Donor audits in deceased organ donation: a scoping review.

PURPOSE: We sought to collate and summarize existing literature on donor audits (DA) and how they have been used to guide deceased organ donation and transplantation system performance and quality assurance. SOURCE: We searched MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science supplemented by Google to identify grey literature on 6 May 2022, to locate studies in English, French, and Spanish. The data were screened, extracted, and analyzed independently by two reviewers. We grouped the results into five categories: 1) motivation for DA, 2) DA methodology, 3) potential and actual donors, 4) missed donation opportunities, and 5) quality improvement. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The search yielded 2,416 unique publications and 52 were included in this review. Most studies were from the UK (n = 13) and published between 2001 and 2006 (n = 15). The methodologies described for DA were diverse. Our findings showed that the primary motivation for conducting DA was to identify potential donors and the number of potential deceased organ donors is significantly higher than the number of actual donors. Among retrieved studies, the proportion of donation opportunities following neurologic determination of death was 95/222 (43%) compared with 25/181 (14%) for donation after cardiocirculatory death (DCD), suggesting that the missed donation rate is higher for DCD. CONCLUSION: Donor audits help identify missed donation opportunities along the deceased donation pathway and can help support the evaluation of quality improvement initiatives.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Nous avons cherché à colliger et résumer la documentation existante sur les vérifications des donneuses et donneurs (VD) et la façon dont elles ont été utilisées pour guider la performance et l'assurance de la qualité des systèmes de don et de transplantation d'organes de personnes décédées. SOURCES: Le 6 mai 2022, nous avons effectué des recherches dans MEDLINE, CINAHL et Web of Science, complétées par des recherches sur Google afin d'identifier la littérature grise et de localiser les études en anglais, en français et en espagnol. Les données ont été examinées, extraites et analysées de manière indépendants par deux personnes. Nous avons regroupé les résultats en cinq catégories : 1) motivation pour la VD, 2) méthodologie de la VD, 3) donneurs et donneuses potentiel·les et réel·les, 4) occasions de dons manquées, et 5) amélioration de la qualité. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Notre recherche nous a permis de découvrir 2416 publications uniques et 52 ont été incluses dans cette revue. La plupart des études provenaient du Royaume-Uni (n = 13) et avaient été publiées entre 2001 et 2006 (n = 15). Les méthodologies décrites pour la vérification des donneuses et donneurs étaient diverses. Nos résultats ont montré que la principale motivation pour mener une VD était d'identifier des donneurs et donneuses potentiel·les et que le nombre potentiel de donneuses et donneurs d'organes après le décès était significativement plus élevé que le nombre réel. Parmi les études retenues, la proportion d'occasions de dons après un diagnostic de décès neurologique était de 95/222 (43 %), comparativement à 25/181 (14 %) pour le don après un décès cardiocirculatoire (DDC), ce qui suggère que le taux de dons manqués est plus élevé pour le DDC. CONCLUSION: Les vérifications des donneuses et donneurs aident à identifier les occasions de dons manquées le long du parcours de don après un décès et peuvent aider à soutenir l'évaluation des initiatives d'amélioration de la qualité.

Canadian organ donation organizations' donor audit processes: an environmental scan.

