Influence of gestational age and fetal heart rate on the fetal mechanical PR interval.

OBJECTIVE: The fetal mechanical PR interval obtained via pulsed Doppler has previously been demonstrated to correlate with electrocardiographic PR interval measured in the neonate. We sought to further analyze the influence of fetal heart rate and gestational age upon the fetal mechanical PR interval. METHODS: We searched our database for mechanical PR intervals, which were obtained during fetal echocardiography performed in our antenatal diagnostic unit. We included fetuses with a normal cardiac structural survey. The mechanical PR interval is measured from the A wave of the mitral valve to the beginning of ventricular systole corresponding to the opening of the aortic valve. Linear regression curves were generated to examine the correlation of mechanical PR interval with gestational age and fetal heart rate. Analysis of variance was used to compare the mean variation across three gestational age groups: 17-21.9 weeks (n = 24), 22-25.9 weeks (n = 52) and 26-38 weeks (n = 20). RESULTS: Mechanical PR intervals were measured in 96 fetuses with normal fetal echocardiography. The mechanical PR interval was 123.9 +/- 10.3 ms (mean +/- SD), with a range of 90-150 ms. Linear regression curves correlating mechanical PR interval with fetal heart rate and gestational age demonstrated a flat slope with R2 = 0.016, p = 0.22 and R2 = 0.0004, p = 0.85, respectively. The mechanical PR interval measured over the three gestational ages was as follows (mean +/- SD): 122.3 +/- 10.5 ms for 17-21.9 weeks; 125.0 +/- 9.6 ms for 22-25.9 weeks; and 123.1 +/- 11.9 ms for 26-38 weeks. Analysis of variance revealed no difference among the mechanical PR interval means measured over the three gestational age groups (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Fetal mechanical PR interval ranges from 90 to 150 ms in fetuses with sonographically normal fetal cardiac structure and rate. The mechanical PR interval appears to be independent of gestational age and fetal heart rate.

Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and fetal outcomes after elective repeat Cesarean section versus a trial of labor in women after one prior uterine scar. STUDY DESIGN: All women with a previous single low transverse Cesarean section delivered at term with no contraindications to vaginal delivery were retrospectively identified in our database from January 1995 to October 1998. Outcomes were first analyzed by comparing mother-neonate dyads delivered by elective repeat Cesarean section to those undergoing a trial of labor. Secondarily, outcomes of mother-neonatal dyads who achieved a vaginal delivery or failed a trial of labor were compared to those who had elective repeat Cesarean delivery. RESULTS: Of 1408 deliveries, 749/927 (81%) had a successful vaginal birth after a prior Cesarean delivery. There were no differences in the rates of transfusion, infection, uterine rupture and operative injury when comparing trial of labor versus elective repeat Cesarean delivery. Neonates delivered by elective repeat Cesarean delivery were of earlier gestation and had higher rates of respiratory complications (p < 0.05). Mother-neonatal dyads with a failed trial of labor sustained the greatest risk of complications. CONCLUSION: Overall, neonatal and maternal outcomes compared favorably among women undergoing a trial of labor versus elective repeat Cesarean delivery. The majority of morbidity was associated with a failed trial of labor. Better selection of women likely to have a successful vaginal birth after a prior Cesarean delivery would be expected to decrease the risks of trial of labor.

Maternal pain and anxiety in genetic amniocentesis: expectation versus reality.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate maternal perceptions of both pain and anxiety before and after genetic amniocentesis. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective study of midtrimester, singleton pregnancies was conducted between March 2000 and July 2000. Study variables included patient demographics, medical and obstetric histories, indication for amniocentesis and a description of the source of information used by the patient regarding the procedure and technical degree of difficulty. Maternal pain and anxiety associated with performing amniocentesis were subjectively quantified with the use of the visual analog scale (VAS). Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed rank test, anova, and simple and stepwise regression analyses. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-three women participated in the study. Perception of pain before amniocentesis was significantly higher compared to that expressed immediately after the procedure, with a mean VAS score of 3.7 +/- 2.5 vs. 2.1 +/- 2.0 (P < 0.0001). Similarly, perception of anxiety was significantly greater prior to the procedure, with a mean VAS score of 4.6 +/- 2.8 vs. 2.8 +/- 2.4 after the amniocentesis (P < 0.0001). Perceptions of pain and anxiety were significantly and positively correlated to each other both before and after the procedure (P < 0.0001). History of a prior amniocentesis was the only variable associated with reducing expected pain and anxiety (negative correlation, P < 0.001), whereas the technical degree of difficulty was the only significant variable impacting on the actual pain and anxiety (positive correlation, P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Preamniocentesis counseling should emphasize the fact that, for most women, the actual pain and anxiety experienced during the procedure are significantly lower than expected. In fact, on a scale of 0-10, the mean level of pain was only 2.1, with a slightly higher mean level of anxiety.

Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes at term of a trial of labor in women with previous cesarean delivery who delivered neonates weighing > 4000 g versus women with those weighing < or = 4000 g. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed medical records for all women undergoing a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery during a 12-year period. The current analysis was limited to women at term with one prior cesarean and no other deliveries. The rates of cesarean delivery and symptomatic uterine rupture for women with infants weighing > 4000 g were compared to the rates for women with infants weighing < or = 4000 g. Logistic regression was used to control for the potential confounding by use of epidural, maternal age, labor induction, labor augmentation, indication for previous cesarean, type of uterine hysterotomy, year of delivery, receiving public assistance, and maternal race. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Of 2749 women, 13% (365) had infants with birth weights > 4000 g. Cesarean delivery rate associated with birth weights < or = 4000 g was 29% versus 40% for those with birth weights > 4000 g (P = .001). With use of logistic regression, we found that birth weight > 4000 g was associated with a 1.7-fold increase in risk of cesarean delivery (95% CI, 1.3-2.2). The rate of uterine rupture for women with infants weighing < or = 4000 g was 1.0% versus a 1.6% rate for those with infants weighing > 4000 g (P = .24). Although the logistic regression analysis revealed a somewhat higher rate of uterine rupture associated with birth weights of > 4000 g (adjusted OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.7-4.1), this difference was not statistically significant. The rate of uterine rupture was 2.4% for women with infants weighing > 4250 g, but this rate did not differ significantly from the rate of uterine rupture associated with birth weights < or = 4250 g (P = .1). CONCLUSION: A trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery may be a reasonable clinical option for pregnant women with suspected birth weights of > 4000 g, given that the rate of uterine rupture associated with these weights does not appear to be substantially increased when compared to lower birth weights. However, some caution may apply when considering a trial of labor in women with infants weighing > 4250 g. In these women with infants weighing > 4000 g, the likelihood of successful vaginal delivery, although lower than for neonates weighing < or = 4000 g, is still 60%.

Oxytocin dose and the risk of uterine rupture in trial of labor after cesarean.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between uterine rupture and oxytocin use in trial of labor after cesarean. METHODS: A case-control study was performed. Cases were all women with uterine ruptures who received oxytocin during a trial of labor after a single cesarean delivery within a 12-year period (n = 24). Four controls undergoing trial of labor after a single cesarean delivery were matched to each case by 500 g birth weight category, year of birth, and by induction or augmentation (n = 96). The study had an 80% power to detect a 40% increase in oxytocin duration or a 65% increase in total oxytocin dose. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen in initial oxytocin dose, maximum dose, or time to maximum dose. Although women with uterine ruptures had higher exposure to oxytocin as measured by mean total oxytocin dose (544 mU higher) and oxytocin duration (54 minutes longer), these differences were not statistically significant. Women with uterine rupture who received oxytocin were more likely to have experienced an episode of uterine hyperstimulation (37.5% compared with 20.8%, P =.05). However, the positive predictive value of hyperstimulation for uterine rupture was only 2.8%. CONCLUSION: Although no significant differences in exposure to oxytocin were detected between cases of uterine rupture and controls, the rarity of uterine rupture limited our power to detect small differences in exposure. In women receiving oxytocin, uterine rupture is associated with an increase in uterine hyperstimulation, but the clinical value of hyperstimulation for predicting uterine rupture is limited.

