Outcomes of a contemporary sample of patients with atrial fibrillation taking digoxin: results from the AFBAR study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess and compare the effect of digoxin on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation vs those under beta-blockers or none of these drugs. METHODS: AFBAR is a prospective registry study carried out by a team of primary care physicians (n=777 patients). Primary endpoints were survival, survival free of admission due to any cause, and survival free of admission due to cardiovascular causes. The mean follow up was 2.9 years. Four groups were analyzed: patients receiving digoxin, beta-blockers, or digoxin plus beta-blockers, and patients receiving none of these drugs. RESULTS: Overall, 212 patients (27.28%) received digoxin as the only heart control strategy, 184 received beta-blockers (23.68%), 58 (7.46%) were administered both, and 323 (41.57%) received none of these drugs. Digoxin was not associated with all-cause mortality (estimated hazard ratio=1.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-2.60; P=.2), admission due to any cause (estimated hazard ratio=1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.710-1.498; P=.8), or admission due to cardiovascular causes (estimated hazard ratio=1.193; 95% confidence interval, 0.725-1.965; P=.4). No association was found between digoxin use and all-cause mortality, admission due to any cause, or admission due to cardiovascular causes in patients without heart failure. There was no interaction between digoxin use and sex in all-cause mortality or in survival free of admission due to any cause. However, an association was found between sex and admission due to cardiovascular causes. CONCLUSIONS: Digoxin was not associated with increased all-cause mortality, survival free of admission due to any cause, or admission due to cardiovascular causes, regardless of underlying heart failure.

Seguimiento clínico de una muestra contemporánea de pacientes con fibrilación auricular en tratamiento con digoxina: resultados del estudio AFBAR / Outcomes of a contemporary sample of patients with atrial fibrillation taking digoxin: results from the AFBAR study

Introducción y objetivos: Evaluar el efecto de la digoxina en los resultados clínicos de los pacientes con fibrilación auricular con y sin tratamiento con bloqueadores beta. Métodos El AFBAR es un registro prospectivo llevado a cabo por un equipo de médicos de atención primaria (n = 777 pacientes). Los objetivos principales fueron la supervivencia, la supervivencia libre de hospitalización por cualquier causa y la supervivencia libre de hospitalización por causas cardiovasculares. La media de seguimiento fue 2,9 años. Se analizaron cuatro grupos: pacientes tratados con digoxina, bloqueadores beta o digoxina más bloqueadores beta, y pacientes que no recibían ninguno de estos fármacos. Resultados En total, 212 pacientes (27,28%) recibieron digoxina como única estrategia de control de frecuencia; 184 recibieron bloqueadores beta (23,68%); 58 (7,46%), ambos fármacos y 323 (41,57%), ninguno de ellos. El tratamiento con digoxina no se asoció a la mortalidad por todas las causas (razón de riesgos estimada = 1,42; intervalo de confianza del 95%, 0,710-1,498; p = 0,2), la hospitalización por todas las causas (razón de riesgos estimada = 1,03; intervalo de confianza del 95%, 0,71-1,49; p = 0,8) ni la hospitalización por causas cardiovasculares (razón de riesgos estimada = 1,193; intervalo de confianza del 95%, 0,725-1,965; p = 0,4). No se observó asociación entre el empleo de digoxina y la mortalidad por cualquier causa, la hospitalización por cualquier causa o la hospitalización por causas cardiovasculares en los pacientes sin insuficiencia cardiaca. No hubo interacción entre el uso de digoxina y el sexo en cuanto a la mortalidad por todas las causas o la supervivencia sin hospitalización por todas las causas. Sin embargo, sí se observó una asociación entre el sexo y la hospitalización por causa cardiovascular. Conclusiones: La digoxina no se asoció a un aumento de la mortalidad por cualquier causa, la supervivencia libre de hospitalización por cualquier causa ni la supervivencia libre de hospitalización por causas cardiovasculares, con independencia de la presencia de insuficiencia cardiaca subyacente (AU)

Introduction and objectives We aimed to assess and compare the effect of digoxin on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation vs those under beta-blockers or none of these drugs. We compared the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients who were undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in terms of the degree of echocardiographic response to resynchronization. Patients were classified in 3 subgroups; super-responders, responders, and nonresponders. Methods AFBAR is a prospective registry study carried out by a team of primary care physicians (n = 777 patients). Primary endpoints were survival, survival free of admission due to any cause, and survival free of admission due to cardiovascular causes. The mean follow up was 2.9 years. Four groups were analyzed: patients receiving digoxin, beta-blockers, or digoxin plus beta-blockers, and patients receiving none of these drugs. Conclusions Digox in was not associated with increased all-cause mortality, survival free of admission due to any cause, or admission due to cardiovascular causes, regardless of underlying heart failure(AU)

Effect of diabetes on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. The CIBAR study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of diabetes mellitus on the prognosis of patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. The multicenter prospective cohort study involved 1108 outpatients with ischemic heart disease whose clinical characteristics were recorded by 69 primary care physicians. Morbidity and mortality were recorded during a mean follow-up period of 6.9 months. Overall, 29% of patients were diabetic; they were older than non-diabetics, presented with more risk factors, had poorer blood pressure control, and had more comorbid conditions. In addition, diabetics were more likely to be prescribed renin-angiotensin system blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics and lipid-lowering drugs. Cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization rates were higher in diabetics. On multivariate analysis, diabetes was found to be an independent predictor of a cardiovascular event (hazard ratio=1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.82). Prognosis in chronic ischemic heart disease is relatively good, although it is worse in diabetics, which means that treatment and disease controls targets must be more rigorously applied in these patients.

Influencia de la diabetes en las características clínicas y el pronóstico de pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica crónica. Estudio CIBAR / Effect of diabetes on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. The CIBAR study

Evaluamos el impacto de la diabetes mellitus (DM) en el pronóstico de pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica crónica (CIC). Estudio multicéntrico de cohortes prospectivas, en el que 69 médicos de atención primaria registraron características de 1.108 pacientes ambulatorios con CIC y analizaron la mortalidad y la morbilidad tras un seguimiento medio de 6,9 meses. Los diabéticos (29%) eran mayores que los no diabéticos, tenían más factores de riesgo, peor control de presión y más comorbilidades y recibían más bloqueadores del sistema renina-angiotensina, antagonistas del calcio, diuréticos e hipolipemiantes. La mortalidad y los ingresos por causa cardiovascular fueron mayores en los diabéticos. En el análisis multivariable, la DM fue un determinante independiente de eventos cardiovasculares (hazard ratio = 1,81; intervalo de confianza del 95%, 1,17-2,82). La CIC tiene un pronóstico relativamente benigno, aunque empeora en los diabéticos, por lo que en ellos el tratamiento y los objetivos de control han de ser más estrictos (AU)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of diabetes mellitus on the prognosis of patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. The multicenter prospective cohort study involved 1108 outpatients with ischemic heart disease whose clinical characteristics were recorded by 69 primary care physicians. Morbidity and mortality were recorded during a mean follow-up period of 6.9 months. Overall, 29% of patients were diabetic; they were older than non-diabetics, presented with more risk factors, had poorer blood pressure control, and had more comorbid conditions. In addition, diabetics were more likely to be prescribed renin-angiotensin system blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics and lipid-lowering drugs. Cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization rates were higher in diabetics. On multivariate analysis, diabetes was found to be an independent predictor of a cardiovascular event (hazard ratio=1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.17- 2.82). Prognosis in chronic ischemic heart disease is relatively good, although it is worse in diabetics, which means that treatment and disease controls targets must be more rigorously applied in these patients (AU)