The Carter Center's assistance to river blindness control programs: establishing treatment objectives and goals for monitoring ivermectin delivery systems on two continents.

Periodic mass treatment with ivermectin in endemic communities prevents eye and dermal disease due to onchocerciasis. As part of an international global partnership to control onchocerciasis, The Carter Center's Global 2000 River Blindness Program (GRBP) assists the ministries of health in ten countries to distribute ivermectin (Mectizan, donated by Merck & Co.). The GRBP priorities are to maximize ivermectin treatment coverage and related health education and training efforts, and to monitor progress through regular reporting of ivermectin treatments measured against annual treatment objectives and ultimate treatment goals (e.g., full coverage, which is defined as reaching all persons residing in at risk villages who are eligible for treatment). Since the GRBP began in 1996, more than 21.2 million ivermectin treatment encounters have been reported by assisted programs. In 1999, more than 6.6 million eligible persons at risk for onchocerciasis received treatment, which represented 96% of the 1999 annual treatment objective of 6.9 million, and 78% of the ultimate treatment goal in assisted areas.

The Onchocerciasis Elimination Program for the Americas: a history of partnership.

The decision in 1987 by the pharmaceutical firm Merck & Co. to provide Mectizan (ivermectin) free of charge to river blindness control programs has challenged the international public health community to find effective ways to distribute the drug to rural populations most affected by onchocerciasis. In the Americas, PAHO responded to that challenge by calling for the elimination of all morbidity from onchocerciasis from the Region by the year 2007 through mass distribution of ivermectin. Since 1991, a multinational, multiagency partnership (consisting of PAHO, the endemic countries, nongovernmental development organizations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, as well as academic institutions and funding agencies) has developed the political, financial, and technical support needed to move toward the realization of that goal. This partnership is embodied in the Onchocerciasis Elimination Program for the Americas (OEPA), which is supported by the River Blindness Foundation (RBF) and now by the Carter Center. OEPA was conceived as a means of maintaining a regional initiative to eliminate what is otherwise a low priority disease. Since its inception in 1993, the OEPA has provided more than US$ 2 million in financial, managerial, and technical assistance to stimulate and/or support programs in Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, and Venezuela, so as to take full advantage of the Merck donation. Now halfway into a five-year, US$ 4 million grant provided through the Inter-American Development Bank, the OEPA's capacity to support the regional initiative is assured through 1999.

The onchocerciasis elimination program for the Americas: a history of partnership / Programa de Eliminación de la Oncocercosis para las Américas: historia de solidaridad

The decision in 1987 by the pharmaceutical firm Merck & Co. to provide Mectizan (ivermectin) free of charge to river blindness control programs has challenged the international public health community to find effective ways to distribute the drug to rural populations most affected by onchocerciasis. In the Americas, PAHO responded to that challenge by calling for the elimination of all morbidity from onchocerciasis from the Region by the year 2007 through mass distribution of ivermectin. Since 1991, a multinational, multiagency partnership (consisting of PAHO, the endemic countries, nongovernmental development organizations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, as well as academic institutions and funding agencies) has developed the political, financial, and technical support needed to move toward the realization of that goal. This partnership is embodied in the Onchocerciasis Elimination Program for the Americas (OEPA), which is supported by the River Blindness Foundation (RBF) and now by the Carter Center. OEPA was conceived as a means of maintaining a regional initiative to eliminate what is otherwise a low priority disease. Since its inception in 1993, the OEPA has provided more than US$2 million in financial, managerial, and technical assistance to stimulate and/or support programs in Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico and Venezuela, so as to take full advantage of the Merck donation. Now halfway into a five-year, US$ 4 million grant provided through the Inter-American Development Bank, the OEPA's capacity to support the regional initiative is assured through 1999

La decisión tomada en 1987 por la Merck & Co., fabricante de productos farmacéuticos, de proveer Mectizan® (ivermectina) gratuitamente a los programas de control de la oncocercosis ha obligado a la comunidad sanitaria internacional a buscar formas de distribuir el medicamento a las poblaciones rurales que se ven más afectadas por la enfermedad. En las Américas, la OPS respondió al reto con un llamado a eliminar de la Región toda morbilidad por oncocercosis para el año 2007 mediante la distribución de ivermectina al público. Desde 1991, una alianza multinacional de diversas entidades (la OPS, países con oncocercosis endémica, agencias de desarrollo no gubernamentales, los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades en Atlanta, Georgia, instituciones académicas y agencias de financiamiento) ha generado el apoyo político, económico y técnico necesario para tratar de alcanzar esa meta. Esta alianza está representada por el Programa de Eliminación de la Oncocercosis en las Américas (OEPA), subvencionado por la Fundación Ceguera de los Ríos y actualmente por el Centro Carter. El OEPA se creó como iniciativa de alcance regional destinada a eliminar una enfermedad que no merece atención prioritaria. Desde su aparición en 1993, el OEPA ha aportado más de US$ 2 millones en ayuda económica, administrativa y técnica para fomentar y subvencionar programas en Brasil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, México y Venezuela, logrando así aprovechar al máximo la donación de la Merck & Co. Ahora que hemos llegado a la mitad de una subvención de 5 años y US$ 4 millones aportada por el Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, se sabe que el OEPA tiene la capacidad para apoyar la iniciativa regional hasta fines de 1999

The Onchocerciasis elimination program for the Americas: a history of partnership

The decision in 1987 by the pharmaceutical firm Merck & Co. to provide Mectizan (ivermectin) free of charge to river blindness control programs has challenged the international public health community to find effective ways to distribute the drug to rural populations most affected by onchocerciasis. In the Americas, PAHO responded to that challenge by calling for the elimination all morbidity from onchocerciasis from the region by the year 2007 through mass distribution of ivermectin. Since 1991, a multinational, multiagency partnership (consisting of PAHO, the endemic countries, nongovernmental development organizations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, as well as academic institutions and funding agencies) has developed the political, financial, and technical support needed to move toward the realization of that goal. This partnership is embodied in the Onchocerciasis Elimination Program for the Americas (OEPA), which is supported by the River Blindness Foundation (RBF) and now by the Carter Center, OEPA was conceived as a means of maintaining a regional initiative to eliminate what is otherwise a low priority disease. Since its inception in 1993, the OEPA has provided more than US$ 2 million in financial, managerial, and technical assistance to stimulate and/or support programs in Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, and Venezuela, so as to take full advantage of the Merck donation, Now halfways into a five-year, US$ 4 million grant provided through the Inter-American Development Bank, the OEPA's capacity to support the regional initiative is assured through 1999 (AU)

The onchocerciasis elimination program for the Americas: a history of partnership

The decision in 1987 by the pharmaceutical firm Merck & Co. to provide Mectizan (ivermectin) free of charge to river blindness control programs has challenged the international public health community to find effective ways to distribute the drug to rural populations most affected by onchocerciasis. In the Americas, PAHO responded to that challenge by calling for the elimination of all morbidity from onchocerciasis from the Region by the year 2007 through mass distribution of ivermectin. Since 1991, a multinational, multiagency partnership (consisting of PAHO, the endemic countries, nongovernmental development organizations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, as well as academic institutions and funding agencies) has developed the political, financial, and technical support needed to move toward the realization of that goal. This partnership is embodied in the Onchocerciasis Elimination Program for the Americas (OEPA), which is supported by the River Blindness Foundation (RBF) and now by the Carter Center. OEPA was conceived as a means of maintaining a regional initiative to eliminate what is otherwise a low priority disease. Since its inception in 1993, the OEPA has provided more than US$2 million in financial, managerial, and technical assistance to stimulate and/or support programs in Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico and Venezuela, so as to take full advantage of the Merck donation. Now halfway into a five-year, US$ 4 million grant provided through the Inter-American Development Bank, the OEPA's capacity to support the regional initiative is assured through 1999

Transient changes in cytokine profiles following ivermectin treatment of onchocerciasis.

Cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells after antigen or mitogen stimulation was assessed before and after semiannual ivermectin treatment of 27 patients with onchocerciasis. Before treatment, Onchocerca volvulus antigen (OvA) elicited interleukin (IL)-5 production but inhibited production of IL-10, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Six months after the first dose of ivermectin, there were increases in the IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, and interferon-gamma responses to mitogen and in the GM-CSF and IL-10 responses to OvA. By 24 months (after four ivermectin doses), OvA-induced GM-CSF production and mitogen-induced IL-2 and IL-10 production remained elevated above pretreatment levels, whereas that of other cytokines returned to or below pretreatment levels. These transient changes in cytokine response profiles of patients with onchocerciasis following ivermectin treatment likely reflect changes in antigen load.

Comparison of the sensitivity of different geographical isolates of Onchocerca volvulus microfilariae to ivermectin: effects of exposure to drug on development in the blackfly Simulium ornatum.

Four geographical isolates (Ghana forest, Ghana savannah, Cameroon forest, Guatemala) of Onchocerca volvulus microfilariae (mf) and O. lienalis mf (UK) were examined for their sensitivity to ivermectin by incubation in vitro in drug followed by assessing their ability to develop in the blackfly Simulium ornatum after intrathoracic injection. Parasites were incubated for 30 min in ivermectin (10(-6) to 10(-9) M), which resulted in a concentration dependent decrease in the numbers of parasites surviving and developing in the insect; there were significant reductions in parasite recoveries from all isolates in the 10(-6) M to 5 x 10(-8) M ivermectin groups, but no significant effect was seen following incubation in concentrations of 10(-8) M and below. Experiments consistently demonstrated that the 4 isolates of O. volvulus were similarly sensitive to ivermectin (in the 10(-7) M ivermectin groups there was a reduction of 76.3% to 85.1% in numbers of infective larvae, and 60.9% to 85.5% in numbers of all larval stages, compared to controls); O. lienalis mf were significantly more sensitive (100% reduction in infective larvae, 98.7% reduction in all larval stages). This baseline information on drug sensitivity and techniques should prove useful for examining populations of O. volvulus for possible development of drug resistance in the future.

Adverse reactions after community treatment of onchocerciasis with ivermectin in Guatemala.

Male and female residents on a Guatemalan coffee plantation where Onchocerca volvulus infections were hyperendemic were offered oral ivermectin (100-200 micrograms/kg) as part of a community-wide treatment programme for onchocerciasis. Forty-five persons were treated and then questioned daily for 28 d about changes in their health. Those with complaints were monitored until all signs and symptoms had resolved. Sixty-seven percent complained of some adverse event after treatment; 60% developed observable adverse reactions attributed clinically to ivermectin. No reaction was life-threatening; the most common were oedema (53%) and fever (47%). Expulsion of intestinal helminths was reported by 38%. Almost all reactions began 24-48 h after treatment; their mean duration was 5 d, despite treatment with acetaminophen and antihistamines. Three patients had oedematous changes lasting over 2 weeks. Incidence, but not severity, of reactions was related to the pretreatment density of microfilariae in skin.

Amocarzine investigated as oral onchocercacidal drug in 272 adult male patients from Guatemala / Amocarzina investigada con droga oral antioncercosa 272 adultos pacientes hombres de Guatemala

The clinical investigations with three types of a three days regimen of amocarzine permitted to adjust the fixed dosing to the body weight related dosing and subsequently the adminstration of amocarzine from fasting state to drug intake after food. The main objective to reach a dose woth predictable and sustained absorption was achieved, and this in turn proved to be onchocercacidal and safe. A combined clinicopharmacokinetic study showed enhancement and consistency of amocarzine absorption after food. Quantitative assessment of the urinary excretion confirmed presence of the N-oxide metabolite, which qualitatively was visible by a urine colorimetry. This assay proved useful for drug monitoring. Ultrasonography of onchocercal skin nodules detected changes within the nodules following amocarzine therapy. Histology agter nodul-ectomy at four months post-therapy showed thal 57% of the female worms were dead, 24% necrobiotic, and 19% alive; male worms were more necrobiotic. Skin microfilariae were reduced within one week to about 10% of the initial level and after one year they remained at about 20%. Skin punch biopsies on day 5 showed that most microfilariae were dead or moribund. Ocular reduction of microfilariae was also observed, althought it was slower than in the skin. The visual acuity improved within the one year's observation time. Ocular and clinical tolerability was good, with one exception of neurological disturbance, which was fully reversible. Se quential testing of the liver function showed average values within the normal range. In conclusion, a repeat low dose regimen of amocarzine (3 mg/Kg twice daily postprandially for three consecutive days) was well absorbed with predictable plasma levels, macro-and microfilaricidal with good local and systemic tolerability in patients with moderate to heavy onchocerciasis. Amorcarzine is recommended for further clinical investigations, particularly inf emales and juveniles. Urine colorimetry and nodular ultrasonography are recommended for optional monitoring of amocarzine

Ivermectin: reduction in prevalence and infection intensity of Onchocerca volvulus following biannual treatments in five Guatemalan communities.

Residents of five hyperendemic communities located in the central focus of onchocerciasis in Guatemala were treated with ivermectin (Mectizan) or placebo every six months for 30 months. The effects of treatment on prevalence and the intensity of skin infection (microfilarial skin density [MFD]) were evaluated. Significant and persistent reductions in both of these indices were achieved by coverage of 80.7% of the eligible populations. The highest proportionate reductions in both indicators of infection occurred after the first treatment, followed by more gradual decreases through the fourth treatment. In one community in which the mean coverage was 92.7%, prevalence decreased from 74.0% at pretreatment to 34.9% after four treatments, while the MFD decreased from 7.8 to 2.0; reductions of 52.8% and 74.3% from pretreatment values, respectively. In every ivermectin-treated community except one, in which drug acceptance was low, the mean community MFD values were reduced to the level associated with low infectiousness for the vector, Simulium ochraceum. Moreover, the category of MFD associated with high vector infectiousness was reduced at least ten-fold over the pretreatment level. One community had low participation during the first two treatments (32.8% and 22.7% of those eligible). This increased to 55.2% at the third treatment because of implementation of an educational program describing both the disease and the beneficial effects of ivermectin and because skin biopsies and nodulectomies were not performed. Secondary reaction rates for all communities were 29.5%, 9.9%, 10.3%, 8.2%, and 7.1% for the first through fifth treatments, respectively. Pruritus was the most common (34.0%) secondary reaction, followed by facial edema (31.8%). All reactions were classified as mild to moderate. Recommendations for mass distribution of ivermectin in Guatemala are given.

The effects of repetitive community-wide ivermectin treatment on transmission of Onchocerca volvulus in Guatemala.

The effects of biannual ivermectin treatment at the community level on transmission of Onchocerca volvulus during the dry season were measured over a 30-month period in Guatemala. In the Los Tarrales Transmission Zone, an area encompassing three villages, significant changes occurred in both the prevalence and quantity of infection in the Simulium ochraceum vector population. These included a 76% reduction in females with infective stage larvae (L3S) and an 80% reduction in number of L3S per 1,000 parous flies. Significant reductions in both the mean infective biting density (IBD) and mean transmission potential (TP) also occurred. In Santa Emilia, the prevalence of infection with L3S in S. ochraceum was significantly reduced by 77% from the baseline value. The number of O. volvulus L3S per 1,000 parous flies was also reduced by 92%. Changes in both the IBD and TP were substantial but not significant due to the high degree of variance in the occurrence of O. volvulus L3S in the vector population. This was due, in part, to the movement of infected migrant workers into the finca (coffee farm). In Los Andes, four recurrent treatments successfully blocked transmission of infective stage larvae. Prevalence (flies with all stages of developing larvae) in the vector population was reduced by 89% over the two-year period; yearly reductions in both the IBD and TP were also highly significant, ultimately ending in zero values. This finding is particularly striking since prior to treatment, Los Andes exhibited the highest IBD of the three study locations and the second highest TP.

