RESUMEN
In order to clarify the differences in the effects of vegetation restoration strategies on soil carbon sequestration and aggregate stability under different water-eroded environments, we collected experimental data from 91 papers and evaluated the response of soil organic carbon (SOC) stock and aggregate stability to vegetation restoration based on Meta-analysis. The results showed the following:â compared with cropland or bare land, forestland/grassland restoration was beneficial to increase SOC stock and improve aggregate stability, but the dominant functions of the two were different. The effect of forestland restoration on carbon sequestration was stronger than that of grassland reforestation, and the effect of grassland restoration on aggregate stability was stronger than that of forestland restoration. â¡ Multi-factor Meta-analysis showed that the factors that significantly affected SOC were restoration year, soil clay content, vegetation coverage, mean annual precipitation (MAP), mean annual temperature (MAT), and soil depth. The positive effect of vegetation restoration on SOC stock increased with the increase in vegetation coverage rate. Grassland restoration had a more significant effect on SOC stock when soil clay content was 20%-32%, it was more likely to promote the carbon sequestration effect of grassland when MAP>800 mm or MAT<15â, and there was no significant change in SOC stock under different restoration years. However, the effect of forestland restoration on SOC stock was more significant when soil clay content was>32%. Climate conditions had no limited effect on SOC stock in forestland, and there was a positive effect between SOC stock under forestland restoration and restoration years. ⢠Vegetation restoration had stronger significant positive effects on mean weight diameter (MWD) and mean geometric diameter (GMD) when the clay content was 20%-32%, and MWD and GMD increased with the increase in vegetation coverage. â£SOC stock growth could explain 25% and 24% of the variation in the effect value of MWD and GMD, respectively. These results indicated that the formation of SOC was the result of multiple factors, and soil aggregate stability was limited only by vegetation coverage and soil clay content. The increase in SOC stock could promote the improvement of water stability MWD and GMD. These results can clarify the carbon sequestration effect of different vegetation restoration measures in water-eroded environments and provide theoretical reference for the restoration and reconstruction of degraded ecosystems.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of Ruji Recipe (RR) in preventing disease recurrence/metastasis and improving quality of life (QOL) for female breast cancer patients after operation. METHODS: Totally 102 female patients with stage I - III breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed. They were assigned to the treatment group (54 cases) and the control group (48 cases) according to whether they would rather accept RR therapy. Estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) positive patients also accepted endocrine therapy. The overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence and metastasis, and QOL were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Totally 100 patients completed the study. The median follow-up was 59 months. The median OS was 60 months in the treatment group and 52.5 months in the control group (chi2 = 3.274, P > 0.05). The median DFS was 55.0 months in the treatment group and 47.5 months in the control group (chi2 = 10.145, P < 0.01). The DFS rate was 75.9% (41/54) in the treatment group and 54.3% (25/46) in the control group (chi2 = -2.259, P < 0.05). There was statistical difference in the 2-, 3-, and 5-year DFS between the two groups (P < 0.01). There was statistical difference in the 2-year DFS 3-year DFS between stage II and III and stage III (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). There was statistical difference in the ER positive patients between 2-year DFS and 3-year DFS (P < 0.01, P < 0.05). There was statistical difference in the 3-and 5-year distant metastasis rate (DMR) in the treatment group, lower than that of the control group (3.7% vs 31.0%, 20.7% vs 60.7%; P < 0.01). By the end of follow-up, disease progression occurred in 13 cases of the treatment group, local recurrence in 3 cases, single organ metastasis in 7 cases, multi-metastasis in 3 cases, while the corresponding numbers were 21, 1, 11, and 9 in the control group (P < 0.05). As for 1 week before study and at 2-year follow-up using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Breast Cancer (FACT-B) system, there was statistical difference in the QOL between the two groups (P < 0.05), and better effect was obtained in the treatment group. CONCLUSION: RR, as an assistant therapy, could improve the OS rate, the DFS rate, and the QOL for post-surgical female breast cancer patients in 2 -3 years.
