RESUMEN
Mutations and gene expression are the two most studied genomic features in cancer research. In the last decade, the combined advances in genomic technology and computational algorithms have broadened mutation research with the concept of mutation density and expanded the traditional scope of protein-coding RNA to noncoding RNAs. However, mutation density analysis had yet to be integrated with non-coding RNAs. In this study, we examined long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) mutation density patterns of 57 unique cancer types using 80 cancer cohorts. Our analysis revealed that lncRNAs exhibit mutation density patterns reminiscent to those of protein-coding mRNAs. These patterns include mutation peak and dip around transcription start sites of lncRNA. In many cohorts, these patterns justified statistically significant transcription strand bias, and the transcription strand bias was shared between lncRNAs and mRNAs. We further quantified transcription strand biases with a Log Odds Ratio metric and showed that some of these biases are associated with patient prognosis. The prognostic effect may be exerted due to strong Transcription-coupled repair mechanisms associated with the individual patient. For the first time, our study combined mutational density patterns with lncRNA mutations, and the results demonstrated remarkably comparable patterns between protein-coding mRNA and lncRNA, further illustrating lncRNA's potential roles in cancer research.
RESUMEN
Significant advances have been achieved in understanding the critical role of enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) in the complex field of gene regulation. However, notable uncertainty remains concerning the biology of eRNAs, highlighting the need for continued research to uncover their exact functions in cellular processes and diseases. We present a comprehensive study to scrutinize mutation density patterns, mutation strand bias, and mutation burden in eRNAs across multiple cancer types. Our findings reveal that eRNAs exhibit mutation strand bias akin to that observed in protein-coding RNAs. We also identified a novel pattern, in which mutation density is notably diminished around the central region of the eRNA, but conspicuously elevated towards both the beginning and end. This pattern can be potentially explained by a mechanism involving heightened transcriptional activity and the activation of transcription-coupled repair. The central regions of the eRNAs appear to be more conserved, hinting at a potential mechanism preserving their structural and functional integrity, while the extremities may be more susceptible to mutations due to increased exposure. The evolutionary trajectory of this mutational pattern suggests a nuanced adaptation in eRNAs, where stability at their core coexists with flexibility at their extremities, potentially facilitating their diverse interactions with other genetic entities.