Rapidly Progressive, Fata Infection Caused by Bacillus Cereus in a Patient with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: We herein report a fatal case of fulminant septicemia caused by Bacillus cereus in a 49-year-old female with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: Her two blood culture sets were positive for Gram-positive, rod-shaped bacterium. Bacillus cereus was identified by high-throughput MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. RESULTS: The patient died within 12 hours from the onset of B cereus infection. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute leukemia presented with fever and unexplained multiple organ lesions, especially accompanied by CNS symptoms, should alert to the possibility of Bacillus cereus infection.

Strain Elastography: A Valuable Additional Method to BI-RADS?

BACKGROUND: Breast lesions classified as BI-RADS-US 3 are probably benign and observation was recommended, while a considerable number of BI-RADS-US 4 lesions were benign, resulting in excessive biopsies. We focus exclusively on BI-RADS-US 3 and 4 lesions and hypothesize that improved diagnostic performance can be achieved by integrating real-time elastography (strain ratio) into the BI-RADS-US classification system. METHOD: From April 2010 to September 2015, 1071 lesions were included in the final analysis. After the conventional ultrasound examination, the BI-RADS-US (2013) classification was used to evaluate the lesions. Then the strain ratios were calculated, and the final diagnosis was made on the basis of histological results. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV were calculated and the AUCs were compared. Additionally, an analysis of the diagnostic performance expressed by the pretest and posttest probability of disease (POD) was performed in BI-RADS-US 3 and 4A lesions. RESULTS: With the cutoff point of 2.98, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the strain ratio method were 86.9 %, 86.6 % and 82.6 %, respectively. In BI-RADS-US 3 lesions, a suspicious strain ratio significantly modified the POD from 1.3 % to a posttest POD of 29.8 %. In BI-RADS-US 4A lesions, a suspicious strain ratio significantly modified the POD from 8.5 % to a posttest POD of 48.7 %. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonographic elastography (strain ratio) yields additional diagnostic information in the evaluation of BI-RADS-US 3 and 4 breast lesions. The strain ratios should be integrated into the BI-RADS-US classification system and into daily practice.

What Help Could Ultrasound Elastography Give to the Diagnosis of Breast Papillary Lesions?

On the basis of results of our previous studies and the findings of other scholars, the most common histologic type of false-positive diagnosis with strain elastography (SE) was papilloma. The objectives of our study were to evaluate whether SE could contribute to conventional ultrasound differentiation between benign and malignant papillary lesions and between papillary lesions and other common benign breast lesions. Data on 89 papillary lesions at our hospital, including 74 benign and 15 malignant papillary lesions, were included in our study. In addition, 198 non-papillary benign tumors were selected as the control group, including 126 fibroadenomas and 72 cases of fibrocystic mastopathy. All patients gave written informed consent. All patients with breast lesions underwent conventional ultrasound and SE examination. Breast Imaging Recording and Data System (BI-RADS) category and SE score were compared with respect to sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in differentiating between benign and malignant papillary lesions. We then explored the possibility of using BI-RADS combined with SE to differentiate papillary lesions from non-papillary benign tumors. For differentiating between benign and malignant papillary lesions, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of BI-RADS was 0.568, whereas the AUC values of SE score, strain ratio and BI-RADS combined with SE were 0.517, 0.584 and 0.509, respectively (p > 0.05). For differentiating between papillary lesions and non-papillary benign lesions, the AUC of BI-RADS combined with SE was 0.835, which was higher than the values for BI-RADS (0.775) and SE (SE score: 0.648, strain ratio: 0.661) (p < 0.001). The specificity and accuracy of BI-RADS combined with SE were significantly higher than those for BI-RADS alone without a decrease in sensitivity (p < 0.05). SE could not improve the diagnostic efficiency of BI-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant papillary lesions. However, BI-RADS combined with SE could improve the specificity of BI-RADS without decrease in sensitivity for differentiating breast papillary lesions from non-papillary benign lesions.

Ultrasound Elastography Combined With BI-RADS-US Classification System: Is It Helpful for the Diagnostic Performance of Conventional Ultrasonography?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the additive diagnostic performance of ultrasound elastography (UE) to ultrasound (US) with the 2003 or 2013 Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-US classification systems for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. METHODS: From June 2010 to December 2012, 738 women with 770 breast lesions were recruited into this retrospective study. Breast lesions were evaluated separately by US, UE, and both. US assessment was based on the 2003 or 2013 BI-RADS-US, and UE assessment was based on a previously reported 5-point scale. Diagnostic performance of US, UE, and both was compared. RESULTS: Before category 4 lesions were subdivided, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for US, UE, and both were, respectively, 0.735, 0.877, 0.878 (P < .01). When subcategories of 4 lesions were considered, the AUC for US, UE, and both were, respectively, 0.865, 0.877, and 0.883 (P > .05). Adding UE to analysis of 4A lesions can decrease the percentages of malignancy to 2.56%. CONCLUSION: When the 2003 BI-RADS was considered, UE could give US some help in differentiating breast lesions. However, when the 2013 BI-RADS was considered, UE gave little help to US, although it reduced unnecessary biopsies of benign category 4A lesions.

Ultrasonic elastography features of phyllodes tumors of the breast: a clinical research.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the ultrasonic elastography features of phyllodes tumors of the breast comparing with fibroadenomas. A retrospective database was queried for the patients diagnosed as phyllodes tumors and fibroadenomas at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital from January 2008 to August 2012. Three hundred and fifty lesions from 323 consecutive patients were included in the study. All the cases were examined by conventional ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography. Ultrasound elastography was used to calculate strain ratio of the lesions with bilateral breast tissue at the same depth as reference. There were 36 phyllodes tumors (27 benign, 8 borderline, 1 malignant) and 314 fibroadenomas (158 the pericanalicular type, 103 the intracanalicular type, 53 other special types). The strain ratio for phyllodes tumors (3.19 ± 2.33) was significantly higher than for fibroadenomas (1.69 ± 0.88) (p<0.05). The Spearman(.)s correlation coefficient between strain ratio of ultrasound elastography and pathological groups was significant, with a value of 0.17 (p<0.05). Ultrasound elastography could provide additional information to differentiate phyllodes tumors from fibroadenoma in breast.

Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the additive value of ultrasound strain elastography (USE) to BI-RADS for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast small lesions. METHODS: Breast masses (≤2 cm) with histological diagnosis examined by ultrasonography and USE in our department from April 2004 to December 2009 were reviewed. Conventional B-mode ultrasound findings were classified according to the BI-RADS classification. USE findings were classified according to the 5-point scale. Histological diagnosis was used as the reference standard. RESULTS: 401 (246 benign (61.3%), 155 malignant (38.7%)) from 370 consecutive patients were included in the study. Sensitivity and specificity were 90.3%, 68.3% for BI-RADS; 72.3%, 91.9% for USE. The sensitivity of BI-RADS was better than that of USE (P<0.05), while the specificity of USE was better than that of BI-RADS (P<0.05). A revised BI-RADS combined with USE results was proposed in this study. Sensitivity and specificity were 83.9% and 87.8% for revised BI-RADS. The diagnostic performance of revised BI-RADS was better than BI-RADS (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: USE could give BI-RADS some help in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast small lesions. The addition of elastography to BI-RADS could improve the diagnostic performance in <2 cm lesions.