Vulnerability to Financial Toxicity From Stone Surgery.

PURPOSE: Financial toxicity has been described in stone formers however little is understood regarding its causes and how it may relate to stone surgery. We therefore aimed to longitudinally describe markers of financial strain in stone formers from the preoperative to postoperative time points. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2022 to April 2023. Patients were enrolled in the waiting area prior to undergoing elective ureteroscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Participants completed the Commonwealth Fund's Biennial Health Insurance Survey at this time point and at 30 days postop. Items were pre-selected from the survey to capture markers of financial strain due to healthcare costs. RESULTS: One hundred nine participants were enrolled. Participants were a majority white (70%), college educated (62%), and privately ensured (72%). Despite these traditionally protective sociodemographic features, 42% of patients reported some marker of financial strain at the preoperative timepoint. Patients with Medicaid reported even higher financial stress (67%). Furthermore, 46% of patients did not know their deductible amount. Response rate was low at 30 days postop (35%) but suggested some patients were experiencing new financial strains. CONCLUSIONS: This paper shows that a significant proportion of stone patients are already displaying markers of financial strain from healthcare bills even prior to surgery as well as poor understanding of the costs they may incur. This makes them vulnerable to experiencing financial toxicity postoperatively and emphasizes the importance of understanding all contributing factors when developing future strategies to intervene in financial toxicity.

Postoperative Recovery of Quality-of-Life Following Ureteroscopy for Nephrolithiasis: The Impact on Pain Intensity and Interference and the Ability to Participate in Social Roles.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively capture patient-reported outcomes to assess the recovery profile of ureteroscopy (URS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults undergoing URS for renal/ureteral stones were eligible for inclusion (11/2020-8/2022). Patients prospectively completed PROMIS - Pain Intensity, - Pain Interference, and - Ability to participate in social roles and activities in-person preoperatively (POD 0) and via email on POD 1, 7, 14, and 30. Scores are reported as T-scores (normalized to U.S. population, mean=50) with a change of 5 (0.5 SD) considered clinically significant. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-eight participants enrolled at POD 0 (POD 1 =87, POD 7 =83, POD 14 =70, POD30 =67). There was a worsening of quality of life from day 0 to day 1 and day 0 to 7. All dimensions then improved with an increase in scores from day 0 to day 14 and day 0 to day 30. On multivariable analysis, the presence of a preoperative ureteral stent (OR 0.14) and use of semirigid URS (OR 0.33) were associated with a reduced odds for severe pain interference at day 1. The use of semirigid URS (OR 0.20) was associated with a reduced odds for severe worsening in the ability to participate in social roles at day 1. CONCLUSION: Ability to participate in social roles declines immediately postoperatively, while pain intensity and interference sharply increase. There is a gradual improvement until POD 30. Findings suggest preoperative stents may influence postoperative recovery. Results offer meaningful insight to assist in counseling and setting expectation for patients postoperatively.

Clinicians' Perspectives on Proactive Patient Safety Behaviors in the Perioperative Environment.

Importance: The perioperative environment is hazardous, but patients remain safe with a successful outcome during their care due to staff adaptability and resiliency. The behaviors that support this adaptability and resilience have yet to be defined or analyzed. One Safe Act (OSA), a tool and activity developed to capture self-reported proactive safety behaviors that staff use in their daily practice to promote individual and team-based safe patient care, may allow for improved definition and analysis of these behaviors. Objective: To thematically analyze staff behaviors using OSA to understand what may serve as the basis for proactive safety in the perioperative environment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative thematic analysis included a convenience sample of perioperative staff at a single-center, tertiary care academic medical center who participated in an OSA activity during a 6-month period in 2021. All perioperative staff were eligible for inclusion. A combined deductive approach, based on a human factor analysis and classification framework, as well as an inductive approach was used to develop themes and analyze the self-reported staff safety behaviors. Exposures: Those selected to participate were asked to join an OSA activity, which was conducted in-person by a facilitator. Participants were to self-reflect about their OSA (proactive safety behavior) and record their experience as free text in an online survey tool. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was the development and application of a set of themes to describe proactive safety behaviors in the perioperative environment. Results: A total of 140 participants (33 nurses [23.6%] and 18 trainee physicians [12.9%]), which represented 21.3% of the 657 total perioperative department full-time staff, described 147 behaviors. A total of 8 non-mutually exclusive themes emerged with the following categories and frequency of behaviors: (1) routine-based adaptations (46 responses [31%]); (2) resource availability and assessment adaptations (31 responses [21%]); (3) communication and coordination adaptation (23 responses [16%]); (4) environmental ergonomics adaptation (17 responses [12%]); (5) situational awareness adaptation (12 responses [8%]); (6) personal or team readiness adaptation (8 responses [5%]); (7) education adaptation (5 responses [3%]); and (8) social awareness adaptation (5 responses [3%]). Conclusions and Relevance: The OSA activity elicited and captured proactive safety behaviors performed by staff. A set of behavioral themes were identified that may serve as the basis for individual practices of resilience and adaptability that promote patient safety.

Proactive Patient Safety: Focusing on What Goes Right in the Perioperative Environment.

OBJECTIVE: Adverse events in the perioperative environment, a potential risk to patients, may be mitigated by nurturing staff adaptability and resiliency. An activity called "One Safe Act" (OSA) was developed to capture and highlight proactive safety behaviors that staff use in their daily practice to promote safe patient care. METHODS: One Safe Act is conducted in-person in the perioperative environment by a facilitator. The facilitator gathers an ad hoc group of perioperative staff in the work unit. The activity is run as follows: staff introductions, purpose/instructions of the activity, participants self-reflect about their OSA (proactive safety behavior) and record it as free text in an online survey tool, the group debriefs with each person sharing their OSA, and the activity is concluded by summarizing behavioral themes. Each participant completed an attitudinal assessment to understand changes in safety culture perception. RESULTS: From December 2020 to July 2021, a total of 140 perioperative staff participated (21%, 140/657) over 28 OSA sessions with 136 (97%, 140/136) completing the attitudinal assessment. A total of 82% (112/136), 88% (120/136), and 90% (122/136) agreed that this activity would change their practices related to patient safety, improve their work unit's ability to deliver safe care, and demonstrated their colleagues' commitment to patient safety, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The OSA activity is participatory and collaborative to build shared, new knowledge, and community practices focused on proactive safety behaviors. The OSA activity achieved this goal with a near universal acceptance of the activity in promoting an intent to change personal practice and increasing engagement and commitment to safety culture.

The Endourological Society Inaugural Census Report.

The Endourological Society, the premier urologic society encompassing endourology, robotics, and focal surgery, is composed of a diverse group of >1300 urologists. However, limited information has been collected about society members. Recognizing this need, a survey was initiated to capture data regarding current member practices, as well as help the Society shape the future direction of the organization. Presented herein is the inaugural Endourological Society census report as the beginning of a continued effort for global improvement in the field of endourology. Using a REDCap® database, an email survey was circulated to the membership of the Endourological Society from May through June 2021. Twenty questions were posed, categorizing member data in terms of epidemiology/demographics, practice patterns, member opinions, and future educational preferences. Responses were received from 534 members, representing 40.3% of membership. Data demonstrated that the average age, gender, race, and ethnicity of the typical Society member respondent is a 48-year-old Caucasian male working in the United States, with a mean of 25 years in practice. Retrograde endoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy were identified as the most common practice skills, and 50% of members are involved in robotics. Importantly, the census confirmed that the World Congress of Endourology and Technology remains popular with Society members as a means of educational advancement. To sustain and advance the Society, information is required to understand the career interests and future educational desires of its members. This inaugural census provides crucial data regarding its membership and how the Society can achieve continued success and adjust its focus. Future census efforts will expand on the initial findings and stratify the data to elucidate changes in the needs of the Society as a whole. Circulating an annual census will allow for continued improvements in the field of endourology and, ultimately, better care for urologic patients.

