Propensity-score matched outcomes of resection of stage IV primary colon cancer with and without simultaneous resection of liver metastases.

There is controversy in the best management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CLM). This study aimed to compare short-term and survival outcomes of simultaneous resection of CLM and primary colon cancer compared to resection of only colon cancer. This retrospective matched cohort study included patients from the National Cancer Database (2015-2019) with stage IV colon adenocarcinoma and synchronous liver metastases who underwent colectomy. Patients were divided into two groups: colectomy-only (resection of primary colon cancer only) and colectomy-plus (simultaneous resection of primary colon cancer and liver metastases). The groups were matched using the propensity score method. The primary outcome was short-term mortality and readmission. Secondary outcomes were conversion, hospital stay, surgical margins, and overall survival. 4082 (37.6%) of 10,862 patients underwent simultaneous resection of primary colon cancer and liver metastases. After matching, 2038 patients were included in each group. There were no significant differences between the groups in 30-days mortality (3.1% vs 3.8%, p = 0.301), 90-days (6.6% vs 7.7%, p = 0.205) mortality, 30-days unplanned readmission (7.2% vs 5.3%, p = 0.020), or conversion to open surgery (15.5% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.298). Patients in the colectomy plus group had a higher rate of lower incidence of positive surgical margins (13.2% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.001) and longer overall survival (median: 41.5 vs 28.4 months, p < 0.001). Synchronous resection of CLM did not increase the rates of short-term mortality, readmission, conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery, or hospital stay and was associated with a lower incidence of positive surgical margins.

Immunotherapy in Stage III-IV Colon Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

SUMMARY: Immunotherapy for the systemic treatment of cancer offers new treatment possibilities for advanced malignancies. Despite promising initial results, evidence on efficacy of immunotherapy for colon cancer is lacking. Thus, we aimed to assess short-term and long-term outcomes of immunotherapy in patients with advanced colon cancer. A US National Cancer Database was searched for patients with stage III-IV colonic adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2019. Propensity score matching was used to classify the cohort into 2 groups: patients who received immunotherapy and controls. Main outcome measures were primary outcome was overall survival (OS). A total of 23,778 patients with stage III-IV colonic adenocarcinoma were treated with immunotherapy during the study period compared to 114,753 controls. Immunotherapy treated patients were younger (median age 61 vs. 67 y; P<0.001), more often male (57.3% vs. 50.7%, P<0.001), had more private insurance (44.1% vs. 33.7%; P<0.001), had more left-sided tumors (49.5% vs. 39.1%; P<0.001) and liver metastasis (80.2% vs. 61.7%; P<0.001) than controls. Immunotherapy patients received more standard chemotherapy (49.8% vs. 41.6%; P<0.001). After propensity-score matching, mean OS was significantly shorter in the immunotherapy group compared with controls (34.7 vs. 36.2 mo; P=0.008). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that immunotherapy was associated with increased risk for mortality (HR: 1.1; 95% CI: 1.02-1.18; P=0.005). Patients who received immunotherapy had lower 90-day mortality rates compared with controls (2.3% vs. 3.6%; P=0.004), but the groups had equivalent 30-day mortality rates (0.7% vs. 0.8%; P=0.76). Immunotherapy showed no improvement in OS in patients with stage III-IV colon cancer.

Upfront laparotomy versus conversion from minimally invasive surgery to open surgery in colon cancer: Is there a difference in outcomes?

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether conversion from minimally invasive surgery to laparotomy in patients with colon cancer contributes to worse outcomes compared with those operated by laparotomy. In this study, we aimed to assess the implications of transitioning from minimally invasive surgery to laparotomy in patients with colon cancer compared with patients undergoing upfront laparotomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database, including patients with stages I to III colon cancer (2010-2019). Patients who underwent either upfront laparotomy (Open Surgery Group) or minimally invasive surgery converted to open surgery (Converted Surgery Group) were included. Groups were balanced using propensity-score matching. Primary outcome was overall survival, and secondary outcomes included 30- and 90-day mortality and 30-day readmission rates. RESULTS: The study included 65,083 operated patients with stage I to III colon cancer; 57,091 patients (87.7%) were included in the Open Surgery group and 7,992 (12.3%) in the Converted Surgery group. 93.5% were converted from laparoscopy, and 6.5% were converted from robotic surgery. After propensity-score matching, 7,058 patients were included in each group. Median overall survival was significantly higher in the Converted Surgery group (107.3 months) than in the Open Surgery group (101.5 months; P = .006). A survival benefit was seen in patients >65 years of age (79.5 vs 71.9 months; P = .001), left-sided disease (129.4 vs 114.5 months; P < .001), and with a high Charlson comorbidity index score (=3; 58.9 vs 42.3 months; P = .03). Positive margin rates were similar between the groups (6.3% vs 5.6%; P = .07). Converted patients had a higher 30-day readmission rate (6.7% vs 5.6%, P = .006) and shorter duration of stay (median, 5 vs 6 days, P < .001) than patients in the Open Surgery group. In addition, 30-day mortality was comparable between the groups (2.9% vs 3.5%; P = .07). CONCLUSION: Conversion to open surgery from minimally invasive surgery was associated with better overall survival compared with upfront open surgery. A survival benefit was mainly seen in patients >65 years of age, with significant comorbidities, and with left-sided tumors. We believe these data suggest that, in the absence of an absolute contraindication to minimally invasive surgery, it should be the preferred approach in patients with colon cancer.

Association between microsatellite status and characteristics and outcomes of early-onset compared to late-onset rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is an important prognosticator for colorectal cancer (CRC). The present study aimed to assess the impact of MSI status on the characteristics and outcomes of early-onset compared to late-onset rectal cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the US National Cancer Database (2004-2019) to assess the baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, short-term outcomes, and overall survival (OS) of early-onset rectal adenocarcinoma affecting patients < 50 years compared to late-onset rectal adenocarcinoma according to the MSI status. RESULTS: The present study included 48,407 patients (59.9% male) with rectal cancer, 17.3% of patients were < 50 years and 6.3% had MSI-H tumors. In the early-onset group, patients with MSI-H tumors had a lower mean age (41.5 vs 43 years, p < 0.001) and presented less often with stage IV disease (22.1% vs 17.7%, p = 0.03) and liver metastasis (9.1% vs 13.5%, p = 0.011) than patients with MSS tumors. In the late-onset group, patients with MSI-H and MSS tumors had similar demographics, disease stage, and metastatic pattern, yet MSI-H patients more often received neoadjuvant radiation therapy (58.9% vs 55.1%, p = 0.009) and neoadjuvant systemic therapy (40% vs 36.2%, p = 0.005). In both age groups, MSI-H tumors were associated with more pathologic T3-4 stage and were more likely mucinous and poorly differentiated carcinomas than MSS tumors. The median OS of MSI-H tumors was similar to MSS tumors (108.09 vs 102.31 months, p = 0.1), whether in the early-onset (139.5 vs 134.2 months, p = 0.821) or late-onset groups (106.1 vs 104.3 months, p = 0.236). CONCLUSIONS: In both age groups, MSI-H rectal cancers were more often mucinous and poorly differentiated carcinomas and had pT3-4 stage more often than MSS cancers. MSI-H rectal cancers tend to present less often with distant metastases and nodal involvement than MSS cancers only in early-onset, but not in late-onset rectal cancers. The association between MSI status and survival was not notable in this study, whether in the early-onset or late-onset groups.

Trends in management and outcomes of colon cancer in the United States over 15 years: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Management of colon cancer has changed over the last few decades. We assessed the trends in management and outcomes using the US National Cancer Database (NCDB). A retrospective analysis of all patients with colonic adenocarcinoma between 2005 and 2019 was conducted. The cohort was divided into three equal time periods: Period 1 (2005-2009), Period 2 (2010-2014), and Period 3 (2015-2019) to examine treatment and outcomes trends. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). The study included 923,275 patients. A significant increase in patients with stage IV disease was noted in Period 3 compared to Period 1 (47.9% vs. 27.9%, respectively), whereas a reciprocal reduction was seen in patients with locally advanced disease (stage II: 20.8%-12%; stage III: 14.5%-7.7%). Use of immunotherapy significantly increased from 0.3% to 7.6%. Mean 5-year OS increased (43.6 vs. 42.1 months) despite the increase in metastatic disease and longer time from diagnosis to definitive surgery (7 vs. 14 days). A reduction in 30-day readmission (5.1%-4.2%), 30- (3.9%-2.8%), and 90-day mortality (7.1%-5%) was seen. Laparoscopic and robotic surgery increased from 45.8% to 53.1% and 2.9% to 12.7%, respectively. Median postoperative length of hospital stay decreased by 2 days. Rate of positive resection margins (7.2%-6%) and median number of examined lymph nodes (14-16) also improved. Minimally invasive surgery and immunotherapy for colon cancer significantly increased in recent years. Patient outcomes including OS improved over time.

Outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision compared to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Transanal dissection is increasingly used in laparoscopic surgery for total mesorectal excision of lower rectal cancers. Several studies compared outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with and without transanal dissection, yet there is a paucity of high-quality evidence. This meta-analysis aimed to provide a pooled comparative analysis of outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with and without transanal dissection based on evidence from randomized controlled trials. METHODS: This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2022-compliant systematic review of randomized controlled trials compared laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with and without transanal dissection. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through March 2023. The Medical Subject Headings terms used in the search were Rectal neoplasms, Proctectomy, Laparoscopy, and Transanal. The main outcomes included operative and pathologic outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias version 2 tool, and certainty of the evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The primary study outcome was conversion to open surgery. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials (1,339 patients; median age 61.2 years) were included; 671 patients underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with transanal dissection, and 668 underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision without transanal dissection. Both groups were similar in age, body mass index, and disease stage, but the laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with transanal dissection group had a higher male-to-female ratio, received neoadjuvant therapy and had a hand-sewn anastomosis more often. Patients who underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with transanal dissection had lower conversion rates (odds ratio = 0.179; P = .001), a higher likelihood of achieving complete total mesorectal excision (odds ratio = 1.435; P = .025), and fewer harvested lymph nodes (weighted mean difference = -1.926; P = .035). The groups had similar operative times (weighted mean difference = -3.476; P = .398), total complications (odds ratio = 0.94; P = .665), major complications (odds ratio = 1.112; P = .66), anastomotic leak (odds ratio = 0.67; P = .432), positive circumferential resection margin (odds ratio = 0.549; P = .155), and positive distal margins (odds ratio = 0.559; P = .171). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with transanal dissection was associated with lower odds of conversion to open surgery, greater likelihood of achieving complete total mesorectal excision, and fewer harvested lymph nodes than laparoscopic total mesorectal excision without transanal dissection.

Stapler size independently predicts postoperative complications following stapled ileocolic anastomosis: A retrospective cohort study.

AIM: Staplers used in ileocolic anastomosis construction differ in length and height. We assessed the impact of stapler type in creating ileocolic anastomoses on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of an Institutional Review Board approved database included patients who underwent laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer between January 2011 and August 2021. All patients had construction of extracorporeal antiperistaltic stapled ileocolic anastomosis using a linear cutting stapler. Main outcome measures were short-term (<30 day) morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: In all, 270 patients (136 men; median age 70.2 years) were included. A 75 mm stapler was used in 49 (18.1%) patients, 80 mm in 97 (35.9%) and 100 mm in 124 (45.9%). Blue cartridge (stapler height 3.5 mm) was used in 175 (64.5%) and green cartridge (4.8 mm) in 18 (7%) patients; this information was unavailable in 77 (28.5%) cases. Apical enterotomy closure was performed by linear stapler in 54% and linear cutting stapler in 46%. Apical staple line reinforcement or imbrication suturing was used in 26.3%. The overall postoperative complication rate was 28.9%. The anastomotic leak rate was 2.6%. Independent predictors of complications after laparoscopic right colectomy were older age (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1-1.06; P = 0.01), extended colectomy (OR 2.76, 95%CI 1.07-7.08; P = 0.035) and emergency surgery (OR 4.5, 95%CI 1.3-14.9; P = 0.014). A 100-mm linear cutting stapler was an independent protective factor against postoperative complications (OR 0.3, 95%CI 0.18-0.85; P = 0.019). Stapler height and closure technique of apical enterotomy did not affect postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Independent predictors of complications after laparoscopic right colectomy were older age, extended colectomy and emergency surgery. Using a 100 mm stapler was an independent protective factor against postoperative complications.

