The Causal Relationships Between Gut Microbiota, Brain Volume, and Intelligence: A Two-Step Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence indicates that dynamic changes in gut microbiome can affect intelligence; however, whether these relationships are causal remains elusive. We aimed to disentangle the poorly understood causal relationship between gut microbiota and intelligence. METHODS: We performed a 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using genetic variants from the largest available genome-wide association studies of gut microbiota (N = 18,340) and intelligence (N = 269,867). The inverse-variance weighted method was used to conduct the MR analyses complemented by a range of sensitivity analyses to validate the robustness of the results. Considering the close relationship between brain volume and intelligence, we applied 2-step MR to evaluate whether the identified effect was mediated by regulating brain volume (N = 47,316). RESULTS: We found a risk effect of the genus Oxalobacter on intelligence (odds ratio = 0.968 change in intelligence per standard deviation increase in taxa; 95% CI, 0.952-0.985; p = 1.88 × 10-4) and a protective effect of the genus Fusicatenibacter on intelligence (odds ratio = 1.053; 95% CI, 1.024-1.082; p = 3.03 × 10-4). The 2-step MR analysis further showed that the effect of genus Fusicatenibacter on intelligence was partially mediated by regulating brain volume, with a mediated proportion of 33.6% (95% CI, 6.8%-60.4%; p = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide causal evidence indicating the role of the microbiome in intelligence. Our findings may help reshape our understanding of the microbiota-gut-brain axis and development of novel intervention approaches for preventing cognitive impairment.

Multi-tissue transcriptome-wide association study reveals susceptibility genes and drug targets for insulin resistance-relevant phenotypes.

AIM: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple susceptibility loci associated with insulin resistance (IR)-relevant phenotypes. However, the genes responsible for these associations remain largely unknown. We aim to identify susceptibility genes for IR-relevant phenotypes via a transcriptome-wide association study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a large-scale multi-tissue transcriptome-wide association study for IR (Insulin Sensitivity Index, homeostasis model assessment-IR, fasting insulin) and lipid-relevant traits (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol) using the largest GWAS summary statistics and precomputed gene expression weights of 49 human tissues. Conditional and joint analyses were implemented to identify significantly independent genes. Furthermore, we estimated the causal effects of independent genes by Mendelian randomization causal inference analysis. RESULTS: We identified 1190 susceptibility genes causally associated with IR-relevant phenotypes, including 58 genes that were not implicated in the original GWAS. Among them, 11 genes were further supported in differential expression analyses or a gene knockout mice database, such as KRIT1 showed both significantly differential expression and IR-related phenotypic effects in knockout mice. Meanwhile, seven proteins encoded by susceptibility genes were targeted by clinically approved drugs, and three of these genes (H6PD, CACNB2 and DRD2) have been served as drug targets for IR-related diseases/traits. Moreover, drug repurposing analysis identified four compounds with profiles opposing the expression of genes associated with IR risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided new insights into IR aetiology and avenues for therapeutic development.

High-throughput functional dissection of noncoding SNPs with biased allelic enhancer activity for insulin resistance-relevant phenotypes.

Most of the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with insulin resistance (IR)-relevant phenotypes by genome-wide association studies (GWASs) are located in noncoding regions, complicating their functional interpretation. Here, we utilized an adapted STARR-seq to evaluate the regulatory activities of 5,987 noncoding SNPs associated with IR-relevant phenotypes. We identified 876 SNPs with biased allelic enhancer activity effects (baaSNPs) across 133 loci in three IR-relevant cell lines (HepG2, preadipocyte, and A673), which showed pervasive cell specificity and significant enrichment for cell-specific open chromatin regions or enhancer-indicative markers (H3K4me1, H3K27ac). Further functional characterization suggested several transcription factors (TFs) with preferential allelic binding to baaSNPs. We also incorporated multi-omics data to prioritize 102 candidate regulatory target genes for baaSNPs and revealed prevalent long-range regulatory effects and cell-specific IR-relevant biological functional enrichment on them. Specifically, we experimentally verified the distal regulatory mechanism at IRS1 locus, in which rs952227-A reinforces IRS1 expression by long-range chromatin interaction and preferential binding to the transcription factor HOXC6 to augment the enhancer activity. Finally, based on our STARR-seq screening data, we predicted the enhancer activity of 227,343 noncoding SNPs associated with IR-relevant phenotypes (fasting insulin adjusted for BMI, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides) from the largest available GWAS summary statistics. We further provided an open resource (http://www.bigc.online/fnSNP-IR) for better understanding genetic regulatory mechanisms of IR-relevant phenotypes.