PURPOSE: Deceased donor audits (DAs) allow organ donation and transplantation systems to measure and analyze missed donation opportunities (MDOs). Missed donation opportunities can harm both patients/families denied the opportunity to donate and patients on transplant waitlists denied access to lifesaving organs. In Canada, there are no national standards for DAs, data analysis, nor accountability processes surrounding MDOs. Understanding DA current practice in each jurisdicton would facilitate developing a national strategy for DAs. METHOD: All provincial organ donation organizations (ODOs) were invited to participate in an environmental scan (ES) of current DA practices. The two ES phases were an electronic survey followed by semistructured interviews. We collected information about the objectives, frequency, scope, data collection methodology, resources required, definitions/metrics used, and process for reporting outcomes. RESULTS: All eleven ODOs participated in both phases of the ES (July and October 2019). The primary purposes for conducting DAs were to estimate the following: 1) donor potential (5/11, 45%); 2) system performance at the provincial level (3/11, 27%); and 3) system performance at the hospital level (3/11, 27%). Frequency of DAs varied from weekly to annually, depending on the availability of death reports, urban vs rural setting, and staffing. High variability was observed in DA methodology, donor definitions, and metrics across jurisdictions. CONCLUSION: There is significant variability across Canadian ODOs in the methodology, definitions, timeliness, data collection, and reporting of DAs. This underscores the need for a national donor audit strategy to reduce preventable harm from MDOs to patients/families at end of life and those on transplant waitlists.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les vérifications des donneurs et donneuses décédé·es permettent aux systèmes de dons et de transplantations d'organes de mesurer et d'analyser les occasions de dons manquées. Les occasions de don manquées peuvent nuire à la fois aux patient·es et aux familles qui se voient refuser la possibilité de faire un don et à la patientèle inscrite sur les listes d'attente pour une greffe qui se voit refuser l'accès à des organes vitaux. Au Canada, il n'existe pas de normes nationales pour les vérifications de donneurs et donneuses, ni pour l'analyse des données ou les processus de responsabilisation entourant les occasions de dons manquées. L'élaboration d'une stratégie nationale pour les vérifications des donneurs et donneuses serait facilitée par la compréhension des pratiques actuelles de vérification de chaque territoire. MéTHODE: Tous les organismes provinciaux de don d'organes (ODO) ont été invités à participer à une analyse environnementale des pratiques actuelles en matière de vérification des donneurs et donneuses. Les deux phases de l'analyse environnementale consistaient en un sondage électronique suivi d'entrevues semi-structurées. Nous avons recueilli des informations sur les objectifs, la fréquence, la portée, la méthodologie de collecte de données, les ressources requises, les définitions/paramètres utilisés et le processus de communication des résultats. RéSULTATS: Les onze ODO ont participé aux deux phases de l'analyse environnementale (juillet et octobre 2019). Les principaux objectifs des vérifications de donneurs et donneuses étaient d'estimer ce qui suit : 1) le potentiel de donneur ou donneuse (5/11, 45 %); 2) le rendement du système à l'échelle provinciale (3/11, 27 %); et 3) le rendement du système au niveau hospitalier (3/11, 27 %). La fréquence des vérifications variait d'une fois par semaine à une fois par année, selon la disponibilité des déclarations de décès, le milieu urbain vs rural, et la dotation en personnel. Une grande variabilité a été observée dans la méthodologie de vérification, les définitions de donneur/donneuse et les paramètres entre les territoires des ODO. CONCLUSION: Il existe une grande variabilité entre les ODO canadiens en ce qui concerne la méthodologie, les définitions, la rapidité, la collecte de données et la production de rapports sur les vérifications des donneurs et donneuses. Cela souligne la nécessité d'une stratégie nationale de vérification des donneurs et donneuses pour réduire les préjudices évitables causés par les occasions de dons manquées aux patient·es/familles en fin de vie et aux personnes sur les listes d'attente pour une transplantation.

Pharmacokinetics of Commonly Used Antimicrobials in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Adequate dosing of antimicrobials is critical to properly treat infections and limit development of resistance and adverse effects. Limited guidance exist for antimicrobial dosing adjustments in patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy, particularly in the pediatric population. A systematic review was conducted to delineate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of antimicrobials in critically ill neonates and children requiring ECMO therapy. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, Global Health and All EBM Reviews databases were queried. Grey literature was examined. All clinical studies reporting PK/PD parameters of antimicrobials in critically ill pediatric patients treated with ECMO were included, except for case reports and congress abstracts. Two independent reviewers applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Reviewers were then paired to independently extract data and evaluate the methodological quality of studies using the ROBINS-I tool and the compliance with ClinPK reporting guidelines. Patient and study characteristics, key PK/PD findings, details of ECMO circuits and co-treatments were summarized qualitatively. Broad dosing recommendations were formulated based on the available data for specific antimicrobials. RESULTS: Twenty-nine clinical studies were included; most were observational and uncontrolled. Patient characteristics and co-treatments were often missing. The effect of ECMO on PK/PD parameters of antimicrobials varied depending on the drugs and population studied. It was only possible to formulate dosing recommendations for a few antimicrobials given the paucity of data, its overall low quality and heterogeneity in reporting. CONCLUSION: Limited data exists on the PK/PD of antimicrobials during ECMO therapy in the pediatric population. Rigorously designed population PK studies are required to establish empiric dosing guidelines for antimicrobials in patients requiring this therapeutic modality. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring for antimicrobials in pediatric patients on ECMO should be encouraged to optimize dosing. TRIAL REGISTRY: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018099992 (Registered: July 24th 2018).

Preventable harm in the Canadian organ donation and transplantation system: a descriptive study of missed organ donor identification and referral.

PURPOSE: Deceased organ donation is predicated on timely identification and referral (IDR) of potential organ donors. Many Canadian provinces have legislated mandatory referral of potential deceased donors. Untimely or missed IDRs are safety events where best or expected practice has not occurred causing preventable harm to patients and denying families the opportunity of donation at end of life (EOL) as well as denying transplant waitlist patients access to lifesaving organs. METHODS: We requested donor definitions and data to calculate IDR, consent, and approach rates from all Canadian organ donation organizations (ODOs) for 2016-2018. We then estimated the number of missed IDR patients who were eligible for approach (safety events) and the associated preventable harm to patients at EOL and on transplant waitlists. RESULTS: Annually, there were 63-76 missed IDR patients eligible for approach (3.6-4.5 per million population [PMP]) from four ODOs-three with mandatory referral legislation. Applying each ODO's approach and consent rates for the corresponding year, there were 37-41 missed donors (2.4 donor PMP) annually. Assuming three transplants per donor, the theoretical number of missed transplants would be 111-123 (6.4-7.3 transplants PMP) annually. CONCLUSIONS: Data from four Canadian ODOs show that missed IDR safety events resulted in important preventable harm measured by a lost opportunity for donation of 2.4 donors PMP annually and 354 potentially missed transplants between 2016 and 2018. Given that 223 patients died on Canada's waitlist in 2018, national donor audits and quality improvement initiatives to optimize IDR are essential to reduce preventable harm to these vulnerable populations.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le don d'organes provenant de personnes décédées repose sur l'identification et l'aiguillage en temps opportun des donneurs d'organes potentiels. De nombreuses provinces canadiennes ont légiféré sur l'aiguillage obligatoire des donneurs potentiels décédés. Les identifications et aiguillages inopportuns ou manqués constituent des événements liés à la sécurité pour lesquels la meilleure pratique ou la pratique attendue n'a pas eu lieu, causant des préjudices évitables aux patients et privant les familles de la possibilité de faire un don en fin de vie, tout en refusant aux patients inscrits sur une liste d'attente de greffe un accès à des organes vitaux. MéTHODE: Nous avons demandé les définitions et les données sur les donneurs pour calculer les taux d'identification et d'aiguillage, de consentement et d'approche de tous les organismes canadiens de don d'organes (ODO) pour la période de 2016-2018. Nous avons ensuite estimé le nombre de patients n'ayant pas été identifiés et aiguillés mais qui étaient admis à être approchés (événements liés à la sécurité) et les préjudices évitables aux patients en fin de vie et sur les listes d'attente pour une greffe. RéSULTATS: Chaque année, l'identification et l'aiguillage a échoué pour 63 à 76 patients éligibles (3,6 à 4,5 par million d'habitants [PMH]) dans quatre ODO ­ dont trois possédant une législation rendant l'aiguillage obligatoire. En appliquant l'approche et les taux de consentement de chaque ODO pour l'année correspondante, on a constaté qu'il y avait de 37 à 41 donneurs manqués (2,4 donneurs PMH) chaque année. En supposant trois greffes par donneur, le nombre théorique de greffes manquées serait de 111 à 123 (6,4 à 7,3 greffes PMH) par an. CONCLUSION : Les données de quatre ODO canadiens montrent que les événements de sécurité liés à une identification et un aiguillage manqués ont entraîné d'importants préjudices évitables, mesurés par une occasion perdue de donner pour 2,4 donneurs PMH chaque année et 354 greffes potentiellement manquées entre 2016 et 2018. Étant donné que 223 patients sont décédés sur la liste d'attente du Canada en 2018, les vérifications nationales des donneurs et les initiatives d'amélioration de la qualité visant à optimiser l'identification et l'aiguillage sont essentielles pour réduire les préjudices évitables causés à ces populations vulnérables.

Bronchiolitis Management and Unnecessary Antibiotic Use Across 3 Canadian PICUs.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the patient characteristics, clinical management, and infectious etiology in critically ill children with bronchiolitis. The secondary objective was to determine the association between antibiotic use and hospital length of stay among patients without concomitant bacterial infections. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including patients ≤2 years old with bronchiolitis admitted to 3 Canadian pediatric intensive care units between 2016 and 2018. RESULTS: We included 372 patients with a median age of 2.1 months (interquartile range 1.2-6.6) and Pediatric Risk of Mortality III score 3.0 (interquartile range 0-3.0). Initial ventilatory management included high flow nasal cannula (28.2%) and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (53.7%), of which 41.9% and 87.5%, respectively, did not require escalation of ventilatory support. Chest radiographs (81.7%) and respiratory virus testing (95.4%) were performed in most patients; 14.0% received systemic steroids. Respiratory syncytial virus was detected in 61.3% patients, and 7.5% had a culture-positive concomitant bacterial infection. Of 258 (69.4%) patients with a viral infection, only 45.3% received antibiotics. In this group, antibiotic use beyond 72 hours was not associated with hospital length of stay (ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.97-1.34). CONCLUSIONS: High flow nasal canulae and noninvasive ventilation are commonly used in severe bronchiolitis. Despite contrary evidence, steroids and antibiotics were also frequently used. Evidence-based guidelines specific to children with severe bronchiolitis are needed to improve the care delivered to this patient population.

Antimicrobial Stewardship in Bronchiolitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Three PICUs in Canada.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between the implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program at a local PICU and to determine the association between the presence of an antimicrobial stewardship programs and antimicrobial use across three Canadian PICUs, among critically ill children with bronchiolitis. DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Three Canadian PICUs over two winter seasons. INTERVENTIONS: An antimicrobial stewardship program was implemented at PICU 1 at the end of season 1. PATIENTS: Patients less than or equal to 2 years old admitted with bronchiolitis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used regression models with an interaction term between site (PICU 1 and PICU 2) and season (1 and 2) as the primary analysis to determine the association between implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program at PICU 1 and 1) the proportion of antimicrobials discontinued 72 hours after hospital admission (logistic regression), 2) antimicrobial treatment duration (negative binomial regression), and 3) antimicrobial prescriptions within 48 hours of hospital admission (logistic regression). As a secondary analysis, we determined the association between having an antimicrobial stewardship program present and the aforementioned outcomes across the three PICUs. A total of 372 patients were included. During seasons 1 and 2, median age was 2.2 months (interquartile range, 1.2-6.2 mo) and 2.1 months (interquartile range, 1.3-6.8 mo), respectively. Among patients with viral bronchiolitis, implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program at PICU 1 was associated with increased odds of discontinuing antimicrobials (odds ratio, 25.63; 95% CI, 2.86-326.29), but not with antimicrobial duration (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.31-1.02) or antimicrobial prescriptions (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.10-1.04). The presence of an antimicrobial stewardship program was similarly associated with antimicrobial discontinuation among patients with viral bronchiolitis (odds ratio, 20.79; 95% CI, 2.46-244.92), but not with antimicrobial duration (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.32-1.03) or antimicrobial prescriptions (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.12-1.11). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial stewardship programs were associated with increased likelihood of discontinuing antimicrobial treatments in the PICU patients with viral bronchiolitis. However, larger studies are needed to further determine the role of an antimicrobial stewardship programs in reducing unnecessary antimicrobial use in this patient population.

Improving transparent team communication with the 'Glass Door' decal communication tool: a mixed methods analysis of family and staff perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value and perspectives of intensive care unit (ICU) healthcare professionals (HCPs) and families about the Glass Door (GD) decal team communication tool. DESIGN: Quality improvement methodology was used to design, test and implement the GD. Uptake was measured through audit. Impact was assessed through mixed methodology (survey of ICU HCPs (n=96) and semi-structured interviews of HCPs (n=10) and families (n=7)). SETTING: Eighteen bed, closed, mixed medical-surgical-cardiac ICU in a tertiary care, university-affiliated, paediatric hospital. POPULATION: Interdisciplinary ICU HCPs and families of children admitted to the ICU. INTERVENTION: A transparent template (the GD) applied to the outside of ICU patients' doors with sections for HCPs names, physiological goals and planned tests and treatments for the day. Medical staff completed the GD in rounds (AM and PM) and any HCP caring for the patient updated it throughout the day. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After 3 months, 96% of 613 doors were employed of which 99% respected confidentiality. ICU HCPs reported improved understanding of the patient's plan (84% today vs 59% pre-GD, p<0.001) and sense that families were up-to-date (79% today vs 46% pre-GD, p<0.001). Based on semi-structured interviews, the GD promoted a shared understanding of the plan contributing to care continuity. The GD reassured families the team is working together and fostered family engagement in the care. Routine family experience surveys showed no change in families' sense of privacy during admission; families denied the GD's anticipated compromise of confidentiality. CONCLUSIONS: The GD decal communication tool, visible on the patient's door, improved ICU HCPs' perceived knowledge of their patient's plan. The GD improved the shared mental model, facilitated teaching and information transfer and fostered family engagement. Challenges included knowing the rules for use and consistent application. Concerns initially raised by HCPs about confidentiality were denied by families.

Pharmacokinetics of Commonly Used Antimicrobials in Critically Ill Adults During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Adequate dosing of antimicrobials is critical to properly treat infections and limit development of resistance and adverse effects. Limited guidance exists for antimicrobial dosing adjustments in patients requiring extracorporporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy. A systematic review was conducted to delineate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of antimicrobials in critically ill adult patients requiring ECMO. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, Global Health, and All EBM Reviews databases were searched. Grey literature was examined. All studies reporting PK/PD parameters of antimicrobials in critically ill adults treated with ECMO were included, except for case reports and congress abstracts. Ex vivo studies were included. Two independent reviewers applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Reviewers were then paired to independently abstract data and evaluate methodological quality of studies using the ROBINS-I tool and the compliance with ClinPK guidelines. Patients' and studies' characteristics, key PK/PD findings, details of ECMO circuits and co-treatments were summarized qualitatively. Dosing recommendations were formulated based on data from controlled studies. RESULTS: Thirty-two clinical studies were included; most were observational and uncontrolled. Fourteen ex vivo studies were analysed. Information on patient characteristics and co-treatments was often missing. The effect of ECMO on PK/PD parameters of antimicrobials varied depending on the studied drugs. Few dosing recommendations could be formulated given the lack of good quality data. CONCLUSION: Limited data exist on the PK/PD of antimicrobials during ECMO therapy. Rigorously designed and well powered populational PK studies are required to establish empiric dosing guidelines for antimicrobials in patients requiring ECMO support. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018099992 (Registered: July 24th 2018).

Gender and Authorship in Pediatric Critical Care Randomized Control Trials.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the gender distribution of authorship of pediatric critical care randomized control trials. DATA SOURCES: The 415 randomized control trials in pediatric critical care published before 2019. STUDY SELECTION: We included all randomized control trials enrolling children in a PICU. We used PICUtrials.net, which uses comprehensive search strategies of multiple databases, to identify published randomized control trials. DATA EXTRACTION: We manually extracted the name and profession of each listed author from each publication and classified each author as male or female based on their name. RESULTS: We included 2,146 authors and were able to classify 1,888 (88%) as men or women. Overall, 38% of authors were women, this varied with the authorship position: 37% of first, 38% of middle, and 25% of last authors were women (p < 0.001). The three most common professions were physician (63%), nonclinician (11%), and nurse (6%)-of which 30%, 45%, and 97%, respectively, were women. The percentage of female authorship overall has increased from 28% in 1985-1989 to 39% in 2015-2018 (p for trend = 0.004). There were no significant differences in the characteristics of randomized control trials published with a female first or last author versus those with both male first and last authors with respect to the median number of children randomized (60 vs. 50; p = 0.41), multicentred trials (17% vs. 24%; p = 0.12), trials at low risk of bias (50% vs. 66%; p = 0.26), reporting any funding (55% vs. 51%; p = 0.66), or median number of citations per year (1.5 vs. 2.4; p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Although increasing over time, the percentage of researchers publishing pediatric critical care randomized control trials who are women still lags behind the percentage clinicians who are women. Trials that female researchers publish are similar in characteristics and impact as male researchers. Further work should identify barriers to gender diversity and potential solutions in pediatric critical care research.

Just the facts: Organ donation in the emergency department: When you can't save one, save eight.

A 16-year-old female presents to a community emergency room following a suicide attempt by hanging. Prehospital, on arrival of paramedics, the patient was in a pulseless electrical activity rhythm. Paramedics provided advanced cardiac life support for 20 minutes before they obtained return of spontaneous circulation. In the emergency department, she had another 25-minute cardiac arrest with ultimate return of spontaneous circulation. She is now hemodynamically stable on Levophed 0.2 µg/kg/min. Her neurological exam shows pupils to be 3 mm and fixed bilaterally, absent cough and gag, and no response to central or peripheral pain. She occasionally triggers 2-3 spontaneous breaths per minute above the set rate on the ventilator. Her CT head scan shows severe anoxic changes and cerebral edema.

The impact of a quality improvement project to standardize pain, agitation, and withdrawal assessments on the use of morphine and midazolam in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the impact of a quality improvement initiative to increase assessments of pain, agitation, and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome, on the use of sedative and analgesic medication in a pediatric intensive care unit. METHODS: This is a retrospective pre and post, observational, quality improvement study conducted in an 18-bed medical-surgical-cardiac, tertiary intensive care unit. We included patients consecutively admitted from October 1 to March 31 (pre-period 2015-2016, post-period 2016-2017) who were mechanically ventilated beyond 48 hours. A multidisciplinary team, including a family advisor, implemented the following interventions using rapid "Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles:" (a) standardized pain and sedation assessments, (b) standardized sedation goal setting, and (c) non-pharmacological strategies to manage pain and agitation. We did not implement any specific sedation protocol. We used audit and feedback to reinforce change. RESULTS: The post-intervention phase started once sedation scores were documented q12h for >60% of patients. The groups (n = 45 per group) were similar regarding demographics, severity of illness, and mechanical ventilation duration, but different in length of intensive care stay. The cumulative dose of midazolam equivalent was significantly lower in the post-intervention period (3.71 vs 2.65 mg/kg/mechanical ventilation day, P = 0.009, 95% CI: -1.12 (-1.89, -0.31)). Morphine equivalent usage went from 3.51 to 2.57 mg/kg/mechanical ventilation day (P = 0.066, 95% CI: -0.67 [-1.44, 0.05]). There were no significant pre-post-differences in the use of other sedative agents, rates of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome or severe pain, nor medication cost. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a multifaceted QI project was successful at increasing standardized assessments of pain and agitation, and was associated with a significant reduction in midazolam use. We also observed a decrease in morphine use without increasing rates of severe pain. Incidence of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and cost were unchanged.

Potential organ donor identification and system accountability: expert guidance from a Canadian consensus conference.