Trial of labor after 40 weeks' gestation in women with prior cesarean.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in women with prior cesareans delivering at or before 40 weeks' gestation with those delivering after 40 weeks. METHODS: We reviewed labor outcomes over 12 years at one institution for women with one prior cesarean and no other deliveries who had a trial of labor at term. We analyzed the rates of symptomatic uterine rupture and cesarean for term deliveries before or after 40 weeks and stratified for spontaneous and induced labor. Potential confounding by birth weight was controlled using logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Of 2775 women with one prior scar and no other deliveries, 1504 delivered at or before 40 weeks and 1271 delivered after 40 weeks. For spontaneous labor, rupture rate at or before 40 weeks was 0.5% compared with 1.0% after 40 weeks (P =.2, adjusted OR 2.1, CI 0.7, 5.7). For induced labor, uterine rupture rates were 2.1% at or before 40 weeks and 2.6% after 40 weeks (P =.7, adjusted OR 1.1, CI 0.4, 3.4). For spontaneous labor, rate of cesareans during subsequent trials of labor at or before 40 weeks was 25% compared with 33.5% after 40 weeks (P =.001, adjusted OR 1.5, CI 1.2, 1.8). For induced labor, rate of cesareans during subsequent trials of labor at or before 40 weeks was 33.8% compared with 43% after 40 weeks (P =.03, adjusted OR 1.5, CI 1.1, 2.2). CONCLUSION: The risk of uterine rupture does not increase substantially after 40 weeks but is increased with induction of labor regardless of gestational age. Because spontaneous labor after 40 weeks is associated with a cesarean rate similar to that following induced labor before 40 weeks, awaiting spontaneous labor after 40 weeks does not decrease the likelihood of successful vaginal delivery.

Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture.

OBJECTIVE: To relate interdelivery interval to risk of uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all women who had a trial of labor after cesarean delivery over 12 years (July 1984 to June 1996). Analysis was limited to women with only one prior cesarean delivery and no prior vaginal deliveries who delivered term singletons and whose medical records included the month and year of the prior delivery. The time in months between the prior cesarean delivery and the index trial of labor was calculated, and the women were divided accordingly to permit comparison with respect to symptomatic uterine rupture. RESULTS: Two thousand four hundred nine women had trials of labor after one prior cesarean delivery and had complete data from the medical records. There were 29 uterine ruptures (1.2%) in the population. For interdelivery intervals up to 18 months, the uterine rupture rate was 2.25% (seven of 311) compared with 1.05% (22 of 2098) with intervals of 19 months or longer (P =.07). Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the risk of uterine rupture according to interdelivery interval while controlling for maternal age, public assistance, length of labor, gestational age at least 41 weeks, and oxytocin use. Women with interdelivery intervals of up to 18 months were three times as likely (95% confidence interval, 1.2, 7.2) to have symptomatic uterine rupture. CONCLUSION: Interdelivery intervals of up to 18 months were associated with increased risk of symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean delivery compared with that for longer interdelivery intervals.

Effect of previous vaginal delivery on the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of prior vaginal delivery on the risk of uterine rupture in pregnant women undergoing a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of all pregnant women with a history of cesarean delivery who attempted a trial of labor during a 12-year period at a single center were reviewed. For the current analysis, the study population was limited to term pregnancies. The effect of previous vaginal delivery on the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor was evaluated. Separate analyses were performed for women with a single previous cesarean delivery and for those with >1 prior cesarean delivery. For each of these subgroups, the rate of uterine rupture among women who had > or =1 prior vaginal delivery was compared with the rate among women with no prior vaginal delivery. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the associations with control for confounding factors. RESULTS: Of 3783 women with 1 prior scar, 1021 (27.0%) also had > or =1 prior vaginal delivery. During a subsequent trial of labor, the rate of uterine rupture was 1.1% among pregnant women without prior vaginal delivery and 0.2% among pregnant women with prior vaginal delivery (P =.01). Logistic regression analysis controlling for duration of labor, induction, birth weight, maternal age, year of birth, epidural analgesia, and oxytocin augmentation indicated that, among women with a single scar, those with a prior vaginal delivery had a risk of uterine rupture that was one fifth that of women without a previous vaginal delivery (odds ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.8). In the group of 143 pregnant women with >1 previous cesarean delivery, women with a prior vaginal delivery had a somewhat lower risk of uterine rupture (3.9% vs 2.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-6.7). This difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Among women with 1 prior cesarean delivery undergoing a subsequent trial of labor, those with a prior vaginal delivery were at substantially lower risk of uterine rupture than women without a previous vaginal delivery.