Predictors and survival outcomes of having less than 12 harvested lymph nodes in proctectomy for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations suggest that a minimum of 12 lymph nodes (LNs) should be harvested during curative rectal cancer resection. We aimed to assess predictors and survival outcomes of harvesting < 12 lymph nodes in rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: A retrospective case-control analysis of factors associated with harvesting < 12 LNs in rectal cancer surgery was conducted. Data were derived from the National Cancer Database 2010-2019. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of harvesting < 12 LNs. Association between harvesting < 12 LNs and 5-year overall survival (OS) was assessed using Cox regression and Kaplan Meier statistics. RESULTS: 67,529 patients (60.8% male; mean age: 61.2 ± 12.5 years) were included. Median number of harvested LNs was 15 (IQR: 11-20); 27.1% of patients had < 12 harvested LNs. Independent predictors of harvesting < 12 LNs were older age (OR: 1.016;p < 0.001), neoadjuvant systemic treatment (OR: 1.522;p < 0.001), neoadjuvant radiation treatment (OR: 1.367;p < 0.001), longer duration of radiation therapy (OR: 1.003;p < 0.001) and abdominoperineal resection (OR: 1.071;p = 0.017). Higher clinical TNM stage and tumor grade, pull-through coloanal anastomosis, and minimally invasive surgery were independently associated with ≥ 12 harvested LNs. < 12 harvested LNs was independently associated with lower 5-year OS (HR: 1.24;p < 0.001) and shorter mean OS (96.7 vs 102.8 months;p < 0.001) than ≥ 12 harvested LNs. CONCLUSIONS: Older age, open resection, and neoadjuvant therapy were independent predictors of < 12 harvested LNs. Conversely, higher clinical TNM stage and tumor grade, coloanal anastomosis, and minimally invasive surgery were predictive of ≥ 12 harvested LNs. < 12 LNs harvested was associated with lower OS.

A national cancer database analysis of the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of appendiceal malignant mesenchymal tumors.

The present study aimed to assess the characteristics and outcomes of appendiceal malignant mesenchymal tumors. This was a retrospective case-series study of patients with appendiceal malignant mesenchymal tumors in the national cancer database (2005-2019). The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and short-term mortality. 53 patients (40 GISTs and 13 sarcomas) were included. 92.6% of GIST patients had stage I disease and 76.9% of GISTs were ≤2 cm. Most appendiceal GISTs were treated with appendectomy or partial colectomy whereas half of patients with appendiceal sarcoma underwent hemicolectomy or subtotal colectomy. Only one short-term mortality was recorded in the sarcoma group. One-third of patients with sarcoma had positive surgical margins versus 5.1% of patients with GISTs. GIST patients had longer median OS (117.1 vs 54.8 months) than sarcoma patients.

Characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of anal versus rectal squamous cell carcinoma, a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Although squamous cell carcinoma is the most common malignancy of the anal canal, it rarely affects the rectum. The present study aimed to assess the differences in characteristics, treatments, clinical and pathologic outcomes, and survival between anal and rectal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: The United States National Cancer Databases (2004-2020) of anal canal and rectal cancer were used for this retrospective cohort analysis. Patients with anal or rectal squamous cell carcinoma were included in the analysis. The study's primary outcome was overall survival, and secondary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and positive resection margins. RESULTS: The present study included 76,830 patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma and 7,908 with rectal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma presented more often with early clinical stage I and stage II disease (50.4% vs 45.9%, P < .001) and less often with stage IV disease (6.5% vs 15.1%, P < .001). Anal squamous cell carcinomas were more often treated with upfront surgery than were rectal squamous cell carcinomas (37.7% vs 19.7%, P < .001), whereas rectal squamous cell carcinomas were more often treated with chemoradiation therapy alone (68.3% vs 59.8%, P < .001). Anal squamous cell carcinomas were treated more often with local excision (33.4% vs 15.8%, P < .001) than rectal squamous cell carcinoma. Anal squamous cell carcinoma was associated with a higher incidence of positive resection margins (41.9% vs 32.8%, P < .001). The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were higher after surgery for rectal squamous cell carcinoma than for anal squamous cell carcinoma (1.5% vs 0.4% and 4.1% vs 1.6%, respectively, P < .001). Anal squamous cell carcinoma had longer median overall survival (145.3 vs 90.3 months, P < .001) than rectal squamous cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma presented more often with early-stage disease and less often with distant metastasis and were more often treated with upfront surgery, mainly local excision. Anal squamous cell carcinoma was associated with lower 30-day and 90-day mortality and longer overall survival than rectal squamous cell carcinoma.

Propensity-score matched analysis of the pathologic outcomes and survival benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in stage II-III anal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Anal adenocarcinomas are a rare condition which account for less than 10% of anal cancers. The present study aimed to assess the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the clinical and pathologic outcomes and overall survival (OS) of patients with stage II-III anal adenocarcinomas after abdominoperineal resection (APR). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients with anal adenocarcinoma in the US National Cancer Database (NCDB) (2010-2020) was conducted. Propensity-score matching was used to compare patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (neoadjuvant therapy group) to the no-neoadjuvant group. The primary outcome was 5-year OS whereas secondary outcomes included conversion to open surgery, hospital stay, surgical margins, 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: A total of 742 patients (56% male) with a mean age of 63.6 ± 12.4 years were included. A total of 214 patients in the neoadjuvant group were matched with 107 in the no-neoadjuvant group. The mean OS was similar between the two groups (47.5 vs. 44.8 months, p = 0.253). Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy had a longer median time between diagnosis and surgery (151 vs. 54 days, p < 0.001), lower 90-day mortality (1.9% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.046), more pT0 tumors (15.7% vs. 0%), less pT3-4 tumors (28.4% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.001), less pN1-2 tumors (22.9% vs. 34.7%, p < 0.001), and less lymphovascular invasion (16.2% vs. 40%, p < 0.001) than the no-neoadjuvant group. Both groups had similar conversion rates, hospital stay, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and positive surgical margins. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant therapy before APR was associated with significant downstaging of anal adenocarcinomas and lower 90-day mortality, yet similar OS to patients who were surgically treated without neoadjuvant treatment.

Predictors of Nodal Disease in Rectal Cancer Patients with Complete Mucosal Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) achieve complete mucosal response following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and may be candidates for watch and wait strategy. This study aimed to identify predictors of nodal disease in patients with LARC who had a complete mucosal response to NAT. METHODS: This case-control study included patients with LARC who were treated with NAT in the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2019. Patients with complete mucosal response, defined as pathologic T0, were identified and classified according to the status of the pathologic N stage into complete response (pT0, pN0) and complete mucosal response with positive nodal disease (pT0, pN +). The two groups were compared regarding baseline demographics and tumor characteristics to determine the predictors of nodal disease after NAT. RESULTS: A total of 5529 patients (59.7% male) with a mean age of 59.6 ± 12.2 years had a complete mucosal response following NAT. Nodal disease was detected in 443 (8%) patients with a complete mucosal response. Independent predictors of nodal disease were clinical N + stage (OR: 1.87, p < 0.001), mucinous histology (OR: 3.8, p = 0.003), and lymphovascular invasion (OR = 4.01, p < 0.001). The clinical T stage was inversely related to the risk of nodal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having a complete mucosal response following NAT, 8% of patients had nodal disease. Clinical evidence of nodal involvement on preoperative assessment, mucinous tumor histology, and lymphovascular invasion predicted nodal disease after NAT. These findings should be considered when making a decision on watch and wait strategy in patients with clinical complete response.

