Cell-Penetrating Peptides.

In this introductory chapter, we first define cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs), give short overview of CPP history and discuss several aspects of CPP classification. Next section is devoted to the mechanism of CPP penetration into the cells, where direct and endocytic internalization of CPP is explained. Kinetics of internalization is discussed more extensively, since this topic is not discussed in other chapters of this book. At the end of this section some features of the thermodynamics of CPP interaction with the membrane is also presented. Finally, we present different cargoes that can be transferred into the cells by CPPs and briefly discuss the effect of cargo on the rate and efficiency of penetration into the cells.

Cell-penetrating peptides in protein mimicry and cancer therapeutics.

Extensive research has been undertaken in the pursuit of anticancer therapeutics. Many anticancer drugs require specificity of delivery to cancer cells, whilst sparing healthy tissue. Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs), now well established as facilitators of intracellular delivery, have in recent years advanced to incorporate target specificity and thus possess great potential for the targeted delivery of anticancer cargoes. Though none have yet been approved for clinical use, this novel technology has already entered clinical trials. In this review we present CPPs, discuss their classification, mechanisms of cargo internalization and highlight strategies for conjugation to anticancer moieties including their incorporation into therapeutic proteins. As the mainstay of this review, strategies to build specificity into tumor targeting CPP constructs through exploitation of the tumor microenvironment and the use of tumor homing peptides are discussed, whilst acknowledging the extensive contribution made by CPP constructs to target specific protein-protein interactions integral to intracellular signaling pathways associated with tumor cell survival and progression. Finally, antibody/antigen CPP conjugates and their potential roles in cancer immunotherapy and diagnostics are considered. In summary, this review aims to harness the potential of CPP-aided drug delivery for future cancer therapies and diagnostics whilst highlighting some of the most recent achievements in selective delivery of anticancer drugs, including cytostatic drugs, to a range of tumor cells both in vitro and in vivo.

Bioportide: an emergent concept of bioactive cell-penetrating peptides.

Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) have proven utility for the highly efficient intracellular delivery of bioactive cargoes that include peptides, proteins, and oligonucleotides. The many strategies developed to utilize CPPs solely as pharmacokinetic modifiers necessarily requires them to be relatively inert. Moreover, it is feasible to combine one or multiple CPPs with bioactive cargoes either by direct chemical conjugation or, more rarely, as non-covalent complexes. In terms of the message-address hypothesis, this combination of cargo (message) linked to a CPP (address) as a tandem construct conforms to the sychnological organization. More recently, we have introduced the term bioportide to describe monomeric CPPs that are intrinsically bioactive. Herein, we describe the design and biochemical properties of two rhegnylogically organized monometic CPPs that collectively modulate a variety of biological and pathophysiological phenomena. Thus, camptide, a cell-penetrant sequence located within the first intracellular loop of a human calcitonin receptor, regulates cAMP-dependent processes to modulate insulin secretion and viral infectivity. Nosangiotide, a bioportide derived from endothelial nitric oxide synthase, potently inhibits many aspects of the endothelial cell morphology and movement and displays potent anti-angiogenic activity in vivo. We conclude that, due to their capacity to translocate and target intracellular signaling events, bioportides represent an innovative generic class of bioactive agents.

Influence of stearyl and trifluoromethylquinoline modifications of the cell penetrating peptide TP10 on its interaction with a lipid membrane.

The PepFect family of cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) was designed to improve the delivery of nucleic acids across plasma membranes. We present here a comparative study of two members of the family, PepFect3 (PF3) and PepFect6 (PF6), together with their parental CPP transportan-10 (TP10), and their interactions with lipid membranes. We show that the addition of a stearyl moiety to TP10 increases the amphipathicity of these molecules and their ability to insert into a lipid monolayer composed of zwitterionic phospholipids. The addition of negatively charged phospholipids into the monolayer results in decreased binding and insertion of the stearylated peptides, indicating modification in the balance of hydrophobic versus electrostatic interactions of peptides with lipid bilayer, thus revealing some clues for the selective interaction of these CPPs with different lipids. The trifluoromethylquinoline moieties, in PF6 make no significant contribution to membrane binding and insertion. TP10 actively introduces pores into the bilayers of large and giant unilamellar vesicles, while PF3 and PF6 do so only at higher concentrations. This is consistent with the lower toxicity of PF3 and PF6 observed in previous studies.

Cholesterol prevents interaction of the cell-penetrating peptide transportan with model lipid membranes.

Interaction of the cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) cysteine-transportan (Cys-TP) with model lipid membranes was examined by spin-label electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). Membranes were labeled with lipophilic spin probes and the influence of Cys-TP on membrane structure was studied. The influence of Cys-TP on membrane permeability was monitored by the reduction of a liposome-trapped water-soluble spin probe. Cys-TP caused lipid ordering in membranes prepared from pure dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) and in DMPC membranes with moderate cholesterol concentration. In addition, Cys-TP caused a large increase in permeation of DMPC membranes. In contrast, with high cholesterol content, at which model lipid membranes are in the so-called liquid-ordered phase, no effect of Cys-TP was observed, either on the membrane structure or on the membrane permeability. The interaction between Cys-TP and the lipid membrane therefore depends on the lipid phase. This could be of great importance for understanding of the CPP-lipid interaction in laterally heterogeneous membranes, while it implies that the CPP-lipid interaction can be different at different points along the membrane.

Role of cysteine 341 and arginine 348 of GLP-1 receptor in G-protein coupling.

We have demonstrated the ability of peptides derived from the third intracellular loop of GLP-1 receptor to differently modulate activity of four different types of G-proteins overexpressed in sf9 cells. In this respect, the involvement of Cys(341) in inhibition of G(s) and Cys(341) in activation of G(s) and in inhibition of G(i1,) G(o), and G(11), respectively, indicates their potential role in discrimination between different types of G-proteins. Moreover, these two amino acids from the third intracellular loop might represent an important novel targets for covalent modification by downstream regulators in signaling through GLP-1 receptor.

Histamine release, an undesired effect of thrombin inhibitors with basic character, is mediated through direct activation of G(i) proteins.

The common structural feature of LK direct thrombin inhibitors is a strong basic group attached to the azaphenylalanine scaffold, which is important for the appropriate interaction at the thrombin active site. Our previous results have shown that this basic group could be responsible for a reduction of tracheal air flow and a fall of mean arterial pressure in anaesthetized rats, an undesired effect of direct thrombin inhibitors which correlated with their ability to release histamine from mast cells. In the present study, we investigated the mechanism of LK direct thrombin inhibitors-induced histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells. We demonstrated that thrombin inhibitors with basic character (LK-732, LK-639 and LK-6063) provoked release of histamine from mast cells, while less basic analogs (LK-658, LK-633 and LK-6062) had no effect. Histamine released by LK-732 and LK-639 was suppressed by removal of sialic acid residues by neuraminidase and by pertussis toxin, an inhibitor of G(i) protein activity. Additional demonstration that G proteins are the targets of LK-732 and LK-639 was provided by the increase of GTPgammaS binding rate to G proteins in rat brain cortical membranes. Our results indicate that basic direct thrombin inhibitors LK-732 and LK-639 provoke release of histamine from mast cells by direct activation of G(i) proteins through the similar biochemical pathway as basic secretagogues.

Multiple interaction sites of galnon trigger its biological effects.

Galnon was first reported as a low molecular weight non-peptide agonist at galanin receptors [Saar et al. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7136-7141]. Following its systemic administration, this synthetic ligand affected a range of important physiological processes including appetite, seizures and pain. Physiological activity of galnon could not be explained solely by the activation of the three known galanin receptors, GalR1, GalR2 and GalR3. Consequently, it was possible that galnon generates its manifold effects by interacting with other signaling pathway components, in addition to via GalR1-3. In this report, we establish that galnon: (i) can penetrate across the plasma membrane of cells, (ii) can activate intracellular G-proteins directly independent of receptor activation thereby triggering downstream signaling, (iii) demonstrates selectivity for different G-proteins, and (iiii) is a ligand to other G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) in addition to via GalR1-3. We conclude that galnon has multiple sites of interaction within the GPCR signaling cascade which mediate its physiological effects.

Inhibition of erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase by n-butanol at high concentrations.

Erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is bound to the membrane by a complex glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor, so the effect of alcohol on AChE activity may reflect direct and/or membrane-mediated effects. The indication of a direct interaction between n-butanol and AChE molecules is the activation/inhibition of AChE by occupation of the enzyme's active and/or regulatory sites by alcohol. The activation of AChE can occur only at low concentrations of alcohols, while at high concentrations AChE is inhibited. In this work the mechanism of inhibition of erythrocyte AChE by n-butanol at high concentrations was studied. The values of activity, calculated assuming parabolic competitive inhibition, which implies that one or two molecules of inhibitor bind to the enzyme, fit well to the experimental values. From the values of the inhibition constants it was concluded that at high n-butanol concentrations two alcohol molecules usually interact with AChE.

Cell-penetrating peptides: mechanism and kinetics of cargo delivery.

Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are short peptides of less than 30 amino acids that are able to penetrate cell membranes and translocate different cargoes into cells. The only common feature of these peptides appears to be that they are amphipathic and net positively charged. The mechanism of cell translocation is not known but it is apparently receptor and energy independent although, in certain cases, translocation can be partially mediated by endocytosis. Cargoes that are successfully internalized by CPPs range from small molecules to proteins and supramolecular particles. Most CPPs are inert or have very limited side effects. Their penetration into cells is rapid and initially first-order, with half-times from 5 to 20 min. The size of smaller cargoes does not affect the rate of internalization, but with larger cargoes, the rate is substantially decreased. CPPs are novel vehicles for the translocation of cargo into cells, whose properties make them potential drug delivery agents, of interest for future use.

The membrane lateral domain approach in the studies of lipid-protein interaction of GPI-anchored bovine erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase.

A novel membrane lateral domain approach was used to test whether the activity of the membrane-bound enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE) depends on the local properties (e.g. local lipid ordering) of bovine erythrocyte-ghost membrane. This issue has an additional aspect of interest due to an alternative mode of insertion of AChE molecules into the membrane by the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor. In our experiments the lateral domain membrane structure was influenced by temperature and by the addition of n-butanol, and was quantitatively characterized using the method of EPR spectrum decomposition. The activity of AChE was determined by a colorimetric assay in the same samples. The results show that the membrane stabilizes the conformation of the membrane-bound AChE compared to the isolated AChE. In addition, a correlation was observed between the temperature dependence of order parameter of the most-ordered domain type and the activity of AChE. Therefore, our findings support the idea that the function of GPI proteins can be modulated by the lipid bilayer. Based on the assumption that the overall activity of AChE depends on the order parameters of particular domain types as well as their proportions, two models for AChE activity were introduced. In the first, a random distribution of enzyme molecules was proposed, and in the second, localization of enzyme molecules in a single (cholesterol-rich) domain type was assumed. Better agreement between measured and calculated activity values speaks in favor of the second model.

Molecular characterization of specific H1-receptor agonists histaprodifen and its Nalpha-substituted analogues on bovine aortic H1-receptors.

