult to diagnostically establish a cause-and-effect between atypical symptoms and GERD. In addition, the benefit of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS) in patients with laryngopharyngeal manifestations of GERD are not well characterized. We report the largest series reported to date assessing operative and quality of life (QOL) outcomes after LARS in patients experiencing extraesophageal manifestations of GERD and discuss recommendations for this patient population. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with extraesophageal symptoms and pathologic reflux that underwent LARS between February 2012 and July 2019 was conducted. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with atypical manifestations of GERD as defined by preoperative survey in addition to physiological diagnosis of pathological reflux. Patient QOL outcomes was analyzed using four validated instruments: the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Laryngopharyngeal Reflux QOL, Swallowing QOL (SWAL), and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQOL) surveys. RESULTS: 420 patients (24% male, 76% female) with a mean age of 61.7 ± 13.0 years and BMI of 28.6 ± 5.0 kg/m2 were included in this study. Thirty-day wound (0.2%) and non-wound (6.74%) related complication rates were recorded in addition to thirty-day readmission rate (2.6%). Patients reported significant improvements in laryngopharyngeal symptoms at mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 16.6 months post LARS reflected by results of four QOL instruments (RSI - 64%, LPR - 75%, GERD-HRQOL - 80%, SWAL + 18%). The majority of patients demonstrated complete resolution of symptoms upon subsequent encounters with 68% of patients reporting no atypical extraesophageal manifestations during follow-up survey (difficulty breathing - 86%, chronic cough - 81%, hoarseness - 66%, globus sensation - 68%) and 68% of patients no longer taking anti-reflux medication. Seventy-two percent of patients reported being satisfied with their symptom control at latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately selected candidates with atypical GERD symptomatology and objective diagnosis of GERD LARS may afford significant QOL improvements with minimal operative or long-term morbidity.

Impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on perioperative outcomes following minimally invasive retromuscular abdominal wall reconstruction: a comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and recurrence rates are higher in obese patients undergoing open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Historically, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 has served as a relative contraindication to open AWR. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on outcomes after AWR for higher versus lower BMI patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted of all patients who underwent MIS AWR between September 2015 and April 2019 at our institution. Patients were subdivided into two groups based on their BMI: BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2 and BMI > 35 kg/m2. Patient demographics and perioperative data were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 461 patients were identified and divided into two groups: BMI ≤ 35 (n = 310) and BMI > 35 (n = 151). The two groups were similar in age (BMI ≤ 35: 56.3 ± 14.1 years vs. BMI > 35: 54.4 ± 11.9, p = .154). BMI > 35 group had more patients with ASA score of 3 (81% vs. 32%, p < .001) and comorbid conditions such as hypertension (70% vs. 45%, p < .001), diabetes mellitus (32% vs. 15%, p < .001), and history of recurrent abdominal wall hernia (34% vs. 23%, p = .008). BMI > 35 group underwent a robotic approach at higher rates (74% vs. 45%, p < .001). Patients who underwent a Rives-Stoppa repair from the higher BMI cohort also had a larger defect size (5.6 ± 2.4 cm vs. 6.7 ± 2.4 cm, p = .004). However, there were no differences in defect size in patients who underwent a transversus abdominus release (BMI ≤ 35: 9.7 ± 4.9 cm vs. BMI > 35: 11.1 ± 4.6 cm, p = .069). Both groups benefited similarly from a short length of stay, similar hospital charges, and lower postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Initial findings of our data support the benefits of elective MIS approach to AWR for patients with higher BMI. These patients derive similar benefits, such as faster recovery with low recurrence rates, when compared to lower BMI patients, while avoiding preoperative hernia incarceration, postoperative wound complications, and hernia recurrences. Future follow-up is required to establish long-term perioperative and quality of life outcomes in this patient cohort.

