Molecular and clinical characterization of ICOS expression in breast cancer through large-scale transcriptome data.

ICOS (Inducible T Cell Costimulator), one of the co-stimulatory B7 superfamily members, was characterized as a co-stimulatory receptor for T-cell enhancement. However, the role of ICOS in breast cancer remains largely unknown. The present study systematically investigated the expression pattern and its relation to clinical characteristics and immunotherapy by integrating multiple clinical cohorts and large-scale gene expression data. This study included 2994 breast tumor samples with transcriptome data and matched clinical data. To make our findings more reliable, we set the TCGA cohort as the discovery set and the METABRIC cohort as the validation set. The expression of ICOS in breast cancer is strongly associated with major clinical and molecular characteristics. There is an association between higher ICOS expression and malignant subtypes and grades of tumors. In addition, gene ontology analysis based on genes significantly correlated with ICOS expression indicated that the expression of ICOS is mainly associated with immune responses and inflammation. We also observed strong correlations between ICOS and other promising immune-checkpoint molecules, including PD1, PDL1, CTLA4, and IDO1. Furthermore, we found that ICOS expression is associated with the response to anti-PDL1 immunotherapy and may serve as a biomarker for immunotherapy prediction. Our results indicated higher ICOS expression is significantly associated with favorable survival in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, but not for all subtypes of breast cancer patients. In summary, ICOS correlates with higher malignant breast cancers, and it contributes to the regulation of the immune microenvironment of breast tumors, making it a potential biomarker and immunotherapy target.

Role of Xihuang capsule combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel on the treatment of stage III breast cancer and T cell subsets, survival rate and adverse reactions.

To investigate the impact of Xihuang Capsule combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel on the treatment of stage III breast cancer and T cell subsets, survival rate and adverse reactions. Totally 200 patients with stage III breast cancer were evenly randomized into control group (albumin-bound paclitaxel for chemotherapy) and observation group (Xihuang Capsules for adjuvant therapy based on the treatment of the control group). The RR and DCR of the observation group was markedly higher as compared to the control group (66.7% vs 28.6%; 80.9% VS 47.6%) (all P <0.05). After 4 weeks of treatment, the CD8+ in the two groups decreased, while CD3+ and CD4+ increased, and the change in observation group was more significant (all P<0.05). The observation group exhibited a better half-year, 1-year, 1.5-year and 2-year survival rates compared to the control group (81.0% vs 71.4%, 71.4% vs 57.1%, 57.1% vs 33.3% and 42.9%vs 19.0%) (all P<0.05). Adding Xihuang Capsule to adjuvant therapy with albumin paclitaxel chemotherapy benefits the patient's immunity and survival rate, with good efficacy and safety profiles.

Effect of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy on the incidence of surgical-site wound infection: A meta-analysis.

A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the impact of robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomies on postoperative surgical site wound infections. A comprehensive computerised search of databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and Wanfang Data, was performed to identify studies comparing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with laparoscopicPD. Relevant studies were searched from the inception of the database construction until April 2023. The meta-analysis outcomes were analysed using odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The RevMan 5.4 software was used for the meta-analysis. The findings of the meta-analysis showed that patients who underwent laparoscopic PD had a significantly lower incidence of surgical-site wound (16.52% vs. 18.92%, OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.90, P = .0005), superficial wound (3.65% vs. 7.57%, OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.39-0.68, P < .001), and deep wound infections (1.09% vs. 2.23%, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.34-0.85, P = .008) than those who received robotic PD. However, because of variations in sample size between studies, some studies suffered from methodological quality deficiencies. Therefore, further validation of this result is needed in future studies with higher quality and larger sample sizes.

