Tirofiban for Stroke without Large or Medium-Sized Vessel Occlusion.

BACKGROUND: The effects of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke but who have no evidence of complete occlusion of large or medium-sized vessels have not been extensively studied. METHODS: In a multicenter trial in China, we enrolled patients with ischemic stroke without occlusion of large or medium-sized vessels and with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 5 or more and at least one moderately to severely weak limb. Eligible patients had any of four clinical presentations: ineligible for thrombolysis or thrombectomy and within 24 hours after the patient was last known to be well; progression of stroke symptoms 24 to 96 hours after onset; early neurologic deterioration after thrombolysis; or thrombolysis with no improvement at 4 to 24 hours. Patients were assigned to receive intravenous tirofiban (plus oral placebo) or oral aspirin (100 mg per day, plus intravenous placebo) for 2 days; all patients then received oral aspirin until day 90. The primary efficacy end point was an excellent outcome, defined as a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days. Secondary end points included functional independence at 90 days and a quality-of-life score. The primary safety end points were death and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: A total of 606 patients were assigned to the tirofiban group and 571 to the aspirin group. Most patients had small infarctions that were presumed to be atherosclerotic. The percentage of patients with a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days was 29.1% with tirofiban and 22.2% with aspirin (adjusted risk ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.53, P = 0.02). Results for secondary end points were generally not consistent with the results of the primary analysis. Mortality was similar in the two groups. The incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 1.0% in the tirofiban group and 0% in the aspirin group. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving heterogeneous groups of patients with stroke of recent onset or progression of stroke symptoms and nonoccluded large and medium-sized cerebral vessels, intravenous tirofiban was associated with a greater likelihood of an excellent outcome than low-dose aspirin. Incidences of intracranial hemorrhages were low but slightly higher with tirofiban. (Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; RESCUE BT2 Chinese Clinical Trial Registry number, ChiCTR2000029502.).

Time-Dependent Endovascular Treatment Effect According to Collateral Status in Basilar Artery Occlusion.

Prior studies on anterior circulation stroke have demonstrated that the benefits of endovascular treatment (EVT) may be absent in patients with poor collaterals. Our study focused on patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) to investigate time-dependent EVT effects according to the posterior circulation collateral score (PC-CS). The BASILAR study was a nationwide prospective Chinese registry of consecutive BAO patients. Patients were divided into groups receiving standard medical therapy alone (SMT group) or SMT plus EVT (EVT group). Restricted cubic spline analyses (RCSA) were performed to explore the nonlinear and linear relationships between EVT time and outcomes for different PC-CS. We included 828 patients with acute BAO. Compared with the poor collateral (PC-CS 0-3), the adjusted odds ratio of favorable outcome was 1.311 in patients with moderate (PC-CS 4-5) (95% CI, 0.781-2.201) and 1.899 with good (PC-CS 6-10) collateral (1.125-3.207) for EVT. RCSA revealed that in patients with PC-CS 0-3, the favorable outcome probability after EVT significantly decreased to 10% within 6 h and stabilized thereafter (Pnonlinearity = 0.035), while in patients with moderate and good collateral, the probability was maintained at approximately 30% and 40% respectively, even beyond 6 h (all Pnonlinearity > 0.05). Among patients with BAO, good collateral circulation was independently associated with improved outcomes along with the usage of thrombectomy. Patients with poor collaterals should receive EVT as early as possible, especially within 6 h of symptom onset, while the time window may be extended in patients with moderate and good collaterals. Unique identifier: ChiCTR1800014759.

Twenty-four-hour National Institute of Health Stroke Scale predicts short- and long-term outcomes of basilar artery occlusion after endovascular treatment.

Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the 24-h National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) for short- and long-term outcomes of patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) after endovascular treatment (EVT) in daily clinical routine. Methods: Patients with EVT for acute basilar artery occlusion study registry with the 24-h NIHSS, and clinical outcomes documented at 90 days and 1 year were included. The NIHSS admission, 24-h NIHSS, NIHSS delta, and NIHSS percentage change, binary definitions of early neurological improvement [ENI; improvement of 4/(common ENI)/8 (major ENI)/10 (dramatic ENI)] NIHSS points were compared to predict the favorable outcomes and mortality at 90 days and 1 year. The primary outcome was defined as favorable if the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was 0-3 at 90 days. Results: Of the 644 patients treated with EVT, the 24-h NIHSS had the highest discriminative ability for favorable outcome prediction [receiver operator characteristic (ROC)NIHSS 24 h area under the curve (AUC): 0.92 (0.90-0.94)] at 90 days and 1 year [(ROCNIHSS 24 h AUC: 0.91 (0.89-0.94)] in comparison to the NIHSS score at admission [ROCNIHSS admission AUC at 90 days: 0.73 (0.69-0.77); 1 year: 0.74 (0.70-0.78)], NIHSS delta [ROCΔ NIHSS AUC at 90 days: 0.84 (0.81-0.87); 1 year: 0.81 (0.77-0.84)], and NIHSS percentage change [ROC%change AUC at 90 days: 0.85 (0.82-0.89); 1 year: 0.82 (0.78-0.86)]. Conclusion: The 24-h NIHSS with a threshold of ≤23 points was the best surrogate for short- and long-term outcomes after EVT for BAO in the clinical routine.