Hybrid versus open retromuscular abdominal wall repair: early outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The hybrid approach to abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) for abdominal wall hernias combines minimally invasive posterior component separation and retromuscular dissection with open fascial closure and mesh implantation. This combination may enhance patient outcomes and recovery compared to the open approach alone. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the operative outcomes of hybrid vs. open abdominal wall reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to compare patients who underwent open versus hybrid AWR between September 2015 and August of 2018 at Anne Arundel Medical Center. Patient demographics and perioperative data were collected and analyzed using univariate analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included in the final analysis: 10 in the hybrid and 55 in the open groups. Mean age was higher in the hybrid vs. open group (65.1 vs. 56.2 years, p < 0.05). The hybrid and open groups were statistically similar (p > 0.05) in gender distribution, mean BMI, and ASA score. Intraoperative comparison found hybrid patients parallel to open patients (p > 0.05) in mean operative time (294.5 vs. 267.5 min), defect size (14.4 vs. 13.6 cm), mesh area, and drain placement. The mean total hospital cost was lower in the hybrid group compared to the open group ($16,426 vs. $19,054, p = 0.43). The hybrid group had a shorter length of stay (5.3 vs. 3.6 days, p = 0.03) after surgery and was followed for a similar length of time (12.3 vs. 12.6 months, p = 0.91). The hybrid group showed a lower trend of seroma, hematoma, wound infection, ileus, and readmission rates after surgery. CONCLUSION: A review of patient outcomes after hybrid AWR highlights a trend towards shorter length of stay, lower hospital cost, and fewer complications without significant addition to operative time. Long-term studies on a larger number of patients are definitively needed to characterize the comprehensive benefits of this approach.

Patients with ineffective esophageal motility benefit from laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, affecting more than 50% of Americans. The development of GERD may be associated with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). The impact of esophageal motility on outcomes post laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS), including quality of life (QOL), remains to be defined. The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare QOL outcomes following LARS among patients with and without ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). METHODS: This is a single-institution, retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent LARS, from January 2012 to July 2019, for treatment of GERD at our institution. Patients undergoing revisional surgery were excluded. Patients with normal peristalsis (non-IEM) were distinguished from those with IEM, defined using the Chicago classification, on manometric studies. Four validated QOL surveys were used to assess outcomes: Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related QOL (GERD-HRQL), Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Health-Related QOL (LPR-HRQL), and Swallowing Disorders (SWAL) survey. RESULTS: 203 patients with complete manometric data were identified (75.4% female) and divided into two groups, IEM (n = 44) and non-IEM (n = 159). IEM and Non-IEM groups were parallel in age (58.1 ± 15.3 vs. 62.2 ± 12 years, p = 0.062), body mass index (27.4 ± 4.1 vs. 28.2 ± 4.9 kg/m2, p = 0.288), distribution of comorbid disease, sex, and ASA scores. The groups differed in manometry findings and Johnson-DeMeester score (IEM: 38.6 vs. Non-IEM: 24.0, p = 0.023). Patients in both groups underwent similar rates of Nissen fundoplication (IEM: 84.1% vs. Non-IEM: 93.7%, p = 0.061) with greater improvements in dysphagia (IEM: 27.4% vs. 44.2%) in Non-IEM group but comparable benefit in reflux reduction (IEM: 80.6% vs. 72.4%) in both groups at follow-up. There were no differences in postoperative outcomes. Satisfaction rates with LARS were similar between groups (IEM: 80% vs. non-IEM: 77.9%, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with ineffective esophageal motility derive significant benefits in perioperative and QOL outcomes after LARS. Nevertheless, as anticipated, their baseline dysmotility may reduce the degree of improvement in dysphagia rates post-surgery compared to patients with normal motility. Furthermore, the presence of preoperative IEM should not be a contraindication for complete fundoplication. Key to optimal outcomes after LARS is careful patient selection based on objective perioperative data, including manometry evaluation, with the purpose of tailoring surgery to provide effective reflux control and improved esophageal clearance.

Age-related outcomes in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: Is there a "too old" for antireflux surgery?

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive antireflux surgery has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) in elderly patients. However, there is a paucity of data on the influence of advanced age on long-term quality of life (QoL) and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS). METHOD: A retrospective study of patients undergoing LARS between February 2012 and June 2018 at a single institution was conducted. Patients were divided into four age categories. Perioperative data and quality of life (QOL) outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 492 patients, with mean follow-up of 21 months post surgery, were included in the final analysis. Patients were divided into four age-determined subgroups (< 50:75, 50-65:179, 65-75:144, ≥ 75:94). Advancing age was associated with increasing likelihood of comorbid disease. Older patients were significantly more likely to require Collis gastroplasty (OR 2.09), or concurrent gastropexy (OR 3.20). Older surgical patients also demonstrated increased operative time (ß 6.29, p < .001), length of hospital stay (ß 0.56, p < .001) in addition to increased likelihood of intraoperative complications (OR 2.94, p = .003) and reoperations (OR 2.36, p < .05). However, postoperative QoL outcomes and complication rates were parallel among all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among older patients, there is a greater risk of intraoperative complications, reoperation rates as well as longer operative time and LOS after LARS. However, a long-term QoL benefit is demonstrated among elderly patients who have undergone this procedure. Rather than serving as an exclusion criterion for surgical intervention, advanced age among chronic reflux patients should instead represent a comorbidity addressed in the planning stages of LARS.

