Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Ren Fail ; 45(2): 2258987, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37728063

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the performance of renal resistive index (RRI), semiquantitative power Doppler ultrasound (PDU) score and renal venous Doppler waveform (RVDW) pattern in predicting acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients and establish prediction models. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 234 critically ill patients. Renal ultrasound was measured within 24 h after intensive care unit admission. The main outcome was the highest AKI stage within 5 days after admission according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. RESULTS: Patients in the AKI stage 3 group had significantly higher RRI, RVDW pattern and lower PDU score (p < 0.05). Only lactate, urine volume, serum creatinine (SCr) on admission, PDU score and RVDW pattern were statistically significant predictors (p < 0.05). Model 1 based on these five variables (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.938, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.899-0.965, p < 0.05) showed the best performance in predicting AKI stage 3, and difference in AUC between it and the clinical model including lactate, urine volume and SCr (AUC = 0.901, 95% CI 0.855-0.936, p < 0.05) was statistically significant (z statistic = 2.224, p = 0.0261). The optimal cut-off point for a nomogram based on Model 1 was ≤127.67 (sensitivity: 95.8%, specificity: 82.3%, Youden's index: 0.781). CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram model including SCr, urine volume, lactate, PDU score and RVDW pattern upon admission exhibited a significantly stronger capability for AKI stage 3 than each single indicator and clinical model including SCr, urine volume and lactate.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Ultrasonografía , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico por imagen , Ácido Láctico
2.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 23(1): 483, 2022 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35597924

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted preoperative planning, combined with PSI has become an effective technique for treating complex limb deformities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the novel technique in corrective osteotomy for intra-articular varus ankle deformities associated with osteoarthritis and ankle instability. METHODS: Nineteen patients with intra-articular varus ankle arthritis were reviewed between April 2017 and June 2019, including ten men and nine women with a mean age of 58.3 ± 9.9 years (range, 38 to 76 years). All patients underwent intra-articular opening wedge osteotomy assisted by 3D virtual planning and PSI. Weight-bearing radiographs were used to assess the radiographic results, including TAS angle, TT angle, TMM angle, TC angle, TLS angle, opening-wedge angle, and wedge height. Functional outcomes were assessed by the AOFAS score, VAS score, and ROM of the ankle. RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 32.2 ± 9.0 months (range, 22 to 47 months). The average union time was 4.4 ± 0.9 months (range, 3.0 to 6.5 months). The TAS angle significantly changed from 84.1 ± 4.6° preoperatively to 87.7 ± 3.1° at the 1-year follow-up and 86.2 ± 2.6° at the latest follow-up. Similarly, the TT angle, TMM angle and TC angle changed significantly at the 1-year follow-up compared with the preoperative assessment and remained stable until the last follow-up. However, the TLS was not corrected significantly. The postoperative obtained opening-wedge angle, and wedge height showed no significant change with preoperative planning. The overall complication rate was 15.8%. The mean VAS score improved from 5.3 ± 0.6 to 2.7 ± 0.7. The mean AOFAS score improved from 56.2 ± 7.6 to 80.6 ± 4.6. However, the ROM showed no significant change. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate correction and satisfactory functional recovery were attained with computer-assisted planning and PSI in the corrective osteotomy of intra-articular varus ankle deformities.


Asunto(s)
Tobillo , Osteoartritis , Anciano , Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Tobillo/cirugía , Computadores , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Osteotomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tibia/cirugía
3.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed ; 213: 106523, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34808530

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: bone grafts (bgs) and the opposite screw insertion technique are reported to enhance initial stability after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO); however, it is unclear how the general and local biomechanical stability of the proximal tibia is affected by these reinforcement strategies. In this study, we aimed to assess the biomechanical differences among different fixation configurations for OWHTO under two loading conditions using finite element analysis, and to assess the biomechanical contribution of an opposite screw insertion. METHODS: Models of the proximal tibia with three different gap defects were created to simulate different distraction heights in OWHTO. Four groups of models were then assembled with different fixation configurations, including the no BG (NBG) group, BG group, partially threaded screw (PT) group, and fully threaded screw (FT) group. Testing loads were applied to simulate the static forces on the knee joint during double-limb and single-limb standing. For each group, the stresses of the lateral hinge area (LHA) and the medial implant area (MIA), the maximum displacement of the tibia and the relative displacement (RD) of the medial gap were evaluated. RESULTS: Compared to NBG group, bone block grafting effectively reduced the stress of the tibia and implant, as well as the maximum displacement of the tibia and the RD of the medial gap. The opposite screw group showed similar trends in alleviating the stress concentration on the LHA and MIA, and contributing to the maintaining the medial gap reduction, especially in the FT group; however, additional stresses were concentrated on the opposite screw itself, which indicated the potential risk of screw breakage. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to NBG group, the BG group bone graft showed superior biomechanical advantages in decreasing the risk of implant failure and lateral hinge fracture, and maintaining the reduction in OWHTO. The additional opposite screw provided an extra support to the proximal tibia, with similar contributions to improve the structural stability after osteotomy, especially in the FT group.


