Surgical Treatment of Craniopharyngiomas in Adults: Comparison between Primary Surgery and Surgery for Recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have investigated the differences in outcomes between primary and repeat surgery for a craniopharyngioma in adults. As a result, a treatment concept for adult patients with a craniopharyngioma has not yet been established. The present study aimed to retrospectively analyze adult patients with craniopharyngioma to compare surgical outcomes between primary surgery and surgery for recurrence. METHODS: The demographic and clinical data of 68 adult patients with craniopharyngioma who had primary surgery (n=50) or surgery for recurrence (n=18) were retrospectively analyzed. In addition, the patients were followed up for an average of 38.6 months (range: 1-133 months). RESULTS: The cohorts of patients undergoing primary surgery or repeat surgery did not differ preoperatively in terms of demographic data, or radiological tumor features. However, patients with recurrent craniopharyngioma had significantly more pituitary hormone deficits and hypothalamo-pituitary disorders before surgery compared with patients with newly diagnosed craniopharyngioma. The success rate of complete resection in primary surgery was 53.2%. Even after repeat surgery, a satisfactory rate of complete resection of 35.7% was achieved. Operative morbidity was increased neither in patients with repeat surgery compared with those with primary surgery (postoperative bleeding P=0.560; meningitis P=1.000; CSF leak P=0.666; visual disturbance P=0.717) nor in patients with complete resection compared with those with partial resection. We found no difference in recurrence-free survival between initial surgery and repeat surgery (P=0.733). The recurrence rate was significantly lower after complete resection (6.9%) than after partial resection (47.8%; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Attempting complete resection is justified for not only those with newly diagnosed craniopharyngioma but also for those with recurrent craniopharyngioma. However, the surgeon must settle for less than total resection if postoperative morbidity is anticipated.

Surgical management of primary and secondary pilocytic astrocytoma of the cerebellopontine angle (in adults and children) and review of the literature.

Glial tumors in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) are uncommon and comprise less than 1% of CPA tumors. We present four cases of pilocytic astrocytoma of the CPA (PA-CPA) that were treated in our department. Patients who received surgical treatment for PA-CPA from January 2004 to December 2019 were identified by a computer search of their files from the Department of Neurosurgery, Tübingen. Patients were evaluated for initial symptoms, pre- and postoperative facial nerve function and cochlear function, complications, and recurrence rate by reviewing surgical reports, patient documents, neuroradiological data, and follow-up data. We identified four patients with PA-CPA out of about 1500 CPA lesions (~ 0.2%), which were surgically treated in our department in the last 16 years. Of the four patients, three were male, and one was a female patient. Two were adults, and two were children (mean age 35 years). A gross total resection was achieved in three cases, and a subtotal resection was attained in one case. Two patients experienced a moderate facial palsy immediately after surgery (House-Brackmann grade III). In all cases, the facial function was intact or good (House-Brackmann grades I-II) at the long-term follow-up (mean follow-up 4.5 years). No mortality occurred during follow-up. Three of the patients had no recurrence at the latest follow-up (mean latest follow-up 4.5 years), while one patient had a slight recurrence. PA-CPA can be safely removed, and most complications immediately after surgery resolve in the long-term follow-up.

Endoscopic assistance in retrosigmoid transmeatal approach to intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas - An alternative for middle fossa approach. Technical note.

BACKGROUND: Complete surgical removal of intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas with nerve VII and VIII sparing and without worsening patient's status is challenging. Also the choice of an optimal surgical technique, which is usually limited to selection between retrosigmoid transmeatal (RT) and middle fossa (MF) approach, can be a challenge. Although many previous studies documented superiority of RT to MF approach and vice versa, still no consensus has been reached regarding an optimal approach to intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas. In this technical note, we present RT approach with an endoscopic assistance and highlight its advantages over MF approach in surgical management of pure intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas. METHOD: RT approach with an endoscopic assistance is presented as an optimal surgical treatment for intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas, and its advantages are compared to those offered by MF approach. RESULTS: Under an endoscopic guidance, we found a residual tumor in the fundus of the inner acoustic canal and performed its gross total resection. CONCLUSIONS: RT approach is an excellent technique suitable for safe radical surgical treatment of T1 vestibular schwannomas; this technique is associated with lower morbidity risk than MF approach.