Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Asunto principal
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 907: 174267, 2021 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34146590

RESUMEN

Ulinastatin is a broad-spectrum protease inhibitor widely used for the treatment of various inflammation-related diseases owing to its recognized excellent anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective properties. However, whether ulinastatin can relieve postoperative pain remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the analgesic effects of ulinastatin administered either as a single agent or in combination with sufentanil in a validated preclinical rat model of postoperative pain induced by plantar incision. We found that incisional surgery on the hind paw of these rats induced sustained ipsilateral mechanical pain hypersensitivity that lasted for at least 10 days. A single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of ulinastatin prevented the development and reversed the maintenance of incision-induced mechanical pain hypersensitivity in a dose-dependent manner. However, ulinastatin had no effect on the baseline nociceptive threshold. Moreover, repeated i.p. injections of ulinastatin persistently attenuated incision-induced mechanical pain hypersensitivity and promoted recovery from the surgery. The rats did not develop any analgesic tolerance over the course of repeated injections of ulinastatin. A single i.p. injection of ulinastatin was also sufficient to inhibit the initiation and maintenance of incision-induced hyperalgesic priming when the rats were subsequently challenged with an ipsilateral intraplantar prostaglandin E2 injection. Furthermore, the combined administration of ulinastatin and sufentanil significantly enhanced the analgesic effect of sufentanil on postoperative pain, which involved mechanisms other than a direct influence on opioid receptors. These findings demonstrated that ulinastatin had a significant analgesic effect on postoperative pain and might be a novel pharmacotherapeutic agent for managing postoperative pain either alone or as an adjuvant.


Asunto(s)
Sufentanilo , Analgésicos , Animales , Glicoproteínas , Hiperalgesia , Umbral del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio , Ratas
2.
J Pain Res ; 14: 1201-1214, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33976570

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ulinastatin, a broad-spectrum serine protease inhibitor, has been widely used to treat various diseases clinically. However, so far, the antinociceptive effect of ulinastatin remains less studied experimentally and the underlying mechanisms of ulinastatin for pain relief remain unclear. This study aimed to find evidence of the analgesic effect of ulinastatin on acute somatic and visceral pain. METHODS: The analgesic effect of ulinastatin on acute somatic and visceral pain was evaluated by using formalin and acetic acid-induced writhing test. The analgesic mechanism of ulinastatin was verified by detecting the peripheral inflammatory cell infiltration and spinal glial activation with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry staining. RESULTS: We found that both of intraperitoneal (i.p.) pre-administration and post-administration of ulinastatin could reduce the total number of flinching and the licking duration following intraplantar formalin injection in a dose-related manner. However, the inhibitory effect of ulinastatin existed only in the second phase (Phase 2) of formalin-induced spontaneous pain response, with no effect in the first phase (Phase 1). The formalin-induced edema and ulcer were also improved by i.p. administration of ulinastatin. Moreover, i.p. administration of ulinastatin was also able to delay the occurrence of acetic acid-induced writhing and reduced the total number of writhes dose-dependently. We further demonstrated that ulinastatin significantly decreased the local inflammatory cell infiltration in injured paw and peritoneum tissue under formalin and acetic acid test separately. The microglial and astrocytic activation in the spinal dorsal horn induced by intraplantar formalin and i.p. acetic acid injection were also dramatically inhibited by i.p. administration of ulinastatin. CONCLUSION: Our results for the first time provided a new line of evidence showing that ulinastatin could attenuate acute somatic and visceral pain by inhibiting the peripheral and spinal inflammatory reaction.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA