Clinical factors of importance for outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery: long-term follow-up.

Factors as age, sex, smoking, duration of leg pain, working status, type/level of disc herniation and psychosocial factors have been demonstrated to be of importance for short-term results after lumbar discectomy. There are few studies with long-term follow-up. In this prospective study of lumbar disc herniation patients undergoing surgery, the result was evaluated at 2 and 5-10 (mean 7.3) years after surgery. Predictive factors for satisfaction with treatment and objective outcome were investigated. Out of the included 171 patients undergoing lumbar discectomy, 154 (90%) patients completed the 2-year follow-up and 140 (81%) completed the long-term follow-up. Baseline data and questionnaires about leg- and back pain intensity (VAS), duration of leg pain, disability (Oswestry Disability Index), depression (Zung Depression Scale), sick leave and employment status were obtained preoperatively, at 2-year- and long-term follow-up. Primary outcome included patient satisfaction with treatment (at both time points) and assessment of an independent observer at the 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes at 2-year follow-up were improvement of leg and back pain, working capacity and the need for analgesics or sleeping pills. In about 70% of the patients excellent or good overall result was reported at both follow-ups, with subjective outcome measurements. The objective evaluation after 2 years was in agreement with this result. Time on sick leave was found to be a clinically important predictor of the primary outcomes, with a potential of changing the probability of a satisfactory outcome (both objective and subjective) from around 50% (sick leave >3 months) to 80% (sick leave <2 months). Time on sick leave was also an important predictor for several of the secondary outcomes; e.g. working capacity and the need for analgesics.

Three-dimensional radiological classification of lumbar disc herniation in relation to surgical outcome.

Centrally located lumbar disc herniations have been reported to be of predictive value for poor post-operative clinical outcome. One hundred and fifty patients undergoing lumbar disc herniation surgery were prospectively included. Herniation-related parameters, including the grading of contours, were assessed from pre-operative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images using a new three-dimensional grading system. The radiological findings were compared with outcome parameters two years post-operatively (patient-assessed pain, function/health scores and evaluation by an independent observer). An intra- and inter-observer validation of the classification was performed in a subgroup of patients. High intra-observer and good inter-observer reliability for both CT and MRI was seen. In the study population, no relation between the distribution or size of the herniations and outcome at 2-year follow-up were found. The distribution and size of the lumbar disc herniations with the three-dimensional classification were not found to be of importance for the clinical outcome.

Peridural scar and its relation to clinical outcome: a randomised study on surgically treated lumbar disc herniation patients.

A prospective randomised 2-year follow-up study on patients undergoing lumbar disc herniation surgery. The objective was to investigate the relationship between peridural scarring and clinical outcome, the scar development 6 and 24 months postoperatively by using MRI, and if ADCON-L (a bioresorbable carbohydrate polymer gel) has an effect on scar size and/or improve patients' outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery. The association between peridural scarring and recurrent pain after lumbar disc herniation surgery is debated. Numerous materials have been used in attempts to prevent or reduce postoperative peridural scarring; however, there are conflicting data regarding the clinical effects. The study included 119 patients whose mean age was 39 years (18-66); 51 (47%) were women. Sixty patients (56%) were perioperatively randomised to receive ADCON-L, and 48 (44%) served as controls. All patients underwent MRI at 6 and 24 months postoperatively, and an independent radiologist graded the size, location and development of the scar, by using a previously described scoring system. Pre- and 2-year postoperatively patients graded their leg pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS). At the 2-year follow-up patients rated their satisfaction with treatment (subjective outcome) and were evaluated by an independent neurologist (objective outcome), using MacNab score. There was no relationship between size or localisation of the scar and any of the clinical outcomes (VAS, subjective and objective outcome). The scar size decreased between 6 and 24 months in 49%, was unchanged in 42% and increased in 9% of the patients. Patients treated with ADCON-L did not demonstrate any adverse effects, nor did they demonstrate less scarring or better clinical outcome than control patients. No significant association between the presence of extensive peridural scar or localisation of scar formation and clinical outcome could be detected in the present study. Further, no positive or negative effects of ADCON-L used in disc herniation surgery could be seen.

Is increased segmental motion early after lumbar discectomy related to poor clinical outcome 5 years later?

The purpose of the study was to compare segmental motion in the early postoperative phase after lumbar discectomy to the outcome 5 years postoperatively. The study population had radiologically verified symptomatic L4-L5 or L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation and was referred with an indication for lumbar discectomy. Radiostereometry was performed in the supine and standing positions. The L4-L5 and L5-S1 segments were analysed separately. L4-L5 segments adjacent to the operated L5-S1 segment constituted a reference segment for the operated L4-L5 and vice versa. Twenty-one patients were available for the follow-up at 5 years. Outcome was classified as functionally good or poor. Repeated or planned repeat surgery at the same level during follow-up was considered as poor outcome. The L4-L5 segments in the poor group showed different direction of sagittal rotation (anterior versus posterior) of L4 on L5 compared with the good group (p<0.01). On the L5-S1 segment, patients with poor outcome displayed an increased anterior translation of about 1 mm (p<0.01) compared with the reference segments. Our study suggests that increased inducible vertebral displacement in the early postoperative phase after discectomy is associated with a poor clinical outcome.

The effect of standard lumbar discectomy on segmental motion: 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry.

We measured the effects of lumbar discectomy on segmental motion over a period of 5 years. Twenty-four patients with lumbar disc herniation were treated by standard lumbar discectomy at the L4-L5 or L5-S1 level. Peroperatively, tantalum markers were inserted into L4, L5, and the sacrum. Radiostereometric analysis was performed at discharge from hospital and 5 years postoperatively. The treated level was compared with the corresponding untreated level. Thus, patients who had discectomy at the L4-L5 level served as controls for patients with L5-S1 lesions and vice versa. The relative rotation and translation in relation to the three cardinal axes were calculated. Inducible displacements over the two discs were calculated between the supine and standing positions. At the L4-L5 level, there were no differences in inducible displacements between the operated and control levels at discharge or 5 years postoperatively. At the L5-S1 level we found decreasing inducible movement in the sagittal plane over time for discectomy patients. The reason for decreasing mobility over time after discectomy at the L5-S1 but not at the L4-L5 level is unknown. Mechanical factors caused by the more vertical orientation of the L5-S1 disc in combination with degenerative changes could be one explanation.

Outcome scores in degenerative cervical disc surgery.

Forty-six consecutive patients with neck pain and arm radiculopathy were treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. All patients had neurological symptoms corresponding to a herniated disc and/or spondylosis at one or two cervical levels, verified by magnetic resonance imaging. The patients were stabilized with an anterior graft and randomized to either fixation with a CSLP plate or no internal fixation. Preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively the patients filled in a questionnaire that included a modified Million Index, a modified Oswestry Index and the Zung Depression Scale. They were also asked to register their pain in the arm and in the neck on a vertical visual analogue scale (VAS). At the 2-year follow-up, an unbiased observer graded the patients' clinical outcome using Odom's criteria. A test-retest procedure was carried out to examine the questionnaire reproducibility. In the group that was operated at one level, there was no significant improvement in any of the scores. Nevertheless, 81% of the patients were satisfied with the outcome of the surgery. All scores improved in the group operated at two levels. The pain in the neck and arm, as measured on a VAS, decreased in both groups. The improvement in arm pain was significantly more pronounced in patients operated with a plate at two levels compared to those who were operated without a plate. At the 2-year follow-up, patients with an excellent or good result according to Odom's criteria had a lower Million Index (P < 0.0005), Oswestry Index (P < 0.0005), and Zung (P = 0.024) score, than the group classified as fair or poor. There was a significant correlation (P < 0.0001 for all scores) between the test and retest results. We conclude that the modified Million Index and Oswestry Index are clinically useful tools in the evaluation of outcome after degenerative cervical disc surgery. The clinical benefits of plate fixation were minimal. The outcome after surgery, measured with the Oswestry Index, Million Index and VAS for arm and neck pain, seems to correlate well with the classification of outcome by Odom.

Recruitment of low threshold motor-units in the trapezius muscle in different static arm positions.

A prevailing hypothesis for development of myalgia symptoms in the trapezius muscle is based on observations that in stereotypic activation of muscle the same low-threshold motor-units are the first ones to be recruited, and that these units are active throughout the contraction, until total relaxation. The theory suggests that these units are the first ones in monotonous repetitive work to be subject to degenerative processes, causing pain. The present project was undertaken to evaluate to what extent recruitment of motor-units in the trapezius muscle is position-specific, i.e. if there are motor-units that are recruited over a wide range of arm postures. Fine wire electrode pairs, inserted 2 cm lateral to the midpoint between the acromion and the C7 spinous processus, were used for signal acquisition. Methods for decomposition of the interference patterns were developed, allowing identification of single motor-units in signals registered in different arm positions. Voluntary recruitment of motor-units in the descending portion of the trapezius muscle was studied in 24 different arm positions (0-90 degrees shoulder flexion, 0-45 degrees humeral abduction, and 45-135 degrees elbow flexion) in three subjects. The results showed that the wire electrode technique and the signal processing algorithm employed allowed motor-unit identification in non-isometric conditions. It was found that low threshold motor-units in the trapezius muscle, active over a wide range of arm positions, could be identified in all three subjects. We refer to those as Cinderella, or C, units. These results support the research hypothesis addressed.

One-level cervical spine fusion. A randomized study, with or without plate fixation, using radiostereometry in 27 patients.

We randomized 27 consecutive patients undergoing 1-level cervical disc surgery to surgery with or without anterior plate fixation. The patients were studied with radiostereometry and clinically with visual analogue scores (VAS) for arm and neck pain. After 2 years, 1 patient had developed pseudoarthrosis, all other fusions were healed, but 1 patient showed substantial motions in the fusion area between the 1- and 2-year follow-ups. The 12 patients operated on without a plate had increased rotations around the transverse axis, corresponding to deformation towards kyphosis. Clinically, there was no difference in outcome between the two groups, as assessed by VAS. The use of an anterior plate in 1-level degenerative disc surgery in the cervical spine seems to prevent rotational deformation, without affecting the clinical outcome or fusion healing.

Plate fixation adds stability to two-level anterior fusion in the cervical spine: a randomized study using radiostereometry.

This study evaluated whether addition of a cervical spine locking plate (CSLP) in two-level disc fusions improved the postoperative stability and reduced the time to healing. Radiostereometric analysis was used to obtain precise recordings of the three-dimensional motion between the fused vertebrae. Eighteen consecutive patients were operated on with excision of two adjacent cervical discs and anterior horseshoe grafting with autologous bone (Smith Robinson technique). Nine patients were randomized to stabilization with autologous bone grafting and CSLP plate fixation and nine patients to grafting without fixation. Clinical symptoms in terms of pain in the neck and the arm were analysed preoperatively and after 1 year using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The patients operated without a plate displayed increased rotations around the transverse axis, corresponding to the development of a kyphosis [mean value no plate/plate 14.4 degrees/0.8 degrees (repeated measure ANOVA: P < 0.01)]. The mean compression was 3.2 mm larger in patients operated without a plate (repeated measure ANOVA: P < 0.01). Patients operated without a plate had more arm pain at the 1-year follow up (P < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). The VAS score for neck pain did not differ significantly between the two groups. Plate fixation could not be demonstrated to increase the healing rate, promote more rapid fusion or influence the frequency of graft complications.

[Incidence of injuries resulting from physical violence in Reykjavik 1974-1991].

The purpose of this study was to research the incidence of injuries in Reykjavik among those who had been the victims of physical violence. The study examined the computer data on all injury cases resulting from physical violence among legal residents of Reykjavik, the capital area, who were treated at the Emergency Department (ED) of the Reykjavik City Hospital, University of Iceland, from the time period 1974-1991. Data for the year 1991 were analysed with respect to where and when the violence took place. The age-adjusted incidence for injury following physical violence varied with the time period. It increased from 17.3 per thousand per year for men and 7.2 for women in 1974-1976 to 19.3 and 8.4 respectively in 1977-1979. In the period 1980-1982 there was a 30% drop in such cases for both sexes. Since that time there has been a significant increase, such that the incidence for injury following physical violence in 1989-1991 was 19.8 for men and 7.0 for women. The incidence of injury following physical violence was highest among males and females in the age group 15-19 year or 46 and 15, respectively. The incidence of those hospitalized after physical violence doubled from 0.54 to 1.10 for men and from 0.20 to 0.42 for women during the study period. About half (males 53%, females 43%) of those suffering injury resulting from physical violence sought help at the ED on Saturdays or Sundays: among the women 41% had been victims of physical violence in the home, whereas for the men violent aggression was most common in places of entertainment (25%) or outdoors (33%).