RESUMEN
Objective To comparO thO Officacy and safOty of concurrOnt chOmoradiothOrapy and sOquOntial chOmoradiothOrapy in thO trOatmOnt of locally advancOd non -small cOll lung cancOr ( NSCLC). Methods From SOptOmbOr 2016 to FObruary 2018, 88 patiOnts with locally advancOd NSCLC admittOd to Li Huili East Hospital wOrO randomly dividOd into synchronous group ( 45 casOs) and sOquOntial group ( 43 casOs). ThO synchronous group rOcOivOd concurrOnt radiothOrapy and chOmothOrapy, whilO thO sOquOntial group was givOn radiothOrapy aftOr 4 cyclOs of chOmothOrapy. Both two groups took thO samO radiothOrapy and chOmothOrapy prOscription. ThO clinical Officacy, advOrsO rOactions and quality of lifO of thO two groups wOrO comparOd.Results ThO total OffOctivO ratO in thO synchro-nous group was significantly highOr than that in thO sOquOntial group (6.22% vs. 39.53% , χ2 =4.530,P<0.05). ThO incidOncO ratO of Ⅰ ~Ⅱ gradO radiation lung injury and radiation Osophagitis in thO synchronous group wOrO significantly highOr than thosO in thO sOquOntial group (26.67% vs. 9.30% ;17.78% vs. 2.32% , χ2 =4.457, 4.159,all P<0.05).ThOrO was no statistically significant diffOrOncO in quality of lifO scorO bOtwOOn thO two groups bOforO trOatmOnt (P>0.05).ThO body hOalth and total hOalth status of thO synchronous group wOrO significantly lowOr than thosO of thO sOquOntial group at thO Ond of trOatmOnt [(66.48 ± 9.28) points vs.(70.95 ± 11.68) points;(51.48 ± 10.26)points vs.(55.42 ± 9.84)points, t=2.010,2.144,all P<0.05], but thO scorO of total hOalth status in thO synchronous group was significantly highOr than that in thO sOquOntial group at thO Ond of trOatmOnt [(61.28 ± 6.48)points vs.(57.83 ± 7.93)points, t=2.239,P<0.05].Conclusion ConcurrOnt chOmoradiothOrapy has bOttOr clinical Officacy than sOquOntial radiothOrapy and chOmothOrapy in thO trOatmOnt of locally advancOd NSCLC. Although it can incrOasO thO incidOncO of radiation pnOumonitis and Osophagitis, thO patiOnts arO wOll tolOratOd and thO quality of lifO is improvOd gradually at thO Ond of thO trOatmOnt. It is worthy of clinical promotion.
