Intraprocedural continuous saline infusion lines significantly reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury during endovascular procedures for stroke and myocardial infarction: evidence from a systematic review and meta-regression.

BACKGROUND: Contrast media used in mechanical therapies for stroke and myocardial infarction represent a significant cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) in acute medical scenarios. Although the continuous saline infusion line (CSIL) is a standard procedure to prevent thrombus formation within the catheter during neurovascular interventions of mechanical thrombectomy (MT), it is not utilized in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). METHODS: A systematic review of the incidence of AKI after MT for stroke treatment was performed. These data were compared with those reported in the literature regarding the incidence of AKI after PCI for acute myocardial infarction. A random-effect model meta-regression was performed to explore the effects of CSIL on AKI incidence, using clinical details as covariates. RESULTS: A total of 18 and 33 studies on MT and PCI were included, respectively, with 69,464 patients (30,138 [43.4%] for MT and 39,326 [56.6%] for PCI). The mean age was 63.6 years±5.8 with male 66.6%±12.8. Chronic kidney disease ranged 2.0-50.3%. Diabetes prevalence spanned 11.1% to 53.0%. Smoking status had a prevalence of 7.5-72.0%. Incidence of AKI proved highly variable (I2=98%, Cochrane's Q 2985), and appeared significantly lower in the MT subgroup than in the PCI subgroups (respectively 8.3% [95% confidence interval: 4.7-11.9%] vs. 14.7 [12.6-16.8%], P<0.05). Meta-regression showed that CSIL was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of AKI (OR=0.93 [1.001-1.16]; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of CSIL during endovascular procedures in acute settings was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of AKI, and its safety should be routinely considered in such interventions.

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for the Treatment of Symptomatic Central Venous Stenosis in Vascular Access: Results From a European, Multicenter, Single-Arm Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This was a European, multicenter, investigator-initiated and run, single-arm retrospective analysis to assess the safety and the clinical benefit of the use of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) for the treatment of symptomatic central venous stenosis (CVS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven centers from 7 countries across Europe, submitted 86 cases performed during the period between October 2015 and June 2018. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. Patient baseline demographics and procedural details were collected. Mean age was 62.6 years (SD 15.2 years). Median vascular access age was 3.0 years (IQR 1.2-4.8 years). A total of 55 were arteriovenous fistulas (64%) the rest arteriovenous grafts (31/86, 36%). Vessels treated were 43 subclavian veins, 42 brachiocephalic veins and 1 superior vena cava. Median drug-coated balloon diameter was 10 mm (IQR 8-12 mm). Primary outcome measures were clinically assessed intervention-free period (IFP) of the treated segment at 6 months and procedure-related minor and major complications. Secondary outcome measures included access circuit survival, patient survival, and the investigation of independent factors that influence the IFP. RESULTS: IFP was 62.7% at 6 months. Median patient follow-up time was 1.0 year (IQR 0.5-2.2 years). There was 1 minor complication (1/86; 1.2%) and no major complications. Access circuit survival was 87.7% at 6 months. Patient survival was 79.7% at 2 years according to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Higher balloon diameters significantly favored IFP [HR 0.71 (0.55-0.92), p=0.006; 5-7 mm group vs 8-12 mm group, p=0.025]. CONCLUSION: In this analysis, use of PCBs for the treatment of symptomatic CVS was safe. Efficacy was comparable to previous trials. Increased balloon size had a significant effect on patency rates.

Use of Phil Embolic Agent for Bleeding in Non-Neurological Interventions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Phil liquid embolic agent in non-neurological embolization procedures. M&M: Thirty-five patients with a mean age of 62.5 years underwent percutaneous embolization using Phil for the treatment of visceral arterial bleedings in 20/35 patients (including three gluteal, one bladder, two superior mesenteric, three epigastric, one deep femoral, five internal iliac, four intercostal, and one lingual arteries), splanchnic pseudoaneurysms in 11/35 patients (including three hepatic, five splenic, and three renal arteries), pancreatic bleeding metastasis in 1/35 patient, and gastric bleeding varices in 3/35 patients. Phil is composed of a non-adhesive copolymer dissolved in DMSO (Anhydrous Dimethyl Sulfoxide) with different viscosity. Procedures were performed slowly under continuous fluoroscopic guidance to avoid embolization of non-target vessels. RESULTS: Clinical success was obtained with a single intervention in 34 cases (97.15%), while a repeated procedure was required in one case (2.85%). No technical complications nor non-target embolization occurred. A case of post-embolic syndrome was noted (2.85%) in one patient. DMSO administration-related pain was successfully controlled by medical therapy. CONCLUSION: Phil can be considered a safe and effective embolic agent for the treatment of non-neurologic bleeding.