Aerobic exercise improves cognition and motor function poststroke.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive deficits impede stroke recovery. Aerobic exercise (AEX) improves cognitive executive function (EF) processes in healthy individuals, although the learning benefits after stroke are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To understand AEX-induced improvements in EF, motor learning, and mobility poststroke. METHODS: Following cardiorespiratory testing, 38 chronic stroke survivors were randomized to 2 different groups that exercised 3 times a week (45-minute sessions) for 8 weeks. The AEX group (n = 19; 9 women; 10 men; 64.10 +/- 12.30 years) performed progressive resistive stationary bicycle training at 70% maximal heart rate, whereas the Stretching Exercise (SE) group (n = 19; 12 women; 7 men; 58.96 +/- 14.68 years) performed stretches at home. Between-group comparisons were performed on the change in performance at "Post" and "Retention" (8 weeks later) for neuropsychological and motor function measures. RESULTS: VO(2)max significantly improved at Post with AEX (P = .04). AEX also improved motor learning in the less-affected hand, with large effect sizes (Cohen's d calculation). Specifically, AEX significantly improved information processing speed on the serial reaction time task (SRTT; ie, "procedural motor learning") compared with the SE group at Post (P = .024), but not at Retention. Also, at Post (P = .038), AEX significantly improved predictive force accuracy for a precision grip task requiring attention and conditional motor learning of visual cues. Ambulation and sit-to-stand transfers were significantly faster in the AEX group at Post (P = .038), with balance control significantly improved at Retention (P = .041). EF measurements were not significantly different for the AEX group. CONCLUSION: AEX improved mobility and selected cognitive domains related to motor learning, which enhances sensorimotor control after stroke.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves severe hand dysfunction for individuals with chronic stroke: a pilot study.

Restoring hand function is difficult post-stroke. We sought to determine if applying neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) was beneficial for reducing severe hand impairments. Subjects with chronic stroke (N=8; 3 Fe, 5 M; 58.3 +/- 6.9 y/o) received 10 sessions of NMES using two different methods applied in a counterbalanced order. In one intervention, we applied NMES (active) in a novel fashion using multiple stimulators on the forearm flexors and extensors to assist subjects with grasping and releasing a tennis ball. In the other intervention, the NMES ('passive') stimulated repeated wrist extension and flexion. Motor performance was assessed prior to and immediately following the interventions and at retention. Upper extremity (UE) Fugl-Myer scores significantly improved (p < 0.002) immediately following either intervention. Significant improvement was also observed in the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale (MASS) (p < 0.03), immediately following intervention, primarily due to the NMESpassive treatment (p < 0.034). Subjects performed grasping tasks significantly faster (p < 0.0433) following interventions, with performance speeds on dexterous manipulation increasing approximately 10% for NMESactive immediately following intervention, compared to only 0.1% improvement following NMESpassive. Generally, improvements in motor speed remained 10 days following NMESactive intervention, although slightly diminished. In conclusion, severe hand impairment was reduced after a short duration of NMES therapy in this pilot data set for individuals with chronic stroke. NMES-assisted grasping trended towards greater functional benefit than traditional NMES-activation of wrist flexors/extensors.