Robotic and laparoscopic colectomy: propensity score-matched outcomes from a national cancer database.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic and robotic approaches to colonic cancer surgery appear to provide similar outcomes. The present study aimed to compare short-term and survival outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic colectomy for colonic cancer. METHODS: This retrospective review of patients with stage I-III colonic cancer who underwent laparoscopic or robotic colonic resection was undertaken using data from the National Cancer Database (2013-2019). Patients were matched using the propensity score matching method. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes included conversion to open surgery, duration of hospital stay, 30- and 90-day mortality, unplanned readmission, and positive resection margins. RESULTS: The original cohort included 40 457 patients with stage I-III colonic adenocarcinoma, with a mean(s.d.) age of 67.4(12.9) years. Some 33 860 (83.7 per cent) and 6597 (17.3 per cent) patients underwent laparoscopic and robotic colectomy respectively. After matching, 6210 patients were included in each group. Robotic colectomy was associated with marginally longer overall survival for women, and patients with a Charlson score of 0, stage II-III disease or left-sided tumours. The robotic group had a significantly lower rate of conversion (6.6 versus 11 per cent; P < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (median 3 versus 4 days) than the laparoscopic group. The two groups had similar rates of 30-day mortality (1.3 versus 1 per cent for laparoscopic and robotic procedures respectively), 90-day mortality (2.1 versus 1.8 per cent), 30-day unplanned readmission (3.7 versus 3.8 per cent), and positive resection margins (2.8 versus 2.5 per cent). CONCLUSION: In this study population, robotic colectomy was associated with less conversion to open surgery and a shorter hospital stay compared with laparoscopic colectomy.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the treatment of low anterior resection syndrome.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials on treating low anterior resection syndrome to help inform current practice. METHODS: This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review of randomized clinical trials involved different treatments for low anterior resection syndrome. The risk of bias 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The main outcomes were improvement in low anterior resection syndrome after treatment assessed by change in low anterior resection syndrome, fecal incontinence scores, and adverse treatment effects. RESULTS: After an initial screening of 1,286 studies, 7 randomized clinical trials were included. Sample sizes ranged between 12 to 104 patients. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation was the most frequently assessed treatment in 3 randomized clinical trials. The weighted mean difference between posterior tibial nerve stimulation and medical treatment or sham therapy in follow-up low anterior resection syndrome score (-3.31, P = .157) was insignificant. Transanal irrigation reduced major low anterior resection syndrome symptoms by 61.5% compared with 28.6% after posterior tibial nerve stimulation with a significantly lower 6-month follow-up low anterior resection syndrome score. Pelvic floor training achieved better improvement in low anterior resection syndrome than standard care (47.8% vs 21.3%) at 6 months, but this was not maintained at 12 months (40.0% vs 34.9%). Ramosetron was associated with a greater short-term improvement in major low anterior resection syndrome (23% vs 8%) and a lower low anterior resection syndrome score (29.5 vs 34.6) at 4-weeks follow-up than Kegels or Sitz baths. No significant improvement in bowel function was noted after probiotics use as probiotics and placebo had similar follow-up low anterior resection syndrome scores (33.3 vs 36). CONCLUSION: Transanal irrigation was associated with improvement in low anterior resection syndrome according to 2 trials, and ramosetron showed promising short-term results in one trial. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation had a marginal benefit compared with standard care. In contrast, pelvic floor training was associated with short-term symptomatic improvement, and probiotics showed no tangible improvement in low anterior resection syndrome symptoms. Firm conclusions cannot be drawn due to the small number of trials published.

