Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 114(6): 837-844, 2022 06 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35171249

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aims to quantify the extent and diversity of the cancer care workforce, beyond medical oncologists, to inform future demand because the number of cancer survivors is expected to grow in the United States. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data were used to evaluate health-care use of cancer survivors diagnosed between 2000 and 2014, enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare Parts A and B, and 65 years or older in 2008-2015. We calculated percentage of cancer survivors who saw each clinician specialty and their average annual number of visits in each phase of care. We projected the national number of individuals receiving care and number of annual visits by clinician specialty and phase of care through 2040. RESULTS: Cancer survivors had higher care use in the first year after diagnosis and last year of life phases. During the initial year after cancer diagnosis, most survivors were seen for cancer-related care by a medical oncologist (59.1%), primary care provider (55.9%), and/or other cancer-treating physicians (42.2%). The percentage of survivors with cancer-related visits to each specialty declined after the first year after diagnosis, plateauing after year 6-7. However, at 10 or more years after diagnosis, approximately 20% of cancer survivors had visits to medical oncologists and an average of 4 visits a year. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors had higher care use in the first year after diagnosis and last year of life. High levels of care use across specialties in all phases of care have important implications for models of survivorship care coordination and workforce planning.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias , Anciano , Humanos , Medicare , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Sobrevivientes , Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Recursos Humanos
2.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 29(7): 1304-1312, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32522832

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of cancer survivorship is increasing. In this study, we provide contemporary population-based estimates and projections of the overall and site-specific cancer-attributable medical care costs in the United States. METHODS: We identified survivors aged ≥65 years diagnosed with cancer between 2000 and 2012 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database and used 2007 to 2013 claims to estimate costs by cancer site, phases of care, and stage at diagnosis. Annualized average cancer-attributable costs for medical care (Medicare Parts A and B) and oral prescription drugs (Medicare Part D) were estimated by subtracting costs between patients with cancer and matched controls. Costs are reported in 2019 U.S. dollars. We combined phase-specific attributable costs with prevalence projections to estimate national costs from 2015 through 2030. RESULTS: Overall annualized average costs were highest in the end-of-life-cancer death phase, followed by the initial and continuing phases (medical care: $105,500, $41,800, and $5,300 and oral prescription drugs: $4,200, $1,800, $1,100, respectively). There was considerable variation in costs by cancer site and stage. Overall national costs in 2015 were $183 billion and projected to increase 34% to $246 billion by 2030, based only on population growth. CONCLUSIONS: Phase of care cancer-attributable cost estimates by cancer site and stage are key inputs for simulation models and cost-effectiveness analyses. IMPACT: The national cancer-attributed medical care costs in the United States are substantial and projected to increase dramatically by 2030, due to population changes alone, reflecting the rising burden of cancer care among cancer survivors.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas , Neoplasias/economía , Anciano , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Humanos , Estados Unidos
3.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 16(1): e1-e18, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31647697

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: End-of-life (EOL) cancer care is costly, with challenges regarding intensity and place of care. We described EOL care and costs for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in the United States and the province of Ontario, Canada, to inform better care delivery. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with CRC from 2007 to 2013, who died of any cancer from 2007 to 2013 at age ≥ 66 years, were selected from the US SEER cancer registries linked to Medicare claims (n = 16,565) and the Ontario Cancer Registry linked to administrative health data (n = 6,587). We estimated total and resource-specific costs (2015 US dollars) from public payer perspectives over the last 360 days of life by 30-day periods, by stage at diagnosis (0-II, III, IV). RESULTS: In all months, especially 30 days before death, higher percentages of SEER-Medicare than Ontario patients received chemotherapy (15.7% v 8.0%), and imaging tests (39.4% v 31.1%). A higher percentage of Ontario patients were hospitalized (62.5% v 51.0%), but 43.2% of hospitalized SEER-Medicare patients had intensive care unit (ICU) admissions versus 17.9% of hospitalized Ontario patients. Cost differences between cohorts were greater for patients with stage IV disease. In the last 30 days, mean total costs for patients with stage IV disease were $15,881 (SEER-Medicare) and $12,034 (Ontario) versus $19,354 and $17,312 for stage 0-II. Hospitalization costs were higher for SEER-Medicare patients ($11,180 v $9,434), with lower daily hospital costs in Ontario ($1,067 v $2,004). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest opportunities for reducing chemotherapy and ICU use in the United States and hospitalizations in Ontario.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Cuidado Terminal/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
4.
J Clin Oncol ; 35(5): 529-535, 2017 Feb 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28045621

RESUMEN

Purpose Multiple agents for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been approved in the past decade, but little is known about their use and associated spending and survival. Methods We used SEER-Medicare data for elderly patients with a new diagnosis of advanced-stage NSCLC and were treated with antineoplastic agents between 2000 and 2011 (N = 22,163). We estimated the adjusted percentage of patients who received each agent, days while on treatment, survival, and spending in the 12 months after diagnosis. Results During the 12-year study period, a marked shift in treatment occurred along with a rapid adoption of pemetrexed (39.2%), erlotinib (20.3%), and bevacizumab (18.9%) and a decline in paclitaxel (38.7%), gemcitabine (17.0%), and vinorelbine (5.7%; all P < .05). The average total days on therapy increased by 5 days (from 103 to 108 days). Patients who received bevacizumab, erlotinib, or pemetrexed had the longest treatment durations on average (approximately 146 days v 75 days for those who did not receive these agents). Approximately 44% of patients received antineoplastic agents in the last 30 days of life throughout the study period. Acute inpatient spending declined (from $29,376 to $23,731), whereas outpatient spending increased 23% (from $37,931 to $46,642). Median survival gains of 1.5 months were observed. Conclusion Considerable shifts in the treatment of advanced-stage NSCLC occurred along with modest gains in survival and total Medicare spending. More precise outcome information is needed to inform value-based treatment decisions for advanced-stage NSCLC.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Quimioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos
6.
Med Care ; 54(5): 490-7, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26900834

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the use and costs of antineoplastic regimens for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We report population-based trends over a 10-year period in the treatment, survival, and costs in mCRC patients, stratified by ages 65-74 and 75+. METHODS: We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data for persons diagnosed with metastatic colon (N=16117) or rectal cancer (N=4008) between 2000 and 2009. We estimated the adjusted percent of patients who received antineoplastic agents, by type, number, and their costs 12 months following diagnosis. We report the percent of patients who received 3 or more of commonly prescribed agents and estimate survival for the 24-month period following diagnosis by age and treatment. RESULTS: The percentage that received 3 or more agents increased from 3% to 73% in colon patients aged 65-74 and from 2% to 53% in patients 75+. Similar increases were observed in rectal patients. Average 1-year costs per patient in 2009 were $106,461 and $102,680 for colon and rectal cancers, respectively, reflecting an increase of 32% and 20%, for patients who received antineoplastic agents. Median survival increased by about 6 and 10 months, respectively, for colon and rectal patients aged 65-74 who received antineoplastic agents, but an improvement of only 1 month of median survival was observed for patients 75+. CONCLUSIONS: Expensive multiple agent regimens are increasingly used in older mCRC patients. For patients aged 64-75 years, these treatments may be associated with several months of additional life, but patients aged 75+ may incur considerable expense without any survival benefit.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Programa de VERF , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos
7.
BMC Cancer ; 14: 233, 2014 Mar 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24685149

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Physician recommendations for cancer screening and prevention are associated with patient compliance. However, time constraints may limit physicians' ability to provide all recommended preventive services, especially with increasing demand from the Affordable Care Act in the United States. Team-based practice that includes advanced practice registered nurses and physician assistants (APRN/PA) may help meet this demand. This study investigates the relationship between an APRN/PA visit and receipt of guideline-consistent cancer screening and prevention recommendations. METHODS: Data from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression to assess provider type seen and receipt of guideline-consistent cancer screening and prevention recommendations (n = 26,716). RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, women who saw a primary care physician (PCP) and an APRN/PA or a PCP without an APRN/PA in the past 12 months were more likely to be compliant with cervical and breast cancer screening guidelines than women who did not see a PCP or APRN/PA (all p < 0.0001 for provider type). Women and men who saw a PCP and an APRN/PA or a PCP without an APRN/PA were also more likely to receive guideline consistent colorectal cancer screening and advice to quit smoking and participate in physical activity than women and men who did not see a PCP or APRN/PA (all p < 0.01 for provider type). CONCLUSIONS: Seeing a PCP alone, or in conjunction with an APRN/PA is associated with patient receipt of guideline-consistent cancer prevention and screening recommendations. Integrating APRN/PA into primary care may assist with the delivery of cancer prevention and screening services. More intervention research efforts are needed to explore how APRN/PA will be best able to increase cancer screening, HPV vaccination, and receipt of behavioral counseling, especially during this era of healthcare reform.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Neoplasias/psicología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Cooperación del Paciente , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Asistentes Médicos/psicología , Fumar
8.
Neuro Oncol ; 14(3): 351-9, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22241797

RESUMEN

Standard treatment for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) changed in 2005 when addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to maximal surgical resection followed by radiation therapy (RT) was shown to prolong survival in a clinical trial. In this study, we assessed treatment patterns and survival of patients with GBM in community settings in the United States. Patients with newly diagnosed GBM who were aged ≥20 years in 2006 (n = 1202) were identified as part of the National Cancer Institute 's Patterns of Care Studies. We assessed treatment patterns, and in the subset of patients who received total or partial surgical resection, we used multivariable regression analysis to assess patient, clinical, and health system factors associated with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and RT and survival through 2008. Approximately 65% of patients with GBM received total or partial surgical resection, and approximately 70% of these patients received adjuvant TMZ and RT. Receipt of adjuvant therapy was associated with patient age, marital status, health insurance, and tumor location. Median survival in all patients was 10 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9-11 months). Receipt of adjuvant therapy following resection was associated with a lower risk of dying in adjusted analyses for patients who received TMZ and RT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25; 95% CI, 0.18-0.35) and other adjuvant therapies (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.81), compared with no adjuvant therapy. We observed rapid diffusion of a new standard of treatment, adjuvant and concurrent TMZ with RT, among adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM in the community setting following publication of a pivotal clinical trial.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Glioblastoma/mortalidad , Glioblastoma/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Dacarbazina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención al Paciente , Temozolomida , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
9.
Melanoma Res ; 21(6): 547-54, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21897302

RESUMEN

We examined trends in the treatment and survival in a population-based sample of white patients diagnosed with local-stage and regional-stage cutaneous melanoma in 1995, 1996, or 2001, treated in communities across the USA with vital status follow-up through 2007. White patients, aged 20 years or older with invasive cutaneous melanoma, were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results population-based registries. Hospital and pathology records were reabstracted and physicians were asked to verify the provided therapy. The percentage of patients receiving lymph node biopsies increased over time. Sentinel lymph node biopsy increased between 1995 and 2001 from 5 to 32% for men and from 9 to 35% for women. The use of chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and immunotherapy changed little. Facilities with approved residency training programs were more likely to perform lymph node dissections, to perform sentinel lymph node biopsy, and to treat patients more aggressively than were facilities without such programs. Men were significantly more likely than women to die of cutaneous melanoma. In multivariable survival analysis, after adjusting for age, Charlson score, and surgical margins, survival did not change significantly over this time. Deaths were associated with increasing tumor thickness for men and women. Surgical treatment of local or regional melanoma became more extensive over time with fewer local excisions and more lymph node dissections, but with little change in adjuvant therapy. Survival was associated with tumor thickness. Early detection when the tumor thickness is less may decrease mortality. Future research should especially target decreasing the disparity in survival between men and women.


Asunto(s)
Oncología Médica/tendencias , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/terapia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Oncología Médica/métodos , Melanoma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Población , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Carga Tumoral , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
10.
Cancer ; 116(15): 3712-21, 2010 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20564096

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The number of adult survivors of childhood cancer in the United States is increasing because of effective treatments and improved survival. The purpose of this study was to use a national, population-based sample to estimate the burden of illness in adult survivors of childhood cancer. METHODS: A total of 410 adult survivors of childhood cancer and 294,641 individuals without cancer were identified from multiple years of the National Health Interview Survey. Multiple measures of burden, general health, and lost productivity were compared using multivariate regression analyses including: logistic, polytomous logit, proportional odds, and linear models. RESULTS: Controlling for the effects of age, sex, race/ethnicity, and survey year, adult survivors of childhood cancer reported poorer outcomes across the majority of general health measures and productivity measures than individuals without cancer. Survivors were more likely to report their health status as fair or poor (24.3% vs 10.9%; P<.001); having any health limitation in any way (12.9% vs 3.4%; P<.001); being unable to work because of health problems (20.9% vs 6.3%; P<.001); and being limited in the amount/kind of work because of health problems (30.9% vs 10.6%; P<.001). When categorized by time since diagnosis, cancer survivors had poor health outcomes in every time interval, with the greatest limitations in the initial 4 years after diagnosis and 30 or more years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Across multiple measures, adult survivors of childhood cancers have poorer health outcomes and more health limitations than similar individuals without cancer.


