RESUMEN
Midodrine is an oral vasopressor option that allows for discontinuation of intravenous vasopressors for patients with cardiovascular conditions. It does not have a US Food and Drug Administration-labeled indication for use in children, and there is a paucity of literature in patients ≤6 years of age. This case series describes 2 infants with complex congenital heart diseases initiated on midodrine for augmentation of systolic (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) to increase coronary perfusion. Case 1 was initiated on midodrine on hospital day 19 at a dose of 0.5 mg (0.17 mg/kg) enterally every 8 hours that was eventually increased to 1 mg (0.33 mg/kg) every 8 hours. Case 2 was initiated on midodrine on hospital day 15 at a dose of 2.5 mg (0.49 mg/kg) enterally every 8 hours, and this was decreased to 1.25 mg (0.25 mg/kg) every 8 hours due to high SBP. Both patients were discharged home on midodrine; other than the initially high SBP for Case 2, no other adverse drug events were noted. While midodrine was effective based on clinical response in these two infants, additional studies are needed due to the lack of safety and efficacy in children <6 years of age.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There is limited guidance on the most appropriate dosing strategy for intravenous (IV) acyclovir in obese patients. The manufacturer's labelling suggests using ideal body weight (IBW); however, previous pharmacokinetic studies of obese patients have shown more rapid systemic clearance and lower area under the curve and peak concentrations compared with patients with a body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m2. Although pharmacokinetic data suggest that plasma concentrations of acyclovir are best predicted when using adjusted body weight (AdjBW) doses, there is concern about higher rates of acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort review of adult patients with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 prescribed IV acyclovir ≥ 48 hours between 1 January 2014 and 31 August 2021 at a 511-bed academic medical centre. The primary objective was to compare AdjBW with IBW dosing in obese patients who had been prescribed IV acyclovir and to determine whether AdjBW dosing results in higher rates of AKI. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included: 61 were in the IBW cohort and 33 were in the AdjBW cohort. The median BMI [IQR] for all patients was 34.7 kg/m2 [31.8-40.6]. Patients in the AdjBW cohort received a significantly higher median acyclovir dose of 800 mg/dose [IQR 700-850] compared with 600 mg/dose [IQR 500-700] for the IBW cohort (P ≤ 0.0001). No patients dosed using AdjBW developed AKI compared with eight (13.1%) in the IBW group. CONCLUSION: In this study, 8.5% of all obese patients receiving acyclovir developed AKI. Further studies are needed to confirm dosing recommendations.