Breast-Conserving Surgery in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objectives: The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in treating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and analyze the influencing factors and predictors of the efficiency and prognosis of NAC. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by dividing patients into two groups according to two different therapy methods. With BCS as the exposure factor, 46 cases were assigned to the exposed group and 80 cases to the nonexposed group. We compare the difference in operation-related indicators, postoperative complications, local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, and overall survival (OS) rate between the two groups. The factors affecting the efficiency and prognosis of NAC were analyzed by binary logistic regression, and the optimal cutoff value was determined by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The survival curve was plotted, and the univariate log-rank test was performed to analyze the difference in OS between the two groups. The influencing factors of OS were analyzed by the Cox risk regression model. Results: NAC + BCS resulted in significantly less intraoperative blood loss, lower incidence of postoperative complications, and shorter operative time and length of hospital stay than that in NAC (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in local recurrence, distant metastasis, or OS between the two groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the clinical stage I and Ki-67 high expression were independent protective factors of the efficacy of NAC. The high expression of Ki-67 and nondecline expression of Ki-67 were independent risk factors of prognosis. Ki-67 high expression was an independent risk factor of OS (P < 0.05). The ROC curve showed that the AUC of Ki-67 for NAC efficacy, prognosis, and OS were 0.706, 0.820, and 0.687, respectively, with optimal cutoff values of 25.5%, 29.0%, and 32.5%, respectively. Survival analysis showed that the OS of patients with NAC + BCS was 73.9% and NAC + MRM was 70.0% (P > 0.05). In the low expression subgroup of Ki-67, the OS of the two groups were 100.0% and 77.8%, respectively (P=0.060). In the high expression subgroup of Ki-67, the OS of the two groups were 53.8% and 63.6%, respectively (P=0.419). Conclusions: NAC + BCS is a good method for treating TNBC, which has an obvious short-term effect and a good long-term prognosis. Clinical stage I and the high expression of Ki-67 are independent protective factors for the efficacy of NAC. The high expression of Ki-67 and nondecline expression of Ki-67 are independent risk factors of prognosis. Ki-67 is a potential predictor for the efficacy, prognosis, and OS of NAC in TNBC patients. The high expression of Ki-67 indicates better NAC efficacy, a poorer prognosis, and a lower OS.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Breast-Conserving Surgery in the Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Objective: To study the clinical efficacy and quality of life of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with breast-conserving surgery in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 100 patients with triple-negative breast cancer was performed from May 2012 to April 2017. The patients were divided into an observation group and a control group according to different treatment methods, with 50 cases in each group. The control group received AC-T sequential chemotherapy after breast-conserving surgery, and the observation group received AC-T sequential chemotherapy before breast-conserving surgery (neoadjuvant). The operation time, postoperative immune function, postoperative tumor markers, postoperative efficacy, and postoperative complications of the two groups of patients were statistically analyzed, and the quality of life of the two groups of patients 1 year after the operation was compared. Results: Compared with the control group, the operation time and blood loss of the observation group were significantly reduced, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The observation group produced significantly higher total effective rate after treatment (82.00% vs. 56.00%) (P < 0.05). The observation group exhibited superior immune function indexes CD3, CD4, and CD8 after operation when compared with the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in serum tumor marker levels between the two groups before surgery and after surgery (both P > 0.05). Three days after operation, the levels of procalcitonin (PCT) and TNF-α in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, and 3-year survival rate between the two groups (P > 0.05); however, the postoperative complication rate of the observation group was 6.00%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (30%) (P < 0.05). The overall health, physiological function, physiological function, and body pain of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with breast-conserving surgery for triple-negative breast cancer can not only improve the therapeutic effect of patients and reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions but also significantly improve the quality of life of patients after surgery.

Clinical Observation of Zhengyuan Capsule Combined with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Objective: To study the clinical effect of Zhengyuan capsule combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Methods: From September 2014 to September 2017, 120 TNBC patients who underwent radical mastectomy in our hospital were randomly divided into control group (n = 60) and observation group (n = 60). The short-term curative effect, the incidence of toxicity and side effects, and the score of quality of life of the patients were compared. Both recurrence and metastasis rates were also analyzed. Results: The combined treatment of Zhengyuan capsule with neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved the objective remission rate (70.00% in the observation group versus 40.00% in the control group) (P < 0.05). Moreover, this combined treatment significantly decreased the total incidence of side effects (35.00% versus 75.00%). Accordingly, the score of quality of life was also increased in patients treated with Zhengyuan capsule plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.05). Furthermore, supplementation of Zhengyuan capsule can significantly suppress both the recurrence and metastasis rate of TNBC in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy after radical mastectomy in following 3 years (30.00% versus 10.00%, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Zhengyuan capsule effectively improves the short-term curative effect, reduces the side effects of chemotherapy, and improves the quality of life of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy after radical mastectomy. More importantly, this combined treatment can also reduce the long-term recurrence and metastasis of TNBC.