Effects of three-month doses of ivermectin on adult Onchocerca volvulus.

Onchocerca volvulus worms in nodules from Guatemalan patients treated with four, eight, or 11 single doses of ivermectin (150 micrograms/kg of body weight) that were given once every three months were examined by routine histologic techniques and compared with worms in control nodules from untreated persons living in the same location over the same time periods. All treated nodules were removed four months after the last dose of ivermectin, i.e., 13, 25, or 34 months after the start of the trial. At the 25th and 34th months, i.e., after the eighth or eleventh doses of ivermectin, there were excess mortalities in female worms of 25.5% and 32.6%, respectively, over and above the levels in controls. Furthermore, the proportions of live females still producing scanty embryos up to the gastrula stage were only 7.7% and 18.2%, and no females were producing microfilariae. Ivermectin given at 3-month intervals also reduced significantly the mean numbers of live male worms in nodules, as well as the proportions of inseminated females. This regimen was effective in preventing embryogenesis to the microfilarial stage while, at the same time, it caused a slow but steady attrition of the adult worms.

The embryogenesis of Onchocerca volvulus over the first year after a single dose of ivermectin.

Adult Onchocerca volvulus, extracted from nodules before, and at intervals of two weeks to 12 months after, a single 150 micrograms/kg dose of ivermectin, were examined longitudinally and by sequential transverse sections. The mean number of male worms per nodule fell, and the proportion of nodules with no male worm rose, within two weeks of ivermectin and remained so for 12 months. In female worms, at intervals after ivermectin, the percentages of the length of the lower genital tracts occupied by embryos at each stage of development, or by degenerating ova, embryos and microfilariae (mfs), were recorded: (a) in un(re-)inseminated worms whose original embryogenesis was continuing and in those in which it was completed; and (b) in worms, reinseminated post-ivermectin, in which a new embryogenesis had begun. The results indicated that: (a) the time needed for the zygotes of O. volvulus to develop to mfs is 8-12 weeks; (b) nearly 40 percent of females had not resumed mf production by 12 months after treatment; (c) many intrauterine mfs had not degenerated within the first two weeks of ivermectin; (d) some of the last embryos to mature to mfs did not degenerate but accumulated temporarily in the anterior uteri 8-16 weeks after ivermectin.

Amocarzine investigated as oral onchocercacidal drug in 272 adult male patients from Guatemala. Results from three dose regimens spread over three days.

The clinical investigations with three types of a three days regimen of amocarzine permitted to adjust the fixed dosing to the body weight related dosing and subsequently the administration of amocarzine from fasting state to drug intake after food. The main objective to reach a dose with predictable and sustained absorption was achieved, and this in turn proved to be onchocercacidal and safe. A combined clinicopharmacokinetic study showed enhancement and consistency of amocarzine absorption after food. Quantitative assessment of the urinary excretion confirmed the presence of the N-oxide metabolite, which qualitatively was visible by a urine colorimetry. This assay proved useful for drug monitoring. Ultrasonography of onchocercal skin nodules detected changes within the nodules following amocarzine therapy. Histology after nodul-ectomy at four months post-therapy showed that 57% of the female worms were dead, 24% necrobiotic, and 19% alive; male worms were more necrobiotic. Skin microfilariae were reduced within one week to about 10% of the initial level and after one year they remained at about 20%. Skin punch biopsies on day 5 showed that most microfilariae were dead or moribund. Ocular reduction of microfilariae was also observed, although it was slower than in the skin. The visual acuity improved within the one year's observation time. Ocular and clinical tolerability was good, with one exception of neurological disturbance, which was fully reversible. Sequential testing of the liver function showed average values within the normal range. In conclusion, a repeat low dose regimen of amocarzine (3 mg/kg twice daily post-prandially for three consecutive days) was well absorbed with predictable plasma levels, macro- and microfilaricidal with good local and systemic tolerability in patients with moderate to heavy onchocerciasis. Amorcarzine is recommended for further clinical investigations, particularly in females and juveniles. Urine colorimetry and nodular ultrasonography are recommended for optional monitoring of amocarzine.