Asunto(s)
Eficiencia , Estado de Salud , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/terapia , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Sobrevivientes , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Vigilancia de la Población
11.
J Am Diet Assoc ; 109(8): 1376-83, 2009 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19631043

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The consumption of added sugars (eg, white sugar, brown sugar, and high-fructose corn syrup) displaces nutrient-dense foods in the diet. The intake of added sugars in the United States is excessive. Little is known about the predictors of added sugar intake. OBJECTIVE: To examine the independent relationships of socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity with added sugar intake, and to evaluate the consistency of relationships using a short instrument to those from a different survey using more precise dietary assessment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, nationally representative, interviewer-administered survey. SUBJECTS/SETTING: Adults (aged > or = 18 years) participating in the 2005 US National Health Interview Survey Cancer Control Supplement responding to four added sugars questions (n=28,948). STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: The intake of added sugars was estimated using validated scoring algorithms. Multivariate analysis incorporating sample weights and design effects was conducted. Least squares means and confidence intervals, and significance tests using Wald F statistics are presented. Analyses were stratified by sex and controlled for potential confounders. RESULTS: The intake of added sugars was higher among men than women and inversely related to age, educational status, and family income. Asian Americans had the lowest intake and Hispanics the next lowest intake. Among men, African Americans had the highest intake, although whites and American Indians/Alaskan Natives also had high intakes. Among women, African Americans and American Indians/Alaskan Natives had the highest intakes. Intake of added sugars was inversely related to educational attainment in whites, African Americans, Hispanic men, and American Indians/Alaskan Native men, but was unrelated in Asian Americans. These findings were generally consistent with relationships in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2004 (using one or two 24-hour dietary recalls). CONCLUSIONS: Race/ethnicity, family income, and educational status are independently associated with intake of added sugars. Groups with low income and education are particularly vulnerable to diets with high added sugars. Differences among race/ethnicity groups suggest that interventions to reduce intake of added sugars should be tailored. The National Health Interview Survey added sugars questions with accompanying scoring algorithms appear to provide an affordable and useful means of assessing relationships between various factors and added sugars intake.


Asunto(s)
Sacarosa en la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Escolaridad , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Alimentaria/etnología , Renta , Clase Social , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Edad , Asiático/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Sacarosa en la Dieta/efectos adversos , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Indígenas Norteamericanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Encuestas Nutricionales , Valor Nutritivo , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/etiología , Distribución por Sexo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Edulcorantes/administración & dosificación , Edulcorantes/efectos adversos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
Cancer ; 115(12): 2744-54, 2009 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19396819

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are relatively uncommon tumors. Data regarding the patterns of care of patients with STS and its consistency with available guidelines are relatively sparse. The authors conducted a detailed analysis of STS patients diagnosed in 2002 and sampled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. METHODS: The authors sampled 1369 patients with invasive sarcomas. Hospital records were reabstracted, and treating physicians were contacted to verify the therapy provided to each patient. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 60 years. There was a slight male predominance among the patients with nongynecologic sarcomas. Fifty percent of the patients had localized stage sarcoma. Most patients received surgery, but negative margins were obtained in only 50% of patients. Complete resection was less frequent in patients >or=50 years old. Radiation therapy was used in 53% of patients with extremity sarcomas but in only 20% to 30% of the patients with sarcomas at other sites. About 27% of all patients received chemotherapy. Tumor grade was significantly associated with the use of radiation and chemotherapy. Surgical resection, tumor grade, tumor size, use of radiation therapy, and age significantly influenced survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of care of STS differ based on the site of the tumor. The patterns of care for extremity sarcomas are fairly consistent with the available recommendations, but the patterns of care for other sites are less consistent. In addition to certain tumor characteristics, age of the patient was significantly associated with therapy and patient outcome.


Asunto(s)
Sarcoma/terapia , Factores de Edad , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Extremidades , Femenino , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población , Programa de VERF , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Sarcoma/radioterapia , Sarcoma/cirugía , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...