Submucosal gland differentiation and implications in esophageal basaloid squamous cell carcinomas.

Esophageal basaloid squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC) is a heterogenous entity with multilineage differentiation. It lacks systematical analysis on submucosal gland differentiation (SGD) due to the histological diversity and low incidence of esophageal BSCC. This study aims to find the correlation of SGD and clinicopathological features. A total of 152 esophageal BSCCs were separated into three histological groups: pure, mixed, and borderline group. The clinicopathological features were compared between different groups. The prevalence of SGD was also compared between cases of different groups. A panel of antibodies were used to identify SGD. The pure group differed from the mixed and borderline groups in many aspects, lymph node metastasis (LNM), cancer embolus, perineural invasion, and advanced stage occurred less frequently in the pure group (P<0.01). The pure group had a better but statistically insignificant overall survival (P=0.097). The squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) component or focal squamous differentiation was present in metastatic lymph nodes in almost all mixed BSCCs (95.7%, 22/23) with LNM. The LNM rate of superficial (T1b) BSCCs (17.6%, 6/34) was comparable to that of superficial (T1b) SCCs (18.5%, 57/308). However, LNM exclusively occurred in superficial mixed (3/5) and borderline (3/10) BSCCs. The IHC results demonstrated a prevalence of SGD in pure group (77%, 43/56). SGD is considered to be a favorable factor, while the squamous differentiation or invasive SCC component is an adverse factor in esophageal BSCCs. Refinement of classification is a promising way to improve patient management.

Application of a novel scoring system for gastric cancer opportunistic screening in hospital visits.

BACKGROUND: A novel scoring system and screening procedure for gastric cancer (GC) screening was proposed based on the national conditions of China, which state that endoscopy professionals and facilities are relatively limited compared with the large Chinese population. METHODS: A novel scoring system for gastric cancer screening was used to retrospectively analyse the patients who met the screening procedure from April 2017 to December 2019 in our hospital. We divided all of the patients into three groups: low-risk group (0-11 scores), medium-risk group (12-16 scores), and high-risk group (17-23 scores). Statistical analysis was performed on the detection rate of gastric cancer and precursors of gastric cancer among these three groups. RESULTS: A total of 6701 patients were enrolled in this study, including 4,352(64.95%) in the low-risk group, 1,948 patients (29.07%) in the medium-risk group, and 401 patients (5.98%) in the high-risk group. The total detection rate of gastric cancer was 2.84% (190/6,701), with a 0.94% rate (41/4,352) in the low-risk group, a 5.18% rate (101/1,948) in the medium-risk group, and a 11.97% rate (48/401) in the high-risk group. There were statistically significant differences in the detection rate of gastric cancer among these three groups (all P < 0.05). The detection rate of early gastric cancer was 46.31% (88/190) among all of the detected gastric cancers in this study. In addition, the detection rates of differentiated gastric cancer and precursors of gastric cancer in the medium-risk group and high-risk group were significantly higher than those in the low-risk group. In addition, the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of the novel scoring system in differentiating GC was 0.79. CONCLUSION: The screening strategy based on the novel scoring system can significantly improve the efficiency of gastric cancer opportunistic screening in hospital visits. Gastroscopy should be strongly recommended for patients in the medium-risk group and high-risk group, and detailed gastroscopy should be adopted as early as possible to improve the detection rate of early gastric cancer.

Predictive value of nomogram based on Kyoto classification of gastritis to diagnosis of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: It is important to predict the risk of gastric cancer (GC) for endoscopists because early detection of GC determines the selection of the best treatment strategy and the prognosis of patients. The study aimed to evaluate the utility of a predictive nomogram based on the Kyoto classification of gastritis for GC. METHODS: It was a retrospective study that included 2639 patients who received esophagogastroduodenoscopy and serum pepsinogen (PG) assay from January 2019 to November 2019 at the Endoscopy Center of the Department of Gastroenterology, Wenzhou Central Hospital. Routine biopsy was conducted to determine the benign and malignant lesions pathologically. All cases were randomly divided into the training set (70%) and the validation set (30%) by using the bootstrap method. A nomogram was formulated according to multivariate analysis of the training set. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were assessed by concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) as well as calibration curve and were validated by the validation set. RESULTS: Among all patients enrolled, 102 of 2636 cases showed LGIN, HGIN and gastric cancer pathology results, whereas the rest cases showed benign pathological results. Multivariate analysis indicated that age, sex, PG I/II ratio and Kyoto classification scores were independent predictive variables for GC. The C-index of the nomogram of the training set was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74 to 0.84) and the AUC of ROC is 0.79. The calibration curve of the nomogram demonstrated an optimal agreement between predicted probability and observed probability of the risk of GC. The C-index was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79 to 0.94) with a calibration curve of better concurrence in the validation set. CONCLUSION: The nomogram formulated was proven to be of high predictive value for GC.