Comparative Efficacy of Neuromodulation Technologies for Overactive Bladder in Adults: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the comparative efficacy of neuromodulation technologies for overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in adults. DATA SOURCES: A computerized search was conducted of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, CNKI, Wan Fang Data, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to April 21, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: The search selected clinical trials with random allocation to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS), vaginal electrical stimulation (VES), sacral neuromodulation (SNM), parasacral stimulation (PS), pudendal neuromodulation, or placebo. DATA EXTRACTION: The main outcomes were the voiding diary, OAB-related quality of life, and positive response rate. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the risk of bias of each included study, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool was used to evaluate the overall evidence quality of key outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: The study included 21 randomized controlled trials involving 1433 participants, and all trials were used for the meta-analysis. In the network meta-analyses, five of six neuromodulation technologies, including PTNS, TTNS, VES, SNM, and PS, were related to higher efficacy than the placebo. Ranking probability showed that SNM was the most efficacious therapy for improving OAB-related quality of life, urinary episodes, and urinary frequency. For urgency incontinence episodes and the number of pads, PTNS and TTNS were the most efficacious modalities, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neuromodulation technologies, including PTNS, TTNS, VES, SNM, and PS, may be effective and safe solutions for OAB syndrome in adults. Moreover, SNM is the most efficacious regimen for OAB-related quality of life, urinary episodes, and urinary frequency. PTNS and TTNS are the most efficacious modalities for reducing urgency incontinence episodes and the number of pads, respectively. Future studies should pay more attention to the quality of study design and report, patients who may benefit the most from neuromodulation, and the long-term effect, cost-effectiveness, and satisfaction of neuromodulation.

Do patients with and survivors of COVID-19 benefit from telerehabilitation? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) significantly impacts physical, psychological, and social functioning and reduces quality of life, which may persist for at least 6 months. Given the fact that COVID-19 is a highly infectious disease and therefore healthcare facilities may be sources of contagion, new methods avoiding face-to-face contact between healthcare workers and patients are urgently needed. Telerehabilitation is the provision of rehabilitation services to patients at a distance via information and communication technologies. However, high-quality evidence of the efficacy of telerehabilitation for COVID-19 is still lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy of telerehabilitation for patients with and survivors of COVID-19. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline (via PubMed), PEDro, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from January 1st, 2020 to April 30th, 2022 for randomized controlled trials published in English, which aimed to evaluate the efficacy of telerehabilitation vs. face-to-face rehabilitation, usual care, or no treatment for COVID-19. Methodological quality and overall evidence quality of the included studies were assessed. The statistical reliability of the data was quantified using the trial sequential analysis. Results: Seven randomized controlled trials with eight comparisons were included and all of them were used for meta-analysis. The meta-analyses of absolute values showed the superiority of telerehabilitation over no treatment or usual care for dyspnea (Borg scale: mean difference = -1.88, -2.37 to -1.39; Multidimensional dyspnea-12: mean difference = -3.70, -5.93 to -1.48), limb muscle strength (mean difference = 3.29; 2.12 to 4.47), ambulation capacity (standardized mean difference = 0.88; 0.62 to 1.14), and depression (mean difference = -5.68; -8.62 to -2.74). Significant improvement in these variables persisted in the meta-analyses of change scores. No significant difference was found in anxiety and quality of life. No severe adverse events were reported in any of the included studies. Conclusions: Moderate- to very low-quality evidence demonstrates that telerehabilitation may be an effective and safe solution for patients with and survivors of COVID-19 in dyspnea, lower limb muscle strength, ambulation capacity, and depression. Further well-designed studies are required to evaluate the long-term effects, cost-effectiveness, and satisfaction in larger samples.

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Rodent Models of Neuropathic Pain: A Meta-Analysis.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a non-invasive therapeutic intervention that is typically used for many years to treat chronic pain in patients who are refractory to pain medications. However, evidence of the efficacy of TENS treatment for neuropathic pain is lacking in humans. To further understand the efficacy of TENS under various intervention conditions and illuminate the current circumstance and future research directions, we systematically reviewed animal studies investigating the efficacy of TENS in relieving pain in neuropathic pain rodent models. We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE (via PubMed), and Web of Science and identified 11 studies. Two meta-analyses were performed. The first meta-analysis showed that a single TENS treatment was capable of temporarily ameliorating neuropathic pain when compared to control groups with a significant effect (standardized mean difference: 1.54; 95% CI: 0.65, 2.42; p = 0.0007; I 2 = 58%). Significant temporary alleviation in neuropathic pain intensity was also observed in the meta-analysis of repetitive TENS (standardized mean difference: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.31, 1.40; p = 0.002; I 2 = 75%). Subgroup analysis showed no effect of the timing of the application of TENS (test for subgroup difference, p = 0.47). Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses suggested that no single study had an outsized effect on the pooled estimates, which may partly prove the robustness of these findings. Other stratified analyses were prevented by the insufficient number of included studies. Overall, current data suggest that TENS might be a promising therapy to ameliorate neuropathic pain. However, the high risk of bias in the included studies suggests that cautions must be considered when interpreting these findings and it is not reasonable to directly generalize the results obtained from animal studies to clinical practice. Future studies should pay more attention to improving the quality of study design and reporting, thereby facilitating the understanding of mechanisms underlying TENS treatment, reducing more potentially unsuccessful clinical trials, and optimizing the efficacy of TENS for people with neuropathic pain.

Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke spasticity: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke spasticity and to assess its evidence using a meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE (via PubMed), PEDro, CBM, CNKI and Wan Fang Data from their inception to June 2021 for randomised clinical trials published in English or Chinese, which aimed to explore the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on post-stroke spasticity. Two reviewers independently extracted the data and evaluated the methodological quality and overall evidence quality. RESULTS: Thirteen randomised clinical trials comprising 924 patients were included, 12 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that anodal stimulation (standard mean difference = -0.91; [95% CI; -1.63 to -0.19]) combined with other therapies was more effective in improving upper limb spasticity. More than 20 minutes of stimulation were found to be effective in improving spasticity. Transcranial direct current stimulation was superior to the control treatments for subacute (standard mean difference = -1.16; -1.75 to -0.57) and chronic stroke (standard mean difference = -0.68; -1.13 to -0.22) patients aged under 60 (standard mean difference = -1.07; -1.54 to -0.60). No severe adverse events were reported in any of the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Low-quality evidence demonstrates that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation as an adjunct is effective and safe in reducing upper limb post-stroke spasticity when applied for more than 20 minutes in subacute and chronic stroke survivors aged under 60. Further high-quality studies are needed to explore its long-term efficacy and safety.

Effect of vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb function improvement after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) could potentially facilitate arm function recovery after stroke. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effect of VNS paired with rehabilitation on upper limb function recovery after stroke. We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that used VNS paired with rehabilitation for the improvement of upper limb function after stroke and were published in English. Eligible RCTs were identified by searching electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, CENTRAL and PEDro, from their inception until June 2021. Quality of included studies was assessed using PEDro score and Cochrane's risk of bias assessment. A meta-analysis was performed on the collected data. Five studies with a total of 178 participants met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the present meta-analysis revealed a significant effect of VNS on Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE, MD = 3.59; 95% CI, 2.55-4.63; P < 0.01) when compared with the control group. However, no significant difference was observed in adverse events associated with device implantation between the invasive VNS and control groups (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.92-1.32; P = 0.29). No adverse events associated with device use were reported in invasive VNS, and one was reported in transcutaneous VNS. This study revealed that VNS paired with rehabilitation can facilitate the recovery of upper limb function in patients with stroke on the basis of FMA-UE scores, but the long-term effects remain to be demonstrated.

