Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Australian National University Alzheimer Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI) for Chinese community-dwelling residents: A cross-sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: To cross-culturally adapt the Australian National University Alzheimer Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI) and verify the reliability and validity of its cognitive activity domain. METHODS: According to Beaton's guidelines, the ANU-ADRI was were translated into Chinese. The psychometric properties of ANU-ADRI its cognitive activity was conducted among community-dwelling residents (n = 442) in Changchun, Harbin and Hegang from December 2021 to July 2023. RESULTS: The Chinese version of the ANU-ADRI had good content validity and face validity. Exploratory factor analysis of cognitive activity revealed a 3-factor structure, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 64.124 %. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good model fit (x2/df = 1.664, RMSEA = 0.055, RMR = 0.090, GFI = 0.942, CFI = 0.919, IFI = 0.921, TLI = 0.902, and NFI = 0.824). The internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.807) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.787) were considered satisfactory. CONCLUSION: The ANU-ADRI showed acceptable reliability and validity for assessing risk factors for Alzheimer's disease among middle-aged and elderly community-dwelling residents.

Experiences and perspectives on the optimal timing for initiating advance care planning in patients with mild to moderate dementia: A meta-synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning is typically initiated during the last six months of a patient's life. However, due to the progressive decline in the decision-making process in individuals with dementia, their involvement in advance care planning is limited to the early stages of the disease. Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal timing for initiating advance care planning for people with dementia, and a comprehensive review of the literature addressing this matter is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences and perspectives of people with dementia, their family caregivers, and health care professionals with regard to the optimal timing for initiating advance care planning. DESIGN: A meta-synthesis was conducted. DATA SOURCE: The following eight electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and CNKI, WanFang and Vip. REVIEW METHODS: This review uses thematic synthesis to systematically synthesize qualitative evidence and report findings according to The Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) and the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two researchers, and quality was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Qualitative Research Standard Assessment tool. FINDINGS: Twenty-one studies were selected for this review. This review involved an overarching theme: The utilization of pivotal elements to transition from delayed initiation to comprehensive implementation. Three themes emerge, including the prerequisites for initiating advance care planning, not ready to start advance care planning and struggling along narrow roads. For health care professionals, the selection of an opportune moment to initiate advance care planning for people with dementia is not only a challenge but also a crucial prerequisite for the successful implementation of advance care planning. Health care professionals' experience, attitude toward advance care planning, trust relationship with patients, cultural differences among people with dementia and their caregivers, and economic disparities all influence health care professionals' judgment of the timing for initiating advance care planning. CONCLUSIONS: Determining the optimal timing for initiating advance care planning is a complex process that requires a comprehensive consideration of the realities faced by health care professionals, people with dementia and their caregivers. Therefore, it is imperative to provide relevant training to health care professionals to ensure the successful implementation of advance care planning.

Virtual reality-based dementia educational programmes for formal and informal caregivers of people with dementia: A scoping review.

AIM: To map evidence of the existing virtual reality-based dementia educational programmes and the effects of these educational programmes on dementia formal and informal caregivers. DESIGN: A scoping review. METHODS: A comprehensive search of nine databases was conducted to find studies from the inception of the databases to October 2023. Two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts related to the eligibility criteria. Full texts of potentially relevant studies were read by one author and checked by a second. Data extraction and synthesis using NVivo 12 were undertaken by one author and checked by two other authors. RESULTS: Nineteen studies published between 2002 and 2022. The four randomised controlled studies and five qualitative studies were of moderate to good methodological quality. The 10 quasi-experimental studies were of weak to moderate quality. Fifteen virtual reality-based educational programmes had a positive influence on formal and informal caregivers, including improving caregivers' perceptions changing attitudes towards people with dementia, while the nursing competence of formal caregivers did not improve in short term. Educational programmes that covered dementia-related information and care strategies better improved the knowledge level of dementia formal and informal caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative and quantitative studies of moderate to good quality included in this study support the idea that virtual reality-based dementia educational programmes may be a safe and effective way and have potential benefits for improving knowledge, perceptions, attitudes and nursing competence. IMPACT: This scoping review will provide an emerging teaching model for formal and informal caregivers of people with dementia and help them better understand the types and the influence of virtual reality-based dementia educational programmes. REPORTING METHOD: PRISMA-ScR. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Not required as this review in accordance with the aim to map existing literature from the dementia formal and informal caregivers' perspective.

Dignity-preserving care of people with dementia in different nursing environments: a qualitative systematic review.

AIMS: To systematically identify, evaluate and synthesize qualitative evidence about the dignity-related nursing experiences of people with dementia in families and nursing homes, summarize the similarities and differences and analyse the causes and influencing factors. METHODS: A synthesis of qualitative studies retrieved from eight databases that were published before September 2022. Two reviewers independently screened and selected studies. Inclusion criteria were established according to the PICOS principle. Quality assessment was guided by Joanna Briggs Institute's Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument and the structured topic synthesis method was used to summarise studies eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Three key themes were extracted from 14 included studies; the living environment, relationship needs and self-awareness, which focused on improving the dementia-centred nursing environment, meeting the needs of the relationship-centred nursing network, and finally, improving the self-awareness of people with dementia to promote dignity. CONCLUSION: This systematic review shows people with dementia need to integrate into society and maintain their dignity in a dementia-friendly environment that is respectful, inclusive environment that promotes freedom.