PURPOSE: Deceased donation rates in Canada remain below the predicted potential and lag behind leading countries. Missing a potential donor leads to preventable death and disability of transplant candidates and increased healthcare costs. METHODS: Stakeholders were invited to a national consensus conference on improving deceased organ donor identification and referral (ID&R) and healthcare system accountability. In advance, participants received evidence-based, background documents addressing death audits, clinical triggers, required referral legislation, ethics, clinical pathways, and donation standards. At the conference, expert presentations and summaries of background information prepared by the Steering Committee informed group discussions of the preset questions. The conference's themes were: 1) expectations of potential donors, recipients and their families; 2) donor ID&R: clinical and legal perspectives; 3) enhancing accountability: gaps and solutions; and 4) enhancing accountability: quality/safety organizations. RESULTS: Thirty-seven consensus statements were generated. At the healthcare professional (HCP) level, key statements include: 1) donation be consistently addressed as part of end-of-life care but only after a decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment; 2) HCP know how and when to identify and refer potential donors; and 3) transplant candidates be informed of local allocation guidelines and performance. At the healthcare system level, key statements include: 1) national adoption of clinical criteria to trigger ID&R; 2) dedicated resources to match donation activities, including transfer of a potential donor; 3) performance measurement through death audits; 4) reporting and investigation of missed donation opportunities (MDO); 5) recognition of top performers; and 6) missed donor ID&R be considered a preventable and critical safety incident. CONCLUSION: Our consensus statements establish HCP and healthcare system responsibilities regarding potential organ donor ID&R and include the tracking, reviewing and elimination of MDO through system-wide death audits. Once implemented, these consensus statements will help honour patients' wishes to donate, improve service to potential transplant recipients, and support HCPs in fulfilling their ethical and legal responsibilitites. Next steps include implementation, assessment of their impact on donation rates, and investigation of new evidence-based targets for system improvement.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Au Canada, les dons des personnes décédées restent inférieurs aux possibilités prédites et loin derrière les pays les plus performants. Le manque de donneurs potentiels aboutit à des décès évitables, à l'invalidité des candidats à la transplantation et à des coûts de soins de santé plus élevés. MéTHODES: Les principaux acteurs ont été invités à une conférence de consensus nationale sur l'amélioration de l'identification et de l'orientation des donneurs d'organes décédés (ID&R ­Identification and referral) et sur la responsabilité du système de santé. Les participants ont reçu à l'avance des documents basés sur des données probantes qui abordaient l'audit des décès, les facteurs cliniques identifiants, la législation requise pour l'orientation, l'éthique, les cheminements cliniques et les normes de dons. Au cours de la conférence, les présentations d'experts et des résumés de l'information de fond préparés par le Comité de pilotage ont alimenté les discussions de groupe sur les questions préparées. Les thèmes de la conférence étaient les suivants : 1) attentes des donneurs potentiels, des receveurs et de leurs familles; 2) identification et orientation des donneurs : points de vue cliniques et légaux; 3) amélioration de la responsabilité : lacunes et solutions; et 4) amélioration de la responsabilité : organisations de la qualité/sécurité. RéSULTATS: Trente-sept énoncés de consensus ont été générés. Au niveau des professionnels de santé, les principaux énoncés sont les suivants : 1) que le don soit constamment abordé dans le cadre des soins de fin de vie, mais seulement après avoir pris la décision d'arrêter les traitements de maintien de vie; 2) les professionnels de santé ont le savoir-faire pour identifier et orienter les donneurs potentiels; et 3) les candidats à la transplantation doivent être informés des lignes directrices locales sur les attributions et sa performance. Au niveau du système de soins de santé, les principaux énoncés sont les suivants : 1) l'adoption au niveau national de critères cliniques déclenchant l'identification et l'orientation des donneurs; 2) des ressources dédiées aux activités d'appariement des dons, y compris au transfert des donneurs potentiels; 3) des mesures de performance par des audits des décès; 4) la déclaration et des investigations sur les opportunités de dons manqués; 5) la reconnaissance des plus performants; et 6) l'identification et l'orientation manquées de donneurs doivent être considérées comme un incident évitable et critique. CONCLUSION: Nos énoncés de consensus établissent les responsabilités des professionnels de santé et du système de soins pour ce qui concerne l'identification et l'orientation des donneurs potentiels d'organes; ils incluent le suivi, l'analyse et l'élimination des dons manqués via une vérification des causes de décès dans tout le système. Une fois mis en œuvre, ces énoncés de consensus contribueront à honorer les souhaits des patients en matière de dons, améliorer les services apportés aux receveurs potentiels de greffes et soutenir les professionnels de santé dans l'accomplissement de leurs obligations éthiques et légales. Les étapes suivantes incluront la mise en œuvre, l'évaluation de leur impact sur les taux de dons et la recherche de nouvelles cibles basées sur des données probantes pour améliorer le système.

Determinants of urinary catheter removal practices in the pediatric intensive care unit: A survey.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged use of indwelling catheters is associated with hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (UTIs). Literature is scarce about the factors influencing urinary catheter removal and maintenance in children. This study aims to describe the determinants of urinary catheter removal in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of 171 physicians and nurses working at 2 tertiary PICUs in Montreal, Canada. We used focus groups and literature review to design the survey questions and 3 clinical scenarios. We analyzed our results using descriptive statistics and multivariate multinomial regression. RESULTS: There were 131 (77%) participants who answered the survey. Factors prompting urinary catheter removal (P < .01) included recent extubation, superficial sedation level, fever, and history of previous UTI. Presence of shock (P < .01) and fluid overload (P < .05) were associated with maintenance of catheters. Physicians were more likely to remove urinary catheters than nurses in all scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a consistent set of variables that drive the removal of indwelling catheters in PICUs. Studies are needed to determine whether incorporating these determinants into infection control interventions will reduce urinary catheter use and catheter-associated UTIs in critically ill children.

Canadian Guidelines for Controlled Pediatric Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death-Summary Report.