Labor after previous cesarean: influence of prior indication and parity.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the risk of cesarean for women who had trials of labor after one prior cesarean differs from that of nulliparas overall and by indications for those cesareans. METHODS: We reviewed medical records of women who had trials of labor after cesareans between July 1984 and June 1996, and of nulliparas who delivered between December 1994 and August 1995. Cesarean rates for women with prior cesareans were compared with the rates for nulliparas overall and by prior cesarean indication (breech, failure to progress, nonreassuring fetal testing, or other). Lengths of labor for women who had repeat cesareans for failure to progress in index pregnancies were compared by prior cesarean indication. RESULTS: The cesarean rate was 28.7% (634 of 2207) for the prior cesarean group and 13.5% (219 of 1617) for nulliparas (P =.001), and varied according to the prior cesarean indication (13.9%, 37.3%, 25. 4%, and 24.8% for breech, failure to progress, nonreassuring fetal testing, and other, respectively). Mean durations of labor in the index pregnancies for women who had cesareans for failure to progress were 13.9, 11.5, 13.4, and 15.1 hours for breech, failure to progress, nonreassuring fetal testing, and other, respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall rates of cesareans were higher for women with one prior cesarean than for nulliparas. Rates of cesareans after trials of labor were related to the prior cesarean indications. Rates were highest for women whose prior cesareans were for failure to progress and lowest for women whose prior cesareans were for breech. The latter group had a rate that was essentially identical to that of nulliparas. Among women with cesareans for failure to progress in index pregnancies, lengths of labor were shorter for those whose prior cesareans were for failure to progress than for those whose prior cesareans were for other indications, suggesting that physicians may intervene earlier in these cases.

Intrapartum uterine rupture and dehiscence in patients with prior lower uterine segment vertical and transverse incisions.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gravidas with prior low vertical uterine incision(s) are at a higher risk for uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean delivery than women with prior low transverse uterine incision(s). METHODS: The medical records of women undergoing a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery over a 12-year period (July 1984-June 1996) at a tertiary-care hospital were reviewed. Maternal and perinatal outcomes for women with prior low transverse and low vertical incision were compared. Women whose low vertical incision was noted to extend into the corpus of the uterus were excluded. All uterine scar disruptions, which included both symptomatic ruptures and detected asymptomatic dehiscences, were analyzed together, and ruptures were examined separately. RESULTS: The outcomes of 2912 patients undergoing trial of labor for the low transverse group and 377 patients undergoing trial of labor for the low vertical group were compared. Overall, there were 38 (1.3%) scar disruptions in the low transverse group and six (1.6%) in the low vertical group, P = .6. There were 28 (1.0%) symptomatic ruptures in the low transverse group and 3 (0.8%) in the low vertical group, P > .999. The study had a power of 80% to detect an increase in the low vertical rupture rate from 1% (as noted for low transverse incisions) to 3%. CONCLUSION: Gravidas with a prior low vertical uterine incision are not at increased risk for uterine rupture during a trial of labor compared with women with a prior low transverse uterine incision.

Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether there is a difference in the rate of symptomatic uterine rupture after a trial of labor in women who have had 1 versus 2 prior cesarean deliveries. STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of all women with a history of either 1 or 2 prior cesarean deliveries who elected to undergo a trial of labor during a 12-year period (July 1984-June 1996) at the Brigham and Women's Hospital were reviewed. Rates of uterine rupture were compared for these 2 groups. Potential confounding variables were controlled by using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Women with 1 prior cesarean delivery (n = 3757) had a rate of uterine rupture of 0.8%, whereas women with 2 prior cesarean deliveries (n = 134) had a rate of uterine rupture of 3.7% (P =.001). In a logistic regression analysis that was controlled for maternal age, use of epidural analgesia, oxytocin induction, oxytocin augmentation, the use of prostaglandin E(2) gel, birth weight, gestational age, type of prior hysterotomy, year of trial of labor, and prior vaginal delivery, the odds ratio for uterine rupture in those patients with 2 prior cesarean deliveries was 4.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-13. 2) CONCLUSIONS: Women with a history of 2 prior cesarean deliveries have an almost 5-fold greater risk of uterine rupture than those with only 1 prior cesarean delivery.

Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to examine the risk of uterine rupture during induction or augmentation of labor in gravid women with 1 prior cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of all gravid women with history of cesarean delivery who attempted a trial of labor during a 12-year period at a single center were reviewed. The current analysis was limited to women at term with 1 prior cesarean delivery and no other deliveries. The rate of uterine rupture in gravid women within that group undergoing induction was compared with that in spontaneously laboring women. The association of oxytocin induction, oxytocin augmentation, and use of prostaglandin E(2) gel with uterine rupture was determined. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine these associations, with control for confounding factors. RESULTS: Of 2774 women in the analysis, 2214 had spontaneous onset of labor and 560 women had labor induced with oxytocin or prostaglandin E(2) gel. The overall rate of rupture among all patients with induction of labor was 2.3%, in comparison with 0.7% among women with spontaneous labor (P =.001). Among 1072 patients receiving oxytocin augmentation, the rate of uterine rupture was 1.0%, in comparison with 0.4% in nonaugmented, spontaneously laboring patients (P =.1). In a logistic regression model with control for birth weight, use of epidural, duration of labor, maternal age, year of delivery, and years since last birth, induction with oxytocin was associated with a 4.6-fold increased risk of uterine rupture compared with no oxytocin use (95% confidence interval, 1.5-14.1). In that model, augmentation with oxytocin was associated with an odds ratio of 2.3 (95% confidence interval, 0.8-7.0), and use of prostaglandin E(2) gel was associated with an odds ratio of 3.2 (95% confidence interval, 0.9-10.9). These differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Induction of labor with oxytocin is associated with an increased rate of uterine rupture in gravid women with 1 prior uterine scar in comparison with the rate in spontaneously laboring women. Although the rate of uterine rupture was not statistically increased during oxytocin augmentation, use of oxytocin in such cases should proceed with caution.

The second-trimester fetus with isolated choroid plexus cysts: a meta-analysis of risk of trisomies 18 and 21.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of trisomy 18 and trisomy 21 associated with isolated choroid plexus cysts diagnosed by ultrasound in the second trimester. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We reviewed the unabridged PREMEDLINE and MEDLINE databases for articles written in the English language regarding second-trimester fetal isolated choroid plexus cysts and trisomies 18 and 21, published in the period 1987-1997. Selection criteria included only second-trimester, prospective studies in which the rate of fetal isolated choroid plexus cysts could be calculated, the number of fetuses with trisomy 18 and 21 was reported clearly, and pregnant women of all ages were included, rather than only those at high risk for aneuploidy due to advanced maternal age. TABULATION AND RESULTS: Thirteen prospective studies, comprising 246,545 second-trimester scans, were selected. Among 1346 fetuses with isolated choroid plexus cysts, seven had trisomy 18, and five had trisomy 21. For each study, a 2 x 2 table was constructed and the likelihood ratio of a positive test was computed. The likelihood ratios for trisomies 18 and 21 were found to be homogeneous (P = .08 for trisomy 18, and P = .16 for trisomy 21). The summary likelihood ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each chromosomal abnormality were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed effects model of meta-analysis. The summary likelihood ratio for trisomy 18 was 13.8 (CI 7.72, 25.14, P < .001) and for trisomy 21 was 1.87 (CI 0.78, 4.46, P = .16). CONCLUSION: The likelihood of trisomy 18 was 13.8 times greater than the a priori risk in fetuses with isolated choroid plexus cysts diagnosed in the second trimester. However, the likelihood of trisomy 21 was not significantly greater than the a priori risk with isolated choroid plexus cysts. The data supported offering pregnant women karyotyping to rule out trisomy 18 when maternal age at delivery is 36 years or older, or when the risk for trisomy 18 detected by serum multiple-marker screen is more than one in 3000.

Placenta previa percreta involving the left broad ligament and cervix. A case report.

BACKGROUND: Placenta previa percreta with invasion of the broad ligament and uterine cervix is an extremely rare condition and carries high maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. CASE: A 39-year-old, multiparous woman with two previous cesarean sections presented in active labor at term with placenta previa percreta involving the left broad ligament and cervix. The patient was managed by antepartum diagnosis of placenta previa accreta, supracervical hysterectomy, and blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: This case was managed consistent with the literature, and favorable maternal and fetal outcomes were achieved.

Outcomes of severely abnormal umbilical artery doppler velocimetry in structurally normal singleton fetuses.