Demographic-related variables impact subjective experiences of patient wait times and perceived attention afforded in surgical outpatient clinic encounters.

INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction remains a key component in successful delivery of high-quality healthcare. In this study, we attempted to better understand how patient demographics might influence perception of clinic wait times and determine factors that may positively influence perception of a clinic experience. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted assessing patient satisfaction during outpatient surgical clinics in minimally invasive, breast, plastic/reconstructive, and orthopaedic surgery between May and September 2017. Patient demographics, subjective and objective assessments of wait time and physician encounter, and qualitative assessments of physician and patient interaction were collected. RESULTS: 150 patients were enrolled with median age between 45 and 54 years old. Patients perceived mean wait times of 22.5 min and contact with physician as 12.3 min. Objective measures of wait and physician-contact times were 30.8 min and 10.7 min. These trends persisted despite surgical specialty and new versus returning patient class. Widowed patients perceived receiving less attention by doctors (p<.05), retirees believed they spent less time with their physician (p<.05), and associate's degree holders as highest education status had greater differences in perceived-versus-actual contact time with their doctor (p<.05). Clinic patients reported high satisfaction scores (>96%) quantifying physician eye-contact (99.3%), attention (99.8%), clarity of clinical communication (98.7%), interest in answering questions (99.2%), and reasonability (98.2%) highly. Patients described their physicians as excellent (99.4%) and were likely to refer their provider to others (99.9%). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest qualitative factors of patient encounters including eye contact, attention, communication, interest, and subjective perceptions of time bear more weight in the final assessment of patient satisfaction with care than quantitative factors such as actual wait time and duration of time with provider. This is irrespective of differences in perceived wait and contact times between different groups.

Update on the Durability and Performance of Collis Gastroplasty For Chronic GERD and Hiatal Hernia Repair At 4-Year Post-Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Collis gastroplasty (CG) remains an important procedure to lengthen the esophagus when indicated in patients undergoing fundoplication for longstanding refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or large hiatal hernias. Concerns over potential sequelae of CG such as dysphagia and worsening heartburn as well as questions regarding the durability of the procedure remain a subject of debate. In this study, 3 and 4-year postoperative data is presented assessing patient quality of life (QOL) measures for those undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) with and without CG. METHODS: Comparative review of a prospectively maintained GERD patient database was conducted between patients undergoing LARS with CG versus non-CG (NC) at two institutions between October 2004 and February 2019. Patient demographic, perioperative, and QOL data was analyzed at 3 and 4 years postoperatively using four validated instruments: the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Laryngopharyngeal Reflux QOL (LPR-QOL), Swallowing QOL (SWAL), and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQOL) surveys. RESULTS: A total of 214 CG and 798 NC patients were included in this study. The CG group was older (66.1 ± 12.9 vs. 59.0 ± 14.1, p < 0.001), had a higher frequency of ASA class 3 patients (39.7% vs. 29.7%), and had greater proportion of comorbid disease compared to NG. The groups were parallel in BMI (Collis 28.4 ± 5.2 kg/m2 vs. non-Collis 28.6 ± 5.3 kg/m2, p = 0.673). Subset analysis revealed persistent benefits through 4 years reflected by survey results in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in QOL outcomes between CG and NC. A majority of patients in both groups reported discontinuation of antireflux medications and satisfaction with surgical outcomes and symptom control. CONCLUSION: Long-term QOL outcomes after laparoscopic CG are comparable to patients treated with fundoplication alone in cases of long-standing GERD and hiatal hernias. Furthermore, CG patients enjoyed equivalent durability of the procedure without risk of subsequent dysphagia. Collis gastroplasty remains an important tool in the armamentarium of foregut surgeons.

Comparative review of outcomes: laparoscopic and robotic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) access retrorectus repairs.