Influence of food related to dose on the pharmacokinetics of amocarzine and of its N-oxide metabolite, CGP 13 231, after oral administration to 20 onchocerciasis male patients from Guatemala.

Twenty male patients from Guatemala infected with Onchocerca volvulus received a 3 mg/kg oral dose of amocarzine twice daily for three days. The patients were randomly assigned to the sequence fasting/non-fasting and non-fasting/fasting for the morning administration on days 1 and 3. All other doses were given after food intake. Blood samples on days 1 and 3 and urine fractions from days 3 to 5 were collected for the determination of the unchanged drug and of its N-oxide metabolite, CGP 13 231. The absorption of amocarzine and CGP 13 231 was slower and sustained for longer time in fed patients than in fasting ones. The mean AUC of amocarzine was significantly higher (about 20%) in fed patients. No significant difference was found for CGP 13 231. The relative improvement of bioavailability of amocarzine due to food was less prominent than previously obtained after a high dose of 1200 mg which demonstrated a bioavailability improvement of a factor of three. Therefore, saturable dose dependent absorption processes are likely to be involved for the administration in fasting conditions. Conversely, the concentrations of amocarzine in fed patients after 150 and 1200 mg were dose proportional, thus indicating linear kinetics. The cumulative urinary excretions of CGP 6140 ranged from 0.1 to 3.8% of the daily dose. Those of CGP 13 231 ranged from 31 to 64%. This total excretion was larger than that previously recorded in fasting patients after a single oral dose. The present results confirm the improvement of the bioavailability of the drug administered after food intake.

Microfilaricidal effect of amocarzine in skin punch biopsies of patients with onchocerciasis from Latin America.

Skin punch biopsies were performed in 54 selected patients with onchocerciasis participating in a clinical trial with amocarzine (CGP 6140) in Ecuador and Guatemala. Skin snipping for counting microfilariae of Onchocerca volvulus was done before treatment (day 0) and day 4 and 8 following start of the therapy which consisted of 3 mg/kg amocarzine postprandially twice daily for three consecutive days. The mean microfilarial skin density has been reduced by 45% on day 4 and 95% on day 8. Skin punch biopsies were taken on day 5, within 1 cm from the snip site on the iliac crest. Histopathologic examination revealed that the vast majority of the microfilariae in the upper as well as in the deeper dermis were degenerated or necrotic, surrounded often (57%) by minute foci of fibrinoid change of the collagen. There was usually slight, less frequently moderate eosinophilic, lympho-plasmocytic and initial histocytic inflammatory reaction in the vicinity. Microfilariae were frequently (69%) found at the dermal-epidermal junction and in the epidermis. Occasionally (7%) intra-epidermal microabscesses were noted. Microfilariae were detected also in the lumen of some dermal lymphatic vessels. Therefore it is concluded that amocarzine showed marked microfilaricidal effects in the skin of patients with onchocerciasis as evidenced histologically by mainly destroyed or moribund microfilariae which induced a mild to moderate inflammatory cell reaction.

Use of an ophthalmologic ultrasoundscanner in human onchocercal skin nodules for non-invasive sequential assessment during a macrofilaricidal trial with amocarzine in Guatemala. The first experiences.