OBJECTIVE: To construct a management guide for preterm pregnancies complicated by severely abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on all cases of absent or reversed end-diastolic flow umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry identified through an ultrasound data base. Maternal and perinatal outcome variables were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using both parametric and nonparametric statistical techniques. Seventy-one cases were identified over a 5-year period. After excluding multiple gestations, anomalous fetuses, and two cases that were terminated before 24 weeks' gestation, 56 singleton gestations remained for analysis. RESULTS: Among the 56 subjects, there were 45 survivors and 11 deaths (five fetal and six neonatal deaths). Nonsurvivors had a significantly lower gestational age at diagnosis and delivery. Nonsurviving live-born neonates had lower Apgar scores and were significantly smaller; however, there were no differences in proportion or severity of fetal growth restriction in survivors and nonsurvivors. There were no differences in last biophysical profile before delivery or interval from diagnosis of reversed end-diastolic flow to delivery. Predictors of nonsurvival were the presence of reversed end-diastolic flow and oligohydramnios. Perinatal mortality for reversed end-diastolic flow was 333/1000 and 94/1000 for absent end-diastolic flow. Risk for perinatal death was highly gestational age dependent. For delivery at less than 26 weeks, survival was one of four; at 26-27.9 weeks, survival was seven of 12; and at 28 weeks or greater, survival was 37 of 40. CONCLUSION: Whereas severely abnormal umbilical artery blood flow poses significant risk for pregnancy, perinatal mortality is dominated by gestational age at diagnosis and delivery. This may reflect the severity of the disease or the low survival of very immature gestations. Interventions on behalf of the fetus at very early gestational ages should be undertaken with caution.

Emergency peripartum hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: By means of hospital-based data over 9 years we sought to evaluate the clinical indications and incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy by demographic characteristics and reproductive history. STUDY DESIGN: From the obstetric records of all deliveries at Brigham and Women's Hospital between Oct. 1, 1983, and July 31, 1991, we identified all women undergoing emergency peripartum hysterectomy, calculated crude and adjusted incidence rates, conducted statistical tests of linear trends and heterogeneity, and observed the clinical indications preceding the onset of this procedure. RESULTS: There were 117 cases of peripartum gravid hysterectomy identified during this period, for an overall annual incidence of 1.55 per 1000 deliveries. The rate increased with increasing parity and was significantly influenced by placenta previa and a history of cesarean section. The incidence by parity increased from one in 143 deliveries in nulliparous women with placenta previa to one in four deliveries in multiparous women with four or more deliveries with placenta previa. Likewise, the incidence increased from one in 143 deliveries in women with one prior live birth and a prior cesarean section to one in 14 deliveries in multiparous women with four or more deliveries with a history of a prior cesarean section. Both these trends were highly significant (p < 0.001). Abnormal adherent placentation was the most common cause preceding gravid hysterectomy (64%, p < 0.001), with uterine atony accounting for 21%. Although no maternal deaths occurred, maternal morbidity remained high, including postoperative infection in 58 (50%), intraoperative urologic injury in 10 patients (9%), and need for transfusion in 102 patients (87%). CONCLUSIONS: The data identify abnormal adherent placentation as the primary cause for gravid hysterectomy. The data also illustrate how the incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy increases significantly with increasing parity, especially when influenced by a current placenta previa or a prior cesarean section. Maternal morbidity remained high although no maternal deaths occurred.

Fetal hemivertebrae: associated anomalies, significance, and outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To study fetuses who had the sonographic diagnosis of hemivertebrae made in utero (excluding open neural tube defects) and to determine the incidence of associated anomalies, karyotypes, and neonatal outcome. METHODS: Twenty-seven fetuses with sonographically detected vertebral abnormalities (excluding neural tube defects) and postnatal follow-up were included in the study. Associated structural defects and karyotypic anomalies were tabulated. The outcome for fetuses with isolated vertebral abnormalities on prenatal sonogram was compared with that of fetuses with associated anomalies. RESULTS: Eleven of 27 fetuses had hemivertebrae as the only sonographic anomaly. Nine of the 11 were live-born with a good outcome; one patient elected pregnancy termination, and one fetus died of sepsis after premature rupture of the membranes. Sixteen fetuses had other anomalies including cardiac, intestinal, renal, intracranial, and limb anomalies. Seven of these 16 had Potter syndrome, two of whom also had sacral agenesis. Only five of those with additional anomalies survived; five died and six pregnancies were electively terminated. Because four of the six aborted fetuses had Potter syndrome (renal dysgenesis), a lethal malformation, a total of at least nine of the 16 fetuses with other anomalies would not have survived. All seven fetuses with severe oligohydramnios had lethal anomalies. Eighteen fetuses underwent karyotyping (including all those with isolated vertebral anomalies), and all had normal karyotypes. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that sonographically diagnosed, isolated fetal vertebral anomalies carry a good prognosis and the likelihood of a normal karyotype. The presence of associated anomalies reduces the survival to 50%, and when accompanied by significant oligohydramnios, the mortality is 100%.