RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Both sequential embryo transfer (SeET) and double-blastocyst transfer (DBT) can serve as embryo transfer strategies for women with recurrent implantation failure (RIF). This study aims to compare the effects of SeET and DBT on pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: Totally, 261 frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles of 243 RIF women were included in this multicenter retrospective analysis. According to different embryo quality and transfer strategies, they were divided into four groups: group A, good-quality SeET (GQ-SeET, n=38 cycles); group B, poor-quality or mixed-quality SeET (PQ/MQ-SeET, n=31 cycles); group C, good-quality DBT (GQ-DBT, n=121 cycles); and group D, poor-quality or mixed-quality DBT (PQ/MQ-DBT, n=71 cycles). The main outcome, clinical pregnancy rate, was compared, and the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was used to correct potential confounders that might impact pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: GQ-DBT achieved a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (aOR 2.588, 95% CI 1.267-5.284, P=0.009) and live birth rate (aOR 3.082, 95% CI 1.482-6.412, P=0.003) than PQ/MQ-DBT. Similarly, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in GQ-SeET than in PQ/MQ-SeET (aOR 4.047, 95% CI 1.218-13.450, P=0.023). The pregnancy outcomes of GQ-SeET were not significantly different from those of GQ-DBT, and the same results were found between PQ/MQ-SeET and PQ/MQ-DBT. CONCLUSION: SeET relative to DBT did not seem to improve pregnancy outcomes for RIF patients if the embryo quality was comparable between the two groups. Better clinical pregnancy outcomes could be obtained by transferring good-quality embryos, no matter whether in SeET or DBT. Embryo quality plays a more important role in pregnancy outcomes for RIF patients.