BACKGROUND: Building on the principles of eTEP access, described by Dr. Jorge Daes, our group has previously described and standardized a novel minimally invasive approach to restoration of the linea alba and repair of lateral atypical defects of the abdominal wall. The purpose of this report is to present comparative analysis of laparoscopic and robotic eTEP access retrorectus repairs. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted in patients who underwent laparoscopic eTEP (lap-eRS) and robotic-assisted eTEP (robo-eRS) Rives-Stoppa repairs between September 2015 and May 2018 at our institution. We analyzed the preoperative demographics and the perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: Our review identified 206 patients (Lap-eRS 120 vs. robo-eRS 86). The groups were comparable (p > 0.05) in gender distribution (47.6% vs. 53% male) and mean age (53.2 vs. 50.8 years), but different (p < 0.05) in mean BMI (31.3 vs. 34.4 kg/m2) and ASA score (2.1 vs. 2.4). The robo-eRS group had a larger defect size (5.5 vs. 7.1 cm, p < 0.05), a longer mean operative time (120.4 vs. 174.7 min, p < 0.05), and a higher hospitalization cost ($5,091 vs. $6,751, p = 0.005) compared to the lap-eRS group. Average length of stay (0.2 vs. 0.1 days), length of drain placement (5.3 vs. 5.7 days), and reoperations (2.5% vs. 2.3%) were similar between lap-eRS and robo-eRS (p > 0.05). Patients in both groups (lap-eRS vs. robo-eRS) were followed for an average of 5.7 months vs. 5.5 months (p = .735) and showed similar recurrence rates (1.7% vs. 1.2%, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We present the largest series to-date of eTEP access laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia retrorectus repairs. Morbidly obese patients and those with more complex abdominal wall defects were more likely to undergo a robo-eRS. The significantly longer operative time and higher hospital cost associated with the robo-eRS group may be in part due to these factors. Both robotic and laparoscopic eTEP Rives-Stoppa repairs are associated with favorable perioperative outcomes and low recurrence rates.

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) is highly effective in the treatment of select patients with chronic cough.

BACKGROUND: We present the largest single-center study to date of surgical and quality-of-life outcomes among patients treated with laparoscopic antireflux surgery for reflux-associated chronic cough. Extraesophageal manifestations of chronic gastroesophageal reflux are increasingly recognized, among which chronic cough may substantially compromise patient quality of life. Although the benefits of antireflux surgery are well documented in patients with typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, less is known about the short-term impact of antireflux surgery on associated chronic cough. METHODS: Review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease was conducted, identifying individuals who underwent laparoscopic antireflux surgery between February 2012 and July 2018. Inclusion criteria consisted of identifying manifestations of chronic cough in patients diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease as assessed by preoperative survey in addition to the physiologic diagnosis of pathologic reflux. Patient quality of life was analyzed up to 3 years postoperatively using 4 validated survey instruments: the Reflux Symptom Index, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life, Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Quality of Life, and Swallowing Quality of Life. RESULTS: We identified 232 patients (47 men, 185 women) with symptomatic chronic cough among their manifestations of underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease. Mean age, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were 61.7 years, 28.9 kg/m2, and 2, respectively. We observed no 30-day wound-related complications, 17 patients (7.3%) experienced nonwound-related complications, and 2 patients (0.9%) required reoperation. Patients reported significant improvements in chronic cough and other manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease during an average of almost 3 years (Reflux Symptom Index -66%, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life -85%, Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Quality of Life -75%, and Swallowing Quality of Life +29%). Complete resolution of chronic cough was observed in 77% of respondents at follow-up, and 71% of postlaparoscopic antireflux surgery patients stopped antireflux medications. Symptom control was accompanied with a high rate of postoperative satisfaction among 71% patients at latest follow-up. CONCLUSION: Chronic cough associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease after a thorough, objective medical workup can be expected to have an excellent rate of resolution and quality-of-life outcomes after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. A high-volume practice, objective documentation of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and a multidisciplinary approach are key in achieving optimal outcomes.

The trend toward minimally invasive complex abdominal wall reconstruction: is it worth it?