Heterogeneity in stone culture protocols and endourologist practice patterns: a multi-institutional survey.

Kidney stone cultures can be beneficial in identifying bacteria not detected in urine, yet how stone cultures are performed among endourologists, under what conditions, and by what laboratory methods remain largely unknown. Stone cultures are not addressed by current clinical guidelines. A comprehensive REDCap electronic survey sought responses from directed (n = 20) and listserv elicited (n = 108) endourologists specializing in kidney stone disease. Questions included which clinical scenarios prompt a stone culture order, how results influence post-operative antibiotics, and what microbiology lab protocols exist at each institution with respect to processing and resulting stone cultures. Logistic regression statistical analysis determined what factors were associated with performing stone cultures. Of 128 unique responses, 11% identified as female and the mean years of practicing was 16 (range 1-46). A specific 'stone culture' order was available to only 50% (64/128) of those surveyed, while 32% (41/128) reported culturing stone by placing a urine culture order. The duration of antibiotics given for a positive stone culture varied, with 4-7 days (46%) and 8-14 days (21%) the most reported. More years in practice was associated with fewer stone cultures ordered, while higher annual volume of percutaneous nephrolithotomy was associated with ordering more stone cultures (p < 0.01). Endourologists have differing practice patterns with respect to ordering stone cultures and utilizing the results to guide post-operative antibiotics. With inconsistent microbiology lab stone culture protocols across multiple institutions, more uniform processing is needed for future studies to assess the clinical benefit of stone cultures and direct future guidelines.

Longitudinal Changes in Quality of Life After Ureteroscopy for Nephrolithiasis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess alterations in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with nephrolithiasis, given the limited prospective data on patient reported outcomes following surgical intervention with ureteroscopy. METHODS: Adults with either a renal or ureteral calculus who underwent ureteroscopy (URS) were recruited prospectively from 2017-2020. Participants completed the PROMIS-29 profile which measures the dimensions of physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance at enrollment, 1-, 6-, and 12-months. Scores are reported as T-scores (normalized to US-population) and were compared at each time point against the mean for the US-population (50) using one-sample Welch's t'test and between each pairwise time point comparison using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: At enrollment, a total of 69 participants completed the PROMIS-29 survey. As compared to the US-population mean, participants at enrollment had significantly different scores in physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and sleep disturbance (all P<.05), but not ability to participate in social roles and activities. In pairwise comparisons, improvement was only observed from enrollment to 1-month in pain interference (P<.01) and fatigue (P = .03). However, there was improvement at a longer interval from enrollment to 12-months in all dimensions (pairwise comparisons, all P<.05) except depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: The PROMIS-29 profile is responsive to changes in HRQOL for patients with nephrolithiasis undergoing URS, with improvement of PROMIS scores up to 12-months. This information can be utilized for patient counseling to guide expectations during the recovery period.

Quality of life impact and recovery after ureteroscopy and stent insertion: insights from daily surveys in STENTS.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to describe day-to-day evolution and variations in patient-reported stent-associated symptoms (SAS) in the STudy to Enhance uNderstanding of sTent-associated Symptoms (STENTS), a prospective multicenter observational cohort study, using multiple instruments with conceptual overlap in various domains. METHODS: In a nested cohort of the STENTS study, the initial 40 participants having unilateral ureteroscopy (URS) and stent placement underwent daily assessment of self-reported measures using the Brief Pain Inventory short form, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System measures for pain severity and pain interference, the Urinary Score of the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire, and Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index. Pain intensity, pain interference, urinary symptoms, and bother were obtained preoperatively, daily until stent removal, and at postoperative day (POD) 30. RESULTS: The median age was 44 years (IQR 29,58), and 53% were female. The size of the dominant stone was 7.5 mm (IQR 5,11), and 50% were located in the kidney. There was consistency among instruments assessing similar concepts. Pain intensity and urinary symptoms increased from baseline to POD 1 with apparent peaks in the first 2 days, remained elevated with stent in situ, and varied widely among individuals. Interference due to pain, and bother due to urinary symptoms, likewise demonstrated high individual variability. CONCLUSIONS: This first study investigating daily SAS allows for a more in-depth look at the lived experience after URS and the impact on quality of life. Different instruments measuring pain intensity, pain interference, and urinary symptoms produced consistent assessments of patients' experiences. The overall daily stability of pain and urinary symptoms after URS was also marked by high patient-level variation, suggesting an opportunity to identify characteristics associated with severe SAS after URS.

