RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The pediatric cancer Psychosocial Standards of Care calls for psychosocial screening across the cancer trajectory. The current study aims to describe pediatric cancer family needs at the end of treatment (EOT) and summarize feedback on a clinical EOT screening and education program. METHODS: During a clinic visit, families attended an education session regarding general EOT considerations and caregivers and youth aged 11+ years completed questionnaires. Scores were coded for clinical significance based on cutoff scores per questionnaire, and clinical significance frequencies were calculated. Caregivers provided qualitative feedback on the EOT program via an open-ended prompt. RESULTS: Screening was completed by 151 families. Ninety-four patients (67.1%) endorsed risk by self- or proxy-report in at least one domain. Across all patient age groups, a symptom of neurocognitive functioning was the most frequently endorsed risk, including executive functioning, sustained focused, and thinking slower than others. For caregivers, 106 (74.1%) endorsed risk in at least one domain, with concerns for ability to manage their child's medical condition as the most frequent endorsement. Families were agreeable to an EOT program with many caregivers advocating for receiving this program earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Both patients and caregivers experienced clinically significant needs that require intervention at EOT. While patients are experiencing neurocognitive effects and distress, their caregivers are balancing management of their own distress with management of their child's needs during a transition to decreased support from the medical team. The findings affirm the need for systematic screening at EOT and anticipatory guidance for off treatment expectations.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Family management (FM) challenges of maternal caregivers of young adult survivors of childhood brain tumors are well documented, but there are no evidence-based caregiver interventions to improve FM. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to (1) generate the knowledge necessary for developing a caregiver intervention (stage 0) and (2) modify an existing, efficacious intervention by engaging stakeholders (stage 1). METHODS: Stages 0 and 1 of the National Institutes of Health Stage Model for Behavioral Intervention Development and the FM Styles Framework were used in this study. RESULTS: In stage 0, families with condition-focused FM patterns were identified as at risk for poor problem solving. The 12-item Condition Management Ability scale of the FM Measures was selected as the screener to identify condition-focused maternal caregivers. Problem solving was identified as a potential mechanism for promoting behavior change. In stage 1, Bright IDEAS for Everyday Living was modified by integrating the FM Styles Framework creating Training in Problem Solving for Caregivers of Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Brain Tumors. Qualitative and quantitative assessments of feasibility and acceptability by maternal caregivers were excellent and used to improve selected areas of concern. CONCLUSION: Feedback from stakeholders indicates that Training in Problem Solving is a promising approach to shifting FM patterns and improving the functioning of caregivers, young adult survivors, and families. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: When developing interventions, the use of systemic methods can provide both clinically based and scientifically acceptable solutions. Those interventions based on both problem solving and FM are potentially promising but need further testing.