Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Turk J Obstet Gynecol ; 21(3): 208-218, 2024 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39228251

RESUMEN

To evaluate the effect of growth hormone (GH) supplementation on outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for women with poor ovarian response. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained through search in several databases including PubMed, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Outcome measures included live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, cycle cancelation rate, number of retrieved oocytes, number of transferred embryos, total dose of gonadotropin, duration of gonadotropin treatment, and peak estradiol level. Additionally, a meta-regression analysis was carried out to determine any potential linear relationships between these outcomes and IVF success. After analyzing 18 RCTs comprising of 1870 patients, the study found that GH supplementation improved the number of retrieved oocytes [standardized mean difference (SMD), 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-1.00] and transferred embryos group (SMD, 0.80, 95% CI, 0.39, 1.21) as well as peak E2 level (SMD, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.59, 1.81). While reduced the total dose and duration of gonadotropin treatment (SMD, -0.82, 95% CI, -1.25, -0.39, and SMD, -0.63, 95% CI, -1.04, -0.22, respectively). The meta-regression analysis found no linear relationship between clinical pregnancy, live birth rate, or cycle cancelation rate and the outcomes measured (p>0.1). Based on the available evidence, GH supplementation appears to improve the outcomes of IVF or ICSI in women with poor response. However, there is a need for further RCTs with larger sample sizes to determine the cost-effectiveness of adding GH to conventional protocols of IVF/ICSI for treating infertility in women with poor ovarian response.

2.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; : 102850, 2024 Sep 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39293587

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Oral Cabergoline and intravenous Calcium have the potential to prevent Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) in assisted reproductive technology by regulating the activity of the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) receptor. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of Cabergoline with intravenous Calcium versus oral Cabergoline alone on the overall rate of OHSS. METHODS: This study is a randomized clinical trial which was carried out in Milad Infertility Center affiliated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran between April 2016 and January 2018. A total of 192 patients were randomly assigned into two groups. The control group received oral Cabergoline and the intervention group received Calcium gluconate in addition to Cabergoline. A total rate of OHSS, moderate and severe OHSS were measured in both groups. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of the participants and the types of drugs used showed homogeneity between the intervention and control groups (p>.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the number of the follicle, oocytes obtained, metaphase II oocytes, the number of embryos, and the rate of fertilization. Regarding the incidence of OHSS, 26.2% of participants in the control group experienced OHSS, while the occurrence rate was 15.7% in the intervention group (P =.401). The incidence of severe OHSS in the control group and intervention group was 7.1% and 3.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intravenous injection of Calcium gluconate can be effective in preventing Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome.

3.
Int J Fertil Steril ; 18(Suppl 1): 10-16, 2024 Jul 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39033365

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Blastocyst stage transfer appears to improve pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the pregnancy results between fresh cycle blastocyst stage embryo transfer and cleavage stage embryo transfer in patients who undergo intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomised clinical trial study was conducted at the Infertility Research Centre of Milad Hospital in Mashhad, Iran from 2018 to 2020 on 240 infertile women who presented for their first ICSI procedure. These patients were assigned to receive either cleavage embryo transfer (n=112) or blastocyst stage transfer (n=107). Pregnancy outcomes were measured in both groups. RESULTS: There were no differences regarding age, body mass index (BMI), serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), duration of infertility, and aetiology of infertility between the groups (P>0.05). There were more follicles, total oocytes, and metaphase II (M2) oocytes in the blastocyst stage group. Considerably more cleavage stage embryos were transferred compared to the number of transferred blastocysts (P=0.001). The blastocyst group had more vitrified embryos than the cleavage group (P=0.000). The rates of implantation (P=0.332), chemical pregnancy (P=0.165), clinical pregnancy (P=0.694), and live births (P=0.727) were higher in the blastocyst group, but they were not significantly different. The rate of abortion was also not significantly higher in the blastocyst group (P=0.296). CONCLUSION: Blastocysts transferred in the fresh cycle of an ICSI procedure may be more advantageous compared to cleavage stage embryo transfer (registration number: IRCT20181030041503N1).

4.
BMC Genom Data ; 25(1): 13, 2024 Jan 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38297203

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In this study, we aim to investigate the association between BRCA1/2 mutation and uterine cancer incidence. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We systematically searched three databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar up to August 2023; and reviewed 23 cohorts and cross-sectional studies to explore the association between BRCA1/2 mutations and uterine cancer incidence. RESULTS: This systematic review comprised a total of 21 cohort studies and 2 cross-sectional studies after the screening process. According to meta-analysis the prevalence of the BRCA1/2 gene in patients with uterine cancer was 0.02 (95%CI = [0.01,0.03], P < 0.01, I2 = 94.82%) CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis investigates a 2% prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutation in patients with uterine cancer. Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations might be more conscious of uterine malignancies.


Asunto(s)
Proteína BRCA1 , Proteína BRCA2 , Neoplasias Uterinas , Femenino , Humanos , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Estudios Transversales , Mutación , Neoplasias Uterinas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Uterinas/genética , Neoplasias Uterinas/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA