Can antimony contamination in soil undermine the ecological contributions of earthworms?

As antimony (Sb) has been increasingly used in manufacturing industries (e.g., alloy, polymer and electronics industries), Sb contamination in the soil environment becomes widely reported and has drawn growing attention due to the toxicity of Sb to living organisms. Whether soil-dwelling organisms can tolerate Sb toxicity and maintain their ecological functions remains poorly understood. Using a cosmopolitan, ecologically important earthworm species (Eisenia fetida) as an ideal model organism, we examine the effects of Sb on the physiological, molecular and behavioural responses of earthworms to different levels of Sb contamination in soil (0, 10, 50, 100, 250 and 500 mg/kg). We found that earthworms could tolerate heavy Sb contamination (100 mg/kg) by boosting their antioxidant defence (POD and GST) and immune systems (ACP) so that their body weight and survival rate were sustained (c.f. control). However, these systems were compromised under extreme Sb contamination (500 mg/kg), leading to mortality. As such, earthworms exhibited avoidance behaviour to escape from the Sb-contaminated soil, implying the loss of their ecological contributions to the environment (e.g., increase in soil aeration and maintenance of soil structure). By measuring various types of biomarkers along a concentration gradient, this study provides a mechanistic understanding of how earthworms resist or succumb to Sb toxicity. Since extreme Sb contamination in soil (>100 mg/kg) is rarely found in nature, we are optimistic that the health and performance of earthworms are not influenced by Sb in most circumstances, but regular monitoring of Sb in soil is recommended to ensure the integrity and functioning of soil environment. Further studies are recommended to evaluate the long-term impact of Sb in the soil ecosystem through bioaccumulation and trophic transfer among soil-dwelling organisms.

Immune Imprinting and Implications for COVID-19.

Immunological memory is the key source of protective immunity against pathogens. At the current stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, heterologous combinations of exposure to viral antigens during infection and/or vaccination shape a distinctive immunological memory. Immune imprinting, the downside of memory, might limit the generation of de novo immune response against variant infection or the response to the next-generation vaccines. Here, we review mechanistic basis of immune imprinting by focusing on B cell immunobiology and discuss the extent to which immune imprinting is harmful, as well as its effect on SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination.

Screening of host gut-derived probiotics and effects of feeding probiotics on growth, immunity, and antioxidant enzyme activity of hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus♀ × E. lanceolatus♂).

In recent years, the widespread use of antibiotics in intensive grouper mariculture has resulted in the ineffectiveness of antibiotic treatment, leading to an increasing incidence of diseases caused by bacteria, viruses, and parasites, causing serious economic losses. Hence, it is crucial to develop alternative strategies to antibiotics for healthy and sustainable development of the mariculture industry. Here, we aimed to screen host gut-derived probiotics and evaluate its effects on growth and immunity of grouper. In this study, 43 bacterial strains were isolated from the intestine of the hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus♀ × E. lanceolatus♂), and a potential probiotic strain G1-26, which can efficiently secrete amylase, protease, and lipase, was obtained using different screening mediums. Based on 16S rDNA sequencing, the potential probiotic strain G1-26 was identified as Vibrio fluvialis. The results of a biological characteristic evaluation showed that V. fluvialis G1-26 could grow at 25-45 °C, pH 5.5-7.5, salinity 10-40, and bile salt concentration 0-0.030%, and produce amylase, lipase, and protease under different culture conditions. Additionally, V. fluvialis G1-26 is sensitive to many antibiotics and does not exhibit aquatic biotoxicity. Subsequently, hybrid groupers were fed diets containing V. fluvialis G1-26 at different concentrations (0, 106, 108, and 1010 CFU/g) for 60 d. The results showed that V. fluvialis G1-26 at 108 CFU/g did not significantly affect the growth performance of the hybrid grouper (P > 0.05). V. fluvialis G1-26 supplementation at 108 and 1010 CFU/g significantly promoted the relative expression of immune-related genes in hybrid groupers (TLR3, TLR5, IL-1ß, IL-8, IL-10, CTL, LysC, TNF-2, and MHC-2) and improved the activities of alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase, total superoxide dismutase, and total protein in the liver. In conclusion, V. fluvialis G1-26, a potential probiotic strain isolated from the intestine of the hybrid grouper, can be used as an effective immunopotentiator at an optimal dose of 108 CFU/g diet. Our results provide a scientific basis for the development and utilization of probiotics in the grouper mariculture industry.