QualFatigue study: which factors influence the use of specific interventions for breast cancer survivors with fatigue? A cross-sectional exploratory study.

PURPOSE: International guidelines recommend specific interventions to reduce cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Evidence suggests underutilization of these interventions among breast cancer survivors. The QualFatigue study aimed to explore the potential factors influencing the use of specific interventions, for relief, in patients with CRF through qualitative analyses. METHODS: Patients with stage I-III breast cancer, and CRF ≥4 on a 10-point numerical scale were recruited within 6-24 months at the end of their primary treatment. Semi-structured interviews were performed. Emergent themes were identified using a stepped content analysis (QDA Miner software). RESULTS: Data saturation was achieved with 15 interviews. Four main themes emerged as potential sources of influence in the participants' use of specific interventions: (1) expectations regarding the management of CRF, (2) representations of the benefits provided by the interventions, (3) individual physical and psychological conditions, and (4) social and environmental situations. Six key levers came out transversally to optimize the use of specific interventions to relieve CRF: (1) listening and recognition of the individual difficulties and needs; (2) individual and global health assessments; (3) information and advice on how to manage CRF; (4) discussion groups focused on the management of CRF; (5) group activities; and (6) professional and personalized guidance. CONCLUSION: This study calls for multi-level action to address many persistent barriers and exploit levers in the management of CRF.

A qualitative evaluation of the use of interventions to treat fatigue among cancer survivors: A healthcare provider's view.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is among the most common and distressing side effects of cancer treatment. Different types of interventions, including physical activity (PA), psychosocial and mind-body interventions, have been shown to reduce CRF. We aimed to explore HCPs' practices and barriers to refer patients towards interventions to reduce CRF. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study using key informant interviews among a sample of 20 HCPs including medical, surgical and radiation oncologists, pain specialists, nurses, psychologists, psychiatrists and physiotherapists recruited from breast, prostate and colorectal cancer disease groups from a comprehensive cancer centre. RESULTS: Most interviewees reported not to address CRF spontaneously during consultations. When the topic of CRF was brought up by patients, all interviewees acknowledged to recommend PA, whereas few would recommend psychosocial or mind-body interventions. Barriers to recommend interventions to manage CRF included: lack of knowledge about CRF and its treatment, lack of time and complexity of the referral due to their accessibility and cost. CONCLUSION: In a diverse sample of HCPs, most acknowledged not to address CRF proactively with their patients, but identified several actionable barriers. Specific training on screening and management of CRF and improving the referral network dedicated to interventions need to be implemented.

Pregnancy After Breast Cancer in Patients With Germline BRCA Mutations.

PURPOSE: Young women with germline BRCA mutations have unique reproductive challenges. Pregnancy after breast cancer does not increase the risk of recurrence; however, very limited data are available in patients with BRCA mutations. This study investigated the impact of pregnancy on breast cancer outcomes in patients with germline BRCA mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study. Eligible patients were diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2012 with invasive early breast cancer at age ≤ 40 years and harbored deleterious germline BRCA mutations. Primary end points were pregnancy rate, and disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with and without a pregnancy after breast cancer. Pregnancy outcomes and overall survival (OS) were secondary end points. Survival analyses were adjusted for guarantee-time bias controlling for known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of 1,252 patients with germline BRCA mutations (BRCA1, 811 patients; BRCA2, 430 patients; BRCA1/2, 11 patients) included, 195 had at least 1 pregnancy after breast cancer (pregnancy rate at 10 years, 19%; 95% CI, 17% to 22%). Induced abortions and miscarriages occurred in 16 (8.2%) and 20 (10.3%) patients, respectively. Among the 150 patients who gave birth (76.9%; 170 babies), pregnancy complications and congenital anomalies occurred in 13 (11.6%) and 2 (1.8%) cases, respectively. Median follow-up from breast cancer diagnosis was 8.3 years. No differences in DFS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.23; P = .41) or OS (adjusted HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.56; P = .66) were observed between the pregnancy and nonpregnancy cohorts. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy after breast cancer in patients with germline BRCA mutations is safe without apparent worsening of maternal prognosis and is associated with favorable fetal outcomes. These results provide reassurance to patients with BRCA-mutated breast cancer interested in future fertility.

Individualized Prediction of Menses Recovery After Chemotherapy for Early-stage Breast Cancer: A Nomogram Developed From UNICANCER PACS04 and PACS05 Trials.

BACKGROUND: The likelihood of menses recovery varies greatly in premenopausal patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Quantifying this probability for each patient could better inform the chemotherapy discussion and individualize fertility counseling. We performed a pooled analysis of the PACS04 and PACS05 adjuvant randomized trials to develop a nomogram to estimate the probability of menses recovery at 3, 6, and 18 months after the end of adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women who were premenopausal and aged ≤ 50 years at randomization in the PACS04 and PACS05 trials were included in the present analysis. The primary endpoint was the probability of menses recovery within 18 months of chemotherapy completion. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the association of each variable with the likelihood of menses resumption. A nomogram was developed to predict menses recovery at different intervals. RESULTS: The factors associated with menses recovery were assessed for 1210 patients. At a median follow-up of 90 months (range, 3-189 months), 342 of 1210 patients (28.2%) had recovered menses. The probability of menses recovery at 18 months was 25.5% (range, 23.0%-27.9%). After backward elimination, age, final body mass index, type of chemotherapy, and hormone therapy were selected to build the nomogram to predict the probability of menstrual resumption at 3, 6, and 18 months after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: An accurate and individualized prediction of menses recovery is feasible for premenopausal patients eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Our nomogram will be externally validated in a large prospective cohort.

Prognostic assessment and systemic treatments of invasive local relapses of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

The rate of local recurrences, after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, has dramatically changed in last decades, due to advances in surgical and radiation techniques and a more extensive use of adjuvant systemic treatments. However, the occurrence of local recurrences remains a major predictor for distant metastasis and is responsible for increased cancer-specific death. It has been estimated that 1 in 4 HR+ and HR-ipsilateral breast recurrences leads to widespread metastatic disease, with an annual mortality rate of 10% in the first 5 years. Nevertheless, very few studies have been conducted to evaluate the optimal care of purely HR+ local relapses of breast cancer, after surgical removal. In this review we have highlighted the available knowledge on prognostic assessment and systemic treatment for women experiencing local relapses of HR+ breast cancers, underlying unsolved questions and controversial clinical aspects.