Ultrasonography of onchocercal skin nodules was performed with an ophthalmologic real time linear scanner with a B probe of 10 MHz. A clinical trial in Guatemala with amocarzine (CGP 6140)--a new oral macrofilaricidal compound--investigated three repeat dose regimens and one placebo control group, each group consisting of six patients. Onchocercal nodules were scanned before treatment and on day 10, 30 and 60 after start of amocarzine. A total of 28 treated and 8 additional untreated nodules were analysed and compared with the histologic findings following nodulectomy at day 60. Of the 28 treated nodules, 21 were of onchocercal origin and seven were lymph nodes. The correlation between ultrasonography and histology was good in 25 patients, but did not match in three. In 20 out of 21 treated nodules a progressive ultrasonographic change over two months was seen. Of the eight additional untreated nodules, five were of onchocercal origin, one was a lymph node, one an epidermoid cyst and in one only fibrous tissue was detected. The ultrasonography correlated well to histology in seven nodules but not in one. In five onchocercal nodules no change was observed over two months. For initial control purposes six nodules were excised around day 10, four were of onchocercal origin and two were lymph nodes. The correlation was good in four. The present results indicate that an ophthalmologic real time linear scanner can be used in the bidimensional mode as a non-invasive method to assess sequentially the events in superficial onchocercal nodules following chemotherapy with amocarzine. This is the first objective non-invasive method permitting sequential assessment of the content of onchocercal nodules and it is far superior than subjective sequential manual palpation.

Longterm follow-up of onchocerciasis patients in Latin America after treatment and retreatment with amocarzine. Preliminary results.

Amocarzine has been reported to have onchocercacidal effects. Four months posttherapy the majority of adult worms were dead or moribund. The effect of skin microfilariae lasted up to one year as reflected by markedly reduced microfilaridermia. Since the duration of the onchocercacidal effect of amocarzine beyond one year was unknown and since such an effect may influence the planning of future control strategies, efforts were made to follow-up the already treated amocarzine patients for a second year. The present study from Latin America showed that various amocarzine drug regimens produced a prolonged reduction of microfilaridermia at the end of the second year following the initial therapy, the best levels were about 7-17% of the initial parasite load in the skin for some three days amocarzine regimens. Such an effect occurring in a transmission area of onchocerciasis in Latin America provides additional, although indirect, evidence of a macrofilaricidal effect of amocarzine. Similar experiences of a prolonged amocarzine effect on skin microfilariae has also been observed in West Africa (Ghana, Mali). Preliminary results of retreatment schedules at the start of the third year post-initial therapy showed that simplified postprandial dose regimen of one or two days were well tolerated. It is premature at the time of this report to judge upon their ultimate efficacy, but they had significantly reduced levels of moderate microfilaridermia.

Fine structure of microfilariae in the skin of onchocerciasis patients after exposure to amocarzine.

Transmission electron microscopy was used to demonstrate the effects of amocarzine (CGP 6140) on the fine structure of Onchocerca volvulus microfilariae (mf) in skin biopsies from patients treated orally in Guatemala or transepidermally exposed in Liberia. After 6-10 hours exposure to the drug most mf did not show any alterations and only a few mf contained increased numbers of vacuoles in the cytoplasm and clefts between cuticle and hypodermis. At 20-48 hours after treatment most of the mf showed distinct signs of damage. Most frequently seen was disintegration of the cytoplasm of the afibrillar portion of the muscle cells. Some mf showed also disintegration of the myofilaments and of the internal structure of the mitochondria in the muscle cells. Other signs were progressive separation of the cuticle from the hypodermis, increase of intracellular vacuoles and clefts and in some mf condensation of the cytoplasm. The type and the site of the morphological alterations were the same after both forms of amocarzine administration. The degree of morphological changes increased with the length of time of exposure to the drug. Microfilariae with morphological alterations were nearly always surrounded by adherent host cells, mostly eosinophils and macrophages.