Facial infiltrating lipomatosis with hemimegalencephaly and lymphatic malformations caused by nonhotspot phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha mutation.

We report an unusual case of facial infiltrating lipomatosis with hemimegalencephaly and lymphatic malformations. In addition to the clinical data and imaging findings, detection of a heterozygous PIK3CA nonhotspot known pathogenic variant C420R in a facial epidermal nevus provided novel insight into the pathogenic effect of somatic PIK3CA mutations.

Distribution of problematic localized facial infantile haemangiomas and their response to propranolol: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The distribution and response to propranolol of problematic facial infantile haemangiomas (IHs) has rarely been described in the literature. AIM: To map problematic facial IHs and observe their response to propranolol. METHODS: Eligible patients were categorized according to focal location and cohorts corresponding to these (buccal, medial, zygomatic, lateral and multiregional) were created. The primary efficacy variable was regression score ranging from 1 to 4, calculated using results of colour Doppler ultrasonography. RESULTS: In total, 104 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 32 (30·8%) IHs located in the buccal area, 12 (11·5%) in the medial area, 49 (47·1%) in the lateral area and 1 (1·0%) in the zygomatic area, with 10 (9·6%) IH cases having multiregional lesions. We found that the distribution pattern of most IHs matched the surface projection of the trunk of the external carotid and the facial arteries. Further analysis showed that the median regression score in the buccal and medial groups were significantly lower than those in the lateral and multiregional groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment of buccal and medial haemangiomas tends to be more challenging and their distribution pattern mainly reflects the direction of the facial vessels.

Optimal Timing of Laser Hair Removal in Expanded Forehead Flap in the Reconstruction of Facial Defects: During or After Tissue Expansion?

Background: The optimal timing of laser epilation with expanded forehead flaps in facial defect reconstruction remains undetermined. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of hair removal during or after flap expansion. Methods: This prospective exploratory study included 15 (11 women and 4 men, 16.47 ± 16.331 years of age) and 26 (19 women and 7 men, 10.69 ± 10.899 years of age) patients who underwent 755 nm long-pulsed alexandrite laser epilation during flap expansion and after surgery, respectively. Facial reconstruction was performed in these patients because of congenital melanin nevus, scar or port-wine stains. Evaluation included hair reduction rate, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Results: The median number of laser sessions for hair removal during flap expansion was significantly lower than that after surgery (2.00 vs. 3.00, p < 0.01), and the hair reduction rate was also significantly higher during flap expansion (79.5% ± 21.93% vs. 68.3% ± 17.44%, p < 0.05). No severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Laser hair removal is safe and efficient when performed both during flap expansion period and after surgery, but its efficacy was significantly higher, and fewer sessions were required when performed during tissue expansion. Clinical trial registration information: ChiCTR1900026090.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of low fluence Q-switched 1064-nm and conventional Q-Switched 755-nm lasers in the treatment of café-au-lait macules: A prospective self-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Conventional high fluence Q-switched (HFQS) Alexandrite 755-nm are widely used in clinical café-au-lait macules (CALMs) treatment. There have been recent concerns regarding the efficacy and safety of low fluence Q-switched (LFQS) Nd: YAG 1064-nm lasers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the conventional HFQS and LFQS laser in the treatment of CALMs. METHODS: Within 3 months, 20 patients underwent prospective self-controlled split-lesion treatments with HFQS once or twice depending on the recovery rate, and with LFQS six times biweekly. Then the more effective laser was selected for continued treatments. Efficacy outcomes were evaluated by a visual analog scale (VAS) biweekly during the comparative trail. Recovery process, side effects and recurrence were recorded during the trial and follow-up visit. Patient and physician preferences for laser selection were also recorded. RESULTS: The average VAS scores of areas treated with HFQS and LFQS were 2.92 ± 0.86 and 2.93 ± 1.13, respectively (p > 0.05). The most significant efficacy change of LFQS was after the fourth laser treatment (VAS score: 1.82-2.37, p < 0.001). 11 lesions treated with LFQS and 7 with HFQS achieved an optimal treatment response (3.67 ≤ VAS ≤ 4). Three patients relapsed on one side (one on LFQS, two on HFQS) and five on both sides. Adverse effects included temporary hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, uneven pigmentation, and mottled hypopigmentation. Doctors thought 80% of patients were suitable for LFQS. 70% of patients preferred LFQS posttreatment. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy difference between the LFQS 1064-nm laser and HFQS 755-nm laser in treating CALMs in a 3-month comparative trial was statistically insignificant. LFQS is preferred by doctors and patients and is likely to help more patients achieve treatment efficacy than the HFQS within a short time, with fewer temporary adverse reactions, and a more even pigmentation. But it can cause mottled hypopigmentation. The LFQS had obvious lesion clearance after the fourth treatment.

How to Distinguish Solitary Neurofibroma From Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

ABSTRACT: Neurofibroma is a benign tumor originating from Schwann cells. It is diagnosed as a symptom of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) or solitary neurofibroma. Neurofibromatosis type 1 belongs to a class of hereditary diseases, whereas solitary neurofibroma is not. Presence of germline NF1 gene mutations can be used to distinguish the 2 conditions. However, due to false negative results in gene tests, NF1 may be misdiagnosed as solitary neurofibroma. This calls for development of more accurate diagnostic methods. The authors report 2 patients with neurofibroma who required surgery and fertility consulting. using primary cell culture and next-generation sequencing experiments, the authors found NF1 mutation in neurofibroma Schwann cells. But this mutation was not exit in peripheral blood, hence demonstrate this NF1 mutation was somatic rather than germline. These results confirmed the diagnosis of solitary neurofibroma rather than NF1. The presented method is, therefore, suitable for fertility consultation and diagnosis of solitary neurofibroma patient.