Phospholipase cbeta is critical for T cell chemotaxis.

Chemokines acting through G protein-coupled receptors play an essential role in the immune response. PI3K and phospholipase C (PLC) are distinct signaling molecules that have been proposed in the regulation of chemokine-mediated cell migration. Studies with knockout mice have demonstrated a critical role for PI3K in G(alphai) protein-coupled receptor-mediated neutrophil and lymphocyte chemotaxis. Although PLCbeta is not essential for the chemotactic response of neutrophils, its role in lymphocyte migration has not been clearly defined. We compared the chemotactic response of peripheral T cells derived from wild-type mice with mice containing loss-of-function mutations in both of the two predominant lymphocyte PLCbeta isoforms (PLCbeta2 and PLCbeta3), and demonstrate that loss of PLCbeta2 and PLCbeta3 significantly impaired T cell migration. Because second messengers generated by PLCbeta lead to a rise in intracellular calcium and activation of PKC, we analyzed which of these responses was critical for the PLCbeta-mediated chemotaxis. Intracellular calcium chelation decreased the chemotactic response of wild-type lymphocytes, but pharmacologic inhibition of several PKC isoforms had no effect. Furthermore, calcium efflux induced by stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha was undetectable in PLCbeta2beta3-null lymphocytes, suggesting that the migration defect is due to the impaired ability to increase intracellular calcium. This study demonstrates that, in contrast to neutrophils, phospholipid second messengers generated by PLCbeta play a critical role in T lymphocyte chemotaxis.

Presence of a novel inhibitor of capping protein in neutrophil extract.

Capping of actin filament barbed ends regulates the duration of filament elongation and the steady-state level of actin polymerization. We find that the specific capping activity (capping activity per milligram protein) increased when a high speed supernatant of lysed neutrophils was diluted with buffer. The specific capping activity also increased when the concentration of barbed ends increased. This suggested the presence of a capping protein inhibitor that dissociates from capping protein upon dilution and that competes with barbed ends for binding to capping protein. Gel filtration of supernatant revealed a fraction of low-molecular-weight inhibitor (separated from capping protein) that both inhibited and reversed capping of barbed ends by pure capping protein. The properties and molecular weight of this inhibitor do not match with those of other inhibitors including V-1, VASP, or CARMIL. Thus, this inhibitor must either be a modified version of a known inhibitor or a novel inhibitor of capping.

Mammalian CARMIL inhibits actin filament capping by capping protein.

Actin polymerization in cells occurs via filament elongation at the barbed end. Proteins that cap the barbed end terminate this elongation. Heterodimeric capping protein (CP) is an abundant and ubiquitous protein that caps the barbed end. We find that the mouse homolog of the adaptor protein CARMIL (mCARMIL) binds CP with high affinity and decreases its affinity for the barbed end. Addition of mCARMIL to cell extracts increases the rate and extent of Arp2/3 or spectrin-actin seed-induced polymerization. In cells, GFP-mCARMIL concentrates in lamellipodia and increases the fraction of cells with large lamellipodia. Decreasing mCARMIL levels by siRNA transfection lowers the F-actin level and slows cell migration through a mechanism that includes decreased lamellipodia protrusion. This phenotype is reversed by full-length mCARMIL but not mCARMIL lacking the domain that binds CP. Thus, mCARMIL is a key regulator of CP and has profound effects on cell behavior.

Beginning and ending an actin filament: control at the barbed end.

Dynamic actin filaments contribute to cell migration, organelle movements, memory, and gene regulation. These dynamic processes are often regulated by extracellular and?or cell cycle signals. Regulation targets, not actin itself, but the factors that determine it's dynamic properties. Thus, filament nucleation, rate and duration of elongation, and depolymerization are each controlled with regard to time and?or space. Two mechanisms exist for nucleating filaments de novo, the Arp23 complex and the formins; multiple pathways regulate each. A new filament elongates rapidly but transiently before its barbed end is capped. Rapid capping allows the cell to maintain fine temporal and spatial control over F-actin distribution. Modulation of capping protein activity and its access to barbed ends is emerging as a site of local regulation. Finally, to maintain a steady state filaments must depolymerize. Depolymerization can limit the rate of new filament nucleation and elongation. The activity of ADF?cofilin, which facilitates depolymerization, is also regulated by multiple inputs. This chapter describes (1) mechanism and regulation of new filament formation, (2) mechanism of enhancing elongation at barbed ends, (3) capping proteins and their regulators, and (4) recycling of actin monomers from filamentous actin (F-actin) back to globular actin (G-actin).

Formin-induced nucleation of actin filaments.

Formins are proteins best defined by the presence of the unique, highly conserved formin homology domain 2 (FH2). FH2 is necessary and sufficient to nucleate an actin filament in vitro. The FH2 domain also binds to the filament's barbed end, modulating its elongation and protecting it from capping proteins. FH2 itself appears to be a processive cap that walks with the barbed end as it elongates.

Formin leaky cap allows elongation in the presence of tight capping proteins.

Formins, characterized by formin homology domains FH1 and FH2, are required to assemble certain F-actin structures including actin cables, stress fibers, and the contractile ring. FH1FH2 in a recombinant fragment from a yeast formin (Bni1p) nucleates actin filaments in vitro. It also binds to the filament barbed end where it appears to act as a "leaky" capper, slowing both polymerization and depolymerization by approximately 50%. We now find that FH1FH2 competes with tight capping proteins (including gelsolin and heterodimeric capping protein) for the barbed end. We also find that FH1FH2 forms a tetramer. The observation that this formin protects an end from capping but still allows elongation confirms that it is a leaky capper. This is significant because a nucleator that protects a new barbed end from tight cappers will increase the duration of elongation and thus the total amount of F-actin. The ability of FH1FH2 to dimerize probably allows the formin to walk processively with the barbed end as the filament elongates.

Formins: signaling effectors for assembly and polarization of actin filaments.

Eukaryotic cells require filamentous actin to maintain their shape and for movement, growth and replication. New actin filaments are formed by the cutting of existing filaments or de novo through the action of specialized nucleators. The most highly characterized nucleator is the Arp2/3 complex, which nucleates the branched actin networks in the lamellae of migrating cells. Recently, Bni1p, which is a member of the formin family of proteins, has been shown to nucleate actin filaments in vitro. Formins are implicated in the formation of actin cables in yeast, stress fibers in tissue culture cells and cytokinesis in many cell types. Formins contain two highly conserved formin-homology domains, FH1 and FH2. The Bni1p FH2 domain is sufficient to mediate nucleation. The Bni1p FH1 domain binds profilin, an actin-monomer-binding protein that delivers actin to the growing barbed end of filaments. The Bni1p FH1-profilin interaction enhances nucleation. Formins participate in a number of signaling pathways that control the assembly of specific actin structures and bind the barbed end of actin filaments, thereby providing a cytoskeletal basis for the establishment of cell polarity.

Mechanism of formin-induced nucleation of actin filaments.

A fragment of the yeast formin Bni1 containing the FH1FH2 domains increases the rate of filament nucleation from pure G-actin [Pruyne et al. (2002) Science 297, 612-615]. To determine the mechanism of nucleation, we compared the G-actin dependence of Bni1FH1FH2-induced polymerization with theoretical models. The data best fit a model suggesting that Bni1FH1FH2 stabilizes an actin dimer. We also show that nucleation increases with the square root of the Bni1FH1FH2 concentration. We demonstrate that this relationship is expected for any such nucleator, independent of nucleus size. The proline-rich FH1 domain binds profilin, and deletion of this domain decreases the contribution of profilin-actin to the nucleation. A role for profilin binding to the FH1 domain in filament nucleation was supported by the inability of Bni1FH1FH2 to utilize a mutant profilin, H133S profilin, with defective binding to polyproline. Bni1FH1FH2 partially inhibits barbed-end elongation, and we find that the rate constants for both polymerization and depolymerization are decreased by approximately 50%. Bni1FH1FH2 has no effect on pointed-end kinetics or on the critical concentration. To investigate the domains of Bni1 required for these activities, the experiments were all duplicated with the FH2 domain alone. The FH2 domain is as effective as the FH1FH2 domains together in inhibiting barbed-end kinetics; it is less effective as a nucleator but the mechanism is again best fit by dimer stabilization.

An unexplained sequestration of latrunculin A is required in neutrophils for inhibition of actin polymerization.

Latrunculin A (LatA) is a toxic natural product that causes disruption of the actin cytoskeleton in many eukaryotic cells at submicromolar concentrations. LatA has been found to bind G-actin with a dissociation constant of 0.2 microM, and more recently to bind profilin-G-actin and, weakly, thymosin beta4-G-actin. A number of investigators have used LatA as a G-actin sequestering agent. Thus, we studied neutrophil chemotaxis and its requisite conversion of G-actin to F-actin, supported by an extensive pool of G-actin, mainly bound to thymosin beta4. Calculations suggest that the affinity of LatA is insufficient to cause significant sequestration of this pool, and the pool's buffering action should protect neutrophils from depletion of productive G-actin species by submicromolar LatA. Nonetheless, we found that both chemoattractant stimulated migration and F-actin polymerization in neutrophils were inhibited by LatA at these concentrations. The latter effect was accompanied by sequestration of LatA and showed a cell density dependence that was consistent with G-actin sequestration. The apparent contradiction between the calculations and the experimental observations could be reconciled by assuming the presence of an accessory species, of unknown normal function, which forms a high affinity ternary complex with LatA and G-actin, thus causing the cells to concentrate LatA. Other models that could not be ruled out also invoke new actions of LatA, suggesting caution in the interpretation of its effects on cells.

Role of formins in actin assembly: nucleation and barbed-end association.

Nucleation of branched actin filaments by the Arp2/3 complex is a conserved process in eukaryotic cells, yet the source of unbranched actin filaments has remained obscure. In yeast, formins stimulate assembly of actin cables independently of Arp2/3. Here, the conserved core of formin homology domains 1 and 2 of Bni1p (Bni1pFH1FH2) was found to nucleate unbranched actin filaments in vitro. Bni1pFH2 provided the minimal region sufficient for nucleation. Unique among actin nucleators, Bni1pFH1FH2 remained associated with the growing barbed ends of filaments. This combination of properties suggests a direct role for formins in regulating nucleation and polarization of unbranched filamentous actin structures.