Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Curr Med Sci ; 2024 Jun 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38926330

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the serum lipid profiles of patients with localized osteosarcoma around the knee joint before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: After retrospectively screening the data of 742 patients between January 2007 and July 2020, 50 patients aged 13 to 39 years with Enneking stage II disease were included in the study. Serum lipid levels, including total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), lipoprotein-α [Lp(a)], and apolipoprotein A1, B, and E (ApoA1, ApoB, and ApoE), and clinicopathological characteristics were collected before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: The mean levels of TC, TG, and ApoB were significantly increased following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (16%, 38%, and 20%, respectively, vs. pretreatment values; P<0.01). The mean levels of LDL-C and ApoE were also 19% and 16% higher, respectively (P<0.05). No correlation was found between the pretreatment lipid profile and the histologic response to chemotherapy. An increase in Lp(a) was strongly correlated with the Ki-67 index (R=0.31, P=0.023). Moreover, a trend toward longer disease-free survival (DFS) was observed in patients with decreased TG and increased LDL-C following chemotherapy, although this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.23 and P=0.24, respectively). CONCLUSION: Significant elevations in serum lipids were observed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with localized osteosarcoma. There was no prognostic significance of pretreatment serum lipid levels on histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The scale of increase in serum Lp(a) might have a potential prognostic role in osteosarcoma. Patients with increased LDL-C or reduced TG after chemotherapy seem to exhibit a trend toward favorable DFS.

2.
Heliyon ; 10(10): e31380, 2024 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38803927

RESUMEN

Objective: Our aim was to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the in-hospital 14-day (14 d) and 28-day (28 d) survival rates of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: Clinical data of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from December 2022 to February 2023 and the north campus of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital from April 2022 to June 2022 were collected. A total of 408 patients from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were selected as the training cohort, and 151 patients from Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital were selected as the verification cohort. Independent variables were screened using Cox regression analysis, and a nomogram was constructed using R software. The prediction accuracy of the nomogram was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, C-index, and calibration curve. Decision curve analysis was used to evaluate the clinical application value of the model. The nomogram was externally validated using a validation cohort. Result: In total, 559 patients with severe/critical COVID-19 were included in this study, of whom 179 (32.02 %) died. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that age >80 years [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.539, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.027-2.306, P = 0.037], history of diabetes (HR = 1.741, 95 % CI: 1.253-2.420, P = 0.001), high APACHE II score (HR = 1.083, 95 % CI: 1.042-1.126, P < 0.001), sepsis (HR = 2.387, 95 % CI: 1.707-3.338, P < 0.001), high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR = 1.010, 95 % CI: 1.003-1.017, P = 0.007), and high D-dimer level (HR = 1.005, 95 % CI: 1.001-1.009, P = 0.028) were independent risk factors for 14 d and 28 d survival rates, whereas COVID-19 vaccination (HR = 0.625, 95 % CI: 0.440-0.886, P = 0.008) was a protective factor affecting prognosis. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the 14 d and 28 d hospital survival rates in the training cohort was 0.765 (95 % CI: 0.641-0.923) and 0.814 (95 % CI: 0.702-0.938), respectively, and the AUC of the 14 d and 28 d hospital survival rates in the verification cohort was 0.898 (95 % CI: 0.765-0.962) and 0.875 (95 % CI: 0.741-0.945), respectively. The calibration curves of 14 d and 28 d hospital survival showed that the predicted probability of the model agreed well with the actual probability. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the nomogram has high clinical application value. Conclusion: In-hospital survival rates of patients with COVID-19 were predicted using a nomogram, which will help clinicians in make appropriate clinical decisions.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA