Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Anesth Analg ; 2024 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39008425

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Promptly assessing and treating the distress of intensive care unit (ICU) patients may improve long-term psychological outcomes. One holistic approach to reduce patient distress is through dignity-centered care, traditionally used in palliative care. The 25-item Patient Dignity Inventory has construct validity and reliability for measuring dignity-related distress among ICU patients. Because family members often serve as ICU patients' surrogates and play an integral role in patients' dignity, we examined whether family members reliably recognized ICU patients' sources of distress. METHODS: Two single-center observational studies of adult ICU patients were performed from May to June 2022. Inclusion criteria were ICU length-of-stay >48 hours, awake and alert, intact cognition, and no delirium. Study #1 evaluated concordance between patient and family for dignity-related distress. Both completed the Patient Dignity Inventory independently. The next Study #2 measured how many distressing items that the patient reported discussing with family members. RESULTS: Study #1 of concordance had 33 patient-family dyads complete the Patient Dignity Inventory. The concordance correlation coefficient was small, 0.20 (99% confidence interval -0.21 to 0.55) and less than the inventory's test-retest reliability (r = .85). Study #2 examined sharing of Patient Dignity Inventory-related items between patients and family members. There were 12 of 19 patients who had severe distress based on an average Patient Dignity Inventory item score ≥1.92. The median patient shared multiple items of distress with their family (median 12, 99% 2-sided exact Hodges-Lehmann interval 4.0-17.5). CONCLUSIONS: Although ICU patients often report sharing sources of distress with their loved ones, family members cannot accurately or reliably assess the extent to which patients experience psychosocial, existential, and symptom-related distress during critical illness. Treatments of distress should not be delayed by the absence of family members.

2.
Mil Med ; 2024 Jun 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869274

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study reports rates of comorbid chronic pain and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among U.S. military veterans and rates of psychiatric comorbidities among those with both chronic pain and PTSD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study utilized National Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative data to identify all veterans treated for chronic pain or PTSD in 2023. Multivariable logistic regression models determined the likelihood of each psychiatric comorbidity for those with chronic pain and PTSD relative to those with chronic pain only and separately to those with PTSD only, after adjusting for demographic variables and all other psychiatric comorbidities. RESULTS: Of the 5,846,453 service users of the VA in 2023, a total of 2,091,391 (35.8%) met the criteria for chronic pain and 850,191 (14.5%) met the criteria for PTSD. Furthermore, 21.6% of those with chronic pain also had PTSD and over half (53.2%) of those with PTSD also met the criteria for chronic pain (n = 452,113). Veterans with chronic pain and PTSD were significantly more likely to be women, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latina, and urban dwelling. Veterans with chronic pain and PTSD had significantly higher rates of all selected comorbidities relative to veterans with chronic pain only. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD may benefit from tailored treatments to address the additive impact of these conditions.

3.
J Palliat Med ; 27(4): 537-544, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37831928

RESUMEN

The acknowledgment and promotion of dignity is commonly viewed as the cornerstone of person-centered care. Although the preservation of dignity is often highlighted as a key tenet of palliative care provision, the concept of dignity and its implications for practice remain nebulous to many clinicians. Dignity in care encompasses a series of theories describing different forms of dignity, the factors that impact them, and strategies to encourage dignity-conserving care. Different modalities and validated instruments of dignity in care have been shown to lessen existential distress at the end of life and promote patient-clinician understanding. It is essential that palliative care clinicians be aware of the impacts of dignity-related distress, how it manifests, and common solutions that can easily be adapted, applied, and integrated into practice settings. Dignity-based constructs can be learned as a component of postgraduate or continuing education. Implemented as a routine component of palliative care, they can provide a means of enhancing patient-clinician relationships, reducing bias, and reinforcing patient agency across the span of serious illness. Palliative care clinicians-often engaging patients, families, and communities in times of serious illness and end of life-wield significant influence on whether dignity is intentionally integrated into the experience of health care delivery. Thus, dignity can be a tangible, actionable, and measurable palliative care goal and outcome. This article, written by a team of palliative care specialists and dignity researchers, offers 10 tips to facilitate the implementation of dignity-centered care in serious illness.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos , Respeto , Humanos , Atención a la Salud , Pacientes , Muerte
4.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 6(4): 495-497, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33134628

RESUMEN

A 70-year-old woman presented to our emergency department with a severe left-sided headache. The headache's location and accompanying symptoms are consistent with paroxysmal hemicrania. On workup, a cervical computed tomography scan incidentally revealed a left carotid body tumor, and the patient was referred to vascular surgery. After the resection of the tumor, the patient recovered well in the following months. Furthermore, she no longer experienced any additional headache episodes, which were likely caused by the carotid body tumor.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA