Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Trauma ; 68(6): 1464-70, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20539190

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty is continuously rising because of an increasing number of knee joint replacements and an enhanced survivorship of the elderly population after knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to analyze the practicability and effectiveness of the various treatment methods for management of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty, and to determine the clinical and radiographic long-term results of patients following surgical and nonoperative treatment of these injuries. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of 41 patients (31 women and 10 men; average age, 78.6 years) with periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty between 1992 and 2008. Thirty-seven patients showed a periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur, and four patients had a periprosthetic proximal tibial fracture. Thirty-six patients underwent operative stabilization by plate fixation (n = 18), intramedullary nailing (n = 15) or revision arthroplasty (n = 3), and five patients were treated nonoperatively by long-term cast immobilization. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients returned to their preinjury activity level and were satisfied with their clinical outcome. In 10 patients, we saw a relevant decrease of knee function and severe limitations in gait and activities of daily living. Three patients died related to surgery. Successful fracture healing within 6 months was achieved in 33 (87%) of 38 patients. Failures of reduction or fixation occurred in 8 (21%) of 38 patients. Reoperation due to technical failures was necessary in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with current data in literature, we had a satisfactory outcome in following individualized treatment of periprosthetic fractures after knee joint replacement. Referring to the wide field of treatment options and high rates of complications, periprosthetic femoral fractures around the knee commonly constitute a challenging problem for the treating surgeons and require an adequate analysis of fracture etiology and a corresponding transfer into an individual treatment concept.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Fracturas del Fémur/terapia , Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Fracturas de la Tibia/terapia , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Clavos Ortopédicos , Placas Óseas , Moldes Quirúrgicos , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Recuperación de la Función , Reoperación , Factores de Riesgo , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Neurosurgery ; 64(4): 726-33; discussion 733, 2009 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19349830

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment of odontoid fractures that do not allow interfragmentary fracture compression involves either posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis or additional anterior stabilization using a plate construct. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical and radiographic outcome after anterior plate fixation of odontoid fractures that were not suitable for anterior screw fixation. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of 9 patients with an average age of 54 years at the time of surgery who had undergone anterior plate fixation of an odontoid fracture. Indications for using a plate construct were odontoid fractures with anterior oblique fracture lines, fractures with comminution or major displacement, and pathological fractures. RESULTS: Eight patients returned to their preinjury activity level and were satisfied with their treatment. One patient reported chronic pain symptoms and a notable decrease in cervical spine motion. Using the Smiley-Webster Scale to quantify their clinical outcome, we achieved an overall outcome score of 1.6. Bony fusion was achieved in all patients. Reduction or fixation failed in 2 patients. Reoperation for technical failures was not necessary in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: We had promising results using anterior plate fixation for surgical treatment of odontoid fractures that did not allow interfragmentary fracture compression. Because this method avoids the rigid fixation of the atlantoaxial joint in contrast to techniques of posterior cervical arthrodesis, it seems to be a practical option for the management of fracture types that require additional stabilization of the odontoid.


Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/métodos , Placas Óseas , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artrodesis/instrumentación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Examen Neurológico , Apófisis Odontoides/cirugía , Radiografía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Tomógrafos Computarizados por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...