Increased serum CXCL10 levels are associated with clinical severity and radiographic progression in patients with lumbar disc degeneration.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar intervertebral degenerative disc disease (IDD) is a multifaceted progressive condition that commonly occurs in conjunction with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). CXCL10 mRNA appears to be increased in both IDD and LHD. OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to identify the relationship between serum CXCL10 levels and disease severity in patients with IDD. METHODS: 136 IDD patients with low back pain, 127 asymptomatic volunteers and 120 healthy controls were enrolled. Serum CXCL10 protein concentrations were detected using commercial human CXCL10 ELISA Kits. Serum CXCL10 mRNA were examined using qRT-PCR. Clinical severity was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) scores. Radiographic severity was defined using the MRI-based Pfirrmann classification of disc degeneration. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used in estimating the correlation between CXCL10 and Pfirrmann grade. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the lumbar multifidus muscle (LMM) and psoas major (PM) were calculated, and fat infiltration was evaluated by Ropponen-Kjaer criteria. RESULTS: Serum CXCL10 concentrations were markedly raised in IDD patients with low back pain in contrast to asymptomatic individuals and healthy controls. Serum CXCL10 levels were positively associated with Pfirrmann grade. ROC curve analysis indicated that serum CXCL10 correlated well with Pfirrmann grade. In addition, serum CXCL10 concentrations were significantly higher in IDD patients with LMM and PM degeneration compared with IDD patients without degeneration. Increased CXCL10 levels positively correlated with VAS and ODI scores, as well as decreased CSA and fat filtration of the LMM and PM. CONCLUSION: Increased serum CXCL10 levels correspond to clinical severity and radiographic progression in IDD patients.

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation for patients with disorders of consciousness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could potentially facilitate consciousness improvement in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC). The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of tDCS on consciousness recovery for patients with DOC. Methods: Eight databases were systematically searched from their inception to June 2022. Quality of included studies were assessed using PEDro score and Cochrane's risk of bias assessment. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software. Seventeen studies with 618 patients were identified eligible for this study, and fifteen studies with sufficient data were pooled in the meta-analysis. Results: The results of meta-analysis showed a significant effect on increasing GCS scores (MD = 1.73; 95% CI, 1.28-2.18; P < 0.01) and CRS-R scores (MD = 1.28; 95% CI = 0.56-2.00; P < 0.01) in favor of the real stimulation group as compared to sham. The results of subgroup analysis demonstrated that only more than 20 sessions of stimulation could significantly enhance the improvement of GCS scores and the CRS-R scores. Moreover, the effect of tDCS on CRS-R score improvement was predominant in patients with minimal conscious state (MCS) (MD = 1.84; 95% CI = 0.74-2.93; P < 0.01). Conclusion: Anodal tDCS with sufficient stimulation doses appears to be an effective approach for patients with MCS, in terms of CRS-R scores. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022336958.

Neuroprotection by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Rodent Models of Focal Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.

Infarct size is associated with stroke severity in clinical studies, so reducing it has become an important target and research hotspot in the treatment of ischemic stroke. Some preclinical studies have shown transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduced infarct size and improved neurological deficit, but others have not found beneficial effects. Besides, the optimal pattern of tDCS for ischemic stroke remains largely unknown. To shed light on the current circumstance and future research directions, the systematic review evaluated the effect of different tDCS paradigms in reducing infarct size and improving neurological deficit in rodent models of ischemic stroke and assessed the methodological quality of current literature. We searched the MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus from their inception to August 18, 2021, to identify studies evaluating the effects of tDCS in rodent models of ischemic stroke. Eight studies were included, of which seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed cathodal tDCS, rather than anodal tDCS, reduced infarct size mainly measured by tetrazolium chloride and magnetic resonance imaging (standardized mean difference: -1.13; 95% CI: -1.72, -0.53; p = 0.0002) and improved neurological deficit assessed by a modified neurological severity score (standardized mean difference: -2.10; 95% CI: -3.78, -0.42; p = 0.01) in an early stage of focal ischemic stroke in rodent models. Subgroup analyses showed effects of cathodal tDCS on infarct size were not varied by ischemia duration (ischemia for 1, 1.5, and 2 h or permanent ischemia) and anesthesia (involving isoflurane and ketamine). The overall quality of studies included was low, thus the results must be interpreted cautiously. Published studies suggest that cathodal tDCS may be a promising avenue to explore for augmenting rehabilitation from focal ischemic stroke. Considering the methodological limitations, it is unreliable to blindly extrapolate the animal data to the clinical practice. Future research is needed to investigate the mechanism of tDCS in a randomized and blinded fashion in clinically relevant stroke models, such as elderly animals, female animals, and animals with comorbidities, to find an optimal treatment protocol.