Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mol Cell Biochem ; 2024 Mar 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478221

RESUMEN

Autophagy related gene 4B (ATG4B) plays a central role in autophagy machinery, but its clinical relevance to AAA remains unknown. In this study, 205 AAA patients and 205 age- and sex-matched controls were included to detect the serum ATG4B levels. Meanwhile, abdominal aortic specimens from 24 AAA patients and 6 human organ donors were collected to evaluate the mRNA and in situ protein expression of ATG4B. We observed significantly higher ATG4B mRNA and protein expression levels in AAA group compared to those in control group, with a positive correlation between mRNA levels and serum/in situ protein levels (serum, r = 0.518, P = 0.010; in situ, r = 0.453, P = 0.026). Serum ATG4B exhibited the diagnostic potential for AAA (AUC = 0.702, sensitivity = 75.6%) and intraluminal thrombus recognition (AUC = 0.602, sensitivity = 67.9%). Logistic regression revealed a significant association between elevated serum ATG4B and an increased risk of AAA and intraluminal thrombus formation. Deceased patients displayed higher baseline serum ATG4B levels, which could predict postoperative mortality (HR = 1.028, 95%CI = 1.007-1.049, P = 0.009, AUC = 0.612, sensitivity = 84.6%). The bioinformatics analysis suggested that ATG4B may modulate cellular autophagy and influence pathways associated with inflammation, lipid metabolism, or apoptosis, thereby contributing to the occurrence and development of AAA. The drug-gene interaction network identified 13 potential therapeutic drugs targeting ATG4B. In conclusion, ATG4B may serve as a promising biomarker for the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of AAA patients and play a key role in the pathogenesis of AAA.

2.
Int J Cancer ; 154(10): 1709-1718, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38230569

RESUMEN

Lifestyle factors after a cancer diagnosis could influence the survival of cancer 60 survivors. To examine the independent and joint associations of healthy lifestyle factors with mortality outcomes among cancer survivors, four prospective cohorts (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], UK Biobank [UKB] and Kailuan study) across three countries. A healthy lifestyle score (HLS) was defined based on five common lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol drinking, diet, physical activity and body mass index) that related to cancer survival. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) for the associations of individual lifestyle factors and HLS with all-cause and cancer mortality among cancer survivors. During the follow-up period of 37,095 cancer survivors, 8927 all-cause mortality events were accrued in four cohorts and 4449 cancer death events were documented in the UK and US cohorts. Never smoking (adjusted HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69-0.86), light alcohol consumption (adjusted HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82-0.90), adequate physical activity (adjusted HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.94), a healthy diet (adjusted HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.61-0.78) and optimal BMI (adjusted HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.85-0.93) were significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality. In the joint analyses of HLS, the HR of all-cause and cancer mortality for cancer survivors with a favorable HLS (4 and 5 healthy lifestyle factors) were 0.55 (95% CI 0.42-0.64) and 0.57 (95% CI 0.44-0.72), respectively. This multicohort study of cancer survivors from the United States, the United Kingdom and China found that greater adherence to a healthy lifestyle might be beneficial in improving cancer prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Estilo de Vida Saludable , Neoplasias , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudios de Cohortes , Encuestas Nutricionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Estilo de Vida , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Nutrients ; 15(22)2023 Nov 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38004195

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Both genetic and dietary factors play significant roles in the etiology of colorectal cancer (CRC). To evaluate the relationship between certain food exposures and the risk of CRC, we carried out a large-scale association analysis in the UK Biobank. METHODS: The associations of 139 foods and nutrients' intake with CRC risk were assessed among 118,210 participants. A polygenic risk score (PRS) of CRC was created to explore any interaction between dietary factors and genetic susceptibility in CRC risk. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of CRC risk linked to dietary variables and PRS were estimated using Cox regression models. Multiple comparisons were corrected using the error discovery rate (FDR). RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 12.8 years, 1466 incidents of CRC were identified. In the UK Biobank, alcohol and white bread were associated with increased CRC risk, and their HRs were 1.08 (95% CI: 1.03-1.14; FDRP = 0.028) and 1.10 (95% CI: 1.05-1.16; FDRP = 0.003), whereas dietary fiber, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and manganese intakes were inversely associated. We found no evidence of any PRS-nutrient interaction relationship in relation to CRC risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that higher intakes of alcohol and white bread are associated with increased CRC risk, whilst dietary fiber, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and manganese are inversely associated.


Asunto(s)
Calcio , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Magnesio , Manganeso , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Dieta/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Fibras de la Dieta , Calcio de la Dieta , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Fósforo
4.
J Glob Health ; 13: 04096, 2023 Oct 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37824177

RESUMEN

Background: Due to their known variation by geography and economic development, we aimed to evaluate the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) in China over the past decades and identify factors associated with CRC among the Chinese population to provide targeted information on disease prevention. Methods: We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of epidemiolocal studies on the incidence, mortality, and associated factors of CRC among the Chinese population, extracting and synthesising data from eligible studies retrieved from seven global and Chinese databases. We pooled age-standardised incidence rates (ASIRs) and mortality rates (ASMRs) for each province, subregion, and the whole of China, and applied a joinpoint regression model and annual per cent changes (APCs) to estimate the trends of CRC incidence and mortality. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses to assess the effect estimates of identified associated risk factors. Results: We included 493 articles; 271 provided data on CRC incidence or mortality, and 222 on associated risk factors. Overall, the ASIR of CRC in China increased from 2.75 to 19.39 (per 100 000 person-years) between 1972 and 2019 with a slowed-down growth rate (APC1 = 5.75, APC2 = 0.42), while the ASMR of CRC decreased from 12.00 to 7.95 (per 100 000 person-years) between 1974 and 2020 with a slight downward trend (APC = -0.89). We analysed 62 risk factors with synthesized data; 16 belonging to the categories of anthropometrics factors, lifestyle factors, dietary factors, personal histories and mental health conditions were graded to be associated with CRC risk among the Chinese population in the meta-analysis limited to the high-quality studies. Conclusions: We found substantial variation of CRC burden across regions and provinces of China and identified several associated risk factors for CRC, which could help to guide the formulation of targeted disease prevention and control strategies. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42022346558.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Incidencia , Factores de Riesgo , China/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control
5.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 32(8): 1048-1060, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37220872

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To systematically appraise and synthesize available epidemiologic evidence on the associations of environmental and genetic factors with the risk of sporadic early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) and early-onset advanced colorectal adenoma (EOCRA). METHODS: Multiple databases were comprehensively searched to identify eligible observational studies. Genotype data from UK Biobank were incorporated to examine their associations with EOCRC in a nested case-control design. Meta-analyses of environmental risk factors were performed, and the strength of evidence was graded based on predefined criteria. Meta-analyses of genetic associations were conducted using the allelic, recessive, and dominant models, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 61 studies were included, reporting 120 environmental factors and 62 genetic variants. We found 12 risk factors (current overweight, overweight in adolescence, high waist circumference, smoking, alcohol, sugary beverages intake, sedentary behavior, red meat intake, family history of colorectal cancer, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and metabolic syndrome) and three protective factors (vitamin D, folate, and calcium intake) for EOCRC or EOCRA. No significant associations between the examined genetic variants and EOCRC risk were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Recent data indicate that the changing patterns of traditional colorectal cancer risk factors may explain the rising incidence of EOCRC. However, research on novel risk factors for EOCRC is limited; therefore, we cannot rule out the possibility of EOCRC having different risk factors than late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC). IMPACT: The potential for the identified risk factors to enhance the identification of at-risk groups for personalized EOCRC screening and prevention and for the prediction of EOCRC risk should be comprehensively addressed by future studies.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Adolescente , Humanos , Adenoma/etiología , Adenoma/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Sobrepeso , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/epidemiología , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto
6.
Nutrients ; 15(3)2023 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36771436

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, studies have discovered that different fatty acids (Fas) are linked to colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. METHODS: We systematically searched Embase and Medline databases to identify eligible studies that examined the associations of different types of Fas with CRC risk. The effect estimates and their 95% confidence intervals (Cis) were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the robustness of the study findings. RESULTS: This study evaluated the associations of 28 dietary and 18 blood Fas with CRC risk by summarizing the most updated evidence from 54 observational and four Mendelian Randomization (MR) studies. The present findings suggested that high dietary intake of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexanoic acid (DHA), and docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) are related to low risk of CRC, while the n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio and trans-FA are related to high risk of CRC. The summary of all cohort studies found that a high intake of SFA and DHA was a protective factor for CRC, and a high intake of the n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio was a risk factor for CRC. In the subgroup analysis of cancer subsites, we found that the dietary intake of linoleic acid (LA) and trans-FA are risk factors, while DPA is a protective factor for colon cancer. High dietary DHA intake was associated with a lower risk of rectal cancer, while the dietary n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio was associated with a higher risk of rectal cancer. Meta-analysis of blood FA levels showed a significant reverse association between blood pentadecanoic acid and CRC risk, whilst other blood Fas showed no significant association with CRC risk. All included MR studies showed that high plasma arachidonic acid (AA) is associated with increased CRC risk. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence on the dietary intake and blood levels of Fas in relation to CRC risk is less consistent. Future studies are needed to investigate how the metabolism of Fas contributes to CRC development.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3 , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Ácidos Grasos , Ingestión de Alimentos , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etiología , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto
7.
Front Oncol ; 11: 690219, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34277434

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whether aspirin use can decrease or increase cancer risk remains controversial. In this study, a meta-analysis of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted to evaluate the effect of aspirin use on common cancer risk. METHOD: Medline and Embase databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Meta-analyses of cohort studies and RCTs were performed to assess the effect of aspirin use on the risk of colorectal, gastric, breast, prostate and lung cancer. Cochran Q test and the I square metric were calculated to detect potential heterogeneity among studies. Subgroup meta-analyses according to exposure categories (frequency and duration) and timing of aspirin use (whether aspirin was used before and after cancer diagnosis) were also performed. A dose-response analysis was carried out to evaluate and quantify the association between aspirin dose and cancer risk. RESULTS: A total of 88 cohort studies and seven RCTs were included in the final analysis. Meta-analyses of cohort studies revealed that regular aspirin use reduced the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) (RR=0.85, 95%CI: 0.78-0.92), gastric cancer (RR=0.67, 95%CI: 0.52-0.87), breast cancer (RR=0.93, 95%CI: 0.87-0.99) and prostate cancer (RR=0.92, 95%CI: 0.86-0.98), but showed no association with lung cancer risk. Additionally, meta-analyses of RCTs showed that aspirin use had a protective effect on CRC risk (OR=0.74, 95%CI: 0.56-0.97). When combining evidence from meta-analyses of cohorts and RCTs, consistent evidence was found for the protective effect of aspirin use on CRC risk. Subgroup analysis showed that high frequency aspirin use was associated with increased lung cancer risk (RR=1.05, 95%CI: 1.01-1.09). Dose-response analysis revealed that high-dose aspirin use may increase prostate cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for low-dose aspirin use for the prevention of CRC, but not other common cancers. High frequency or high dose use of aspirin should be prescribed with caution because of their associations with increased lung and prostate cancer risk, respectively. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and to find the minimum effective dose required for cancer prevention.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...