BACKGROUND: Open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) was previously one of the only methods available to treat complex ventral hernias. We set out to identify the impact of laparoscopy and robotics on our AWR program by performing an economic analysis before and after the institution of minimally invasive AWR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed inpatient hospital costs and economic factors for a consecutive series of 104 AWR cases that utilized separation of components technique (57 open, 38 laparoscopic, 9 robotic). Patients were placed into two groups by date of procedure. Group 1 (Pre MIS) was July 2012-June 2015 which included 52 open cases. Group 2 (Post MIS) was July 2015-August 2016 which included 52 cases (5 open, 38 laparoscopic, 9 robotic). RESULTS: A total of 104 patients (52 G1 vs. 52 G2) with mean age (54.2 vs. 54.1 years, p = 0.960), BMI (34.7 vs. 32.1 kg/m2, p = 0.059), and ASA score (2.5 vs. 2.3, p = 0.232) were included in this review. Total length of stay (LOS) was significantly shorter for patients in the Post MIS group (5.3 vs. 1.4 days, p < 0.001). Although operating room (OR) supply costs were $1705 higher for the Post MIS group (p = 0.149), total hospital costs were $8628 less when compared to the Pre MIS group (p < 0.001). Multiple linear regressions identified increased BMI (p = 0.021), longer OR times (p = 0.003), and LOS (p < 0.001) as predictors of higher total costs. Factors that were predictive of longer LOS included older patients (p = 0.003) and patients with larger defect areas (p = 0.004). MIS was predictive of shorter hospital stays (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in operating room supply costs, transition to performing MIS AWR in cases that were previously done through an open approach decreased LOS and translated into significant overall total cost savings.

Operative Outcomes after Open Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Retromuscular Mesh Fixation Using Fibrin Glue versus Transfascial Sutures.

Ideal fixation techniques have not been fully elucidated at the time of complex open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). We compared operative outcomes and quality of life with retromuscular mesh fixation using fibrin glue (FG) versus transfascial sutures (TS). Retrospective review identified complex hernia patients who underwent open AWR with mesh from November 2012 through April 2016. Multivariate analysis examined postoperative outcomes between groups. Quality of life was assessed using the Carolinas Comfort Scale. Seventy-five patients (18 FG vs 57 TS) with mean age (54.3 vs 53.9 years, P = 0.914), body mass index (35.8 vs 34.7 kg/m2, P = 0.623) and American Society of Anesthesiologist score (2.6 vs 2.5, P = 0.617) were reviewed. No differences in wound (P = 0.072) and nonwound (P = 0.639) related complications were noted between groups. Risk of reoperations (P = 0.275) and 30-day readmissions (P = 0.137) were also comparable. The TS group was twelve times more likely to report pain at six-month follow-up compared with FG (12.29 OR, 95 per cent confidence interval 1.26-120.35, P = 0.031). No hernia recurrences were noted in either group at a mean follow-up of 390 ± 330 days. The use of FG to secure mesh in the retromuscular space during complex open AWR may be a safe alternative to penetrating transfascial fixation with potential to reduce chronic pain.

Patients are well served by Collis gastroplasty when indicated.

BACKGROUND: Debate persists over the impact of Collis gastroplasty (CG) on outcomes after anti reflux surgery. This study analyzed operative and quality of life (QOL) outcomes from one of the largest series of laparoscopic anti reflux surgery (LARS) with CG reported to date. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to compare outcomes between patients undergoing LARS with CG versus without CG at two large centers with expertise in foregut surgery from October 2004-December 2011 and July 2012-September 2016. Demographic, perioperative, and QOL data were reviewed. Four validated surveys were used for QOL outcomes: reflux symptom index (RSI), gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related QOL (GERD-HRQL), laryngopharyngeal reflux health-related QOL (LPR-HRQL), and swallowing QOL (SWAL-QL). RESULTS: 480 patients consisted of 149 Collis vs 331 non-Collis with mean age of 66.3 vs 58.9 years (P ≤ .001), BMI of 28.6 vs 29.7 (P = .040) and ASA score of 2.4 vs 2.2 (P = .005) were included. Collis patients underwent longer duration operations (133.2 mins vs 94.2; P ≤ .001) with greater duration of hospital stay (3.1 vs 1.8; P ≤ .001). Thirty-day readmission and reoperation rates were equivalent between the two groups. Wound and non-wound related complications were also comparable. After mean 12 month follow up, QOL assessment revealed significant improvements for all patients post-surgery with comparable results between Collis and non-Collis patients. Furthermore, CG did not contribute to post-operative dysphagia, reflux, or a significant leak rate. CONCLUSION: Patients who require a CG to address a true short esophagus during LARS have comparable operative and QOL benefits as non-Collis patients without added morbidity or mortality.

