Clinicopathologic analysis of nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphomas, a multicenter retrospective study from China.

Background: Nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphomas (nTFHLs) represent a new family of peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs), and comparative studies of their constituents are rare. Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled 10 patients with nTFHL-F and 30 patients with nTFHL-NOS diagnosed between December 2017 and October 2023 at six large comprehensive tertiary hospitals; 188 patients with nTFHL-AI were diagnosed during the same period at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University for comparison. Results: Compared with nTFHL-AI, nTFHL-NOS patients exhibited better clinical manifestations, lower TFH expression levels, and a lower Ki-67 index. However, no differences in clinicopathological features were observed between nTFHL-F and nTFHL-AI patients as well as nTFHL-NOS patients. According to the survival analysis, the median OS for patients with nTFHL-NOS, nTFHL-AI, and nTFHL-F were 14.2 months, 10 months, and 5 months, respectively, whereas the median TTP were 14 months, 5 months, and 3 months, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed differences in TTP among the three subtypes(P=0.0173). Among the population of patients receiving CHOP-like induction therapy, there were significant differences in the OS and TTP among the nTFHL-NOS, nTFHL-AI, and nTFHL-F patients (P=0.0134, P=0.0205). Both the GDPT and C-PET regimens significantly improved the ORR, OS, and PFS in nTFHL patients. Conclusion: There are significant differences in the clinical manifestations, pathology, and survival outcomes among the three subtypes of nTFHLs. However, further research with a larger sample size, and involving clinical pathology and molecular genetics is needed to determine the distinctive biological characteristics of these tumors.

Misdiagnosis analysis of 2291 cases of haematolymphoid neoplasms.

Objective: To retrospectively analyze the reasons for misdiagnosis of haematolymphoid neoplasms and provide experience for improving the diagnostic level in China. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 2291 cases of haematolymphoid diseases evaluated by the Department of Pathology of our hospital from 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2021. All 2291 cases were reviewed by two hematopathologist experts and classified according to the 2017 revised WHO classification criteria, supplemented immunohistochemistry (IHC), molecular biology and genetic information as needed. The diagnostic discordance between primary and expert review was evaluated. The possible causes of the diagnostic discrepancies were analyzed for each step involved in the procedure of diagnosis. Results: In total, 912 cases did not conform to the expert diagnoses among all the 2291 cases, with a total misdiagnosis rate of 39.8%. Among them, misdiagnosis between benign and malignant lesions accounted for 24.3% (222/912), misdiagnosis between haematolymphoid neoplasms and non-haematolymphoid neoplasms accounted for 3.3% (30/912), misdiagnosis among lineages accounted for 9.3% (85/912), misclassification in lymphoma subtypes accounted for 60.8% (554/912), and other misdiagnoses among benign lesions accounted for 2.3% (21/912) of cases, among which misclassification of lymphoma subtypes was the most common. Conclusion: The accurate diagnosis of haematolymphoid neoplasms is challenging, involving various types of misdiagnosis and complicated causes, however, it is important for precise treatment. Through this analysis, we aimed to highlight the importance of accurate diagnosis, avoid diagnostic pitfalls and to improve the diagnostic level in our country.

Multiple CAR-T cell therapy for acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A case report.

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common childhood malignancy. The cure rate has reached 90% after conventional chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but the prognosis of patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) leukemia is still poor after conventional treatment. Since FDA approved CD19 CAR-T cell (Kymriah) for the treatment of R/R B-ALL, increasing studies have been conducted on CAR-T cells for R/R ALL. Herein, we report the treatment of a patient with ALL who relapsed after allogeneic HSCT, had a complete remission (CR) to murine scFv CD19 CAR-T but relapsed 15 months later. Partial response was achieved after humanized CD19 CAR-T treatment, and the patient finally achieved disease-free survival after sequential CD22 CAR-T treatment. By comparing the treatment results of different CAR-T cells in the same patient, this case suggests that multiple CAR-T therapies are effective and safe in intramedullary and extramedullary recurrence in the same patient, and the expansion of CAR-T cells and the release of inflammatory cytokines are positively correlated with their efficacy. However, further clinical studies with large sample sizes are still needed for further clarification.

Comparison of Image Quality, Diagnostic Accuracy and Radiation Dose Between Flash Model and Retrospective ECG-Triggered Protocols in Dual Source Computed Tomography (DSCT) in Congenital Heart Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Dual source computed tomography (DSCT) plays an important role in the diagnosis of congenital heart diseases (CHD). However, the issue of radiation-related side effects constitutes a wide public concern. The aim of the study was to explore the differences in diagnostic accuracy, radiation dose and image quality between a prospectively ECG - triggered high - pitch spiral acquisition (flash model) and a retrospective ECG-gated protocol of DSCT used for the detection of CHD. MATERIAL/METHODS: The study included 58 patients with CHD who underwent a DSCT examination, including two groups of 29 patients in each protocol. Then, both subjective and objective image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose were compared between the two protocols. RESULTS: The image quality and the total as well as partial diagnostic accuracy did not differ significantly between the protocols. The radiation dose in the flash model was obviously lower than that in the retrospective model (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the retrospective protocol, the flash model can significantly reduce the dose of radiation, while maintaining both diagnostic accuracy and image quality.