RESUMEN
Prospective evaluation was performed in 60 in-patients, carriers of ascites of different etiologies, analyzing the validity of the parameters depending on protein and albumin dosage, both in the ascitic serum and fluid, for the discrimination of possible etiological causes of ascites, including in these parameters Protein Concentration in the Ascitic Fluid, the Serum-Ascites Albumin Gradient, the Protein Ascites/Serum Ratio, and the Albumin Concentration in the ascitic fluid. Average age was 46.9 +/- 19.6, all female; 21 cases were associated with Chronic Hepatic Disease, 14 to Tuberculosis, 11 to Malignant Neoplasia, 7 to Nephrotic syndrome, 4 to Congestive Heart Failure, 2 to Collagen Disease, and 1 to a severe Malnutrition case. The evaluation parameters correlate with the oncotic and hydrostatic pressures of the Starling Law, on the basis of what they could be compared with, demonstrating that their sensitivity levels and their specificity may be used as positive or negative predictive values in the discriminative evaluations of ascites in relation to its probable etiological causes. Even though the Serum-Ascites Albumin Gradient may be useful in the separation of ascites cases with portal hypertension, it is also useful for classifying exudates and transudates. However, the other parameters must not be excluded for the evaluation of those cases, aiming at establishing whether the peritoneum has been affected and hence the terms transudates and exudates should still be used on the basis of the high sensitivity value and specificity of theses tests, which do not differentiate them statistically from the Serum-Ascites Albumin Gradient. Using the cut-off points for each parameter, the most adequate for our population would be 1.5 gr/dl for Albumin and 2.5 gr/dl for protein, with the additional lower cost benefit.