Asunto(s)
Tornillos Óseos , Osteotomía , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Placas Óseas , Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Tibia/cirugía
4.
Orthop Surg ; 10(3): 272-275, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30152608

RESUMEN

The clinical incidence of tumors in the manubrium is not high. Regardless of whether the tumor is primary or metastatic, the tumor should be completely removed as long as the patient is able to tolerate the surgery. This procedure can lead to sternal defects. Deciding on the method of defect reconstruction is a critical problem that clinicians face. In this , to reduce the limitations of the patient's upper body movement after surgery due to the inflexibility in the connections of the sternal prosthesis, we created a prosthesis using a computer-assisted design method and a 3-D technique, to completely preserve the agility of the sternum and maximize the patient's post-operational movement. The method used in the present study takes into consideration the individual's chest anatomy, sternum stress, and many other biological characteristics. Care is taken to measure the sternum size accurately, to provide personalized treatment, to accomplish precise results, and to reduce potential future damage. The patient's shoulder function was improved following the procedure.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Condrosarcoma/cirugía , Manubrio/cirugía , Prótesis e Implantes , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Condrosarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Diseño Asistido por Computadora , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Masculino , Manubrio/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Diseño de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
5.
Int J Surg ; 44: 329-338, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28705591

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) was a common degenerative disease that affected the lumbar spine function and quality of life, which can be treated both surgery and conservative treatment. We did this study to compare the effectiveness of surgery versus conservative treatment for LSS. METHODS: We searched PubMed as well as other databases in September.18th.2016. Randomized controlled trials compared surgery versus conservative treatment for patients with LSS were enrolled. Outcomes and complications were collected with data selection criteria and analyzed with Review Manager Version 5.3. RESULTS: Nine RCTs (14 articles) and 1658 patients were included, and three of them were high-quality studies. At first 6 months after treatment, there were no significant differences for ODI scores between two therapeutic groups (P > 0.05), however, surgery group showed significant higher ODI scores at one year (P < 0.05) and two years (P < 0.05). Two studies reported no significant difference between laminectomy and conservative treatment for the SF-36 physical function scores at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months (P > 0.05) and two studies reported patients were satisfied with X-STOP implanted at six weeks, six months, and one year. No statistical differences for the adverse events intra-operation or within 72 h (P > 0.05) between surgery and non-surgery groups. Moreover, subgroup analysis showed there were no safety differences between laminectomy and conservative treatment, X-STOP and conservative treatment at early stage of duration. However, the surgical groups had higher complication rates than non-surgery groups throughout the follow-up duration. CONCLUSION: Surgery groups showed better late clinical outcomes after one year and higher complication rate throughout the follow-up duration, although it had no significant differences compared with conservative groups in the first six months post-treatment. However, there was no evidence that a definitive method could be firmly recommended to LSS patients. Further researches were needed to achieve high quality and credible results.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Estenosis Espinal/terapia , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía
6.
Int J Surg ; 39: 57-64, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28110031

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: and purpose: Interspinous process devices (IPD) were widely used for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). However, whether IPD was superior to bony decompression was still debated. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of IPD to bony decompression for LSS. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCTR), Ovid Medline, China national knowledge internet database, Wan Fang database were searched in August.8th.2016. Studies were identified using selection criteria and analysed was performed with Review Manager Version 5.3. RESULTS: Four RCTs (seven articles) were included, with 200 patients in the interspinous process devices (IPD) group and 200 patients in bony decompression (DP) group. There was no significant difference in hospital stay time (P = 0.36), VAS leg pain scores (P = 0.83), and complication rates (P = 0.20) for IPD alone versus bony decompression. However, IPD alone showed higher VAS low back pain scores (P = 0.03) and reoperation rates (P < 0.0001) between the two therapy groups. Two studies' results showed the IPD group had lower cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients who received IPD may obtain several benefits in the short term, it was associated with higher costs, reoperation rates. Both IPD and bony decompression were acceptable strategies for LSS, but the risks, indications, and costs of IPD should be carefully taken into account before surgery.


Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Reoperación , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Int J Surg ; 39: 65-73, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28089798

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Both external fixation (ExFx) and open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF) were used to treat complex tibial plateau fractures, but it was not sure which one was better. So we did this meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of ExFx and ORIF in managing complex tibial plateau fractures. METHODS: Articles published before August 5, 2016 were selected from PubMed, Cochrane library, and some other electronic database. Relevant journals were also searched manually with no language limited. Two independent reviewers searched and assessed the literature. A fixed effect model was initially used for meta-analyses with RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: When compared with ORIF, cases undergoing ExFx were more likely to return to the preinjury state at the early stage, but no difference in the later period of follow-up. However, ExFx group had higher infection rate (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.08-3.63, P = 0.03), higher venous thromboembolism rate (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.49-4.96, P = 0.45), higher re-operation rate (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.47-1.62, P = 0.66) and lower compartment syndrome rate (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.12-3.22, P = 0.56), lower TKA rate (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.20-1.34, P = 0.17). There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of deep infection, venous thromboembolism, compartment syndrome and VTE between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Although external fixation may offer some advantages, both were acceptable strategies in managing complex tibial plateau fractures. According to our analysis results, we strongly recommend that selection of definitive fixators should base on the fracture patterns, soft-tissue condition as well as the injury stages in clinical practice. More important, further multicentered, randomized controlled studies should be implemented to get a more reliable and clear result.


Asunto(s)
Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adulto , Fijadores Externos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...