Multidomain interventions based on a life-course model to prevent dementia in at-risk Chinese older adults: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Due to the time-dependent effect of specific risk factors for dementia, multidomain interventions based on a life-course model might achieve optimal preventive effects against dementia. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of multidomain interventions based on a life-course model of modifiable risk factors for dementia in at-risk Chinese older adults. DESIGN: This was a two-arm, proof-of-concept, randomized controlled trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We randomly assigned 96 community-dwelling at-risk adults aged 60 years or older in a 1:1 ratio to either the 6-month multidomain intervention group (dementia literacy, physical activity, cognitive training, social activity and optional modules) or the control group (health education). METHODS: The primary outcomes were the dementia risk score and cognitive composite Z score. The secondary outcomes included the individual components of the dementia risk score (protective and risk factors) and cognitive composite Z score (global cognition, memory, executive function and language), social isolation (loneliness, social contact, and social participation), dementia literacy and prevention belief. Linear mixed models with maximum likelihood estimation were used to calculate the outcomes between the groups over time. RESULTS: The primary analyses showed that the dementia risk score was significantly lower (p < 0.001) and that the cognitive composite Z score was significantly higher (p = 0.013) in the multidomain intervention group than in the control group. Baseline characteristics did not modify the effects of the multidomain interventions (p value for interaction > 0.05). For secondary outcomes, statistically significant group × time interactions were observed for the protective (p = 0.001) and risk factors (p = 0.049), as well as in executive function (p = 0.020), loneliness (p = 0.029), dementia literacy (p < 0.001) and prevention belief (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Multidomain interventions based on a life-course model are feasible and have the potential to reduce dementia risk and improve cognitive function in at-risk Chinese older adults. REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2100053417).

The impact of education/training on nurses caring for patients with stroke: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Stroke survivors have complex needs that necessitate the expertise and skill of well-trained healthcare professionals to provide effective rehabilitation and long-term support. Limited knowledge exists regarding the availability of specialized education and training programs specifically designed for nurses caring for stroke patients. AIM: This review aims to assess the content and methods of training for nurses caring for stroke patients, examine its impact on both nurses and patients, and identify key facilitators and barriers to its implementation. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive scoping review by reviewing multiple databases, including PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Data extraction and narrative synthesis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. RESULTS: Seventeen articles were included in this review. We found that education/training not only enhanced patients' self-care abilities, nursing outcomes, and satisfaction, but also had a positive impact on the knowledge, skills, and practices of nurses. The obstacles to education/training included feasibility and cost-effectiveness, while the driving factors were management support and participation, professional education/training, and controlled environment creation. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the crucial role of education/training in enhancing stroke care provided by nurses. Effective education/training integrates various educational methods and management support to overcome implementation barriers and optimize clinical practice benefits. These findings indicate the necessity of universal and consistent stroke education/training for nurses to further improve patient outcomes in stroke care.

Genetic testing decision-making experiences within families of colorectal cancer patients: A qualitative study.

PURPOSE: Genetic testing is the gold standard for the diagnosis of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes but is currently inadequate and nonideal. The decision-making processes regarding genetic testing are even less well known. The present study aims to explore the decision-making experience of genetic testing for colorectal cancer patients and their family members. METHOD: A descriptive qualitative study was employed. Data were collected using individual semi-structured interviews with 5 colorectal cancer patients and 20 family members from November 2020 to April 2021. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS: Four categories were identified: 1) the source of information for genetic testing, 2) the differentiated attitudes towards genetic testing, 3) genetic testing decisional needs, and 4) the factors influencing genetic testing decision-making. Colorectal cancer patients and their families engaged in two distinct pathways to genetic testing decisions: direct decision-making and indirect decision-making. Throughout these processes, due to the limited source of information, they had information needs that were met and facilitated genetic testing decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal cancer patients and family members need knowledge related to genetic testing, but they have limited access to information, which prevents them from making informed decisions. Providing decision aid interventions and informational support are significant steps towards addressing the support needs of this population.

The influence of web-based decision aids on informal caregivers of people with dementia: A systematic mixed-methods review.

Caring for people with dementia is considered one of the most stressful and difficult forms of care. Informal caregivers constantly face high physical and emotional burdens. Therefore, it is essential to provide them with effective and practical support. Web-based decision aids can provide convenient and effective decision support for informal caregivers. The aim of this study was to assess and synthesize the influence of web-based decision aids on informal caregivers of people with dementia. Searches of electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, PsycINFO, CNKI, Open Grey and Baidu Wenku) and reference lists of relevant studies were conducted in July 2022. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies published in Chinese and English on the use of web-based decision aids by informal caregivers of people with dementia were included. The studies were selected by screening titles, abstracts and full texts, and the quality of each study was assessed by two researchers independently. Fourteen studies were published between 2010 and 2022, including five qualitative studies, four quantitative studies and five mixed-methods studies. Web-based decision aids have a positive influence on informal caregivers of people with dementia by providing decision support, satisfying needs, promoting psychological health, improving communication ability and reducing caregiver burden. Informal caregivers of people with dementia are receptive to web-based decision aids and expect their functionality to be optimized further. Web-based decision aids offer potential benefits to informal caregivers by providing effective decision-making support and improving their psychological health and ability to communicate.

How to manage comorbidities in people with dementia: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: People with dementia experience a high prevalence of comorbidities that seriously affect patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to map the evidence and components related to comorbidity management, including interventions to facilitate and support the practice of management. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted. In June 2022, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Open grey, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant literature. The inclusion criteria were outlined to identify studies on comorbidity management in people with dementia. RESULTS: We found 43 items that met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the studies were published since 2010. Most research focused on medication management, health care service use and provision, and comorbidity-related monitoring and management; there were a small number of studies that involved decision-making. Only 6 studies developed interventions to support dementia care, which included comorbidity management. Studies involving the comorbidity management process were mainly based on qualitative methods, which make it difficult to quantify the impact of these processes on comorbidity management. CONCLUSIONS: Given the serious impact of dementia on managing comorbidities, there is a need to develop systematic interventions targeting the management of comorbidities.