Results of the patient report of intermittent catheterization experience (PRICE) study.

AIMS: Patient satisfaction is paramount to health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) outcomes. High quality, quantitative data from the US describing patients' actual experiences, difficulties, and HR-QoL while on an intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) regimen is very scarce. Our objective was to better understand patient practices with and attitudes towards ISC. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, multi-centered, clinical study of adult men and women performing ISC in the United States. Data collected included demographics, medical history, catheter characteristics, specific self-catheterization habits and two validated HR-QoL questionnaires: The Intermittent Self-Catheterization Questionnaire (ISC-Q) and the Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire (ICDQ). RESULTS: Two hundred participants were recruited from six sites; 70.0% were male, 73.5% were Caucasian with a median age was 51.0 years (range 19-90 years). The ISC-Q showed that the vast majority of participants reported ease with ISC (82.0% satisfaction score) had confidence in their ability to perform ISC (91.9% satisfaction score); yet, many felt self-conscious about doing so (58.3% satisfaction score) and had concerns about long-term adverse effects (58.1% satisfaction score). The ICDQ indicated little to no difficulty for most participants with all routine ISC practices. A small minority of participants reported some difficulty with a "blocking sensation" during initiation of catheterization, leg spasticity, and painful catheterization. Multivariate linear regression results are also reported. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Participants are confident with ISC and have little overall difficulty, which may be a product of successful education and/or catheter design. urinary tract infections (UTIs) were common (yet variable) and may contribute to the noted long-term ISC concerns. Limitations exist including various selection biases leading to concerns of external validity. Future educational interventions in this population may further improve HR-QoL, optimize UTIs prevention, and diminish concerns with long-term ISC.

Text Messaging Real-Time COVID-19 Clinical Guidance to Hospital Employees.

BACKGROUND: During the initial days of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, hospital-wide practices rapidly evolved, and hospital employees became a critical population for receiving consistent and timely communication about these changes. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to rapidly implement enterprise text messaging as a crisis communication intervention to deliver key COVID-related safety and practice information directly to hospital employees. METHODS: Utilizing a secure text-messaging platform already routinely used in direct patient care, we sent 140-character messages containing targeted pandemic-related updates to on-duty hospital employees three times per week for 13 weeks. This innovation was evaluated through the analysis of aggregate "read" receipts from each message. Effectiveness was assessed by rates of occupational exposures to COVID-19 and by two cross-sectional attitudinal surveys administered to all text-message recipients. RESULTS: On average, each enterprise text message was sent to 1,997 on-duty employees. Analysis of "read" receipts revealed that on average, 60% of messages were consistently read within 24 hours of delivery, 34% were read in 2 hours, and 16% were read in 10 minutes. Readership peaked and fell in the first week of messaging but remained consistent throughout the remainder of the intervention. A survey administered after 2 weeks revealed that 163 (79%) users found enterprise texts "valuable," 152 (73%) users would recommend these texts to their colleagues, and 114 (55%) users preferred texts to email. A second survey at 9 weeks revealed that 109 (80%) users continued to find texts "valuable." Enterprise messaging, in conjunction with the system's larger communication strategy, was associated with a decrease in median daily occupational exposure events (nine events per day premessaging versus one event per day during messaging). CONCLUSION: Enterprise text messages sent to hospital-employee smartphones are an efficient and effective strategy for urgent communications. Hospitals may wish to leverage this technology during times of routine operations and crisis management.

The RCA ReCAst: A Root Cause Analysis Simulation for the Interprofessional Clinical Learning Environment.

PROBLEM: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education calls for resident participation in real or simulated interprofessional analysis of a patient safety event. There are far more residents who must participate in these investigations than available institutional root cause analyses (RCAs) to accommodate them. To correct this imbalance, the authors developed an institutionally sponsored, interprofessional RCA simulation program and implemented it across all graduate medical education (GME) residency programs at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. APPROACH: The authors developed RCA simulations based upon authentic adverse events experienced at their institution. To provide relevance to all GME programs, RCA simulation cases varied widely and included examples of errors involving high-risk medications, communication, invasive procedures, and specimen labeling. Each simulation included residents and other health care professionals such as nurses or pharmacists whose disciplines were involved in the actual event. Participants adopted the role of RCA investigation team, and in small groups systematically progressed through the RCA process. OUTCOMES: A total of 289 individuals from 18 residency programs participated in an RCA simulation in 2019-2020. This included 84 interns (29%), 123 residents (43%), 20 attending physicians (7%), and 62 (21%) other health care professionals. There was an increase in ability of GME trainees to correctly identify factors required for an RCA investigation (62% pre vs 80% post, P = .02) and an increase in intent to "always report" for each adverse event category (3% pre vs 37% post, P < .001) following the simulation. NEXT STEPS: The authors plan to expand the RCA simulation program to other GME clinical sites while striving to involve all GME learners in this educational experience at least once during training. Additionally, by collaborating with health system patient safety leaders, they will annually review all new RCAs to identify cases suitable for simulation adaptation.

Emergency department and hospital revisits after ambulatory surgery for kidney stones: an analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.

Our objective was to identify the rate of revisit to either emergency department (ED) or inpatient (IP) following surgical stone removal in the ambulatory setting, and to identify factors predictive of such revisits. To this end, the AHRQ HCUP ambulatory, IP, and ED databases for NY and FL from 2010 to 2014 were linked. Cases were selected by primary CPT for shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy (URS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) with accompanying ICD-9 for nephrolithiasis. Cystoscopy (CYS) was selected as a comparison group. The risk of revisit was explored using multivariate models. The overall unplanned revisit rate following stone removal was 6.4% (4.2% ED and 2.2% IP). The unadjusted revisit rates for SWL, URS, and PNL are 5.9%, 6.8%, and 9.0%, respectively. The adjusted odds of revisit following SWL, URS, and PNL are 1.93, 2.25, and 2.70 times higher, respectively, than cystoscopy. The majority of revisits occurred within the first two weeks of the index procedure, and the most common reasons for revisit were due to pain or infection. Younger age, female sex, lower income, Medicare or Medicaid insurance, a higher number of chronic medical conditions, and hospital-owned surgery centers were all associated with an increased odds of any revisit. The most important conclusions were that ambulatory stone removal has a low rate of post-operative revisits to either the ED or IP, there is a higher risk of revisit following stone removal as compared to urological procedures that involve only the lower urinary tract, and demographic factors appear to have a moderate influence on the odds of revisit.

A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Pain Intensity and Interference After Ureteroscopy for Nephrolithiasis Without Postoperative Opioids.

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the degree and time to resolution of pain in the postoperative period, we captured patient-reported pain intensity and interference prospectively in patients following ureteroscopy for nephrolithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults undergoing ureteroscopy for renal/ureteral stones from 11/2018 to 1/2020 were eligible for inclusion. All received nonopioid postoperative pain control. Patients prospectively completed Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Pain Intensity and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Pain Interference instruments preoperatively on postoperative day (POD) 0 and via email on POD 1, 7, and 14. Scores are reported as T-scores (normalized to US population, mean = 50) with changes of 5 (0.5 standard deviation) considered clinically significant. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients completed enrollment at POD 0 (POD 1 = 74, POD 7 = 61, POD 14 = 47). Compared to US means, intensity and interference were significantly different at all time point comparisons (Wilcoxon rank test; all P <.001) except intensity at POD 7 (P = .09) and interference at POD 14 (P = .12). For both, there was a significant difference at each time comparison (repeated measures ANOVA; all P <.05). Increasing age was predictive of lower intensity (Confidence Interval (CI): -0.31 to -0.04; P = .012) and interference (CI: -0.36 to -0.06; P =.01) at POD 1. The presence of a postoperative stent was predictive of higher intensity (CI: 0.68-10.81; P = .03) and interference (CI: 0.61-12.96; P = .03) at POD 7. Increasing age remained a predictor of lower interference at POD 1 on multivariable analysis (CI: -0.46 to -0.01; P = .03). CONCLUSION: Pain intensity and interference are elevated immediately, but intensity normalizes by POD 7, while interference remains elevated until POD 14. Age and indwelling ureteral stent influence both intensity and interference.

An Analysis of the US News & World Report Methodology for Attribution of Specialty Care in Otolaryngology and Urology.

US News & World Report (USNWR) rankings can assist patients with choosing where to receive their specialty care. USNWR methodology assumes that the specialty caring for hospitalized patients is equivalent to the specialty assigned by administrative coding. We examined the frequency of discordance between USNWR methodology-assigned specialty and the actual specialty care received for 2 surgical specialties, otolaryngology (ENT) and urology (GU). Our analysis included inpatient deaths identified by USNWR coding for these specialties from 2013 to 2017 at a single academic tertiary care center. We found that a minority of patients with deaths attributed by USNWR to these 2 specialties were actually cared for by ENT (6/14; 43%) or GU (3/19; 16%). Only 5 of 14 (36%) and 2 of 19 (11%) deaths were potentially associated with ENT and GU care, respectively. We identified a significant discordance between USNWR-assigned specialty and the actual specialty care received.

Patient safety education and perceptions of safety culture in American and Canadian urological residency training programs.

INTRODUCTION To assess the perception of patient safety culture and the infrastructure to support patient safety (PS) education within American and Canadian urological residency programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A needs assessment was developed by experts in patient safety. The survey contained items about prior PS education, perceived value of learning PS, components of an ideal PS curriculum, and desired resources to facilitate PS education. Select items from the validated AHRQ Survey on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS) were also included. The survey was distributed electronically (12/2018-2/2019) to all urology residents (RES) and program directors (PD) of urological residency programs via the Society of Academic Urologists. All responses were anonymous. RESULTS: A total of 26 PD (18.3%; 26/142) and 100 RES (6.7%; 100/1,491) completed the survey. Nearly all RES received PS training (79%), but this was lower for PD (42%). The majority of RES and PD felt that PS was an important educational competency (RES = 83%; PD = 89%) and a pathway for academic success (RES 74%; PD 84%). Both groups desired an online PS curriculum (RES = 69%; PD = 68%) with error causation models (RES = 42%; PD = 52%) as the primary topic to cover. Assessment of safety culture confirmed safety is a priority, but only 1 PD (5%; 1/19) and 25 RES (25%; 25/100) rated their residency program's overall safety grade as 'excellent'. CONCLUSIONS: PS education remains a priority for program directors and urological trainees. Both groups called for additional resources from urological professional societies for this education. To that end, an online, centralized, freely accessible PS curriculum is under development.

Implementing a patient safety culture survey to identify and target process improvements in academic ambulatory urology practices: a multi-institutional collaborative.

INTRODUCTION: A shared professional culture focused on patient safety is critical to delivering high-quality care. There is a need for objective metrics to help identify target areas for improvement in patient safety culture. The Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS) was developed and validated by the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to measure patient safety culture in the ambulatory setting. In this study we report on safety culture and practices in six academic urology clinics utilizing this validated questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SOPS was administered to all staff in ambulatory urology practices affiliated with participating centers. Percent positive responses were calculated for each of 10 validated composite domains and were compared between sites and respondent roles. Nonparametric statistical analyses were performed to identify differences between groups. RESULTS: The survey was administered to 185 staff members, with an overall response rate of 66%. Within each domain there was substantial variability between sites, with significant differences observed in staff training (p = 0.034), office processes/standardization (p = 0.008), patient care tracking (p = 0.047), communication about errors (p = 0.001), and organizational learning (p = 0.015). Similar variation was seen between respondent roles with significant differences for patient care tracking (p = 0.002) and communication about errors (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The SOPS is a clinically useful tool to identify issues impacting a practice's safety culture. Substantial variability was observed within each composite domain at the levels of practice site and respondent role. Comparing composite domain results between clinics will allow leadership to identify gaps and evaluate policies and resources of higher performing peer sites.

Health-related quality of life in renal stone formers: are we improving?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a multidimensional construct measuring how disease impacts one's life. In the context of nephrolithiasis this is particularly relevant given the active and quiescent phases of the disease which may not correlate with the traditional index of stone free status. Several instruments are now available to objectively measure HRQOL in this population, including the first disease-specific instrument. Therefore, an overview of emerging data on HRQOL is provided that reviews the availability of these tools/instruments and emphasizes patient-centered care and research. RECENT FINDINGS: The common generic instruments used to measure HRQOL in any population (36-Item Short Form health survey and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) and the only disease-specific instrument developed to measure HRQOL in nephrolithiasis (Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life Questionnaire) are described. Emerging evidence suggests that age and sex influence renal stone formers perception of their HRQOL across a range of dimensions. Several other factors also appear to play a role, such as socioeconomic status, but these have yet to be validated in more than one study or population, and postoperative outcomes measured in terms of HRQOL are almost absent from the literature. SUMMARY: Physician-centric outcomes, such as stone status, are no longer the only objective and acceptable measures by which to understand the natural history of nephrolithiasis. Patient-centered approaches through the use of HRQOL are slowly emerging in research and clinical care alike. However, they remain largely in their infancy in these spheres.

Preventing Excess Narcotic Prescriptions in New Robotic Surgery Discharges: The PENN Prospective Cohort Quality Improvement Initiative.

Purpose: To reduce the amount of opioids prescribed at discharge after robotic surgery, we hypothesized that the majority patients do not require opioids for pain control after robotic urologic oncologic procedures. Materials and Methods: This prospective study aimed to reduce opioids prescribed at discharge after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), robot-assisted radical nephrectomy (RARN), and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Before 9/2018, 100% of patients were discharged on varying amounts of oxycodone (range: 75-337.5 oral morphine milligram equivalents [MME]). We implemented a standardized nonopioid analgesia pathway with escalation options (Fig. 1). To assess the safety of our approach, we analyzed pain scores, telephone encounters, and emergency department visits in our cohort. Results: Our cohort (n = 170) consisted of patients undergoing RARP (n = 87), RARN (n = 25), and RAPN (n = 58) between September 2018 and January 2019. Overall, 67.7% were discharged without opioids, 24.4% with 10 pills of tramadol (50 MME), and 8.2% with 10 pills of oxycodone (75 MME). On multivariable analysis, older age (odds ratio: 0.961, 95% confidence interval: 0.923-0.995, p = 0.026) was associated with lower odds of needing opioids at discharge. There was no difference in pain scores at the postoperative outpatient visit (p = 0.66) or postoperative telephone encounters (p = 0.45) between those discharged with and without opioids. Conclusion: The majority of robotic surgery patients do not require opioids upon discharge. Implementation of a simple, standardized nonopioid protocol resulted in a dramatic reduction in the amount of opioids prescribed in our patient population. An escalation protocol allows for a patient-centered approach to reduce narcotic prescribing, although still addressing surgical pain.