OBJECTIVES: Create trustworthy, rigorous, national clinical practice guidelines for the practice of pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death in Canada. METHODS: We followed a process of clinical practice guideline development based on World Health Organization and Canadian Medical Association methods. This included application of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Questions requiring recommendations were generated based on 1) 2006 Canadian donation after circulatory determination of death guidelines (not pediatric specific), 2) a multidisciplinary symposium of national and international pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death leaders, and 3) a scoping review of the pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death literature. Input from these sources drove drafting of actionable questions and Good Practice Statements, as defined by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation group. We performed additional literature reviews for all actionable questions. Evidence was assessed for quality using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation and then formulated into evidence profiles that informed recommendations through the evidence-to-decision framework. Recommendations were revised through consensus among members of seven topic-specific working groups and finalized during meetings of working group leads and the planning committee. External review was provided by pediatric, critical care, and critical care nursing professional societies and patient partners. RESULTS: We generated 63 Good Practice Statements and seven Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation recommendations covering 1) ethics, consent, and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, 2) eligibility, 3) withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy practices, 4) ante and postmortem interventions, 5) death determination, 6) neonatal pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death, 7) cardiac and innovative pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death, and 8) implementation. For brevity, 48 Good Practice Statement and truncated justification are included in this summary report. The remaining recommendations, detailed methodology, full Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tables, and expanded justifications are available in the full text report. CONCLUSIONS: This process showed that rigorous, transparent clinical practice guideline development is possible in the domain of pediatric deceased donation. Application of these recommendations will increase access to pediatric donation after circulatory determination of death across Canada and may serve as a model for future clinical practice guideline development in deceased donation.

"We Should Talk"-Moving knowledge into action by learning to engage patients, families, and healthcare staff to communicate for patient safety.

Innovation in patient engagement and empowerment has been identified as a priority area in the Canadian healthcare system. This article describes the development and implementation of the We Should Talk campaign at an academic pediatric hospital. Through the use of a guiding theoretical framework and a multidisciplinary project team, a multimedia campaign was designed to inspire staff, patients and families to effectively communicate to improve patient safety. The We Should Talk campaign provides a case study for how an organization can foster frontline improvement through the engagement of patient, families, and healthcare providers.

Presence of a Physician Safety Champion Is Associated with a Reduction in Urinary Catheter Utilization in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Safety champions are effective in a variety of safety initiatives; however, there are no reports of their role in hospital-acquired infections prevention. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the association of the presence of a physician safety champion with our urinary catheter device utilization ratios (DUR) in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). METHODS: Our PICU has incidence rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) and urinary catheter DUR above the 90th percentile. Using a quasi-experimental design, we compared our DUR when the PICU team was exposed and unexposed (champion's maternity leaves) to a physician safety champion. Hospital acquired infection (HAI) surveillance of all PICU admissions between April 1st 2009 and June 29th 2013 was done prospectively. To ensure stable acuity of the patient population over time, we used the central venous catheter (CVC) DUR as a control. RESULTS: The urinary catheter DUR was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.45) during the unexposed period versus 0.39 (95%CI 0.38-0.40) during the exposed period, for an absolute difference of 0.05 (95%CI 0.03-0.06; p<0.0001). The overall CVC DUR increased from 0.57 (95%CI 0.55-0.58) during the unexposed period to 0.63 (95%CI 0.61-0.64) during the exposed period, an absolute increase of 0.06 (95%CI 0.04-0.08; p<0.0001). Comparing the exposed and unexposed periods, adjusting for time trend, we observed a 17% decrease in the urinary catheter DUR when the safety champion was present (odds ratio [OR] 0.83; 95%CI 0.77-0.90). The rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infections did not change. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a unit-based safety champion can have a positive impact on urinary catheter DUR in a PICU.

Canadian recommendations for critical care ultrasound training and competency.

OBJECTIVE: To achieve national consensus on standards of training, quality assurance and maintenance of competence for critical care ultrasound for intensivists and critical care trainees in Canada using recently published international training statements. DATA SOURCES: Existing internationally endorsed guidelines and expert opinion. DATA SYNTHESIS: In November 2013, a day-long consensus meeting was held with 15 Canadian experts in critical care ultrasound in which essential topics relevant to training ultrasound were discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus was achieved to direct training curriculum, oversight, quality assurance and maintenance of competence for critical care ultrasound. In providing the first national guideline of its kind, these Canadian recommendations may also serve as a model of critical care ultrasound dissemination for other countries.