Percepción de la población respecto a los riesgos asociados a los estudios de imágenes / Public perception of radiation-related risks of imaging studies

Introduction: In recent years, diagnostic procedures using ionizing radiation have achieved a great boom, although patients are often unaware of the risks they involve. Objectives: To know how is ionizing radiation perceived by the population attending Clínica Dávila, Department of Radiology (DRCD).Methods: A voluntary and anonymous survey was conducted on patients and / or companions. Results: A total of 330 adults were surveyed. An 57 percent had completed higher education, whereas 7.9 percent had only finished elementary schooling; 78.8 percent had undergone three or more imaging tests. CT examination was considered to pose the highest levels of risk (42.4 percent), followed by Ultrasonography (30.6 percent). Discussion: The survey group was made up of young adults, mostly college graduates, and predominantly female. Surprinsingly enough, considering that obstetric sonography is commonly used during pregnancy, US was ranked second in terms of associated health risks. There is an evident interest in the subject, since 90 percent of responders would like to receive further information.

Introducción: Los procedimientos diagnósticos que usan radiación ionizante están en auge, aunque conllevan riesgos muchas veces desconocidos por los pacientes. Objetivos: Conocer la percepción de la población que acude al Departamento de Radiología de Clínica Dávila (DRCD) sobre la radiación. Material y métodos: Se aplicó una encuesta voluntaria y anónima a pacientes y/o acompañantes. Resultados: Se encuestó a 330 adultos. El 57 por ciento poseía estudios superiores y 7,9 por ciento sólo estudios básicos. El 78,8 por ciento se había efectuado 3 o más estudios radiológicos. La TC fue el examen considerado con mayor riesgo (42,4 por ciento), luego la US (30,6 por ciento). Discusión: El grupo encuestado fueron adultos jóvenes, con estudios superiores en su mayoría y con predominio femenino. Sorprendió que la US se considerara como el segundo examen de mayor riesgo, ya que las mujeres poseen mayor contacto con este estudio durante el embarazo. Hay interés en el tema, porque el 90 por ciento desea recibir información.

[Weight maintenance in humans. Could it mimic calorie restriction of animal models?]. / La mantención de peso en humanos podría ser equivalente a la restricción calórica de los modelos animales?

BACKGROUND: Energy restriction (ER) extends life span in animals, by decreasing oxidative stress. AIM: To compare adiposity, metabolic variables and DNA oxidative damage, among adults, reporting a constant body weight (weight maintainers), versus those reporting a progressive increase (weight gainers). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Clinical history, dietary recall, anthropometric measures, abdominal CT scan and fasting blood samples (to measure lipoproteins, glucose and insulin), were obtained in 44 males. These subjects were classified as weight maintainers if they had a change in weight of 3 kg or less in the last 10 years, or weight gainers, if they had a weight increment of more than 6 kg, in the same lapse. Oxidative damage was assessed by 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), in DNA extracted from circulating lymphocytes, in 5 weight maintainers, 8 weight gainers and 5 healthy elders. RESULTS: Energy Intake was 18% higher in weight gainers (p <0.01). Adiposity and central fat were higher among weight gainers (p <0.01). Abdominal fat correlated with serum lipoproteins, glucose and insulin sensitivity, assessed by the Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA). 8-OHdG levels did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of weight change based on the clinical history correlates with actual body composition, thus it may be a reliable indicator of long term energy Intake. This method could be comparable to weight clamp models employed in animals to study aging.