Characteristics and symptomatology of colorectal cancer in the young.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of colorectal cancer in patients <50 years has rapidly risen recently. Understanding the presenting symptoms may facilitate earlier diagnosis. We aimed to delineate patient characteristics, symptomatology, and tumor characteristics of colorectal cancer in a young population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted evaluating patients <50 years diagnosed between 2005 and 2019 with primary colorectal cancer at a university teaching hospital. The number and character of colorectal cancer-related symptoms at presentation was the primary outcome measured. Patient and tumor characteristics were also collected. RESULTS: Included were 286 patients with a median age of 44 years, with 56% <45 years. Nearly all patients (95%) were symptomatic at presentation, with 85% having 2 or more symptoms. The most common symptoms were pain (63%), followed by change in stool habits (54%), rectal bleeding (53%), and weight loss (32%). Diarrhea was more common than constipation. More than 50% had symptoms for at least 3 months before diagnosis. The number and duration of symptoms were similar in patients older than 45 compared to those younger. Most cancers were left-sided (77%) and advanced stage at presentation (36% stage III, 39% stage IV). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of young patients with colorectal cancer, the majority presented with multiple symptoms having a median duration of 3 months. It is essential that providers be mindful of the ever-increasing incidence of colorectal malignancy in young patients, and that those with multiple, durable symptoms should be offered screening for colorectal neoplasms based on symptoms alone.

The Prognostic Impact of Microsatellite Instability on the Outcome of Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: a National Cancer Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is recognized as a favorable outcome predictor in colorectal cancer. However, its impact on overall survival (OS) of appendiceal carcinoma has not been thoroughly studied. This study aimed to assess the impact of MSI on OS of patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma, stratified by disease stage, tumor histology, and patients' demographics. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of the colon cancer National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2005 and 2019. Patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma with known MSI status were included and subdivided according to MSI status into positive and negative. Primary outcome was OS stratified by MSI status. RESULTS: The study included 1681 (50.1% male) patients with a mean age of 58.9 ± 14.2 years; 211 (12.5%) had MSI-positive tumors (69 MSI low, 53 MSI high, and 89 not specified). Mean 5-year OS of patients with MSI-positive and MSI-negative carcinomas was similar (81.9 versus 78.6 months, p = 0.747). Patients with stage IV MSI-positive carcinomas had significantly longer OS than patients with MSI-negative carcinomas of the same stage (41.3 vs 26.5 months, p = 0.02). Differences in OS for patients with stages I-III were not statistically significant. Compared to MSI-negative/low carcinomas, MSI-high tumors had more advanced pathologic TNM stage (stage III: 23.9% vs 17.8%-stage IV: 41.3% vs 35.4%, p = 0.003), received more chemotherapy (56% vs 41%, p = 0.04), yet had similar OS (81.9 vs 78.9 months, p = 0.357). CONCLUSIONS: MSI status of appendiceal adenocarcinomas did not significantly impact survival, except for stage IV disease in which a survival benefit of MSI was noted.

Financial and Inpatient Burden of Adhesion-Related Small Bowel Obstruction: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative adhesions may occur after >90% of laparotomies and is the most common cause of small bowel obstruction (SBO). Despite the high incidence, there is a lack of data related to financial implications of adhesion-related SBO (ASBO). This systematic literature review of in-hospital costs for treatment of ASBO searched PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases according to PRISMA guidelines. Exclusion criteria were reviews, editorials, clinical vignettes, studies of patients <18 years of age, studies with no English full text and studies assessing adhesiolysis for causes other than SBO or that used extrapolations with economic models. Main outcome measures were financial costs per patient and national costs. RESULTS: Seven studies, published between 1999 and 2016, incorporating a total of 39 573 patients, were identified. Four were undertaken in European countries, one in the USA, 1 in New Zealand and 1 in Nigeria. Overall national costs regarding treatment of patients with ASBO ranged between $3.468 million and $1.77 billion. Median overall cost in the medical management group was $2371.5 ($1814-$2568) vs $12370 ($4914-$25321) in the surgical group. Median length of stay was 4 (3-7) days for patients conservatively treated and 11.5 (8-16.3) days for patients who underwent surgery. Median length of stay of operated patients on was almost triple that of patients conservatively managed. CONCLUSIONS: Given the major financial implications of ASBO, further initiatives are needed to avoid operations for SBO when clinically appropriate and minimize delays taking patients with high suspicion of complete SBO to the operating room.

Male gender, smoking, younger age, and preoperative pain found to increase postoperative opioid requirements in 592 elective colorectal resections.

PURPOSE: With increased awareness of the opioid epidemic, understanding contributing factors to postoperative opioid use is important. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient and perioperative factors that contribute to postoperative opioid use after colorectal resections and their relation to pre-existing pain conditions and psychiatric diagnoses. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted identifying adult patients who underwent elective colorectal resection at a single tertiary center between 2015 and 2018. Patient demographics, preoperative factors, surgical approach, and perioperative pain management were evaluated to determine standard conversion morphine milligram equivalents required for postoperative days 0 to 3 and total hospital stay. RESULTS: Five hundred and ninety-two patients: 46% male, median age 58 years undergoing colorectal resections for indications including cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, and diverticulitis were identified. Less opioid use was found to be associated with female gender (ß = - 42), patients who received perioperative lidocaine infusion (ß = - 30), and older adults (equivalents/year) (ß = - 4, all p < 0.01). Preoperative opioid use, preoperative abdominal pain, epidural use, and smoking were all independently associated with increased postoperative opioid requirements. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients undergoing elective colorectal resection, factors that were associated with higher perioperative opioid use included male gender, smoking, younger age, preoperative opioid use, preoperative abdominal pain, and epidural use. Perioperative administration of lidocaine was associated with decreased opioid requirements. Understanding risk factors and stratifying postoperative pain regimens may aid in improved pain control and decrease long-term dependency.

Geriatric clinical screening tool for cervical spine injury after ground-level falls.

BACKGROUND: A consistent approach to cervical spine injury (CSI) clearance for patients 65 and older remains a challenge. Clinical clearance algorithms like the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilisation Study (NEXUS) criteria have variable accuracy and the Canadian C-spine rule excludes older patients. Routine CT of the cervical spine is performed to rule out CSI but at an increased cost and low yield. Herein, we aimed to identify predictive clinical variables to selectively screen older patients for CSI. METHODS: The University of Iowa's trauma registry was interrogated to retrospectively identify all patients 65 years and older who presented with trauma from a ground-level fall from January 2012 to July 2017. The relationship between predictive variables (demographics, NEXUS criteria and distracting injuries) and presence of CSI was examined using the generalised linear modelling (GLM) framework. A training set was used to build the statistical models to identify clinical variables that can be used to predict CSI and a validation set was used to assess the reliability and consistency of the model coefficients estimated from the training set. RESULTS: Overall, 2312 patients ≥65 admitted for ground-level falls were identified; 253 (10.9%) patients had a CSI. Using the GLM framework, the best predictive model for CSI included midline tenderness, focal neurological deficit and signs of trauma to the head/face, with midline tenderness highly predictive of CSI (OR=22.961 (15.178-34.737); p<0.001). The negative predictive value (NPV) for this model was 95.1% (93.9%-96.3%). In the absence of midline tenderness, the best model included focal neurological deficit (OR=2.601 (1.340-5.049); p=0.005) and signs of trauma to the head/face (OR=3.024 (1.898-4.815); p<0.001). The NPV was 94.3% (93.1%-95.5%). CONCLUSION: Midline tenderness, focal neurological deficit and signs of trauma to the head/face were significant in this older population. The absence of all three variables indicates lower likelihood of CSI for patients≥65. Future observational studies are warranted to prospectively validate this model.