Primary versus redo paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair: a comparative analysis of operative and quality of life outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: We compared patient outcomes after initial versus redo paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair at two high-volume GI surgery centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review analyzed one-year outcomes after initial versus redo elective laparoscopic PEH repair, including wound/non-wound-related complications and quality of life benefits as measured by four validated instruments: reflux symptom index, gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related, laryngopharyngeal reflux, and swallowing scales. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventeen patients (271 initial and 46 redo) underwent laparoscopic PEH repair. Groups differed with respect to age (64.6 vs. 60.2 years, p = 0.027), but were comparable in gender (71.2 vs. 67.4% female, p = 0.596), BMI (29.0 vs. 27.6 kg/m2, p = 0.100), and ASA score (2.3 vs. 2.3 p = 0.666). Redo surgery was more complex with longer mean operative times (112.2 vs. 139.1 min, p < 0.001). Groups did not statistically differ with respect to 30-day wound (0.7 vs. 2.2%, p = 0.363) and non-wound (6.0 vs. 8.7%, p = 0.511)-related complications. After one year of follow-up, QOL analysis revealed that initial versus redo groups significantly benefited from operative intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although redo PEH repairs are more complex, patients enjoy equivalent operative outcomes and quality of life benefits compared to initial surgery lending support to the significance of surgeon experience and high-volume centers in optimizing outcomes.

Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Release, a Novel Minimally Invasive Approach to Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Open abdominal wall reconstruction is used to repair complex abdominal wall hernias with contour abnormalities. We present a novel minimally invasive approach to address these types of defects, completed entirely laparoscopically. METHODS: Three patients underwent laparoscopic abdominal wall reconstruction for complex hernias in August and September of 2015. Operative approach consisted of laparoscopic transversus abdominis components separation, defect closure, and wide mesh implantation in the retromuscular space. RESULTS: Two males and one female with mean age and body mass index of 70 and 30.1, respectively, underwent a mean operation room time of 329 minutes. Estimated blood loss and length of stay were 91.7 cc and 4.7 days, respectively. No subcutaneous flaps were raised avoiding the need for subcutaneous drains. There were no perioperative complications. All of the subfascial drains were removed prior to patient discharge. On initial follow-up visit at 3 weeks, there was no evidence of wound complications, bulging, or hernia recurrences. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic abdominal wall reconstruction with transversus abdominis release is a unique and feasible approach to complex abdominal wall defects with the potential to reduce pain, facilitate recovery, and decrease length of hospital stay for patients.

"See one, do one, teach one": inadequacies of current methods to train surgeons in hernia repair.

INTRODUCTION: Residency/fellowship training in hernia repair is still too widely characterized by the "see one, do one, teach one" model. The goal of this study was to perform a needs assessment focused on surgical training to guide the creation of a curriculum by SAGES intended to improve the care of hernia patients. METHODS: Using mixed methods (interviews and online survey), the SAGES hernia task force (HTF) conducted a study asking subjects about their perceived deficits in resident training to care for hernia patients, preferred training topics about hernias, ideal learning modalities, and education development. RESULTS: Participants included 18 of 24 HTF members, 27 chief residents and fellows, and 31 surgical residents. HTF members agreed that residency exposes trainees to a wide spectrum of hernia repairs by a variety of surgeons. They cited outdated materials, techniques, and paucity of feedback. Additionally, they identified the "see one, do one, teach one" method of training as prevalent and clearly inadequate. The topics least addressed were system-based approach to hernia care (46 %) and patient outcomes (62 %). Training topics residents considered well covered during residency were: preoperative and intraoperative decision-making (90 %), complications (94 %), and technical approach for repairs (98 %). Instructional methods used in residency include assisted/supervised surgery (96 %), Web-based learning (24 %), and simulation (30 %). Residents' preferred learning methods included simulation (82 %), Web-based training (61 %), hands-on laboratory (54 %), and videos (47 %), in addition to supervised surgery. Trainees reported their most desired training topics as basic techniques for inguinal and ventral hernia repairs (41 %) versus advanced technical training (68 %), which mirrored those reported by attending surgeons, 36 % and 71 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was a consensus among HTF members and surgical trainees that a comprehensive, dynamic, and flexible educational program employing various media to address contemporary key deficits in the care of hernia patients would be welcomed by surgeons.