Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 67(1): 107-113, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35060659

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The use of traditional birth attendants (TBAs) in low- and middle-income countries remains controversial. The aim of this secondary analysis was to observe factors associated with visiting a TBA in addition to a skilled nurse for antepartum care and how this additional care was associated with birth characteristics and outcomes. METHODS: The study included a convenience sample of women living in Southwestern Guatemala enrolled in a community nursing program between October 1, 2018, and December 3, 2019. This analysis describes the sociodemographic characteristics, antepartum care, birth outcomes, and postpartum behaviors of women who received antepartum care with skilled nurses only compared with women who received antepartum care with skilled nurses and a TBA. RESULTS: Of the 316 enrollees, 259 had given birth and completed their postpartum visit at the time of analysis. Three women were excluded because of missing data. The majority of women in the study sample reported visiting a TBA over the course of their pregnancies (80.9%). Women who saw a TBA in addition to the nurse were similar to the comparator sample except that they were almost 3 times more likely to have 8 or more prenatal contacts with the nurse. In separate multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for number of prenatal visits, women who saw a TBA in addition to nurses had a reduced likelihood of cesarean birth, increased likelihood of birth with a TBA, and increased likelihood of breastfeeding within one hour of birth compared with women who only received antenatal care from nurses. Patient-reported adverse outcomes were not included in the analysis because of low prevalence and concern about data quality and missing data. DISCUSSION: Among a convenience sample of women in the Trifinio community in rural Guatemala, a large proportion of women continued to seek the care of a TBA in pregnancy while using a skilled nursing program for antenatal care. Intentionally integrating the TBA into the maternity care workforce may be beneficial for improving pregnancy care quality measures.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Materna , Partería , Femenino , Guatemala , Humanos , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Población Rural
3.
Matern Child Health J ; 24(8): 1038-1046, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32405739

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This analysis describes the interpregnancy interval (time from livebirth to subsequent conception) in a convenience sample of women living in Southwest Guatemala and the association of antepartum characteristics and postpartum outcomes with a short interpregnancy interval (< 24 months). METHODS: This is an observational study of a convenience sample of women enrolled in the Madres Sanas community antenatal/postnatal nursing program supported by the Center for Human Development in Southwest Trifinio, Guatemala, between October 1, 2018 and October 1, 2019. We observed the distribution of interpregnancy intervals among the population of women with a reported date of last live birth, and used bivariate comparisons to compare women with a short interpregnancy interval (< 24 months) to those with an optimal interval ([Formula: see text] 24 months) by antepartum, obstetric and delivery, and postpartum outcomes. RESULTS: 171 parous women enrolled in the Madres Sanas program between October 1, 2018 and October 1, 2019, and reported the date of their last live birth. One hundred-forty-one (82.5%) women delivered and 130 of those women (92.2%) were seen for their 40-day postpartum visit. The mean interval was 37.1 months with a 22.1-month standard deviation. The median interval was 33.7 months with an interquartile range of 19.6-49.5 months. Among these women, 113 (66.1%) the interpregnancy interval was at least 24 months. The only covariate of all sociodemographic, obstetric and antepartum, delivery, and postpartum characteristics that differed between women who achieved an interval ([Formula: see text] 24 months) compared to those that did not (< 24 months), was age (median 22.9, interquartile range (IQR) [19.1,27.0] vs median 24.8, IQR [21.6,27.9], respectively, p = 0.006). A regression model found that with each increasing year of age, the interpregnancy interval increases by 1.08 months, p = 0.025. CONCLUSION: Among parous women, two-thirds of women space pregnancies at least 24 months. Older women were more likely to have a longer interval between live births.


Asunto(s)
Intervalo entre Nacimientos/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Rural/tendencias , Adulto , Correlación de Datos , Femenino , Guatemala/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Factores de Riesgo , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...