We determined the molecular properties of the selective and potent H(1)-receptor agonist histaprodifen and its N(alpha) substituted analogues: methyl-, dimethyl-, and imidazolylethyl-histaprodifen (suprahistaprodifen). All derivatives show high affinity for (3)H-mepyramine labeled bovine aortic H(1)-receptor binding sites with the following order of potency: suprahistaprodifen > dimethylhistaprodifen > methylhistaprodifen > histaprodifen > histamine. Suprahistaprodifen and dimethylhistaprodifen were the most potent displacers of (3)H-mepyramine binding (K(i)=4.3 and 4.9 nM, respectively). Histaprodifen, methylhistaprodifen and suprahistaprodifen binding was differentially influenced by GTP, whereas dimethylhistaprodifen was not affected. All drugs, except dimethylhistaprodifen, were activators of G-proteins. Their order of potency was suprahistaprodifen > histamine > histaprodifen > methylhistaprodifen. Their effect on G-protein activation was abolished by the addition of the H(1)-receptor antagonist triprolidine (10 microM), which given alone did not activate G-proteins. Our data suggest that histaprodifens are potent but heterogeneous H(1)-receptor ligands with diverse effects on the molecular level in our model system. While the histaprodifen, methylhistaprodifen and suprahistaprodifen data are in agreement with their agonistic nature, as shown in the functional studies performed on different species (rat and guinea pig H(1)-receptor), dimethylhistaprodifen behaved as an antagonist in our study.

Different role of intracellular loops of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor in G-protein coupling.

Previous studies revealed the importance of the third intracellular loop of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) in coupling to G(s) and G(i1) proteins. In order to further study the signaling mechanisms of GLP-1R, we tested three peptides, corresponding to the sequences of the first (IC(1)), the second (IC(2)), and the third (IC(3)) intracellular loop of GLP-1R, for their interactions with heterotrimeric G-proteins of different types (G(alphas), G(alphao), G(alphai1), and G(alpha11) plus G(beta1gamma2)) overexpressed in sf9 cells. IC(3) peptide powerfully stimulates all types of tested G-proteins, whereas IC(1) and IC(2) peptides show differential effects on G-proteins. Both IC(1) and IC(2) peptides activate G(s) and cooperate with IC(3) peptide in its stimulation. G(o) is not affected by IC(1) and IC(2). G(i1) and G(11) are not affected by IC(1), but are activated by IC(2), which in activation cooperates with IC(3). We suggest that GLP-1R is not coupled only to G(s) and G(i1), as shown previously, but also to G(o) and G(11). IC(3) loop is the main switch that mediates signaling via GLP-1R to G-proteins, while IC(1) and IC(2) loops are important in discrimination between different types of G-proteins.

Membrane-bound progesterone receptors coupled to G proteins in the fungus Rhizopus nigricans.

Steroid binding sites with high affinity for progesterone (Kd=40+/-14 nM determined by binding, and Kd=71+/-22 nM determined by displacement studies) and lower affinity for 21-hydroxyprogesterone and for testosterone, but no affinity for estradiol-17beta, onapristone and alpha-naphthoflavone were detected in the enriched plasma membrane fraction of the fungus Rhizopus nigricans. The amount of steroid binding sites is in accordance with the value of B(max)=744+/-151 fmol (mg protein)(-1). In the membrane fraction, progesterone induced about 30% activation of G proteins over basal level, as determined by GTPase activity (EC50=32+/-8 nM) and by the guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) binding rate (EC50=61+/-21 nM). The affinity of receptors for progesterone was substantially decreased in the presence of GTPgammaS and of cholera toxin. Our results suggest the existence of progesterone receptors in the membrane of Rhizopus nigricans and their coupling to G proteins.

G-Protein coupled progesterone receptors in the plasma membrane of fungus Rhizopus nigricans.

We have demonstrated simultaneous existence of progesterone receptors and GTPase activity in the membranes prepared from the filamentous fungus Rhizopus nigricans. The results obtained with pertussis toxin treated fungal mycelium suggest that these receptors do not couple to Gi-Go-proteins and play a role in the induction of steroid hydroxylating enzyme system by steroid substrates in the fungus.