North Carolina College of Emergency Physicians' Guidance Document on Emergency Medical Services.

The North Carolina College of Emergency Physicians (NCCEP) Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Committee uses an evidence-based approach in writing its protocols and procedures. The most recent revision of the NCCEP document, which was started in late 2010, lasted for more than 1 year and utilized committee members from across the state. Four meetings were held at locations across North Carolina. In addition, 2 surveys were sent to get input from EMS providers. Since 2010, the document has been updated on an ongoing basis, aligning it with the latest evidence-based medicine.

Retrospective Validation of a Protocol to Limit Unnecessary Transport of Assisted-living Residents Who Fall.

Abstract Objective. Emergency medical services (EMS) often transports patients who suffer simple falls in assisted-living facilities (ALFs). An EMS "falls protocol" could avoid unnecessary transport for many of these patients, while ensuring that patients with time-sensitive conditions are transported. Our objective was to retrospectively validate an EMS protocol to assist decision making regarding the transport of ALF patients with simple falls. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients transported to the emergency department from July 2010 to June 2011 for a chief complaint of "fall" within a subset of ALFs served by a specific primary care group in our urban EMS system (population 900,000). The primary outcome, "time-sensitive intervention" (TSI), was met by patients who had wound repair or fracture, admission to the ICU, OR, or cardiac cath lab, death during hospitalization, or readmission within 48 hours. EMS and primary care physicians developed an EMS protocol, a priori and by consensus, to require transport for patients needing TSI. The protocol utilizes screening criteria, including history and exam findings, to recommend transport versus nontransport with close primary care follow-up. The EMS protocol was retrospectively applied to determine which patients required transport. Protocol performance was estimated using sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV). Results. Of 653 patients transported across 30 facilities, 644 had sufficient data. Of these, 197 (31%) met the primary outcome. Most patients who required TSI had fracture (73) or wound repair (92). The EMS protocol identified 190 patients requiring TSI, for a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI: 93-98%), specificity of 54% (95% CI: 50-59%), and NPV of 97% (95% CI: 94-99%). Of 7 patients with false negatives, 3 were readmitted (and redischarged) after another fall, 3 sustained hip fractures that were surgically repaired, and 1 had a lumbar compression fracture and was discharged. Conclusions. In this cohort, two-thirds of patients with falls in ALFs did not require TSI. An EMS protocol may have sufficient sensitivity to safely allow for nontransport of these patients with falls in ALFs. Prospective validation of the protocol is necessary to test this hypothesis.

Improved out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival after the sequential implementation of 2005 AHA guidelines for compressions, ventilations, and induced hypothermia: the Wake County experience.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We assess survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest after community-wide implementation of 2005 American Heart Association guidelines. METHODS: This was an observational multiphase before-after cohort in an urban/suburban community (population 840,000) with existing advanced life support. Included were all adults treated for cardiac arrest by emergency responders. Excluded were patients younger than 16 years and trauma patients. Intervention phases in months were baseline 16; phase 1, new cardiopulmonary resuscitation 12; phase 2, impedance threshold device 6; and phase 3, full implementation including out-of-hospital-induced hypothermia 12. Primary outcome was survival to discharge. Other survival and neurologic outcomes were compared between study phases, and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for survival by phase were determined by multivariate regression. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred sixty-five cardiac arrest patients were eligible for inclusion: baseline n=425, phase 1 n=369, phase 2 n=161, phase 3 n=410. Across phases, patients had similar demographic, clinical, and emergency medical services characteristics. Overall and witnessed ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia survival improved throughout the study phases: respectively, baseline 4.2% and 13.8%, phase 1 7.3% and 23.9%, phase 2 8.1% and 34.6%, and phase 3 11.5% and 40.8%. The absolute increase for overall survival from baseline to full implementation was 7.3% (95% CI 3.7% to 10.9%); witnessed ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia survival was 27.0% (95% CI 13.6% to 40.4%), representing an additional 25 lives saved annually in this community. CONCLUSION: In the context of a community-wide focus on resuscitation, the sequential implementation of 2005 American Heart Association guidelines for compressions, ventilations, and induced hypothermia significantly improved survival after cardiac arrest. Further study is required to clarify the relative contribution of each intervention to improved survival outcomes.

Low acuity EMS dispatch criteria can reliably identify patients without high-acuity illness or injury.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study evaluated the appropriateness of requests assigned the alpha determinant at the time of dispatch by Emergency Medical Dispatchers using the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS). METHODS: The primary end point was the proportion of EMS calls assigned the alpha dispatch determinant that resulted in a high-acuity patient encounter. Patient care reports from January 1 to June 30, 2004, were eligible for inclusion; reports with known errors in data entry or those that were not the result of caller interrogation via the 9-1-1 emergency medical dispatch center (EMDC) were excluded. High-acuity patients were defined as those who met trauma triage criteria or received treatment for acute coronary syndrome, respiratory distress, altered mental status, acute stroke, allergic reaction, or abnormal vital signs. Secondary end points included call-processing time, the proportion of included patients who were transported emergently to hospital, and the adherence of the EMDC to National Academy of Emergency Dispatch (NAED) quality assurance guidelines. RESULTS: There were 23,939 dispatches; 2,703 were recorded as alpha dispatches in the electronic patient care report (ECR), of which 582 were excluded. Twenty-one of 2,121 calls (<1%) meeting inclusion criteria met high-acuity criteria and were considered as inappropriate alpha dispatches. Fourteen of 2,121 (<1%) were transported emergently to the hospital, eight of whom also met the high-acuity criteria. The call-processing time at the 90th percentile was 2 minutes and 29 seconds. The EMDC demonstrated 99% compliance with NAED quality assurance standards. CONCLUSION: The use of standard MPDS protocols can successfully identify patients who do not demonstrate high-acuity illness or injury more than 99% of the time.