Fetal MRI-Based Body and Adiposity Quantification for Small for Gestational Age Perinatal Risk Stratification.

BACKGROUND: Small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses are at risk for perinatal adverse outcomes. Fetal body composition reflects the fetal nutrition status and hold promise as potential prognostic indicator. MRI quantification of fetal anthropometrics may enhance SGA risk stratification. HYPOTHESIS: Smaller, leaner fetuses are malnourished and will experience unfavorable outcomes. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: 40 SGA fetuses, 26 (61.9%) females: 10/40 (25%) had obstetric interventions due to non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS), and 17/40 (42.5%) experienced adverse neonatal events (CANO). Participants underwent MRI between gestational ages 30 + 2 and 37 + 2. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, True Fast Imaging with Steady State Free Precession (TruFISP) and T1 -weighted two-point Dixon (T1 W Dixon) sequences. ASSESSMENT: Total body volume (TBV), fat signal fraction (FSF), and the fat-to-body volumes ratio (FBVR) were extracted from TruFISP and T1 W Dixon images, and computed from automatic fetal body and subcutaneous fat segmentations by deep learning. Subjects were followed until hospital discharge, and obstetric interventions and neonatal adverse events were recorded. STATISTICAL TESTS: Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions for the association between TBV, FBVR, and FSF and interventions for NRFS and CANO. Fisher's exact test was used to measure the association between sonographic FGR criteria and perinatal outcomes. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: FBVR (odds ratio [OR] 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2-0.76) and FSF (OR 0.95, CI 0.91-0.99) were linked with NRFS interventions. Furthermore, TBV (OR 0.69, CI 0.56-0.86) and FSF (OR 0.96, CI 0.93-0.99) were linked to CANO. The FBVR sensitivity/specificity for obstetric interventions was 85.7%/87.5%, and the TBV sensitivity/specificity for CANO was 82.35%/86.4%. The sonographic criteria sensitivity/specificity for obstetric interventions was 100%/33.3% and insignificant for CANO (P = 0.145). DATA CONCLUSION: Reduced TBV and FBVR may be associated with higher rates of obstetric interventions for NRFS and CANO. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

Characterization of extracellular vesicles in COVID-19 infection during pregnancy.

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 infection may cause a severe inflammatory response, inflicting severe morbidity and mortality. This risk is modestly increased in pregnant patients. Despite the hypercoagulability and immunosuppression associated with pregnancy, most pregnant women experience a mild COVID-19 infection. Maternal extracellular vesicles (EVs) may interact with endothelial and immune components to facilitate a favorable disease course. This pilot study aimed to explore the characteristics of EVs released during COVID-19 infection occurring during the third trimester of pregnancy. Methods: In this prospective study, blood samples were obtained from 16 healthy non-pregnant (NP), 18 healthy-pregnant (HP), and 22 COVID-19 positive pregnant subjects (CoV-P). Disease course and pregnancy outcomes were assessed and EVs were characterized. Of note, limited volumes of sample acquired from the subjects made it necessary to use smaller and different subsets of samples for each analysis. Results: The majority (91%) of the COVID-19-pregnant subjects (18 mild and 2 moderate disease) experienced good pregnancy-related outcomes. EV concentrations were higher in healthy-pregnant subjects compared to non-pregnant subjects (p = 0.0041) and lower in COVID-19-pregnant subjects compared to healthy-pregnant subjects (p = 0.0150). CD63 exosome marker expression was higher in EVs of healthy-pregnant subjects and COVID-19-pregnant subjects compared to EVs of non-pregnant subjects (p = 0.0149, p = 0.0028, respectively). Similar levels of SARS-CoV-2 entry proteins (ACE-2 and TMPRSS2) were found in all three groups. Cytokine content increased in healthy-pregnant subject-EVs compared to non-pregnant EVs, while IL-2 and IL-6 levels were decreased in COVID-19-pregnant subject-EVs compared to healthy-pregnant subject-EVs (p = 0.043, p = 0.0390, respectively). CD8+, cytotoxic T-cell marker, was lower in non-pregnant EVs compared to healthy-pregnant subject-EVs and to COVID-19-pregnant subjects (p = 0.0108, p < 0.0001, respectively). COVID-19- pregnant subject-EVs demonstrated higher levels of platelet activation marker (CD62P) than non-pregnant (p = 0.0327) and healthy-pregnant subjects (p = 0.0365). Endothelial marker EV-CD144+ was lower in healthy-pregnant subjects versus non-pregnant subjects (p = 0.0093), but similar in COVID-19-pregnant and non-pregnant subjects. Other EVs' coagulation markers/activity, D-Dimer and fibrinogen levels were similar in healthy-pregnant subjects and COVID-19 positive pregnant subjects. Conclusion: COVID-19 positive pregnant subjects' EVs demonstrated an attenuated inflammatory response, with no additional activation of the coagulation system.

Reduced adipose tissue in growth-restricted fetuses using quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance images.

OBJECTIVES: Fat-water MRI can be used to quantify tissues' lipid content. We aimed to quantify fetal third trimester normal whole-body subcutaneous lipid deposition and explore differences between appropriate for gestational age (AGA), fetal growth restriction (FGR), and small for gestational age fetuses (SGAs). METHODS: We prospectively recruited women with FGR and SGA-complicated pregnancies and retrospectively recruited the AGA cohort (sonographic estimated fetal weight [EFW] ≥ 10th centile). FGR was defined using the accepted Delphi criteria, and fetuses with an EFW < 10th centile that did not meet the Delphi criteria were defined as SGA. Fat-water and anatomical images were acquired in 3 T MRI scanners. The entire fetal subcutaneous fat was semi-automatically segmented. Three adiposity parameters were calculated: fat signal fraction (FSF) and two novel parameters, i.e., fat-to-body volume ratio (FBVR) and estimated total lipid content (ETLC = FSF*FBVR). Normal lipid deposition with gestation and differences between groups were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-seven AGA, 18 FGR, and 9 SGA pregnancies were included. All three adiposity parameters increased between 30 and 39 weeks (p < 0.001). All three adiposity parameters were significantly lower in FGR compared with AGA (p ≤ 0.001). Only ETLC and FSF were significantly lower in SGA compared with AGA using regression analysis (p = 0.018-0.036, respectively). Compared with SGA, FGR had a significantly lower FBVR (p = 0.011) with no significant differences in FSF and ETLC (p ≥ 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body subcutaneous lipid accretion increased throughout the third trimester. Reduced lipid deposition is predominant in FGR and may be used to differentiate FGR from SGA, assess FGR severity, and study other malnourishment pathologies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Fetuses with growth restriction have reduced lipid deposition than appropriately developing fetuses measured using MRI. Reduced fat accretion is linked with worse outcomes and may be used for growth restriction risk stratification. KEY POINTS: • Fat-water MRI can be used to assess the fetal nutritional status quantitatively. • Lipid deposition increased throughout the third trimester in AGA fetuses. • FGR and SGA have reduced lipid deposition compared with AGA fetuses, more predominant in FGR.

Effect of BMI change on recurrence risk in patients with endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to explore the effect of body mass index (BMI) change on cancer recurrence risk during the routine surveillance of endometrial cancer patients. METHODS: Data on patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma that had a staging procedure and continued follow-up was retrospectively collected. We compared patients' BMI at time of surgery and during the last clinic follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the effect of predictors on BMI change and the risk of recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 211 patients were included in the final analysis. The majority of patients had stage I disease (n=176, 89%) and endometrioid histology (n=178, 86%). Median follow-up time was 53.4 (standard deviation (SD) 40) months. The mean BMI was 30.4 kg/m2 (interquartile range (IQR) 25-34) at surgery compared with 30.9 kg/m2 (IQR 26-36) at last follow-up (p<0.001). The BMI increase was most pronounced in patients with endometroid histology that recurred, 31.6 (IQR 24-35) kg/m2 at surgery compared with 33.5 (IQR 27-36) kg/m2 at last follow-up (p=0.016). On multivariate analysis, age and BMI change were the only predictors that were significantly associated with the risk of recurrence (overall response (OR 1.07 (0.99-1.14), p=0.05, OR 1.37 (1.12-1.67), p=0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients with endometroid endometrial cancer that had an increase in BMI during follow-up were at an increased risk for cancer recurrence compared with patients that did not change or had a decrease in BMI.

Uterine Artery Pseudoaneurysm in a Pregnant Patient with Retrocervical Endometriosis.

A pseudoaneurysm of the uterine artery or its branches is usually a result of vascular trauma during invasive procedures such as a cesarean section, vaginal delivery, myomectomy, hysterotomy, or dilatation and curettage. A uterine artery pseudoaneurysm rupture is a rare, yet life-threatening event. Deep infiltrating endometriosis usually involves a decrease in symptoms and imaging findings throughout pregnancy, with the notable exception of the phenomenon of decidualization. We present the case of a pregnant woman with a recent diagnosis of endometriosis, who conceived spontaneously and presented with disabling pain at 13 weeks' gestation. She was diagnosed with a left, huge (and rapidly growing) retrocervical endometriosis nodule encompassing a uterine artery pseudoaneurysm. Selective transarterial embolization was performed at 22 weeks' gestation owing to enlargement of the pseudoaneurysm sac, and the pseudoaneurysm was obliterated successfully. The patient was followed intensively throughout the pregnancy and the baby was delivered at term by cesarean section. After delivery, the nodule returned to the pregestational size.

Correction to: Once episiotomy, always episiotomy?

The original article can be found online.

Once episiotomy, always episiotomy?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between episiotomy and perineal damage in the subsequent delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, comparing outcome of subsequent singleton deliveries of women with and without episiotomy in their first (index) delivery. Deliveries occurred between the years 1991-2015 in a tertiary medical center. Traumatic vaginal tears, multiple pregnancies, and cesarean deliveries (CD) in the index pregnancy were excluded from the analysis. Multiple logistic regression models were used to control for confounders. RESULTS: During the study period, 43,066 women met the inclusion criteria; of them, 50.4% (n = 21,711) had subsequent delivery after episiotomy and 49.6% (n = 21,355) had subsequent delivery without episiotomy in the index pregnancy. Patients with episiotomy in the index birth higher rates of subsequent episiotomy (17.5 vs. 3.1%; P < 0.001; OR 1.9; 95% CI). In addition, the rates of the first and second degree perineal tears as well as the third and fourth degree perineal tears were significantly higher in patients following episiotomy (33.6 vs. 17.8%; P < 0.001, and 0.2 vs. 0.1%; P = 0.002, respectively). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference at the rates of CD and instrumental deliveries, between the groups. While adjusting for maternal age, ethnicity, birth weight, and vacuum delivery-the previous episiotomy was noted as an independent risk factor for recurrent episiotomy in the subsequent delivery (adjusted OR 6.7; 95% CI 6.2-7.3, P < 0.001). The results remained significant for term (adjusted OR 6.8; 95% CI 6.2-7.4, P < 0.001) as well as preterm deliveries (adjusted OR 4.5; 95% CI 3.3-6.3, P < 0.001) in two different models. CONCLUSION: Episiotomy is an independent risk factor for recurrent episiotomy in the subsequent delivery.